I'm very much down for inh and sig, any other lurkers you have in mind?Sloonei wrote:Would anyone be down for Lynch A Lurker today? We've got a lot of names to choose from in that category.
I'm still partial to a scotty vote, too.
Moderator: Community Team
I'm very much down for inh and sig, any other lurkers you have in mind?Sloonei wrote:Would anyone be down for Lynch A Lurker today? We've got a lot of names to choose from in that category.
I've disagreed with pretty much everything you have said this game or your votes and haven't really given you any heat because I deemed it as a confused civ. I just don't know if you're just that or are just bad.DFaraday wrote:I'm just quoting because I also want to hear more from Quin about this. I haven't seen anything particularly suspicious from you.nutella wrote:Quin, I'm not sure why you think I'm "potential nanman," and to be honest I don't really understand how you arrived at most of your list (I kind of get the Dom and TH part I guess). Could you elaborate? What makes you think I could be nanman based on those posts and taking my voting record into account?
I'm also not sure of the reasoning behind not wanting to vote for people who have dueled before. Sure, they get prizes, but I kind of doubt the prizes are boosts to help them win more duels; that seems a little broken. Having said that, I don't plan on voting Bass as I'm reading him civ at this point.
MMM, yes, I suppose I do have disdain for the living prefectsZuo Ci wrote:You of the golden glow, I would invite you into my home. We may eat from my garden and exchange words. I would know of your disdain for those who have attained prefecture; I would perceive the roots of your feelings which you bear before us now.
That makes sense, I suppose; it seemed like other people just didn't want to send anyone to duel twice on principle.Scotty wrote:I've disagreed with pretty much everything you have said this game or your votes and haven't really given you any heat because I deemed it as a confused civ. I just don't know if you're just that or are just bad.DFaraday wrote:I'm just quoting because I also want to hear more from Quin about this. I haven't seen anything particularly suspicious from you.nutella wrote:Quin, I'm not sure why you think I'm "potential nanman," and to be honest I don't really understand how you arrived at most of your list (I kind of get the Dom and TH part I guess). Could you elaborate? What makes you think I could be nanman based on those posts and taking my voting record into account?
I'm also not sure of the reasoning behind not wanting to vote for people who have dueled before. Sure, they get prizes, but I kind of doubt the prizes are boosts to help them win more duels; that seems a little broken. Having said that, I don't plan on voting Bass as I'm reading him civ at this point.
Voting for those that have already dueled is not the problem at the root. It's he pattern of the people continually getting up to duel shouldn't be dueling if there is we think they aren't bad. And that's why I was trying to get at: I don't think Bass is bad. i haven't seen the merit in Bass's suspicions and I think he has handled himself well in the wake of his duels.
DittoGolden wrote:I had to vote.
Scotty because I suspect him.
INH over sig because INH already has a vote.
Feel the disdain for prefects! It is real!
I do as well, but I don't know as he would be so blatant as to vote two baddies, if he does indeed know everyone's roles. I'm going to stick with Ninja and put the other on Dunny, just to see if it pans out.Golden wrote:I trust Zuo Ci.
It's not even that INH is inactive- he's participated for some time- he's just supposed to be someone that is leading the civ cause. That's what he advertised in being a prefect. JJJ was a good prefect, I am a good prefect, I don't think he is.Bass_the_Clever wrote:I'm cool with voting inactive people.
Are you Zou Ci?Golden wrote:I trust Zuo Ci.
Lol badnutella wrote:He said he suspected me so clearly not
Sorry you're not feeling well, man.Sloonei wrote:Put my votes on INH and sig. This is my weakest performance in a mafia game ever.
I was hoping INH would start posting more now that Red vs. Blue has finished but that doesn't seem to be the case and everyone else is piling votes on him, so sure.
If I ever find the time, I might, but I doubt I will. Starting tomorrow evening I'm basically going to have no free time until next week. I'd like to be more involved here but I'm simply not able to right now.Scotty wrote:Sorry you're not feeling well, man.Sloonei wrote:Put my votes on INH and sig. This is my weakest performance in a mafia game ever.
I was hoping INH would start posting more now that Red vs. Blue has finished but that doesn't seem to be the case and everyone else is piling votes on him, so sure.
Have you read back to Days 1 and 2 yet? I think those days look bad for Bubbles there and I think it looks bad that you haven't done so yet.
I'd just like your input in the case that you are good, because I know how much of a force a civ Sloon can be.
The two vote thing is probably throwing people off. I'm not usually a Vote Analysis Guy, but that's a new dynamic that I doubt anyone has much experience with. You're absolutely right that it's something we should be looking at more. There's a lot of things we should be putting more focus on in this game. This game has a lot going on but no one to solve it.Scotty wrote:I'm not the beacon of activity that I hoped I would be either, but this new job is quite something on my mind. I cannot say I will be any use as we get closer into tech on this show, but I will try and post my thoughts as I catch up should I continue to live.
Oh, and can we start taking into account people's voting patterns? I think there is some info there that people are either lazily avoiding or disagree with me on. If you disagree, great. Praytell why.
Thanks loves
What do you mean by this? What's wrong with my voting record? I mean, it hasn't been perfect since we've lynched a ton of civs, but I don't see why you would find it particularly suspicious. Do you have a specific team (or indie role) in mind for me? What is your reasoning?Scotty wrote: I would like to give it to Nutella but once again, people seem to trust her (or at least trust her more than others) enough to not vote her.
If anyone does trust her, I'm just curious as to what leads you to that conclusion. Because it's surely not her voting record.
I am all about the flow of life. And really have no ire towards anyone. Suspicion? Sure. Ire? Not so much. And I'm not going to be angry on demand.Zuo Ci wrote:And so we commune, spirit to spirit, and may our words reveal virtue. Our fallen brother, he who welcomed the end freely, was met with your ire. It is my chief worry that this ire is not in alignment with the flow of life, and that you have not embraced wu wei. Allow your anger to take you this moment, that I might observe it as you express it, and perhaps my perspective will warp to your will.LoRab wrote:I'm happy to speak with you.
Quin wrote:oh
Do you think that whoever we voted for took over the sock?Golden wrote:I'm guessing that the messages are coming from someone you listed as bad, that isn't.
I don't think Zuo Ci is Zhang Bao. I think he is Jay.
Why?Scotty wrote:Now let's get Nutella.
What's your point?Golden wrote:Am I correct in labelling the following people as absent (as in, not posting or voting for at least ten days)
Bullzeye
Dunny
Jan
Leetic
Nerolunar
sig
Spacedaisy
So? She voted for Wilgy Day 1. So did MM. I think Wilgy was looking to fight because he was a warrior.Golden wrote:In this game nutella has lynched every successfully lynched member of the nanmans, and only one looks like a potential bus (the rest she seems on quite early). MP of the yellow turbans was out for her blood from the start until his death.
So why should we be out to get her? Doesn't that look like someone who is the definition of most likely not to be bad?