Finished my Dom read.
#1 - I want to kiss you, because that was the funniest read I've ever done in the history of mafia playing. It was UUUUuuuuuuge!
#2 - Hold on, still laughing...
# 3 - This post from Wilgy make me think Dom is NOT a Nan type of Man...
Dom wrote:DrWilgy wrote:Dom wrote:Golden wrote:Bass_the_Clever wrote:Golden wrote:Jay, why did you vote for yourself?
Because he skipped the rules section on page one. Lol
The rules say that self-voting is permitted, but it doesn't seem like a very Jay thing to do to give himself a potential reward.
Little Jay has to get a grip!
Hi Dom. U bad again?
Me? Bad? I'm the greatest there ever was.
Scotty is the single greatest threat to this website! He's an actor! He lies!
# 4 -
Here and
here we see MP softly or openly (depends on how you interpret it) defending Dom. This fits in with what I saw in a lot of MP's posts - talking about a crap ton of players, and trying to buddy up to his perceived civs. Feels like that's what's happening here with Dom.
# 5 - To me, all that indicates that the most likely baddie team for Dom to be on is the Yellows. But with their non-existant NKs, and since Dom has at least been around regularly, it just doesn't fit that well. (Plus, we all know that The Dom is a very, very orange man. Not Yellow, orange.)
# 6 - Now we see that MP's defending of Dom doesn't swing both ways, because here Dom calls MP out for volunteering to duel:
Dom wrote:Folks, I am a busy man and some things got in the way. I am here now to kick some @$$.
MacDougall wrote:nutella wrote:MacDougall wrote:nutella wrote:Damn. Sorry Timmer and RIP Rico.
I am inclined to go after Sorsha and TH today especially considering Eloh's implication. Russ is still up there for me as well.
This feels a bit fake to me.
Why?
I dunno, just does. Is it?
Hey Dom, do you still have concerns about DFaraday?
DFaraday is the lowest of the low. Get him out!
MovingPictures07 wrote:
But go ahead though, DDL, vote for me. I want to duel anyway.

I am getting nervous here, people. People have written that those who want to duel are a bit strange in their intentions and dismissive and just not trustworthy.
# 7 - Dom calls out Boomslang for using the exact same phrasing as nutella when responding to another player's accusation (post snipped for space,
read the whole thing here)
Dom wrote:
...
nutella wrote:Also, lack of precedence does not mean lack of probability. There's probably a fancy logical fallacy term for that but idgaf. Just because you've never seen an inactive mafia team before doesn't mean it couldn't happen, especially considering the Yellow Turban team only consists of
three players, and this game has WAY more than three inactive players. They only killed once, and it was on SVS, an inactive player -- perhaps if nobody in the team had been paying attention they wouldn't know SVS hadn't been participating and just picked her to get rid of. Idk, I just think Glorfindel's lines of thinking are not entirely unreasonable

You are not wrong in that.
However, I find the probability to be very low. Hostin' Epi does not randomize roles. He cherry picks roles-- or has int he past. I doubt he'd put all people he suspects might be no-shows as his baddie teams. And he didn't. MM and Wilgy are not no-shows.
So your ignoring the facts is troublesome. Very troublesome. We need a better leader than that.
...
Dragon D. Luffy wrote:Glorfindel wrote:Just another observation here...
As I understand it, part of the case that brought MM undone was his inconsistency in voting for Dr Wilgy for Prefect on Day 0 and then voted to have him duel on Day 1 - is that correct? I note that another player did a similar thing in that Boomslang voted MM for Prefect on Day 0 and then voted him for the dueling ring on Day 1.
The vote for MM's prefecture was mid-poll (i.e. 39th out of 62) so it wasn't really influential and it was MM's only vote for Prefect. I'm not sure what this says but personally, I didn't vote anyone for Prefect about whom I had doubts

You weren't the first to notice it:
http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... 59#p296459
This makes me reconsider my stance on boomslang.
Boomslang wrote:Dragon D. Luffy wrote:Boomslang wrote:Glorfindel wrote:Just another observation here...
As I understand it, part of the case that brought MM undone was his inconsistency in voting for Dr Wilgy for Prefect on Day 0 and then voted to have him duel on Day 1 - is that correct? I note that another player did a similar thing in that Boomslang voted MM for Prefect on Day 0 and then voted him for the dueling ring on Day 1.
The vote for MM's prefecture was mid-poll (i.e. 39th out of 62) so it wasn't really influential and it was MM's only vote for Prefect. I'm not sure what this says but personally, I didn't vote anyone for Prefect about whom I had doubts

Well, if you're not sure what it says, what do you think it says? Or is this one of those baddie "let's plant a seed without actually taking sides and hope it grows into a mighty lynching tree" moves?
Why is it that you always seem to appear only when people mention you?
That is patently untrue, as even a cursory read of my post history would indicate. I just thought Glorf's post was particularly egregious.
As does him using the same phrase as nutella did when she refuted LoRab's claims.
So that makes me want to do a read on nutella. But feel fine atm about Dom, unless there is some big case on him somewhere that I have missed up to now.