I don't want to quote that giant wall of quotes again, and I dislike spoilers, they are impossible to navigate on phone

It seems that your total interpretation of MPs list vs Nutellas list is how it relates to you?
In due time, besides i wouldnt be so rude as to leave it on you if you were in serious dangerLong Con wrote:It's generally polite to give at least one reason.sprityo wrote:Leaving my vote on LongCon for now
sprityo wrote:In due time, besides i wouldnt be so rude as to leave it on you if you were in serious dangerLong Con wrote:It's generally polite to give at least one reason.sprityo wrote:Leaving my vote on LongCon for now
I think that's reasonable. I'm not sure I'm getting the same vibe from SL though, but I can revisit his ISO.S~V~S wrote:I am still feeling a little bit jumpy about Silver. Not sure why. Possibly the way he said, "Well I am known for my freaking out meta, and I freaked out so neener neener" or something to that effect.MovingPictures07 wrote:Yeah, that makes sense, thanks.S~V~S wrote:@MP, yeah it did. That felt very forthright and organic, it did not feel like you were trying to use it for *reasons*. If you get my drift.
What are your reads right at this moment, or if you'd prefer, whom would you vote for if not JOH?
In LC v Llama I feel worse about Llama, but not bad enough to vote where I have been wrong on him for similar reasons recently.
That said, I am not a huge fan of the people who are taking sides in this debate on Day One. Neither of them feels info-y to me.
I am still trying to sort the chattiest HRC folks.
Linki, Thanks Epi.
If you need to sum it up in one sentence, yeah. My objection to Nut's reads centers around three of them and the contradiction in my eyes centers around me. MP didn't put me as town so the whole "MP and Nut are the same so why do you only suspect one and trust the other" thing makes no sense to me.S~V~S wrote:@Jack~
I don't want to quote that giant wall of quotes again, and I dislike spoilers, they are impossible to navigate on phone![]()
It seems that your total interpretation of MPs list vs Nutellas list is how it relates to you?
He just "feels" bad to me. But not so much that I am gonna try hard to get others to vote for him, if you see my point? At this point, Day One, all these people I am unfamiliar with, it is the only thing that stood out enough to me to vote on, and so far, nothing has surpassed it.MovingPictures07 wrote:I think that's reasonable. I'm not sure I'm getting the same vibe from SL though, but I can revisit his ISO.S~V~S wrote:I am still feeling a little bit jumpy about Silver. Not sure why. Possibly the way he said, "Well I am known for my freaking out meta, and I freaked out so neener neener" or something to that effect.MovingPictures07 wrote:Yeah, that makes sense, thanks.S~V~S wrote:@MP, yeah it did. That felt very forthright and organic, it did not feel like you were trying to use it for *reasons*. If you get my drift.
What are your reads right at this moment, or if you'd prefer, whom would you vote for if not JOH?
In LC v Llama I feel worse about Llama, but not bad enough to vote where I have been wrong on him for similar reasons recently.
That said, I am not a huge fan of the people who are taking sides in this debate on Day One. Neither of them feels info-y to me.
I am still trying to sort the chattiest HRC folks.
Linki, Thanks Epi.
I really need to sort JOH. Just can't figure him out. I guess I could vote for him, but I don't feel good about it. Can you talk to me about what it is you most dislike about his posts?
Weird how?Dyslexicon wrote:The post she pointed out gave me weird feels as well. I've actually considered it as possible distancing, if I'm wrong on Nut. I don't really see how it's not possible for Nut to have town reads on players going after each other.Jackofhearts2005 wrote:Explain to me what SVS pointed out. In your own words.
I just realized how many scum there actually are in this game and suddenly felt worse about everything. I don't know if it's deliberate or not, don't feel it is, but you have 10 green reads and implicitly yourself, which is the exact number of town. Also wondering if you have any read on me at all?MovingPictures07 wrote:MP Rainbow #4: EoD D1
Back to a POE list now because I don't feel comfortable saying I have any real "mafia" reads. I don't feel remotely comfortable leaving my vote on Dom anymore; I'm throwing him back up into grey. I suppose I'm open to any of those grey folks still. I'm still a bit bothered by Dom's two questions, as if he tried to seem contributory, but I'm willing to throw him back up in those greys because he approaches the game very differently from me and I'm just really not sure his post is alignment indicative at all. I really need to hear from him so he can explain what he was trying to accomplish with that post.Spoiler: show
Otherwise I'm also bumping LC, nutella, and SL up to slight town. Their contributions feel genuine enough to me that I want to give them more time and don't feel I really have any reason to lynch them today.
I actually misspoke about Adam, I was thinking of Nifty.Dyslexicon wrote:Can you explain your Adam read? Going to see if you've mentioned Jack earlier.gfishfunk wrote:I'm putting Dyslexicon in my strong town reads.
Llama, JoH, or Adam as my strongest scum reads...but......
I would lynch Immortal_Raven for failing to post straight up.
Overall the participation is a bit lower than I expected. But most games have their lurkers.
Yeah, that's understandable. I'm having a bit of trouble sorting people myself, probably in part due to unfamiliarity with a bunch of folks. But it's fun.S~V~S wrote:He just "feels" bad to me. But not so much that I am gonna try hard to get others to vote for him, if you see my point? At this point, Day One, all these people I am unfamiliar with, it is the only thing that stood out enough to me to vote on, and so far, nothing has surpassed it.Spoiler: show
As for gfish, he feels very civ to me, but that could be sheer volume, like you, and taking charge of the thread to some extent.
Weird, odd. Is it not imaginable to you that Nut could read players town even if they're going at each other? The alligation was weird to me.Jackofhearts2005 wrote:Weird how?Dyslexicon wrote:The post she pointed out gave me weird feels as well. I've actually considered it as possible distancing, if I'm wrong on Nut. I don't really see how it's not possible for Nut to have town reads on players going after each other.Jackofhearts2005 wrote:Explain to me what SVS pointed out. In your own words.
Lol.Epignosis wrote:Where the hell is sig when you need someone to lynch Day 1?
Sure. But if that's the case, what is Nut's reasoning? Keep in mind she has played with one of us one time only.MovingPictures07 wrote:What about it is unbelievable? Couldn't she think that it's town v. town v. town? I just don't quite get how you're coming to this conclusion.Jackofhearts2005 wrote:I didn't like Nut's answer to my questions.
You didn't like my tone cause it sounded like an interrogation. It was meant to.
I don't see how you could townread Bob, GFish and me at the same time. Too much Bob content is aimed at me. Too much Jack content is aimed at GFish. I find Nut's reads dishonest/made up.
This? It's pretty weak. Pretty vague. Doesn't talk one bit about content.nutella wrote:I already explained about Dom. Dys I just sort of auto trust and I like their participation thus far. I also get a pretty good vibe from SVS but she can be a sneaky feb. Bob and Gfish both I have mostly agreed with MP's assessments of (Bob reads like a supatown; Gfish I felt weird about a couple times with his focus on meta reads etc but like MP I've decided he's just coming from a different culture/idea of effective scumhunting/content generation.) You I get a similar feeling as in phenon but based on people's meta on you im not sure that it's alignment indicative.
Honestly I don't even know how many scum there are (well, until now, I'll check now).Dyslexicon wrote:I just realized how many scum there actually are in this game and suddenly felt worse about everything. I don't know if it's deliberate or not, don't feel it is, but you have 10 green reads and implicitly yourself, which is the exact number of town. Also wondering if you have any read on me at all?MovingPictures07 wrote:MP Rainbow #4: EoD D1
Back to a POE list now because I don't feel comfortable saying I have any real "mafia" reads. I don't feel remotely comfortable leaving my vote on Dom anymore; I'm throwing him back up into grey. I suppose I'm open to any of those grey folks still. I'm still a bit bothered by Dom's two questions, as if he tried to seem contributory, but I'm willing to throw him back up in those greys because he approaches the game very differently from me and I'm just really not sure his post is alignment indicative at all. I really need to hear from him so he can explain what he was trying to accomplish with that post.Spoiler: show
Otherwise I'm also bumping LC, nutella, and SL up to slight town. Their contributions feel genuine enough to me that I want to give them more time and don't feel I really have any reason to lynch them today.
No, the totality of his posts, a gestalt.MovingPictures07 wrote:Yeah, that's understandable. I'm having a bit of trouble sorting people myself, probably in part due to unfamiliarity with a bunch of folks. But it's fun.S~V~S wrote:He just "feels" bad to me. But not so much that I am gonna try hard to get others to vote for him, if you see my point? At this point, Day One, all these people I am unfamiliar with, it is the only thing that stood out enough to me to vote on, and so far, nothing has surpassed it.Spoiler: show
As for gfish, he feels very civ to me, but that could be sheer volume, like you, and taking charge of the thread to some extent.![]()
Is there anything in particular that stands out positively in gfish's favor that you could show me to help me sort him?
Epignosis wrote:Where the hell is sig when you need someone to lynch Day 1?
I'm not exactly rearing up to mislynch nutella again after we just did so in Currents, especially for near-identical play, so perhaps your meta expectations are off.Jackofhearts2005 wrote:Sure. But if that's the case, what is Nut's reasoning? Keep in mind she has played with one of us one time only.MovingPictures07 wrote:What about it is unbelievable? Couldn't she think that it's town v. town v. town? I just don't quite get how you're coming to this conclusion.Jackofhearts2005 wrote:I didn't like Nut's answer to my questions.
You didn't like my tone cause it sounded like an interrogation. It was meant to.
I don't see how you could townread Bob, GFish and me at the same time. Too much Bob content is aimed at me. Too much Jack content is aimed at GFish. I find Nut's reads dishonest/made up.
This? It's pretty weak. Pretty vague. Doesn't talk one bit about content.nutella wrote:I already explained about Dom. Dys I just sort of auto trust and I like their participation thus far. I also get a pretty good vibe from SVS but she can be a sneaky feb. Bob and Gfish both I have mostly agreed with MP's assessments of (Bob reads like a supatown; Gfish I felt weird about a couple times with his focus on meta reads etc but like MP I've decided he's just coming from a different culture/idea of effective scumhunting/content generation.) You I get a similar feeling as in phenon but based on people's meta on you im not sure that it's alignment indicative.
Auto trust and good vibes are also weak and vague.
This is not supatown Nut that I've seen. Tbf, maybe I'm expecting too much on Day One and her read on me ain't that strong on reread.
Didn't realize it myself until I saw how many greens you had sorted. I was basically just curious what your read on me was if any, can't myself answer to why you should or should not read me town. =)MovingPictures07 wrote:Honestly I don't even know how many scum there are (well, until now, I'll check now).
So, to answer your question, absolutely not deliberate. I've just been gradually sorting more folks and so that's coincidental.
I'm not sure what to think of you, but I'd say you're most apt to be sorted into green of any of the greys left. Why should I read you as town? I'll check out yours and JOH's ISO now in fact, but I'm still curious to hear a response to that question.
Just genuinely intrigued in your perspective; we're like yin and yang because we approach the game differently but I find your perspectives especially insightful and helpful generally for that reason.S~V~S wrote:No, the totality of his posts, a gestalt.MovingPictures07 wrote:Yeah, that's understandable. I'm having a bit of trouble sorting people myself, probably in part due to unfamiliarity with a bunch of folks. But it's fun.S~V~S wrote:He just "feels" bad to me. But not so much that I am gonna try hard to get others to vote for him, if you see my point? At this point, Day One, all these people I am unfamiliar with, it is the only thing that stood out enough to me to vote on, and so far, nothing has surpassed it.Spoiler: show
As for gfish, he feels very civ to me, but that could be sheer volume, like you, and taking charge of the thread to some extent.![]()
Is there anything in particular that stands out positively in gfish's favor that you could show me to help me sort him?
Why are you asking me these questions and no one else?
Jackofhearts2005 wrote:S~V~S wrote:
Typical Day One involves me and Bob trying to lynch someone, Silver complains about it (although he'll likely join in more after playing two Syndicate style games) and everyone else just messes around. We needed to have Day Zero awhile ago imo.
We primarily deal with inactive players via special vigilantes that only kill non posters or by Jack rage quitting.
No problem.sprityo wrote:Also MP thanks for the introduction of me, way back wherever that is, i think you did a splendid job
But... but I wasn't even done that beer.sprityo wrote:@LongCon, there's your reason btw
I don't have much- sorry. Too many new people.MovingPictures07 wrote:Epignosis wrote:Where the hell is sig when you need someone to lynch Day 1?![]()
What are your reads, good sir?
I generally have the first person to reach majority lynched in plurality voting.Dyslexicon wrote:Are we currently standing on a no lynch? Is that what happens if there is a tie? I'd want a lynch rather than no lynch.
that depends on the host. It can vary. Was it in the rules?Dyslexicon wrote:Are we currently standing on a no lynch? Is that what happens if there is a tie? I'd want a lynch rather than no lynch.
Epignosis wrote:I don't have much- sorry. Too many new people.MovingPictures07 wrote:Epignosis wrote:Where the hell is sig when you need someone to lynch Day 1?![]()
What are your reads, good sir?
As I implied, I won't be voting fishfunk. Unfortunately I have to vote now. I'll probably just vote to make sure there's no tie.
I give good blowjobs, probably.MovingPictures07 wrote:Hey JOH, let's talk. You have plenty of content but for some reason I can't sort you out. Convince me why I should town read you.
Lynch is randomized if it's tied. Haven't checked to see if there's any tie-breaking powers. I'd still prefer a firm lynch though.Dyslexicon wrote:Are we currently standing on a no lynch? Is that what happens if there is a tie? I'd want a lynch rather than no lynch.
Just gut right now, which I already established was bad.colonialbob wrote:Gfish, why llama?
Oh man...Jackofhearts2005 wrote:I give good blowjobs, probably.MovingPictures07 wrote:Hey JOH, let's talk. You have plenty of content but for some reason I can't sort you out. Convince me why I should town read you.
Jackofhearts2005 wrote:I give good blowjobs, probably.MovingPictures07 wrote:Hey JOH, let's talk. You have plenty of content but for some reason I can't sort you out. Convince me why I should town read you.