Pokemon Mafia [ENDGAME]

[Dragon D. Luffy]

Oh wow. Good job, Sprit voters!

This is the first time DF mentions spirit in the game.

[Dragon D. Luffy]

Okay, so people are still being bullheaded, so I'll just dump it. DF took his best shot and failed now anyways (suck it), so I'll make it as clear as I can:

At the time Eloh was lynched, there were two possibilities. She had a type of role (almost definitely civ, occasionally indie) that she loves, and often has in Epi games, or Tink has it and had targeted Eloh early on. I believe anyone who has played with Eloh in such a game where she had a role like that would know what was going on. I am certain DF fits the bill there. And he voted for her. He's bad. He voted for her and risked that 1) because it was a reasonable risk, lots of people wouldn't know this I imagine, 2) people who do know it don't like to bring up this style of meta-ness, 3) people who do know it are people who he wanted to NK anyways, so he got rid of them.

La was also part of that tink/Eloh group of people tink targeted. My best guess is, given the numbers, she had 1 other use and that person is already dead. Probably NKed early on. I think the reason tink has gone mia is a lack of interest given people she trusted are all dead. And maybe another possibility, but that's not important.

Anyways, la wanted to lynch DF because she knew it. I've picked it up.

As for teammates. Wilgy and quin are my top two choices. But I still want to lynch DF first, because I'm confident about him.

You honor your avatar, sir.

I feel like I've become obsolete with him around.

Don't lose your fire. You are the new generation. Old ones like him come every now and then to inspire us and show what we can still achieve, but they leave again so we can keep carrying the torch.

[Quin]

Oh wow. Good job, Sprit voters!

This is the first time DF mentions spirit in the game.

i had a mysterious muscle spasm just now and voted for dfaraday by accident

[Dragon D. Luffy]

I think I'm gonna vote DF for that, for the fact I'm having a hard time reading his intentons (which scares me), and because I'm curious. Also because I want Boo to shut up about him.

votes DF

[Quin]

It reads way OTT. I strongly believe exclamation marks are among the most disingenuous of punctuations.

It's also a pretty classic example of feeling the need to say something.

[Quin]

I'm not fine with putting such a strategy together based solely on one person's preferences. If Jack wants a list, let's all submit five or six names and select the ones that appear the most. If the plan can indeed thumb the scale in our favor, then it's too important to be nonchalant about picking names.

I agree. I don't even know some of the people on Jack's list. Although I'm really not crazy about this plan, since there's every chance we could end up empowering one or more baddies, who then will immediately take out their fellow power roles. Furthermore, if Mew/Mewtwo are part of the Oceanic Six, we'll spend the game funneling points into a black hole.

I think it might be more effective to allot points this round to a group of six, as suggested, then rotate on future rounds so that other players can get powers. Granted, this strategy pretty much ensures giving Mafia powers, but it would also keep an array of civvie powers in play even if Mafia start NKing power roles.

Here was DF's stance on the allocation of evo points. He's of the opinion that giving the baddies powers is a necessary evil.

[Dragon D. Luffy]

Boo's theory is nuts, but if DF is bad he gets kudos for making me interested in looking for actual evidence.

[Dragon D. Luffy]

(if he isn't I'll just quietly hide in the dark and curse the world for being so cruel)

[Dragon D. Luffy]

(I'm kind of sounding arrogant here but I'm just really amazed no one has noticed this post from DF before)

[Quin]

RIP. Chrome ate my post. Time to retype.

Right now, I have tonal pings from both DDL and Boo though I'm unsure the direct cause. I don't think Boo is on a team with Hazelnut. I want to see where the Boo suspicion goes and see thier thoughts on having the vote lead.

I'd say put both DF and Timmer on the chopping block again for their shitty votes last cycle. Timmer's vote now has high momentum. He and Boo are probably not on a team.

Anyone wanna tie Mac and Dom, and have them fight to the death as they aren't here lol? Also now that I have some hindsight, it kinda sucks that TSP died right as he entered the game. Probably should have saved him rgardless of the alignment. Oh well, wasn't here.

Sorry, you've made me one of your top suspects because I voted for a (at the time) no-show, then in the same post propose trying to get the other no-shows out?

I'm of the belief that when it comes to voting for someone I have no suspicion of and someone who is contributing nothing to the game, voting the latter is the better option. On Day 1 I didn't have any suspicions, so I would be forcing any reason I had to vote someone.

I'm not liking Boo's Timmer vote. It feels NO U-y, and doesn't make sense coming right after his campaign against LC and Nutella. I'll go ahead and vote Boo for now.

I would be fine with voting Tink or Dom, as they haven't contributed as of yet. If Dys doesn't offer something again soon, I'd say get her out as well. Eloh at least has, although I think it's bizarre that she keeps insisting that Tink is good, when I don't see how she could know that so early in the game.

DFaraday would rather vote a no-show over someone he doesn't suspect. That's fine, but it should also mean that he'd rather vote someone he suspects over a no show. Yet here he is on Day 3 supporting lynches for no-shows when he's got a suspect in boo. He voted him yesterday. Now he's not a consideration. Why?

[DFaraday]

RIP. Chrome ate my post. Time to retype.

Right now, I have tonal pings from both DDL and Boo though I'm unsure the direct cause. I don't think Boo is on a team with Hazelnut. I want to see where the Boo suspicion goes and see thier thoughts on having the vote lead.

I'd say put both DF and Timmer on the chopping block again for their shitty votes last cycle. Timmer's vote now has high momentum. He and Boo are probably not on a team.

Anyone wanna tie Mac and Dom, and have them fight to the death as they aren't here lol? Also now that I have some hindsight, it kinda sucks that TSP died right as he entered the game. Probably should have saved him rgardless of the alignment. Oh well, wasn't here.

Sorry, you've made me one of your top suspects because I voted for a (at the time) no-show, then in the same post propose trying to get the other no-shows out?

I'm of the belief that when it comes to voting for someone I have no suspicion of and someone who is contributing nothing to the game, voting the latter is the better option. On Day 1 I didn't have any suspicions, so I would be forcing any reason I had to vote someone.

I'm not liking Boo's Timmer vote. It feels NO U-y, and doesn't make sense coming right after his campaign against LC and Nutella. I'll go ahead and vote Boo for now.

I would be fine with voting Tink or Dom, as they haven't contributed as of yet. If Dys doesn't offer something again soon, I'd say get her out as well. Eloh at least has, although I think it's bizarre that she keeps insisting that Tink is good, when I don't see how she could know that so early in the game.

DFaraday would rather vote a no-show over someone he doesn't suspect. That's fine, but it should also mean that he'd rather vote someone he suspects over a no show. Yet here he is on Day 3 supporting lynches for no-shows when he's got a suspect in boo. He voted him yesterday. Now he's not a consideration. Why?

Because I'm not consistent? Most people aren't.

I know Boo can't go into do much detail for fear of role outing and such, but I really don't know what exactly it is he thinks I know. Since Eloh was confident of Tink from Day 1, I figured her being bad was the most likely way she'd know a civ alignment.

I was going to vote Boo for leading a lynch on me, then realized I still have a potential chance, so I'm sticking with Wilgy.

[DFaraday]

RIP. Chrome ate my post. Time to retype.

Right now, I have tonal pings from both DDL and Boo though I'm unsure the direct cause. I don't think Boo is on a team with Hazelnut. I want to see where the Boo suspicion goes and see thier thoughts on having the vote lead.

I'd say put both DF and Timmer on the chopping block again for their shitty votes last cycle. Timmer's vote now has high momentum. He and Boo are probably not on a team.

Anyone wanna tie Mac and Dom, and have them fight to the death as they aren't here lol? Also now that I have some hindsight, it kinda sucks that TSP died right as he entered the game. Probably should have saved him rgardless of the alignment. Oh well, wasn't here.

Sorry, you've made me one of your top suspects because I voted for a (at the time) no-show, then in the same post propose trying to get the other no-shows out?

I'm of the belief that when it comes to voting for someone I have no suspicion of and someone who is contributing nothing to the game, voting the latter is the better option. On Day 1 I didn't have any suspicions, so I would be forcing any reason I had to vote someone.

I'm not liking Boo's Timmer vote. It feels NO U-y, and doesn't make sense coming right after his campaign against LC and Nutella. I'll go ahead and vote Boo for now.

I would be fine with voting Tink or Dom, as they haven't contributed as of yet. If Dys doesn't offer something again soon, I'd say get her out as well. Eloh at least has, although I think it's bizarre that she keeps insisting that Tink is good, when I don't see how she could know that so early in the game.

DFaraday would rather vote a no-show over someone he doesn't suspect. That's fine, but it should also mean that he'd rather vote someone he suspects over a no show. Yet here he is on Day 3 supporting lynches for no-shows when he's got a suspect in boo. He voted him yesterday. Now he's not a consideration. Why?

Also, your logic doesn't quite track. I might be okay with lynching no-shows over people I do suspect, especially when my suspects aren't likely to be up for lynching again.

[Quin]

RIP. Chrome ate my post. Time to retype.

Right now, I have tonal pings from both DDL and Boo though I'm unsure the direct cause. I don't think Boo is on a team with Hazelnut. I want to see where the Boo suspicion goes and see thier thoughts on having the vote lead.

I'd say put both DF and Timmer on the chopping block again for their shitty votes last cycle. Timmer's vote now has high momentum. He and Boo are probably not on a team.

Anyone wanna tie Mac and Dom, and have them fight to the death as they aren't here lol? Also now that I have some hindsight, it kinda sucks that TSP died right as he entered the game. Probably should have saved him rgardless of the alignment. Oh well, wasn't here.

Sorry, you've made me one of your top suspects because I voted for a (at the time) no-show, then in the same post propose trying to get the other no-shows out?

I'm of the belief that when it comes to voting for someone I have no suspicion of and someone who is contributing nothing to the game, voting the latter is the better option. On Day 1 I didn't have any suspicions, so I would be forcing any reason I had to vote someone.

I'm not liking Boo's Timmer vote. It feels NO U-y, and doesn't make sense coming right after his campaign against LC and Nutella. I'll go ahead and vote Boo for now.

I would be fine with voting Tink or Dom, as they haven't contributed as of yet. If Dys doesn't offer something again soon, I'd say get her out as well. Eloh at least has, although I think it's bizarre that she keeps insisting that Tink is good, when I don't see how she could know that so early in the game.

DFaraday would rather vote a no-show over someone he doesn't suspect. That's fine, but it should also mean that he'd rather vote someone he suspects over a no show. Yet here he is on Day 3 supporting lynches for no-shows when he's got a suspect in boo. He voted him yesterday. Now he's not a consideration. Why?

Because I'm not consistent? Most people aren't.

I know Boo can't go into do much detail for fear of role outing and such, but I really don't know what exactly it is he thinks I know. Since Eloh was confident of Tink from Day 1, I figured her being bad was the most likely way she'd know a civ alignment.

I was going to vote Boo for leading a lynch on me, then realized I still have a potential chance, so I'm sticking with Wilgy.

But what happened that moved boo from earning your vote to entertaining no-posters as an option again?

[DFaraday]

I think I'm gonna vote DF for that, for the fact I'm having a hard time reading his intentons (which scares me), and because I'm curious. Also because I want Boo to shut up about him.

votes DF

That's what I aim for in every game. I don't like leaving meta traces.

[Quin]

RIP. Chrome ate my post. Time to retype.

Right now, I have tonal pings from both DDL and Boo though I'm unsure the direct cause. I don't think Boo is on a team with Hazelnut. I want to see where the Boo suspicion goes and see thier thoughts on having the vote lead.

I'd say put both DF and Timmer on the chopping block again for their shitty votes last cycle. Timmer's vote now has high momentum. He and Boo are probably not on a team.

Anyone wanna tie Mac and Dom, and have them fight to the death as they aren't here lol? Also now that I have some hindsight, it kinda sucks that TSP died right as he entered the game. Probably should have saved him rgardless of the alignment. Oh well, wasn't here.

Sorry, you've made me one of your top suspects because I voted for a (at the time) no-show, then in the same post propose trying to get the other no-shows out?

I'm of the belief that when it comes to voting for someone I have no suspicion of and someone who is contributing nothing to the game, voting the latter is the better option. On Day 1 I didn't have any suspicions, so I would be forcing any reason I had to vote someone.

I'm not liking Boo's Timmer vote. It feels NO U-y, and doesn't make sense coming right after his campaign against LC and Nutella. I'll go ahead and vote Boo for now.

I would be fine with voting Tink or Dom, as they haven't contributed as of yet. If Dys doesn't offer something again soon, I'd say get her out as well. Eloh at least has, although I think it's bizarre that she keeps insisting that Tink is good, when I don't see how she could know that so early in the game.

DFaraday would rather vote a no-show over someone he doesn't suspect. That's fine, but it should also mean that he'd rather vote someone he suspects over a no show. Yet here he is on Day 3 supporting lynches for no-shows when he's got a suspect in boo. He voted him yesterday. Now he's not a consideration. Why?

Also, your logic doesn't quite track. I might be okay with lynching no-shows over people I do suspect, especially when my suspects aren't likely to be up for lynching again.

This is a matter of mindset, I think. I can at least appreciate how you tackle lynches. I'm just not bound by those shackles.

[DFaraday]

RIP. Chrome ate my post. Time to retype.

Right now, I have tonal pings from both DDL and Boo though I'm unsure the direct cause. I don't think Boo is on a team with Hazelnut. I want to see where the Boo suspicion goes and see thier thoughts on having the vote lead.

I'd say put both DF and Timmer on the chopping block again for their shitty votes last cycle. Timmer's vote now has high momentum. He and Boo are probably not on a team.

Anyone wanna tie Mac and Dom, and have them fight to the death as they aren't here lol? Also now that I have some hindsight, it kinda sucks that TSP died right as he entered the game. Probably should have saved him rgardless of the alignment. Oh well, wasn't here.

Sorry, you've made me one of your top suspects because I voted for a (at the time) no-show, then in the same post propose trying to get the other no-shows out?

I'm of the belief that when it comes to voting for someone I have no suspicion of and someone who is contributing nothing to the game, voting the latter is the better option. On Day 1 I didn't have any suspicions, so I would be forcing any reason I had to vote someone.

I'm not liking Boo's Timmer vote. It feels NO U-y, and doesn't make sense coming right after his campaign against LC and Nutella. I'll go ahead and vote Boo for now.

I would be fine with voting Tink or Dom, as they haven't contributed as of yet. If Dys doesn't offer something again soon, I'd say get her out as well. Eloh at least has, although I think it's bizarre that she keeps insisting that Tink is good, when I don't see how she could know that so early in the game.

DFaraday would rather vote a no-show over someone he doesn't suspect. That's fine, but it should also mean that he'd rather vote someone he suspects over a no show. Yet here he is on Day 3 supporting lynches for no-shows when he's got a suspect in boo. He voted him yesterday. Now he's not a consideration. Why?

Because I'm not consistent? Most people aren't.

I know Boo can't go into do much detail for fear of role outing and such, but I really don't know what exactly it is he thinks I know. Since Eloh was confident of Tink from Day 1, I figured her being bad was the most likely way she'd know a civ alignment.

I was going to vote Boo for leading a lynch on me, then realized I still have a potential chance, so I'm sticking with Wilgy.

But what happened that moved boo from earning your vote to entertaining no-posters as an option again?

His Day 3 posts felt pretty sincere and tracked with what he'd said previously. I thought he jumped from his LC suspicion onto Timmer too easily, which made me suspect him, but he explained where he was at after that lynch and it made me feel a bit better about him. Lately he's really got me convinced he's civ, even though he's going after me.

[Quin]

RIP. Chrome ate my post. Time to retype.

Right now, I have tonal pings from both DDL and Boo though I'm unsure the direct cause. I don't think Boo is on a team with Hazelnut. I want to see where the Boo suspicion goes and see thier thoughts on having the vote lead.

I'd say put both DF and Timmer on the chopping block again for their shitty votes last cycle. Timmer's vote now has high momentum. He and Boo are probably not on a team.

Anyone wanna tie Mac and Dom, and have them fight to the death as they aren't here lol? Also now that I have some hindsight, it kinda sucks that TSP died right as he entered the game. Probably should have saved him rgardless of the alignment. Oh well, wasn't here.

Sorry, you've made me one of your top suspects because I voted for a (at the time) no-show, then in the same post propose trying to get the other no-shows out?

I'm of the belief that when it comes to voting for someone I have no suspicion of and someone who is contributing nothing to the game, voting the latter is the better option. On Day 1 I didn't have any suspicions, so I would be forcing any reason I had to vote someone.

I'm not liking Boo's Timmer vote. It feels NO U-y, and doesn't make sense coming right after his campaign against LC and Nutella. I'll go ahead and vote Boo for now.

I would be fine with voting Tink or Dom, as they haven't contributed as of yet. If Dys doesn't offer something again soon, I'd say get her out as well. Eloh at least has, although I think it's bizarre that she keeps insisting that Tink is good, when I don't see how she could know that so early in the game.

DFaraday would rather vote a no-show over someone he doesn't suspect. That's fine, but it should also mean that he'd rather vote someone he suspects over a no show. Yet here he is on Day 3 supporting lynches for no-shows when he's got a suspect in boo. He voted him yesterday. Now he's not a consideration. Why?

Because I'm not consistent? Most people aren't.

I know Boo can't go into do much detail for fear of role outing and such, but I really don't know what exactly it is he thinks I know. Since Eloh was confident of Tink from Day 1, I figured her being bad was the most likely way she'd know a civ alignment.

I was going to vote Boo for leading a lynch on me, then realized I still have a potential chance, so I'm sticking with Wilgy.

But what happened that moved boo from earning your vote to entertaining no-posters as an option again?

His Day 3 posts felt pretty sincere and tracked with what he'd said previously. I thought he jumped from his LC suspicion onto Timmer too easily, which made me suspect him, but he explained where he was at after that lynch and it made me feel a bit better about him. Lately he's really got me convinced he's civ, even though he's going after me.

But you just said you were thinking of voting boo for leading a lynch on you

[DFaraday]

RIP. Chrome ate my post. Time to retype.

Right now, I have tonal pings from both DDL and Boo though I'm unsure the direct cause. I don't think Boo is on a team with Hazelnut. I want to see where the Boo suspicion goes and see thier thoughts on having the vote lead.

I'd say put both DF and Timmer on the chopping block again for their shitty votes last cycle. Timmer's vote now has high momentum. He and Boo are probably not on a team.

Anyone wanna tie Mac and Dom, and have them fight to the death as they aren't here lol? Also now that I have some hindsight, it kinda sucks that TSP died right as he entered the game. Probably should have saved him rgardless of the alignment. Oh well, wasn't here.

Sorry, you've made me one of your top suspects because I voted for a (at the time) no-show, then in the same post propose trying to get the other no-shows out?

I'm of the belief that when it comes to voting for someone I have no suspicion of and someone who is contributing nothing to the game, voting the latter is the better option. On Day 1 I didn't have any suspicions, so I would be forcing any reason I had to vote someone.

I'm not liking Boo's Timmer vote. It feels NO U-y, and doesn't make sense coming right after his campaign against LC and Nutella. I'll go ahead and vote Boo for now.

I would be fine with voting Tink or Dom, as they haven't contributed as of yet. If Dys doesn't offer something again soon, I'd say get her out as well. Eloh at least has, although I think it's bizarre that she keeps insisting that Tink is good, when I don't see how she could know that so early in the game.

DFaraday would rather vote a no-show over someone he doesn't suspect. That's fine, but it should also mean that he'd rather vote someone he suspects over a no show. Yet here he is on Day 3 supporting lynches for no-shows when he's got a suspect in boo. He voted him yesterday. Now he's not a consideration. Why?

Because I'm not consistent? Most people aren't.

I know Boo can't go into do much detail for fear of role outing and such, but I really don't know what exactly it is he thinks I know. Since Eloh was confident of Tink from Day 1, I figured her being bad was the most likely way she'd know a civ alignment.

I was going to vote Boo for leading a lynch on me, then realized I still have a potential chance, so I'm sticking with Wilgy.

But what happened that moved boo from earning your vote to entertaining no-posters as an option again?

His Day 3 posts felt pretty sincere and tracked with what he'd said previously. I thought he jumped from his LC suspicion onto Timmer too easily, which made me suspect him, but he explained where he was at after that lynch and it made me feel a bit better about him. Lately he's really got me convinced he's civ, even though he's going after me.

But you just said you were thinking of voting boo for leading a lynch on you

I don't suspect him, I just thought my lynch was a done deal and would give a throwaway vote. Then I realized that the numbers could still swing my way, and voted someone I actually suspect.

[DFaraday]

Also, I hate to say it, but if people are insistent on trying to lynch me, I really need to let you know that you're wasting your time. It won't be a good civ outcome if I'm up for lynching.

[Quin]

Sorry, you've made me one of your top suspects because I voted for a (at the time) no-show, then in the same post propose trying to get the other no-shows out?

I'm of the belief that when it comes to voting for someone I have no suspicion of and someone who is contributing nothing to the game, voting the latter is the better option. On Day 1 I didn't have any suspicions, so I would be forcing any reason I had to vote someone.

I'm not liking Boo's Timmer vote. It feels NO U-y, and doesn't make sense coming right after his campaign against LC and Nutella. I'll go ahead and vote Boo for now.

I would be fine with voting Tink or Dom, as they haven't contributed as of yet. If Dys doesn't offer something again soon, I'd say get her out as well. Eloh at least has, although I think it's bizarre that she keeps insisting that Tink is good, when I don't see how she could know that so early in the game.

DFaraday would rather vote a no-show over someone he doesn't suspect. That's fine, but it should also mean that he'd rather vote someone he suspects over a no show. Yet here he is on Day 3 supporting lynches for no-shows when he's got a suspect in boo. He voted him yesterday. Now he's not a consideration. Why?

Because I'm not consistent? Most people aren't.

I know Boo can't go into do much detail for fear of role outing and such, but I really don't know what exactly it is he thinks I know. Since Eloh was confident of Tink from Day 1, I figured her being bad was the most likely way she'd know a civ alignment.

I was going to vote Boo for leading a lynch on me, then realized I still have a potential chance, so I'm sticking with Wilgy.

But what happened that moved boo from earning your vote to entertaining no-posters as an option again?

His Day 3 posts felt pretty sincere and tracked with what he'd said previously. I thought he jumped from his LC suspicion onto Timmer too easily, which made me suspect him, but he explained where he was at after that lynch and it made me feel a bit better about him. Lately he's really got me convinced he's civ, even though he's going after me.

But you just said you were thinking of voting boo for leading a lynch on you

I don't suspect him, I just thought my lynch was a done deal and would give a throwaway vote. Then I realized that the numbers could still swing my way, and voted someone I actually suspect.

Why would you not at least put a throwaway on someone you suspect? I am aware you did that in the end with Wilgy, but that vote wasn't a throwaway. The purpose of it being a throwaway specifically is important to me.

[DrWilgy]

Linki: I'm beginning to get weirded out by Wilgy's game-long desire to eliminate inactives. It's almost nakedly opportunistic, which provides WIFOM.

Tell me, what do you see as the worst case scenario in a game G-Man?

Okay, so people are still being bullheaded, so I'll just dump it. DF took his best shot and failed now anyways (suck it), so I'll make it as clear as I can:

At the time Eloh was lynched, there were two possibilities. She had a type of role (almost definitely civ, occasionally indie) that she loves, and often has in Epi games, or Tink has it and had targeted Eloh early on. I believe anyone who has played with Eloh in such a game where she had a role like that would know what was going on. I am certain DF fits the bill there. And he voted for her. He's bad. He voted for her and risked that 1) because it was a reasonable risk, lots of people wouldn't know this I imagine, 2) people who do know it don't like to bring up this style of meta-ness, 3) people who do know it are people who he wanted to NK anyways, so he got rid of them.

La was also part of that tink/Eloh group of people tink targeted. My best guess is, given the numbers, she had 1 other use and that person is already dead. Probably NKed early on. I think the reason tink has gone mia is a lack of interest given people she trusted are all dead. And maybe another possibility, but that's not important.

Anyways, la wanted to lynch DF because she knew it. I've picked it up.

As for teammates. Wilgy and quin are my top two choices. But I still want to lynch DF first, because I'm confident about him.

What? I'm missing something here.
1) How did we know this about Eloh? Regarding her/Tink having a role they loved?
2) Tink targeted Eloh and Nutella?
3) Didn't Nutella find DF suspect for Sprityo interactions?

DF has been a quiet neutral in my head, but that's how he always is when civ or 3rd party. When Nutella pointed at DF

Oh wow. Good job, Sprit voters!

This is the first time DF mentions spirit in the game.

This does spike my curiosity.

I'm going to have to go through this mess and fully reread DF now.

[DFaraday]

DFaraday would rather vote a no-show over someone he doesn't suspect. That's fine, but it should also mean that he'd rather vote someone he suspects over a no show. Yet here he is on Day 3 supporting lynches for no-shows when he's got a suspect in boo. He voted him yesterday. Now he's not a consideration. Why?

Because I'm not consistent? Most people aren't.

I know Boo can't go into do much detail for fear of role outing and such, but I really don't know what exactly it is he thinks I know. Since Eloh was confident of Tink from Day 1, I figured her being bad was the most likely way she'd know a civ alignment.

I was going to vote Boo for leading a lynch on me, then realized I still have a potential chance, so I'm sticking with Wilgy.

But what happened that moved boo from earning your vote to entertaining no-posters as an option again?

His Day 3 posts felt pretty sincere and tracked with what he'd said previously. I thought he jumped from his LC suspicion onto Timmer too easily, which made me suspect him, but he explained where he was at after that lynch and it made me feel a bit better about him. Lately he's really got me convinced he's civ, even though he's going after me.

But you just said you were thinking of voting boo for leading a lynch on you

I don't suspect him, I just thought my lynch was a done deal and would give a throwaway vote. Then I realized that the numbers could still swing my way, and voted someone I actually suspect.

Why would you not at least put a throwaway on someone you suspect? I am aware you did that in the end with Wilgy, but that vote wasn't a throwaway. The purpose of it being a throwaway specifically is important to me.

Because I was thinking at that point that it was a done deal if nobody changed their votes, and that it wouldn't matter where I voted. I voted with purpose when I saw that I had a chance.

[DrWilgy]

Just skimmed through DF, and DDL is right regarding him never interacting with Sprityo.

Is this a slip?

We've been getting kills every night up until now though. I guess Tink could have been sending kills up to this point, but it doesn't seem likely to me.

[DFaraday]

Just skimmed through DF, and DDL is right regarding him never interacting with Sprityo.

Is this a slip?

We've been getting kills every night up until now though. I guess Tink could have been sending kills up to this point, but it doesn't seem likely to me.

If I were bad, wouldn't I say "we've been sending kills"?

Seriously, don't lynch me.

[DrWilgy]

Guess it doesn't matter, Polls over.

Why do we wait until the last 2 hours to actually discuss?

[Epignosis]

This is very boring.

No one has been lynched.

It is now Night 6.

[Quin]

spooky

[MacDougall]

I think most likely scenario is a miss. Possibly whoever is Mew has a protection ability of some kind.

It could be a miss, but everyone but Tink and Dizzy were around Night 6, so it's unlikely. Correct me if I'm wrong, but Tink and Dizzy can't both be bad if this is the case, because they've both been gone for ages and night kills kept coming in after sprityo died. If it's a miss then someone posted but forgot to send in their night action.

It's very likely not an intentional miss to make us look at absentees, because again, everyone (bar the two) were here.

I meant they took a shot and missed buddy.

[MacDougall]

I think it was Nutella's overreaction to Boo's misinterpretation that conflated their spat and made Boo an easy target. Neither one wanted to back down, so it just got worse for both of them. Boo was taking it too far, which is why he drew the vote fire.

G-Man if you are Mafia I will eat a hat. Full credit to you if you are.

[MacDougall]

It reads way OTT. I strongly believe exclamation marks are among the most disingenuous of punctuations.

It's also a pretty classic example of feeling the need to say something.

Something about that post seems civvie to me. I think I rate DFaraday enough to think that he would be smart enough to not make that post if he were Mafia. I hate it when people say this but it's too pingy to be a real ping?

[DrWilgy]

Just skimmed through DF, and DDL is right regarding him never interacting with Sprityo.

Is this a slip?

We've been getting kills every night up until now though. I guess Tink could have been sending kills up to this point, but it doesn't seem likely to me.

If I were bad, wouldn't I say "we've been sending kills"?

Seriously, don't lynch me.

The only difference between sending and getting is result or achievement.

Dizzy said we'd have something. Dizzy where are you at?

Boo, please respond to my previous question for you and answer this, what is your suspicion of me based on? I saw that I was someone else you'd like to lynch.

[Dragon D. Luffy]

Guys

Vote me plz

[boo]

It's based on stuff. And some things. If I was gunning for you yet, you'd know why. Till then, I'll hold onto it.

I've said my piece on what I have to say about Eloh and tink and la and why it all comes together for why DF needs to go.

His survival hasn't changed my mind, I would like to try again. A fully evolved baddie surviving a lynch wouldn't surprise me at all.

[Dragon D. Luffy]

Imo someone surviving a lynch just makes them more likely bad.

Unless it's a civ role that passively tanks a lynch, which is possible but pretty op.

Or we have a civ governor who made a terrible decision.

[DrWilgy]

It's based on stuff. And some things. If I was gunning for you yet, you'd know why. Till then, I'll hold onto it.

I've said my piece on what I have to say about Eloh and tink and la and why it all comes together for why DF needs to go.

His survival hasn't changed my mind, I would like to try again. A fully evolved baddie surviving a lynch wouldn't surprise me at all.

Why though? The only reason I'd see for holding information would be if there were too many variables.

But why? It seems that you are working soley on . Is the a specific Hazlenut post that you can point out to me?

I agree with bolded.

[DrWilgy]

Guys

Vote me plz

Y tho?

Or we have a civ governor who made a terrible decision.

Explain.

[boo]

He knew he was going to survive, it wasn't a pardon.

[Neverwhere]

Yeah the fact the Faraday survived makes me want to lynch him again.

[DrWilgy]

He knew he was going to survive, it wasn't a pardon.

Also, I hate to say it, but if people are insistent on trying to lynch me, I really need to let you know that you're wasting your time. It won't be a good civ outcome if I'm up for lynching.

Boo is right, DF knew this was going to happen.

[Dragon D. Luffy]

Guys

Vote me plz

Y tho?

Or we have a civ governor who made a terrible decision.

Explain.

Because I want to evolve.

Because we learned nothing and gave mafia an extra night kill.

[Dragon D. Luffy]

Well it does look like DF wasn't defending himself that hard.

[DrWilgy]

Guys

Vote me plz

Y tho?

Or we have a civ governor who made a terrible decision.

Explain.

Because I want to evolve.

Because we learned nothing and gave mafia an extra night kill.

Answers are always so short and sweet with you DDL.

[Dragon D. Luffy]

I believe in being practical.

[Neverwhere]

So I am not familiar with a lot of mafia yet. What could have happened that Faraday was saved last night?

Would this be indicative of him being civ or him being mafia and having the ability to save himself? Or him being mafia and a team member being able to save him?

[Quin]

It is also possible that DFaraday is either town or Mewtwo and also absorbed the night kill last night.

[Quin]

Neverwhere, you voted DF yesterday without so much as a post during the day. Why?

[Neverwhere]

Reading back over my own posts, I'm inclined to side with boo and say I'd be interested in a DFaraday lynch. I remember reading back through Sprityos posts Mac and DFaraday stood out as people sprit was possibly defensive of.

Sorry I had class till late yesterday and then woke up at 2.30 am and thought fuck I didn't vote.

Don't tell me I'm not commited. I got up in the middle of the night purely to vote and go back to sleep. lol

But yeah, my quoted post. Mainly this. I don't really have a whole lot to go on with anyone in this game. I have a feeling it has a lot to do with lower post counts.

[Neverwhere]

Actually, Faraday being the independent would make a lot of sense in this situation. If he is in fact not mafia, I think someone is playing a really good fucking game. I need to re read everyone.

[DrWilgy]

It is also possible that DFaraday is either town or Mewtwo and also absorbed the night kill last night.

Is he immortal in your head Quin?

[Neverwhere]

It is also possible that DFaraday is either town or Mewtwo and also absorbed the night kill last night.

Is he immortal in your head Quin?

Why poking fun?