insertnamehere wrote:Now he's just not even trying anymore.Zany Dex wrote:Silly civvies
I know, that's pretty self-incriminating, right?!?
Moderator: Community Team
insertnamehere wrote:Now he's just not even trying anymore.Zany Dex wrote:Silly civvies
But do you not see the flaw in that? Random voting in a resurrection poll just doesn't seem like a good thing to do, it's far better to at least vote for someone you think might not be bad.insertnamehere wrote:Bea was bringing attention to Bullzeye, but wasn't the most obvious aggressor, them being me and Dom. Also the case on bea was BS.Devin the Omniscient wrote:INH, Could you please explain the part regarding Bullzeye?insertnamehere wrote:RIPIWG Bea, definitely looking at Bullzeye after this.
Randomly chose juliets to be rezzed.
I randomly picked because none of the names really stood out to me as someone I was sure was good. Plus I didn't have time to do a massive re-read on all of the candidates.
Bea never made a case against me. My name came up in a post she made but she herself said she wasn't sure if she found me suspicious, she was in no way a driving force in the case on me.insertnamehere wrote:I agree, me using two different people's logic and combining them makes me bad.Bullzeye wrote:
I'd have to look at Bea's voters again, I don't remember who they were exactly but my comment was more to do with INH seeming to act like it was my fault Bea got lynched when I didn't even vote for her. I agree INH's randomisation is odd, did you also notice when he voted for me he claimed to be following Bea's logic (though she hasn't said much about me) but used yours in his post?
I assume this is what you mean by Bea's "logic" for voting me. Not that nowhere in that post she says I'm bad. Look a couple of posts later for the one where she outright says she isn't sure either way about me. You've also still not explained/backed up the comment you made about me seeming coached. This is the fourth time I'll mention that.insertnamehere wrote:I looked through both Mata and Bullz's posts after this, but Bullzeye's posts seemed very off. I've already stated why.bea wrote:ebwop - and boats. :faceplam: this is what mafia is like for me before caffine.![]()
Ok - so my thought today was to see who, if anyone, has consistently voted for a civ, while not voting for teefies on day 2. Here's what i've come up with:
Day 1: A Person voters who did not vote for teefies and are still alive: Devin, Insertnamehere, Bullzeye, Snow Dog and Mata.
Day 3: Llama voters who did not vote for teefies and are still alive: Insertnamehere, Bullzeye, Devin and Mata. (Snow Dog voted Lizzy)
Day 4: Boo voters who did not vote for teefies and are still alive: Mata, Devin, Bullzeye and Snowdog
Day 5: Boats voters who did not vote for teefies and are still alive: Bullzeye, Devin, and Mata.
I must have missed the OT bit, sorry, sometimes I do skip right over green stuff if I've read it before. I wasn't really using your absence as a reason you're bad anyway, I took evidence from the posts you have made. While I agree that of course you should base your thoughts on other people's observations as well as your own, the point is that it's as well as your own thoughts. It's fine to quote someone, say oh look at these lovely well made points right here and add a little of your own thoughts to it but your early votes were literally:insertnamehere wrote:Also "Based on the posts of other players"? Excuse me, but isn't that how the game of mafia works? You base your suspicions on your observations and other player's observations. Saying that because I use other peoples observations, I'm evil, is like saying that because I voted in the poll, I'm evil.insertnamehere wrote: Snipped a bit, nothing really added by it
The last few days have been very hectic with moving, setting up the Internet so it freaking works, and the holiday to top it all off. I haven't been able to play, and I apologize to MP, and everyone else in this game.
Part 2 up in a minute.
Heroes Mafia! Good times, good times...Dom wrote: DF is usually laid back, yes. I've had quite a bit of experience playing with him, we even both started on the same game and were bad in it together.
Just checking....Epignosis wrote:No, that isn't what I was implying.Dom wrote:You don't think other theories could prove to be fruitful either?Epignosis wrote:The Gambler's fallacy is the civilian's worst enemy. Well, perhaps second only to their actual enemies, but I hope you take my meaning.
I think Bullzeye is getting a pass just because people seem to be gun-shy about pursuing the evidence that the Day 2 lynch gave us. boobea didn't work out so well, but you know what they say about third times.
I'm voting Bullzeye.
While lynching Boo and Bea have no effect on the allegiance of Bullz, do you think other discussions have really been moot?
No, I don't think that.
I just don't want to be accused of wasting perfectly good pasta.
You think randomizing of a rez poll is civv like behavior?DFaraday wrote:Heroes Mafia! Good times, good times...Dom wrote: DF is usually laid back, yes. I've had quite a bit of experience playing with him, we even both started on the same game and were bad in it together.
I must say I'm not seeing the case on INH. I've played with him a couple times, and his behavior strikes me as pretty standard INH.
Mmmmm, that's a good point, Dom.Dom wrote:Just checking....Epignosis wrote:No, that isn't what I was implying.Dom wrote:You don't think other theories could prove to be fruitful either?Epignosis wrote:The Gambler's fallacy is the civilian's worst enemy. Well, perhaps second only to their actual enemies, but I hope you take my meaning.
I think Bullzeye is getting a pass just because people seem to be gun-shy about pursuing the evidence that the Day 2 lynch gave us. boobea didn't work out so well, but you know what they say about third times.
I'm voting Bullzeye.
While lynching Boo and Bea have no effect on the allegiance of Bullz, do you think other discussions have really been moot?
No, I don't think that.
I just don't want to be accused of wasting perfectly good pasta.
You think randomizing of a rez poll is civv like behavior?DFaraday wrote:Heroes Mafia! Good times, good times...Dom wrote: DF is usually laid back, yes. I've had quite a bit of experience playing with him, we even both started on the same game and were bad in it together.
I must say I'm not seeing the case on INH. I've played with him a couple times, and his behavior strikes me as pretty standard INH.
Epignosis wrote:Bitch, my identity is my identity theft protection!
DharmaHelper wrote:I know who I wont be voting for again tomorrow.
Turnip Head wrote: We need to lynch Pennsylvania Bitch.
When does it get to instant death. I WANT PEOPLE DYING FROM MISSING VOTES THIS INSTANCE!!!!MovingPictures07 wrote:Appropriate punishments have now been given to those who have continued to (or just now started to) defy me by missing votes.![]()
You're wrong about me. Just like anyone else still insisting I'm bad. There has never been anything solid against me other than two votes and that alone means nothing.Epignosis wrote:Am I wrong about Bullzeye? Or do you people want to fart around some more?
Sorry that I wasn't able to answer this earlier, and then I missed it. Yes, they could have/can.indiglo wrote:Well then I say we ask.In fact, I'm really glad you bring that up - I hadn't even considered it before.
@ MoPi - Can replacements be lynched the day they replace in?
I have a method to my madness.birdwithteeth11 wrote:When does it get to instant death. I WANT PEOPLE DYING FROM MISSING VOTES THIS INSTANCE!!!!MovingPictures07 wrote:Appropriate punishments have now been given to those who have continued to (or just now started to) defy me by missing votes.![]()
![]()
Not sure I fully understand the case against you. Besides your votes I mean. I noticed before I voted that Bea was getting a lot of attention already. I'll have to go back and read all that because I don't understand it.Bullzeye wrote:You're wrong about me. Just like anyone else still insisting I'm bad. There has never been anything solid against me other than two votes and that alone means nothing.Epignosis wrote:Am I wrong about Bullzeye? Or do you people want to fart around some more?
Epignosis wrote:If llama is good, it means we exist in a universe in which multitasking llama can call out the first of two mafia while simultaneously calling out two civilians.
I don't want to live in that universe.
Epignosis wrote:If llama is good, it means we exist in a universe in which multitasking llama can call out the first of two mafia while simultaneously calling out two civilians.
I don't want to live in that universe.
I have a method to my madness.birdwithteeth11 wrote:When does it get to instant death. I WANT PEOPLE DYING FROM MISSING VOTES THIS INSTANCE!!!!MovingPictures07 wrote:Appropriate punishments have now been given to those who have continued to (or just now started to) defy me by missing votes.![]()
![]()
There is definitely something afoot with at least one of those situations, Russti!Russtifinko wrote:RIP DexI'm sorry I was so wrong about you. I wish you had helped us even just a tiny bit...
What do you think of the other things that have been happening in the thread, such as bea/indiglo and the discussions around Dom and INH?
Quiet you! Don't make me ask again!birdwithteeth11 wrote:I forgot to mention earlier that the next time someone misses a vote, they should be forced to open a present.
Sometimes I amaze myself with these great ideas.
The question is, which one? Dom has pinged me before, I think, but I'd have to read back to remember exactly what he said. No doubt INH is acting weird, but that may be normal for him. And a Freudian slip is in large part what got BWT lynched on back on Day 2, so if bea really made 2 there it may be worth following. On the other hand, if she is good it looks pretty clear that indiglo isn't, pushing so hard for her.Mongoose wrote:There is definitely something afoot with at least one of those situations, Russti!Russtifinko wrote:RIP DexI'm sorry I was so wrong about you. I wish you had helped us even just a tiny bit...
What do you think of the other things that have been happening in the thread, such as bea/indiglo and the discussions around Dom and INH?
I pinged you when I said we should lynch Bullz over Bea a few days ago... if I recall correctly you said you weren't suspicious of me because Bea turned civ. .Russtifinko wrote:The question is, which one? Dom has pinged me before, I think, but I'd have to read back to remember exactly what he said. No doubt INH is acting weird, but that may be normal for him. And a Freudian slip is in large part what got BWT lynched on back on Day 2, so if bea really made 2 there it may be worth following. On the other hand, if she is good it looks pretty clear that indiglo isn't, pushing so hard for her.Mongoose wrote:There is definitely something afoot with at least one of those situations, Russti!Russtifinko wrote:RIP DexI'm sorry I was so wrong about you. I wish you had helped us even just a tiny bit...
What do you think of the other things that have been happening in the thread, such as bea/indiglo and the discussions around Dom and INH?
Oh, right. That's what it was. Thanks for the reminder.Dom wrote:I pinged you when I said we should lynch Bullz over Bea a few days ago... if I recall correctly you said you weren't suspicious of me because Bea turned civ. .Russtifinko wrote:The question is, which one? Dom has pinged me before, I think, but I'd have to read back to remember exactly what he said. No doubt INH is acting weird, but that may be normal for him. And a Freudian slip is in large part what got BWT lynched on back on Day 2, so if bea really made 2 there it may be worth following. On the other hand, if she is good it looks pretty clear that indiglo isn't, pushing so hard for her.Mongoose wrote:There is definitely something afoot with at least one of those situations, Russti!Russtifinko wrote:RIP DexI'm sorry I was so wrong about you. I wish you had helped us even just a tiny bit...
What do you think of the other things that have been happening in the thread, such as bea/indiglo and the discussions around Dom and INH?
and you think that just because indiglo pushes for Bea, if Bea is good, Indi must be bad?
That's pretty crap logic.