Long Con has 99 posts of beer on the wall, 99 posts of beer.
The first comment was a compliment to Sorsha and an observation about me, and then he asks ika and Silverwolf if they've ever been bad here. I am not sure if Long Con bothered with Turf Wars at Endgame, but ika was bad there.
After that is discussion on lie detectors in AWR. LC is not bothered by ika's refusal to spill the beans regarding his Day 1 opinions and says they are probably not helpful anyway.
LC first agrees with Dom about something BR said, but then questions Dom about it, and in the same breath, votes DF.
Long Con wrote:DFaraday wrote:I'm not liking so many votes on Dom already. Especially since I don't think he's done anything shady.
As for Ika's comments re: Epi, I don't agree with it. And I think the practice of policy voting people for not playing a distinctly town game, regardless of whether that person is actually bad, is itself not a town strategy.
I tend to think that baddies, primarily when there is only one baddie team, would be more inclined to give Civ reads than baddie reads, because they're honest (aka 100% sure), whereas any baddie reads are inherently dishonest and harder to manage. That's the feeling I got from this post of yours. Putting my vote on
DFaraday at this time.
DFaraday said he didn't think Dom had done anything deserving of votes, and that he doesn't agree with ika.
This was on page nine, and by this point (going backwards):
Silverwolf had just called spacedaisy good.
spacedaisy said Dom and Silverwolf were good.
ika had just said Silverwolf, Illyria, Scotty, Sorsha and Nerolunar
I could go on.
So this raises the question: Was Long Con genuine in his reason for voting DFaraday when he passed by all those who had freely waved around the label of "civilian?"
Long Con wrote:Dom wrote:For people suspecting DFaraday, do you think this is unusual behavior for him or just vapid behavior?
That question really tries to force the answer to be one of the two, that's kind of weird to me. I don't suspect him for unusual OR vapid behaviour. I suspect him because of what I consider baddie behaviour. You didn't answer my question to you about the dichotomy of your previous post.
Again, if Long Con genuinely believed DFaraday of exhibiting "baddie behaviour," then why was he not inclined to suspect those who came before DF who were calling people civilians?
Long Con wrote:Silverwolf wrote:DFaraday wrote:I'm not liking so many votes on Dom already. Especially since I don't think he's done anything shady.
As for Ika's comments re: Epi, I don't agree with it. And I think the practice of policy voting people for not playing a distinctly town game, regardless of whether that person is actually bad, is itself not a town strategy.
This post is scummy due to the fact that it's an instant defense of the leading wagon.
That's a good way of putting it. The opinion about Epi is a nice safe one as well, for those who have played with Epi a lot. I'm not saying it's wrong, it's almost TOO obvious an opinion to have.
A nice safe opinion, eh? Too obvious?
Long Con wrote:That is some respectable past-game linking. Epi doesn't seem suspicious for being against the LD statement before it was cool... as soon as I saw the plan, I was shaking my head. It's a cheap way out that sucks the creativity and judgment out of the Lie Detector role, and I am always a proponent of acting in the best interests of the spirit of the game, and the Host's intended function of the roles. It's cool to try and find loopholes, but as a host I almost always just close the loophole with a 'spirit of the game' argument.
Someone explain to me how this isn't inherently hypocritical.
And it would appear that DF already raised one of the above points:
Long Con wrote:DFaraday wrote:Black Rock wrote:I don't really see the Dom suspicion at all and yet he already has four votes. Are the votes changeable this game? I might have missed where it says.
DrWilgy wrote:Black Rock wrote:Scotty wrote:So I'm sitting here on the latrine with a revolver pressed against my cranium and I'm currently reading Sherlock Holmes. So there ya go.
Anyone else want to make some gun to head reads?
Don't you think it's a little early?
*There's a note next to Wilgy's body*
It's never too late for love. Seize the chance while you can. Life is too short.
*It seems like Wilgy wanted his friends to go out and hug those who are near to them (before his demise of course)*
lol, I have loved you from the first moment I hosted you.
And here BR said the same thing as me. But I guess it's only suspicious when I find sudden bandwagons forming almost instantly and for no clear reason to be weird.
That's a reasonable point. I'm not trying to unfairly single you out, but your post pinged my gut. I don't control the gut, it controls ME!

Your post, though, gave a soft defense of Dom AND "safe" defense of Epi in the same post, so that caught my attention more.
That said, there are others besides you and BR that have said Dom doesn't seem suspicious to them.
DFaraday wrote:Silverwolf wrote:DFaraday wrote:I'm not liking so many votes on Dom already. Especially since I don't think he's done anything shady.
As for Ika's comments re: Epi, I don't agree with it. And I think the practice of policy voting people for not playing a distinctly town game, regardless of whether that person is actually bad, is itself not a town strategy.
This post is scummy due to the fact that it's an instant defense of the leading wagon.
Is going along with bandwagons more townish behavior?
Changeable votes has given me a changeable mind regarding that... with fixed votes, this looks like a big ol' bandwagon to me. With changeable votes, I see it as a conversation-pusher. I don't expect all of them to still have their votes on Dom by the time the lynch is up, I think the early voting/piling on tends to be more of a part of the journey than the end point.
thellama73 wrote:'Safe" is exactly the right word, Long Con. Well put.
I pat Silver's back, you pat mine. I'm Even Steven.
LC excuses the inconsistency with a jovial reference to his gut. However, when he voted, he made no mention of gut- just "baddie behaviour." One would expect his
LC's Day 1 vote really looks more like a safe place to park a vote and then downplay the meaningfulness of the suspicion, implicitly asking the rest of the thread not to follow him.
Next LC wonders if DrWilgy is bad, opines that no-lynches on Day 1 are a bad idea, and that it sucks to see bwt go. After I pressed LC about BR's vote (from him to me), he said:
Long Con wrote:Epignosis wrote:Long Con wrote:Silverwolf wrote:Polo wrote:You've got a lot more experience than I do. In how many of the Day 1 lynches in the games you've been part of as a civ did you manage to lynch Mafia? Less than 20%?
Last game I played we lynched scum D1, D2, D4 and won the game. It can happen. If we don't lynch, it won't happen at all. Plus, the info. that can be gained from the lynch, flips is helpful for D2. Seeing voting patterns helps read players. I'm not even sure why you wouldn't want to lynch on D1 even if the odds were high it would be on a civ. Otherwise, D2 is the same as D1 with no info. except a night kill.
Yeah, not lynching someone on Day 1 doesn't solve any problems. You have to start the game by just diving in.
Sucks to see BWT lynched so early again as a civ, I am down for a policy No-Lynch of him for the first couple of days in the next few games. Sorry I wasn't around for the later part of the lynch, I was busy and then I was at work. I doubt my vote would have changed anyways.
Dom, I have to look back, did anything more happen with that weird response you gave me earlier?
Black Rock voted for you, and when I called her out for it, she voted for me.
Go.
I was surprised at the vote. I didn't agree with the places that you tried to take it, where BR and I are on a baddie team together and she was doing a distancing vote for those purposes. You can have a look at Flash Mafia for us as baddie teammates if you like. Maybe Monopoly Mafia, if you count that as well.
Maybe Black Rock had the right idea when she voted for you. Your theory was base mudslinging, and when it was pointed out that it didn't match our baddie metas, you glibly said something about good baddies not acting the same as before. That was lame.
I have never seen LC appeal to "meta" before. Ever. Has anyone else? Isn't an appeal to your own "meta" the lame thing here?
LC answers Silverwolf about him agreeing with her and defines "mudslinging" for me. He says that he doesn't think I believe what I'm saying in the thread (which is an inert accusation, really).
After Day 2 begins, LC
votes for Scotty for "buddying" him, but doesn't actually vote in the poll. There's a moot discussion about vote forcing.
Long Con wrote:Scotty wrote:I guess what I'm tryin to say is: Metalmarsh
I could very well see a Dom or DFaraday/MM pairing. A teammate trying to save one of the big trains by attaching to another. A day 1 marmot lynch wouldn't be so bad, would it?
Scotty, where are you on this idea today?
I agree with Llama, I doubt Matt is the baddie we are looking for. I am looking over Scotty's posts right now to see if I can shore up my buddying suspicion, but I'm not seeing much there. Either he's playing a very careful game, or he's not bad. Either way, obviously a Scotty lynch isn't in the cards today, so I'll switch to
DFaraday.
LC defends Matt and votes DF again. What LC agrees with is this:
thellama73 wrote:Spacedaisy wrote:Of all the people garnering votes at the moment Matt is the one that seems the most likely to be bad. For the moment my vote is going there, but I'm not certain I'll leave it there yet. Plus, I really don't know that I think DF is bad and I'm historically crap at reading him so I have no desire to mislynches him early yet again.
This makes me really distrust Spacedaisy. I don't think she thinks Matt is bad, but rather that his death would be more convenient than DFaraday's.
Next, LC lightly chastises Sorsha about "low-hanging fruit" and says Black Rock should participate more, but that he won't be discussing her. In between that, he accused Scotty of defending a civilian DF:
Long Con wrote:Scotty wrote:DFaraday wrote:sig wrote:I won't be around much tomorrow, but will hopefully be around at EOD. If not I'll be voting now.
I still believe there is a good chance DF is mafia. Last game in which I suspected him and didn't follow through he did end up flipping mafia. So I'll be voting for him today.
Lynch DFaraday
Bubbles wrote:im here! i voted dfaraday cause i'm following sig's lead
not because i have any affiliation with sig
but he's the last person to vote and there is no way i can catch up right now, at work
i hope i am not wrong
Both of these votes are terrible and make no sense.
I'm actually with you on this one. We've got "he was mafia last game" and "i'm just copying the last person I saw when I logged in"
Woof. I feel better about DFaraday right now, also considering that he has been mafia twice in a row. Lightning doesn't strike thrice, does it?
Actually this pings me a little about Scotty. I don't think he'd defend a Mafia teammate so blatantly, but if DF is Civ then this 'logic' is what I'd expect a baddie do do to get some cred for defending a civ.
And what was the traffic cone marriage thing? I think that's another one that went over my head.
LC speculates about what it could mean if DFaraday is a civilian, but LC is still voting DF.
Then there's a lengthy post in which he responds to several people. In that post, he tosses a few questions and some suspicion Illyria's way, considers Polo a civilian based on vibes, and gives spacedaisy the eye for "pointless filler."
Long Con wrote:ika wrote:Long Con wrote:Epignosis wrote:With no message from Lady Edith, that means Edith was blocked, could not muster the inspiration to write a solitary word, or the poor girl is dead somewhere in the English wilderness, her body probably consumed by wolves of silver.

I doubt Edith was blocked, I think it's more likely that she missed sending in her PM. The killer could have been blocked as well, instead of a successful protection.
which would imply thats black rock based on her not being around no?
That's my assumption, yes.
Long Con wrote:sig wrote:Spacedaisy wrote:Long Con wrote:Spacedaisy wrote:sig wrote:sig wrote:I see three scenarios here.
1. Ika is mafia and killed Silver before she could get a strong read on him.
2. Someone killed Silver to frame Ika, this points to an experienced mafia member.
3. Silver mainly talked about DF, Epi, and LC around the time of her death and EOD. One of them is mafia and killed her.
I'm requoting this, the more I think about the more likely it is to be true, plus I think all three would think that Ika could be framed for Silver's death. I'll do the leg work for it over the phase, I'm just throwing out some thoughts right now.
It's possible, of the three I thinkDF is the least likely to do this and I feel pretty good about Epi. DF could be bad, LC could be bad. I could see LC pulling this.

Is that because I suspect you?
How does killing Silverwolf frame ika? That seems... counter-logical.
I wasn't aware you suspected me, so no it's not because you suspect me.
And I never said the silver kill frames ika. Sig said that.
Yeah stop giving Daisy credit for my tin foiling.
I don't think I did that.

Sig said "Someone killed Silver to frame Ika", SD said "I think all three would think that Ika could be framed for Silver's death.", then I said "How does killing Silverwolf frame ika? That seems... counter-logical."........ I know the "giving credit" thing is a joke, but Spacedaisy is slightly defensive about it, not wanting to be the person suggesting it.
I'm not surprised that ika is off the poll today, because killing Silverwolf, to me, makes him look extremely Civ.
Just like, if Black Rock were killed Night 1, you can be sure that I'm not Mafia, because I would never do that due to the fact that she's my wife and would cause me intense grief in RL for it. 
When I'm bad, my go-to early kills are designed to frame people... but usually other people.
As for the orange coloured stuff:
Spacedaisy, follow
this link and tell me again that you were not aware that I suspected you. Me saying "I have a bit more Daisy suspish now than when I started this post, so I no longer base her lynchableness on the DF flip." is a good indicator that I suspected you.
After that, LC dialed back on the DF suspicion, and said he would rather lynch Scotty. In the next multiquote lengthy post, LC recaps the spacedaisy suspicion. His conclusions are mostly hedged statements, so I didn't quite understand this...
Long Con wrote:I did think your case on Lorab looked pretty good, Epi, and I could easily vote there... but I'm going to put my vote on Spacedaisy today.
...but he explained
here.
LC grills sig during Night 3 and votes him Day 4.
LC expresses disappointment in the Wilgy lynch, but maintains that he might have been faking the curse. It would seem LC doesn't hold that opinion anymore. He also expressed suspicion of Nerolunar.
Long Con wrote:Nerolunar wrote:Tbh I find it weird that Wilgy listed me. I don´t have BTSC with anyone of any alignment. I think it was more of a scum read from him, and not an indicator of how his role worked out.
It took you a long time to say that. Is that because you didn't want the Lie Detector to check it last night?
Of Wilgy's bad list, you are the one I trust the least, so
Nerolunar.
I was catching up on my phone last night, and the stuff between ika and Epi and Dom had me shaking my head and furrowing my brow. I'll reread on the computer, and see what I think.
LC goes after Nerolunar about not having BTSC and not saying so at Night. Then LC questions ika and engages with sig about Wilgy's known role versus spacedaisy's unknown role.
Long Con wrote:Epignosis
1
Epignosis (1)
100%

I don't know what this means.
LC goes through all of Dom's posts and comes away with an elevated level of suspicion.
LC agrees with me about Scotty's use of a conjunction and then is either
flattering me or making fun of me.
LC mentions examining Illyria, and then posts all caps.
++++
Long Con has several fishy posts, votes, reasons, and interactions.
And Black Rock is still alive.
I would consider voting LC, but I have more detective work to do.