Something doesn't add up.

Moderator: Community Team
You've been twice deceived amigo.Matt F wrote:I know DH.
I've been sending out feelers to see if I could trip anyone up, and right now both Bullz and A Person are claiming to be your partner.
Interesting.Matt F wrote:Right now, I am suspicious of DH, Bullz, and A Person, based on corresponding PMs I've had with them.
Something doesn't add up.
A Person actually told me you were his partner, FWIWMatt F wrote:Very interesting.
A Person and Bullz, any opinions on what's happening here?
Oh no, but I am interested to find out.Matt F wrote:Very interesting.
A Person and Bullz, any opinions on what's happening here?
I don't know what's actually going on but I think you've claimed a role you don't have or something. I've been in contact with both Matt and DH and haven't actually lied to anyone yet so...A Person wrote:Oh no, but I am interested to find out.Matt F wrote:Very interesting.
A Person and Bullz, any opinions on what's happening here?
I'm not denying that pm(s) may have been received and possibly replied to, but as to the current discussion I must admit I'm confused. I don't know what sort of claim I've supposed to have made though.Bullzeye wrote:I don't know what's actually going on but I think you've claimed a role you don't have or something. I've been in contact with both Matt and DH and haven't actually lied to anyone yet so...A Person wrote:Oh no, but I am interested to find out.Matt F wrote:Very interesting.
A Person and Bullz, any opinions on what's happening here?
FWIW everything I said was true. EVERYTHINGMatt F wrote:I think for the time being, I'm going to keep to myself and not create any alliances. Alliance over, Bullz, sorry if you're telling the truth.
Yes.Elohcin wrote:This is quite hilarious. Did you expect it to get this confusing INH? I am sure this is just the beginning.
Isn't ally just a misspelling of a lie? ;DBullzeye wrote:FWIW everything I said was true. EVERYTHINGMatt F wrote:I think for the time being, I'm going to keep to myself and not create any alliances. Alliance over, Bullz, sorry if you're telling the truth.
I intend to treat my allies well though. I can look out for the people who help me in many ways but I can't look after my self that well so it's in my best interests to be as honest as I can. I've yet to lie to anybody I offered an alliance to. Can you say the same? Well the answer is clearly no.A Person wrote:Isn't ally just a misspelling of a lie? ;DBullzeye wrote:FWIW everything I said was true. EVERYTHINGMatt F wrote:I think for the time being, I'm going to keep to myself and not create any alliances. Alliance over, Bullz, sorry if you're telling the truth.
A Person wrote:Isn't ally just a misspelling of a lie? ;DBullzeye wrote:FWIW everything I said was true. EVERYTHINGMatt F wrote:I think for the time being, I'm going to keep to myself and not create any alliances. Alliance over, Bullz, sorry if you're telling the truth.
These are the lyrics to Heart's These Dreams. At his insistence, I am not sharing his name, but he said I could share the message because it's a clue. The cloak and dagger caught my eye.Is it cloak & dagger
Could it be spring or fall
I walk without a cut
Through a stained glass wall
Weaker in my eyesight
The candle in my grip
And words that have no form
Are falling from my lips
These dreams go on when I close my eyes
Every second of the night I live another life
These dreams that sleep when it's cold outside
Every moment I'm awake the further I'm away
Epignosis wrote:If llama is good, it means we exist in a universe in which multitasking llama can call out the first of two mafia while simultaneously calling out two civilians.
I don't want to live in that universe.
We're still on Page 3.thellama73 wrote:This has already become complex beyond belief. It's going to be a fun game.
That depends on your forum settings. You can't trick me, host!insertnamehere wrote:We're still on Page 3.thellama73 wrote:This has already become complex beyond belief. It's going to be a fun game.
Epignosis wrote:If llama is good, it means we exist in a universe in which multitasking llama can call out the first of two mafia while simultaneously calling out two civilians.
I don't want to live in that universe.
Turnip Head wrote: We need to lynch Pennsylvania Bitch.
That's pretty suspicious. I don't trust you this game!Hedgeowl wrote:Omg i love this game already
Epignosis wrote:If llama is good, it means we exist in a universe in which multitasking llama can call out the first of two mafia while simultaneously calling out two civilians.
I don't want to live in that universe.
thellama73 wrote:That's pretty suspicious. I don't trust you this game!Hedgeowl wrote:Omg i love this game already
Turnip Head wrote: We need to lynch Pennsylvania Bitch.
Owl be watching you.Hedgeowl wrote:thellama73 wrote:That's pretty suspicious. I don't trust you this game!Hedgeowl wrote:Omg i love this game already
I don't get it, why is it suspicious?A Person wrote:Owl be watching you.Hedgeowl wrote:thellama73 wrote:That's pretty suspicious. I don't trust you this game!Hedgeowl wrote:Omg i love this game already
I was making a joke, because I have accused Hedgeowl of being suspicious every game and very recently was partially responsible for lynching her when she was a civ.Elohcin wrote:I don't get it, why is it suspicious?A Person wrote:Owl be watching you.Hedgeowl wrote:thellama73 wrote:That's pretty suspicious. I don't trust you this game!Hedgeowl wrote:Omg i love this game already
Epignosis wrote:If llama is good, it means we exist in a universe in which multitasking llama can call out the first of two mafia while simultaneously calling out two civilians.
I don't want to live in that universe.
Epignosis wrote:If llama is good, it means we exist in a universe in which multitasking llama can call out the first of two mafia while simultaneously calling out two civilians.
I don't want to live in that universe.
I wasn't going to comment on it but so far I'm not sure how I deceived anyone, I'm not even sure what it is I supposedly was deceitful about?Epignosis wrote:I don't believe I have ever known A Person to be deceitful. Looking over page 2 again (for the fourth time), I wonder what his sudden motivation for (clearly amateur) deception could be.
So...you have nothing noteworthy to say regarding page 2?A Person wrote:I wasn't going to comment on it but so far I'm not sure how I deceived anyone, I'm not even sure what it is I supposedly was deceitful about?Epignosis wrote:I don't believe I have ever known A Person to be deceitful. Looking over page 2 again (for the fourth time), I wonder what his sudden motivation for (clearly amateur) deception could be.
Not particularly. I was approached by both DH and then Matt F. Matt F said that DH had said I was his partner, which was odd but I thought it might just be a slight misunderstanding and that he meant he'd only pm'd me. I responded to Matt F's pm and then to DH's, saying I had already responded to Matt F's. There were no other claims/information involved so I'm not sure how there is any sort of confusion. Matt F's post saying something was going on was posted almost immediately after I responded, which is why I was mostly interested in watching.Epignosis wrote:So...you have nothing noteworthy to say regarding page 2?A Person wrote:I wasn't going to comment on it but so far I'm not sure how I deceived anyone, I'm not even sure what it is I supposedly was deceitful about?Epignosis wrote:I don't believe I have ever known A Person to be deceitful. Looking over page 2 again (for the fourth time), I wonder what his sudden motivation for (clearly amateur) deception could be.
I got a similar message from Matt F, after which he flat out admitted to trying to trip me up. He is full of tricks, isn't he?A Person wrote: Not particularly. I was approached by both DH and then Matt F. Matt F said that DH had said I was his partner, which was odd but I thought it might just be a slight misunderstanding and that he meant he'd only pm'd me. I responded to Matt F's pm and then to DH's, saying I had already responded to Matt F's. There were no other claims/information involved so I'm not sure how there is any sort of confusion. Matt F's post saying something was going on was posted almost immediately after I responded, which is why I was mostly interested in watching.
Epignosis wrote:If llama is good, it means we exist in a universe in which multitasking llama can call out the first of two mafia while simultaneously calling out two civilians.
I don't want to live in that universe.
Indeed. If that was his intention I can't blame him for it.thellama73 wrote:I got a similar message from Matt F, after which he flat out admitted to trying to trip me up. He is full of tricks, isn't he?A Person wrote: Not particularly. I was approached by both DH and then Matt F. Matt F said that DH had said I was his partner, which was odd but I thought it might just be a slight misunderstanding and that he meant he'd only pm'd me. I responded to Matt F's pm and then to DH's, saying I had already responded to Matt F's. There were no other claims/information involved so I'm not sure how there is any sort of confusion. Matt F's post saying something was going on was posted almost immediately after I responded, which is why I was mostly interested in watching.
I can! I'm not sure if I want people who are going to be so slippery sticking around for too long.A Person wrote:Indeed. If that was his intention I can't blame him for it.thellama73 wrote:I got a similar message from Matt F, after which he flat out admitted to trying to trip me up. He is full of tricks, isn't he?A Person wrote: Not particularly. I was approached by both DH and then Matt F. Matt F said that DH had said I was his partner, which was odd but I thought it might just be a slight misunderstanding and that he meant he'd only pm'd me. I responded to Matt F's pm and then to DH's, saying I had already responded to Matt F's. There were no other claims/information involved so I'm not sure how there is any sort of confusion. Matt F's post saying something was going on was posted almost immediately after I responded, which is why I was mostly interested in watching.
Epignosis wrote:If llama is good, it means we exist in a universe in which multitasking llama can call out the first of two mafia while simultaneously calling out two civilians.
I don't want to live in that universe.
Epignosis wrote:If llama is good, it means we exist in a universe in which multitasking llama can call out the first of two mafia while simultaneously calling out two civilians.
I don't want to live in that universe.