
You can see why no one wanted to ally with you

Vomps really is a barrel full of monkeys.
Moderator: Community Team
That suspiciously sounds like something a DH Drone would say.Mongoose wrote:Hey, Mongoose ain't nobody's drone, okay. I produce plenty of my own honey, thanks.![]()
You can see why no one wanted to ally with you
Vomps really is a barrel full of monkeys.
Vompatti wrote:By the way, I'm not a drone.
Also, Matt F specifically asked me whom to use his NK on, so I obviously told him to use it on Snowy.
I wouldn't have minded a giggle club, if you know what I mean.Matt F wrote:Da Goose and Vomps. The two players I wanted to make a giggle club with.
It could've been legendary. And full of giggles.Vompatti wrote:I wouldn't have minded a giggle club, if you know what I mean.Matt F wrote:Da Goose and Vomps. The two players I wanted to make a giggle club with.
The red part there is a link. To a picture of Elo asking Lizzy to vote DH and saying she can get a bandwagon against him. This despite having done her best to convince us she was on our side.Bullzeye wrote:Voting Elo. Not sure who my other vote will be yet.
This is true. I am truly astonished by her backstabbing. She had me convinced she was on our side.Bullzeye wrote:The red part there is a link. To a picture of Elo asking Lizzy to vote DH and saying she can get a bandwagon against him. This despite having done her best to convince us she was on our side.Bullzeye wrote:Voting Elo. Not sure who my other vote will be yet.
Vomps is just being logical Snowy. Who are the biggest single threats to all our survival? You and Matt with Nks, so naturally he'd suggest for you to try and take each other out. It wasn't personal I'd guess.Snow Dog wrote:Vompatti wrote:By the way, I'm not a drone.
Also, Matt F specifically asked me whom to use his NK on, so I obviously told him to use it on Snowy.
Turnip Head wrote: We need to lynch Pennsylvania Bitch.
I traded my Nk. I don't have it any more. Not for a while. I would have killed MP if I'd had it.Hedgeowl wrote:Vomps is just being logical Snowy. Who are the biggest single threats to all our survival? You and Matt with Nks, so naturally he'd suggest for you to try and take each other out. It wasn't personal I'd guess.Snow Dog wrote:Vompatti wrote:By the way, I'm not a drone.
Also, Matt F specifically asked me whom to use his NK on, so I obviously told him to use it on Snowy.
I guess I agree that at this point Bullz/Dh have played the slimiest game and therefore should win for being willing to go all out and post PMs and Btsc chatter in thread. That for me actually feels like it crossed a line. Of course there are double-crossings in this game, thats the point. But how its come about and the way Bullz/DH play the "poor us" card is just an act and they know it.
We all know Bullz/DH and Snow/AP will have to turn on each other to finish the game, some of us were just willing to admit it earlier is all.
Really voting for me? As this huge threat now that you took out my teammate? At least my continuing to vote for DH would actually break-up another team. Epi is also on my list now for sharing btsc and I assume Lizzy/vomps as well for sharing PMs.
Since it seems I one of the last voters, it doesnt matter, but Im going to think on for a bit.
DH and I got a PM showing that Elo had been double-crossing us. AGAIN. After we trusted her the first time. So I posted it in the thread as the reason for my vote, so that there could be no doubt as to who had screwed who. The stuff we were sent about your alliance with MP and everyone we posted to show that MP was no better than his claims about us, and to prove that we weren't the only ones making alliances.Hedgeowl wrote: I guess I agree that at this point Bullz/Dh have played the slimiest game and therefore should win for being willing to go all out and post PMs and Btsc chatter in thread. That for me actually feels like it crossed a line. Of course there are double-crossings in this game, thats the point. But how its come about and the way Bullz/DH play the "poor us" card is just an act and they know it.
It's hardly a conversation. It's one PM. Anyone else would do the same thing. If I know someone has tried to go against me I'm going to act on that and if I have proof I'm going to show it. If anyone with a kill has a problem with that they know what they can do. If INH has a problem he can modkill me for it.Matt F wrote:But Snowdog, the only reason I didn't want to target you was because I thought you had a NK.
Really gotta rethink my options tonight.
Elo, PM me when you get online. Figure out who you want to target personally, and we'll go from there.
Linki - Ugh, yeah, it's one thing to tell all, but quite another to show private conversations. Icky. Tsk tsk, Bullz.
I disagree. In this game we are specifically allowed to.Matt F wrote:But Snowdog, the only reason I didn't want to target you was because I thought you had a NK.
Really gotta rethink my options tonight.
Elo, PM me when you get online. Figure out who you want to target personally, and we'll go from there.
Linki - Ugh, yeah, it's one thing to tell all, but quite another to show private conversations. Icky. Tsk tsk, Bullz.
Why the hell shouldn't he?Matt F wrote:When you wear the winners banner, Bullz, will you feel proud of your actions here today?
It's a game dude. I've done nothing wrong. Besides, I've won two games here already and do you see those banners in my sig somewhere?Matt F wrote:When you wear the winners banner, Bullz, will you feel proud of your actions here today?
You find banners in sigs a little gauche?Bullzeye wrote:It's a game dude. I've done nothing wrong. Besides, I've won two games here already and do you see those banners in my sig somewhere?Matt F wrote:When you wear the winners banner, Bullz, will you feel proud of your actions here today?
Of course I was part of an alliance with MP. He was my teammate! And Bullz you are a super smart veteran player in this game and have been a double-agent for civ/baddies before. What did you think when as MP's teammate, I didnt join the alliance of 8?Bullzeye wrote:DH and I got a PM showing that Elo had been double-crossing us. AGAIN. After we trusted her the first time. So I posted it in the thread as the reason for my vote, so that there could be no doubt as to who had screwed who. The stuff we were sent about your alliance with MP and everyone we posted to show that MP was no better than his claims about us, and to prove that we weren't the only ones making alliances.Hedgeowl wrote: I guess I agree that at this point Bullz/Dh have played the slimiest game and therefore should win for being willing to go all out and post PMs and Btsc chatter in thread. That for me actually feels like it crossed a line. Of course there are double-crossings in this game, thats the point. But how its come about and the way Bullz/DH play the "poor us" card is just an act and they know it.
Turnip Head wrote: We need to lynch Pennsylvania Bitch.
Yeah..I realise that now.Matt F wrote:![]()
I think Snowy is taking me way too seriously. I guess I've only played a few games with him.
I'm having fun with Bullz, dude.
Bullz and DH have been true to me and AP because WE haven't tried to screw them over. One can't call foul when fouling oneself. (That sounds dirty)Hedgeowl wrote:Of course I was part of an alliance with MP. He was my teammate! And Bullz you are a super smart veteran player in this game and have been a double-agent for civ/baddies before. What did you think when as MP's teammate, I didnt join the alliance of 8?Bullzeye wrote:DH and I got a PM showing that Elo had been double-crossing us. AGAIN. After we trusted her the first time. So I posted it in the thread as the reason for my vote, so that there could be no doubt as to who had screwed who. The stuff we were sent about your alliance with MP and everyone we posted to show that MP was no better than his claims about us, and to prove that we weren't the only ones making alliances.Hedgeowl wrote: I guess I agree that at this point Bullz/Dh have played the slimiest game and therefore should win for being willing to go all out and post PMs and Btsc chatter in thread. That for me actually feels like it crossed a line. Of course there are double-crossings in this game, thats the point. But how its come about and the way Bullz/DH play the "poor us" card is just an act and they know it.Clearly there were mutliple chatzys going on for you as well, so to pretend is was this huge double-cross is dishonest, but then thats what this game is about. You are not the victim here, but keeping trying to sell that cause its working really well for you obviously.
DharmaHelper wrote:This is a game of open BTSC. A game where outing is allowed and encouraged. With that in mind I don't think sharing that Elo planned to backstab and railroad me is all that out of bounds. Nor do I think sharing the schemings and machinations of MP/Daisy and co. was all that unwarranted. If you feel any discomfort or outrage, it should be directed at the fact that you got caught.
And I've far from played the "poor me" card. One minute I'm a slimey schemer with drones and the next I'm a poor me crybaby... Seems like you guys need to get your stories straight. I'm neither for the record, as I think I've played a loyal game to those who've shown me loyalty.
I still want backstage passes to the concert.DharmaHelper wrote:Fair Point Matt, I just thought it was interesting to hear two completely different sides of my game I guess.
I've mesmerized you like I did so many others into doing my bidding.Matt F wrote:I also see the irony in calling others drones while asking DH to direct my NK.
Haha, save it for the PM. I'll be waiting.DharmaHelper wrote:I've mesmerized you like I did so many others into doing my bidding.Matt F wrote:I also see the irony in calling others drones while asking DH to direct my NK.
I have no problem with them, I just don't always like to use them. Only when I feel like I made a strong contribution to the win, like in VGM, or if they're awesome like the Muppets one was.Snow Dog wrote:You find banners in sigs a little gauche?Bullzeye wrote:It's a game dude. I've done nothing wrong. Besides, I've won two games here already and do you see those banners in my sig somewhere?Matt F wrote:When you wear the winners banner, Bullz, will you feel proud of your actions here today?
You know what I mean, the big alliance where MP was basically calling the shots. You weren't invited to our alliance when MP was because we didn't know you were his partner. You'd have been welcome if MP had joined. People have been turning on me left and right. That kinda makes me a victim.Hedgeowl wrote: Of course I was part of an alliance with MP. He was my teammate! And Bullz you are a super smart veteran player in this game and have been a double-agent for civ/baddies before. What did you think when as MP's teammate, I didnt join the alliance of 8?Clearly there were mutliple chatzys going on for you as well, so to pretend is was this huge double-cross is dishonest, but then thats what this game is about. You are not the victim here, but keeping trying to sell that cause its working really well for you obviously.
But way early in the game, you and Bullz were all stoked to be able to use my NK. Now you're not?DharmaHelper wrote:I refuse to direct your NK because its not my NK :P
I did give you a prize! You got one for recruiting people, you just didn't live long enough for it to matter. That's your fault.Matt F wrote:But way early in the game, you and Bullz were all stoked to be able to use my NK. Now you're not?DharmaHelper wrote:I refuse to direct your NK because its not my NK :P![]()
Ah screw it, I'll just take you and Bullz out then. Or attempt to anyway, I'll most likely kill myself. If you have any suggestions other then Bullz or DH, feel free to PM me.
Really off to watch Supernatural now. Just got to season five, it's getting crazy good! If only the host of the Supernatural game had kept his promise and given me a prize in the game, I would probably enjoy the show a lot more.
Yep, it's amazing, but two incredibly different people, like me and Matt have differing opinions too.DharmaHelper wrote:Fair Point Matt, I just thought it was interesting to hear two completely different sides of my game I guess.
Turnip Head wrote: We need to lynch Pennsylvania Bitch.
I did. But you don't want to use my NK, so I feel insulted.DharmaHelper wrote:I thought you wanted us to win