Here's my thoughts on Luffy. I'm going to try something new and do a continuing sort of score after each post, because he's got so much meat to go through and I always suck at quantifying how I feel at the very end. I'll start off at 5/10 just because...middle ground. I don't know.
As I said, I'll refer to each post as post 1, 2, and then just give my thoughts- you can follow through my ISO by looking at his posts from his earliest to latest.
I just realised that since I don't talk about every single post this is just going to be confusing. Just try your best to follow along.
---
1. Makes a point not to trust JJJ based entirely on meta and previous games. I remember having a disagree opinion on this sentiment but at the time I never really found it suspicious. 5/10
2. 'Judge people based on this game, not on how much of a good civ they tend to be' - a complete contradiction to what he just said, and I don't like it very much. 4/10
3. Responds to elohcin with basically an elaborated version of what he just said. I think I'd feel okay about this if he didn't completely contradict himself before. 4/10
4. Votes himself and INH for prefect. My read for INH is pretty wishy-washy because nothing coming from him springs to mind at the moment, so if INH ever dies I'll have something to compare this to. 4/10
5/6/7. He has some discourse with Glorfindel. It's soft and doesn't amount to anything. 4/10
8. He town reads Glorfindel. Or more specifically, 'gets good vibes'. That's a more flexible way of wording a town read to avoid criticism if he ever needs to back down. He has an entire paragraph as to why Glorfindel is giving him good vibes, and like, half a line for Elohcin. If Glorfindel is lynched today and comes back bad I'd be scrutinising Luffy a lot more. But as it is, still 4/10.
9. His prefect vote is a joke vote. 4/10.
10. Points fingers at MP for wallposting, says that it's not a criticism. 4/10
11. Responds to MP to suggest that his wallposting was BS, and that he picks out BS to reply to. In the very same post he mentions seeing lots of suspicious posts on Day 0 but didn't bother addressing them. Suspicious posts = BS, no? 3/10
12/13. Discourse with 3J. I didn't see his worry of people blindly following 3J reflected in the earlier posts he made, but the sentiments behind it I still agree with. 3.5/10
14. He picks up on a suspicious post by Russ. Although he's second guessing himself I do agree with his reason for finding it suspicious. I think there was another he pulled this sort of 'First to do this win a vote' so after I do this I'll go find out who that was. To discredit myself a little, I did play along with whoever that was. 4/10
15. Says that we should lynch those we are most suspicious of, and he's looking into end game. I don't think anything of the latter part but I thought it'd be good to bring it up. 4/10
16.
Says he finds me suspicious and says he'll elaborate. There's a post a little bit later where he agrees with my reasons to dismiss MP's aggressive behaviour as being suspicious which is the closest he comes to it, but he never did come back and explain his reasons. 3/10 Nevermind, he just forgot about little 'ol me. It's a bit later.
17. 'MP is not me though, so I don't know if its a good idea to project myself on him, but after this episode,
I just don't feel like I want to lynch his role at all.' - was this just bad wording? ?/10
18. He's neutral reading me now. Sounds like his reason to scumread me was a miscommunication if anything. Ok. 4/10
---
And that's just Day 1.
linki: I was the one who brought up marmots contradictory voting pattern, poo-head.