DRWILGY
DrWilgy currently has 21 posts. I'm starting to lose steam, so I'm not including posts lacking game-related content. If you want to see those, ISO him for yourself.
DrWilgy wrote:*Strolls into the club wearing a turtle on his head*
What is up familia? *Kisses Sig on the cheek* My name is DrWilgy and I am most definitely a doctor! Whole bunch of cute new faces here... I wonder how they taste!
So... Specifics... I have a bad gut feel about Sloon, and I don't think we should do that role claim thingy! It'll just lead to convolution and I think it will lead to the baddies hitting our power roles more so than help us.
Also! I mostly play on my phone... my phone died today... Ordered a new battery that'll be here in 2 days! I make no promises on how active I can be until then!
Au Revoir~!!
Fluffy entry post,
except for the fact that he throws out a bad gut read of Sloonei and disagrees with Frog's claiming plan.
I'll say null, since town or mafia could just as easily throw out that gut read, and I don't know what to make of disagreements with Frog's claiming plan.
DrWilgy wrote:OH! and before I leave!
YOLO VOTE [NO LYNCH]
(did I do that right boss?)
Second post. Wait a minute... he has a bad read on Sloonei but then votes for no lynch? *involuntary eye twitch* That's Wilgy alright. Null.
DrWilgy wrote:Omoshiroi
Frog you amuse me. I'm in agreement with this plan.
DrWilgy agrees with Frog's 4 low poster voting plan. Null.
DrWilgy wrote:Dyslexicon wrote:DrWilgy wrote:Omoshiroi
Frog you amuse me. I'm in agreement with this plan.
If you're agreeing with this you're one of the people who is up for a lynch. Good idea?
Also, if you agree, then why is your vote not on anyone? Are you caught up with the thread?
Using the hammer by this means will help us gain valuable information based on flip. If I cannot be judged based on my little contribution, at least by this plan I can assist town in some way.
The only negative I see is the potential of hitting a low key civ power role.
No I'm horribly behind. I've been looking for my name during my skim though.
Still have a bad gut feel on Sloon. I'm having trouble reading Sig. I have a bad gut feel on Golden.
Clarifies in response to Dizzy why he supports Frog's voting plan.
Throws out a maintained bad gut read of Sloonei, a difficulty reading sig, and a bad gut read of Golden. It'd be nice to have at least some substantiation for these, if Wilgy could at least point to specific posts where his gut feels bad, but OK. Again though, it's easy for mafia to throw out gut reads, so null.
DrWilgy wrote:Dyslexicon wrote:DrWilgy wrote:Using the hammer by this means will help us gain valuable information based on flip. If I cannot be judged based on my little contribution, at least by this plan I can assist town in some way.
The only negative I see is the potential of hitting a low key civ power role.
No I'm horribly behind. I've been looking for my name during my skim though. Still have a bad gut feel on Sloon. I'm having trouble reading Sig. I have a bad gut feel on Golden.
What valuable information would be gathered by lynching a lurker?
What information do you see coming out of lynching you based on you having low content?
What is your reason for mentioning you have trouble reading Sig, is there a point to this?
Wagons with this plan it will be easier to pick apart wagons. Better analysis latter, if my lynch is avoided within the 4 provided, yay me! If not, oh well.
Sig is try harding harder than I've seen sig try hard... Or at least it feels that way.
DrWilgy wrote:Dyslexicon wrote:DrWilgy wrote:Wagons with this plan it will be easier to pick apart wagons. Better analysis latter, if my lynch is avoided within the 4 provided, yay me! If not, oh well.
Sig is try harding harder than I've seen sig try hard... Or at least it feels that way.
I don't understand what you mean by this.
Can you please clarify
- What do you preceive "this plan" to be, and how will it make it easier to pick apart wagons. Examples?
- What do you mean with "the 4 provided".
You mentioned you couldn't read sig, so I wondered why you felt the need to say that. Now you're saying he's different somehow (if I understand you correctly)?
If I interpereted the plan correctly it's to place the high posters evenly amongst the low posters, followed by the medium. With a more specified pool to pick from it will be interesting to see where people place thier vote and in what order they do so. Will baddies stack up? Will they bus? What type of voting plan do they have. While the results may not be of immediate use, a technicolor vote chart would benefit greatly from this plan.
Or... I'm being optimistic about endgame, not really too sure.
Yeah, he's acting different. I don't know how I feel about it, so I thought I should mention it.
DrWilgy wrote:@MP it makes me wanna murk him... But everytime I feel like I wanna murk Sig he's civillian...

In these posts, Wilgy elaborates on supporting the plan and his difficulty reading sig. What do you folks make of this? Is there anything here? I'm struggling to find anything alignment indicative.
DrWilgy wrote:Zexy wrote:Looks like DrWilgy is a person that only replies to whatever is thrown at them. Inactive, not reading through the thread… is this his regular meta?
I have no meta, just class and good looks.
DrWilgy wrote:Am I a slanker?
Minimal game-related content in these two posts; first one is a declaration that he has no meta in response to Zexy's question about his meta, while the second one is a question asking if he qualifies as a slanker. Null? Again?
DrWilgy wrote:Frog wrote:DrWilgy wrote:Am I a slanker?
You're a slankpapotomus :-P
haha, of the other 3 players in the POE with you, who would you lynch and why?
Between:
Marshmellow
Pirformus
A2theZebra
Zebra probably, I didn't like her response to your plan Mr. Frog. It read to me like she took it as an attack. I'm unsure why she would take it as such when it was simply a scum hunting tool suggestion.
Pirformus... I dont remember reading anything of thiers. Nor do I know who they are so it's a perfect null.
Marmot is Marmoting and I see no reason to vote him.
Silverwolf wrote:ISO'd Dr Wigly, he's posted no content whatsoever, if I had to compromise, I'd lynch here.
Lies.
Golden wrote:Silverwolf wrote:ISO'd Dr Wigly, he's posted no content whatsoever, if I had to compromise, I'd lynch here.
I feel the same, up to where I'm at. I nearly voted Wilgy when I unvoted, but in the end I thought it better that I catch up first.
More lies.
Something I'm curious about now that I'm thinkin about it. Why didn't the players who I had gut read as bad express anything towards the subject? Or... Did I just miss it?
Provides a mafia lean on zebra and null leans on Psi and MM.
Argues against Silver and Golden's declarations that he has not expressed content. To be fair, he has, but it's all been gut-based and mechanics-based.
Lastly, he inquires why his gut reads are going uncontested. That's a good question, I suppose. Still don't know how to read this though.
DrWilgy wrote:Golden wrote:Silverwolf wrote:What about the fact he is attacking ika for RL? Got any issues with that?
Now that I know what you mean by that.
My interpretation of MP's case is that ika hasn't made any substantial scum reads of his own. You could call this that ika's contributions have been quantity over quality. Maybe he has rl reasons for this, and I'm trying to get a handle on whether it makes ika bad or good. I doubt I'll vote ika today (at least, not solely on the basis of this). But I don't think MP's view is unreasonable... for whatever reason, ika hasn't yet been making his own scumreads, and I think you will agree that 'I suspect x because they aren't developing scumreads' is an ok reason to suspect someone generally speaking.
I'm willing to give ika time because his rl situation has been mentioned and it makes sense to me, I'm much more likely to give a pass for someone (in the short term) if I understand why they might not have had time to catch up. This is also part of why I am fine with MP explaining why he wasn't going to be around - I'd rather people know if I won't be contributing much for a while rather than keep them guessing.
( ಠ ل͟ ಠ )
What does this mean???!?!
DrWilgy wrote:Golden wrote:Rainbow time - decided to treat it like gth and have no null reads.
Medium Town
Marco
Sloonei
Zexy
Mild Town
Frog
MovingPictures07
Silverwolf
Dyslexicon
Long Con
sig
Mild Bad
ika
Inawordyes
Psittaciform
Soneji
Metalmarsh89
Moderate Bad
a2thezebra
DrWilgy
What puts me as lowest?
DrWilgy wrote:Golden wrote:Your early contribution was minimal. What put you at lowest on the post count?
I don't really know where you stand on anything.
I want to see more of your doctoring skills.
To be fair, those weren't in rank order within the categories, and for now I'll
VOTE A2THEZEBRA
Well perhaps if you've read my responses to what I have thought about the game you would know. I don't see a civvie Golden shipping my lynch as much as he is without knowing anything about me. While it has been small in amount, I have been rather clear about what I think so far.
VOTE GOLDEN
DrWilgy wrote:Zexy wrote:Wilgy’s post isn’t good either. May be regular Wilgy but all I see is shade towards all the other inactives which is easy to do and hypocritical when inactive yourself.
Where?
@Golden I'll try to fully elaborate on why I think you are bad if I can. I can't make a big post because of my phone constantly going out on me.
DrWilgy wrote:Double check my posts in context with Goldens though. Not sure if instructing you to do so will help, but you might see what I see.
Gut declarations and responses... Er.. Obvious lack of response is a big part of it.
Most recent posts, stuff about Golden.
Ugh, this ISO sucks. With no flip and it still being Day 1, this is tough, and I've officially run out of ISO steam. I won't be doing any more until after we at least have a flip.
Does anyone find anything here? Please comment. I'm considering DrWilgy Nully McNullface because I just don't know what to do with any of this. I won't be voting for him, I guess. Hopefully he gets his phone back soon and can contribute more, particularly with regard to elaborating on his gut suspicions (most notably on Golden).