timmer wrote:Quiet is especially hard to read.
Vomps essentially just said "ture" all game and was bad. in another game, he could do the same thing and be good.
the way I look at it, a playstyle that deviates from the norm has to be weighed in terms of how much its helping the civs. Like, Vomps really didn't seem to care about anything, so feeling badness in his posts became easy after a number of days. If Vomps had been a civ role and played like that, I'd blame only him for his death, you know what i mean?
Basically, if someone is a civ and decides to be non-participatory, they are hurting their own team, so why are they here? It drives me crazy.
I have hosted Vomps, and he sends in his PMs and uses his powers even if he does not say much in the thread. So a living quietish civ who sends in his PM is better than a dead civ and a power lost to the civs. Back in the day when most civs were vanilla, what you say was a zillion percent true. Now when most civs have beneficial night powers, and Vomps uses them, I would disagree that we are better off without him, or more specifically, low participation players. If they send in their PMs (and experience tells me Vomps does), I won't lynch them for being them. Its the Wazz, or more currently, Zombies Syndrome, IMO. Although both times I hosted him he was bad (I just double checked MacGyver).
Have others hosted Vomps? What is their experience re him and sending PMs? Because if I find he also sends PMs as a civ, I won't vote for him just for "ture" becasue he seems more participtory when bad, having just hosted him as a baddie.
DFaraday wrote:Dom wrote:DFaraday wrote:RIP MP, you were the person I felt most civ about all game.
I do agree that Dom and Timmer are good to at least look at, but this was a lynch, not an NK, so I think it would be more of a leap to say that because they were gunning for MP, and now he's dead, we should start looking at them. It was a group effort that killed MP. And I'm actually leaning civ on Dom anyway (Timmer I have no clue).
DFaraday, care to share any other insights? You usually have great insights as a civvie... but not so much in this game. I'd love to hear them!
Snow Dog wrote:DFaraday wrote:RIP MP, you were the person I felt most civ about all game.
I do agree that Dom and Timmer are good to at least look at, but this was a lynch, not an NK, so I think it would be more of a leap to say that because they were gunning for MP, and now he's dead, we should start looking at them. It was a group effort that killed MP. And I'm actually leaning civ on Dom anyway (Timmer I have no clue).
Interesting. i was leaning Bad on Dom and don't know on timmer. You probably know Dom way better than I though.
Interesting fact! DFaraday and I played our first games together! We actually had BTSC. I think we do know each other pretty well.
I think you're giving me way too much credit, for starters! Beyond that, I'm still considering the possibility of SVS as Trogdor, but I'm even more inclined to think that Trogdor is either dead or a player who's completely inattentive to the role. I think tonight will be a good indicator of where things stand there, as if Trogdor is an active player, I doubt they will keep forfeiting kills just to stay hidden for long.
I do feel like MP was right, and a lot of people have brushed off whatever he had to say, but I don't necessarily see that as suspicious. I do want to reread BWT, because of vibes mainly. And I don't know everyone's playing style here, but I suspect a few quieter players may simply be trying to blend in. DP, at least, I know always acts this way, but I wonder about some of the people I've never played with, who seem a bit nondescript.
How very blendy and nondescript of you
You're always a tad blendy Faraday, good or bad, but nondescript would be a good way to describe your game this round, and that is NOT something I associate with you.
is all. I hope that clarifies things a bit.
