Moderator: Community Team
Why do you want this spelled out?Ricochet wrote:You are either recommending me to read something, the way you would just hand me a volume of Byron's finest, or you are recommending me to look into something that you might have an idea what it should reveal, so which is it?S~V~S wrote:I am asking him to read it and to think about it, lol.
. It could mean something, it could mean nothing.
That's what I'm trying to do, I'm trying to figure out what you're getting at (if anything, you could just be trying to look like you're contributing) and if what that is happens to be something sinister than I want to be aware of it. What makes you think I ever pay attention to nuance? I'm all about vibes.S~V~S wrote:Becasue I am seeing something I thought was obvious? And usually I expect Rico (or you for that matter) to pay more attention to nuance than I?a2thezebra wrote:But what motive do you have for asking someone that you feel is an over-thinker to analyze a certain area?
What motive do you have for trying to turn this into something sinister?
Epignosis wrote:If llama is good, it means we exist in a universe in which multitasking llama can call out the first of two mafia while simultaneously calling out two civilians.
I don't want to live in that universe.
I think there was something very very very very obvious going on when you read sigs posts and then look at his role. I was actually beginning to suspect Rico becasue he seemed to be missing it, when he is someone I would expect to catch nuances. Certainly much more so than I.a2thezebra wrote:That's what I'm trying to do, I'm trying to figure out what you're getting at (if anything, you could just be trying to look like you're contributing) and if what that is happens to be something sinister than I want to be aware of it. What makes you think I ever pay attention to nuance? I'm all about vibes.S~V~S wrote:Becasue I am seeing something I thought was obvious? And usually I expect Rico (or you for that matter) to pay more attention to nuance than I?a2thezebra wrote:But what motive do you have for asking someone that you feel is an over-thinker to analyze a certain area?
What motive do you have for trying to turn this into something sinister?
Only liars claim honesty. Zebra every time you claim to have a grasp on my meta you are either wrong or nothing good comes out of it...a2thezebra wrote:I mean that from what I know about Wilgy based on my experiences with him in other games, this feels way more like his baddie game than his civ game. I'm just being honest.Long Con wrote:What do you mean by this?a2thezebra wrote:Your meta's looking pretty bad right now Wilgy, to be honest.
Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Wed Dec 16, 2020 7:33 pm Just how many days of "let's yeet them tomorrow" can a mafioso survive?
The answer: all of them, if you are a marmot.
Metalmarsh89 wrote:ayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
Epignosis wrote:If llama is good, it means we exist in a universe in which multitasking llama can call out the first of two mafia while simultaneously calling out two civilians.
I don't want to live in that universe.
I said this in a previous game and whether he realizes it or not Wilgy has a pattern. His approach to the game and his attitude towards it are indicative of his alignment. This is baddie Wilgy if I've ever seen him.S~V~S wrote:Why do you think he is bad? I have problems getting past his increasingly zany game these days. I have problems seeing past it.
What am I missing?
You're kidding right? Take a look at the poll silly, you're NO U'ing me!DrWilgy wrote:Zebra are you NO U'ing me?
Trying to set up two mislynches like no one's going to see through your motivations.DrWilgy wrote:Thank you for unstaplung my tongue LC. Took abit to heal but I'm able to speak again.
Only liars claim honesty. Zebra every time you claim to have a grasp on my meta you are either wrong or nothing good comes out of it...a2thezebra wrote:I mean that from what I know about Wilgy based on my experiences with him in other games, this feels way more like his baddie game than his civ game. I'm just being honest.Long Con wrote:What do you mean by this?a2thezebra wrote:Your meta's looking pretty bad right now Wilgy, to be honest.
So here's where my opposite faction theory of Sig and Zeebs came from. They were the two who actively opposed the fallacy theories. Seeing the possibility of a baddie stating "hey let's not clear anyone immediately" to get some civvy points felt too easy. Hence why I asked the question regarding it. Sig opposed it and I didn't recall getting a clear response from Zeebs. Zebra then agreed with me on Sig's forceful demeanour and nuked him after having him "scummy meta read".
Now all of this had me thinkin one of the 2 were bad. I just don't know which.
Lola2thezebra wrote:You're kidding right? Take a look at the poll silly, you're NO U'ing me!DrWilgy wrote:Zebra are you NO U'ing me?
Me at 6:45 pm thursdayDrWilgy wrote:Hmm... I had a theory that Zebra and Sig are on opposite teams. Anyone down to test that tomorrow?
You at 9:25 am yesterdaya2thezebra wrote:Your meta's looking pretty bad right now Wilgy, to be honest.
Did I have a part in Sig's mislynch? If you are content to look at the just polls and claim that I'm NO U'ing you, you should've seen last phase that I actually didn't vote. If you do more than poll skim though, I never stated anywhere that Sig should be lynched.a2thezebra wrote:Trying to set up two mislynches like no one's going to see through your motivations.DrWilgy wrote:Thank you for unstaplung my tongue LC. Took abit to heal but I'm able to speak again.
Only liars claim honesty. Zebra every time you claim to have a grasp on my meta you are either wrong or nothing good comes out of it...a2thezebra wrote:I mean that from what I know about Wilgy based on my experiences with him in other games, this feels way more like his baddie game than his civ game. I'm just being honest.Long Con wrote:What do you mean by this?a2thezebra wrote:Your meta's looking pretty bad right now Wilgy, to be honest.
So here's where my opposite faction theory of Sig and Zeebs came from. They were the two who actively opposed the fallacy theories. Seeing the possibility of a baddie stating "hey let's not clear anyone immediately" to get some civvy points felt too easy. Hence why I asked the question regarding it. Sig opposed it and I didn't recall getting a clear response from Zeebs. Zebra then agreed with me on Sig's forceful demeanour and nuked him after having him "scummy meta read".
Now all of this had me thinkin one of the 2 were bad. I just don't know which.
Right I'm definitely NO U'ing you...even though you have to show me the posts that I'm apparently NO U'ing.DrWilgy wrote:Me at 6:45 pm thursdayDrWilgy wrote:Hmm... I had a theory that Zebra and Sig are on opposite teams. Anyone down to test that tomorrow?
You at 9:25 am yesterdaya2thezebra wrote:Your meta's looking pretty bad right now Wilgy, to be honest.
Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Wed Dec 16, 2020 7:33 pm Just how many days of "let's yeet them tomorrow" can a mafioso survive?
The answer: all of them, if you are a marmot.
Well of course you're not going to outright say it when you're trying to set it up indirectly.DrWilgy wrote:I never stated anywhere that Sig should be lynched.
That was in response to you claiming I was the one NO U'ing and pointing out your false statement, and this was before I figured you hadn't read parts of the thread. Why would you claim that I was NO U'ing you if you hadn't read the thread? Why does a civ make uninformed judgements? Its one thing when the info isn't obtainable at the time and can be found later, but in this case the info was there, you ignored/dodged/missed it, then still made a vote locked vote.a2thezebra wrote:Right I'm definitely NO U'ing you...even though you have to show me the posts that I'm apparently NO U'ing.DrWilgy wrote:Me at 6:45 pm thursdayDrWilgy wrote:Hmm... I had a theory that Zebra and Sig are on opposite teams. Anyone down to test that tomorrow?
You at 9:25 am yesterdaya2thezebra wrote:Your meta's looking pretty bad right now Wilgy, to be honest.
Set it up? I set it up by trying to talk with him?a2thezebra wrote:Well of course you're not going to outright say it when you're trying to set it up indirectly.DrWilgy wrote:I never stated anywhere that Sig should be lynched.
That is an illegal vote, MM. Don't make me regret letting you sub in.Metalmarsh89 wrote:Hi everyone!
I'm down for a Ryan O'Neal lynch, because that's who I'm currently voting for.
Epignosis wrote:If llama is good, it means we exist in a universe in which multitasking llama can call out the first of two mafia while simultaneously calling out two civilians.
I don't want to live in that universe.
I don't think that I have played defence at all this game.a2thezebra wrote:Where is this passion with your scumhunting efforts? Your only posts with relevant material are your defense posts, so your fate is already sealed.
S~V~S wrote:20 minutes left, and only 2votes?
This tells me two things: First, she has no urgency before, and second, has no urgency after.S~V~S wrote:Oh doh, it ends tomorrow. Nevermind
I know in the past I've thought I figured out Wilgys meta and I was wrong, he's a hard one to figure out.a2thezebra wrote:I said this in a previous game and whether he realizes it or not Wilgy has a pattern. His approach to the game and his attitude towards it are indicative of his alignment. This is baddie Wilgy if I've ever seen him.S~V~S wrote:Why do you think he is bad? I have problems getting past his increasingly zany game these days. I have problems seeing past it.
What am I missing?
This was it. I don't recall SVS doing something like this before but I'm sure someone will remind if she has.S~V~S wrote:I am gonna make it a three way & vote for sig. Let someone else be the decider
Yeah that's a good one.DrWilgy wrote:I don't think that I have played defence at all this game.a2thezebra wrote:Where is this passion with your scumhunting efforts? Your only posts with relevant material are your defense posts, so your fate is already sealed.
It was a perfectly legal vote! I placed it as a non-participant.thellama73 wrote:That is an illegal vote, MM. Don't make me regret letting you sub in.Metalmarsh89 wrote:Hi everyone!
I'm down for a Ryan O'Neal lynch, because that's who I'm currently voting for.
Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Wed Dec 16, 2020 7:33 pm Just how many days of "let's yeet them tomorrow" can a mafioso survive?
The answer: all of them, if you are a marmot.
Pssst, DrWilgy. Epignosis stated that SVS has done this before. You can lick her now.DrWilgy wrote:Do point out observations on defence vs neutral and aggro please. Are there any key words that set a defensive tone?
Why do I change my spelling of defense?
...
Are both correct? I think both are correct... EPIIIIII!!! I need you!!!
Also, I like the SVS observation. Has she done this before?
Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Wed Dec 16, 2020 7:33 pm Just how many days of "let's yeet them tomorrow" can a mafioso survive?
The answer: all of them, if you are a marmot.
That's right. Let 'er rip.Metalmarsh89 wrote:Pssst, DrWilgy. Epignosis stated that SVS has done this before. You can lick her now.DrWilgy wrote:Do point out observations on defence vs neutral and aggro please. Are there any key words that set a defensive tone?
Why do I change my spelling of defense?
...
Are both correct? I think both are correct... EPIIIIII!!! I need you!!!
Also, I like the SVS observation. Has she done this before?
I'm not sure which observation Wilgy was referring to, mine or Epis. Epi was saying SVS made the same poll time end mistake earlier in this game. My observation was about her being so flippant about creating a tie.Metalmarsh89 wrote:Pssst, DrWilgy. Epignosis stated that SVS has done this before. You can lick her now.DrWilgy wrote:Do point out observations on defence vs neutral and aggro please. Are there any key words that set a defensive tone?
Why do I change my spelling of defense?
...
Are both correct? I think both are correct... EPIIIIII!!! I need you!!!
Also, I like the SVS observation. Has she done this before?
