Yeah, I got a bell.Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Tue Nov 21, 2017 11:53 pm @Long Con
Your thoughts?
Also, did this give you a bell notification?
My thoughts? I like Epi's latest idea. Let's lynch Dom. Or DDL. You still want that, Ep?
Moderator: Community Team
Yeah, I got a bell.Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Tue Nov 21, 2017 11:53 pm @Long Con
Your thoughts?
Also, did this give you a bell notification?
It's Night 1. I'll make up my mind Day 2.Long Con wrote: ↑Wed Nov 22, 2017 12:17 amYeah, I got a bell.Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Tue Nov 21, 2017 11:53 pm @Long Con
Your thoughts?
Also, did this give you a bell notification?
My thoughts? I like Epi's latest idea. Let's lynch Dom. Or DDL. You still want that, Ep?
All fantastically correct answers.JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Tue Nov 21, 2017 10:31 pmWithout having done the deep digging yet that I'd like to do, I can spare some gut takes:nutella wrote: ↑Tue Nov 21, 2017 10:06 pm Good puke Jay. I quite enjoyed the "meta pajamas" analogy. I also found your assessment of Jack to have merit and will keep that in mind as I sort out how I feel about him. And I agree with your funky vibes from DDL; even given that he's been posting while catching up, a lot of his posts have felt vague and directionless.
Tell me how you feel about all of the players whose usernames begin with S: sig, Sloonei, Spacedaisy, speedchuck, and sprityo.
sig as a civilian pirate was more engaged and effortful in the high-octane Day 1 aboard the pirate ship than he was in this high-octane Day 1. Bad vibes.
Sloonei's thing about the eyeroll emoji amused me, and I don't know that I'd expect that flippant response to an accusation from Darth Sloonei. Good vibes.
Spacedaisy appears at a glance to be Doing Work. She has engaged numerous dialogues with an assertive tone, and is bringing the Big Posts. We don't always see this level of motivation from Annie. Good vibes.
speedchuck was willing to engage suspects pointedly, and he cut down his suspect pool with transparent civilian reads (or at least pledges not to lynch). I also like the tone he exhibited in his handling of the Epi/LC feud. Good vibes.
sprityo's posts don't offer much in the way of original contribution. Reads exist here but I don't follow their origins, and there's some piggy-backing happening. That's not ideal. Bad vibes.
Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Wed Dec 16, 2020 7:33 pm Just how many days of "let's yeet them tomorrow" can a mafioso survive?
The answer: all of them, if you are a marmot.
Night PMs are going out now.K2 wrote:Dear Mountains,
Day 1 could have gone better but it also definitely could have been much worse. Nutella is clearly a big mountain. I'm unsure about LC and Epignosis but I think we could benefit from them backing off each other for a little while. Jack should be getting more attention than he is; something feels off about him. Speedchuck too. DDL is not as active as I've seen him be before and it makes me nervous. There's 19 players, let's be careful not to let anyone slip through the cracks.
We have been provided with a second chance. Let's do our very best moving forward.
Sincerely,
Your Friendly Neighborhood K2
Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Wed Dec 16, 2020 7:33 pm Just how many days of "let's yeet them tomorrow" can a mafioso survive?
The answer: all of them, if you are a marmot.
But not a comma.
I can sympathize with you on this point. In a manner of speaking I'm kinda new here too. All those names up there? 3 weeks ago I only knew 6 of them. It's hard to get pushed into a new environment with unfamiliar unfamiliar meta's and weirdos and new names to learn and general game mechanics... It's overwhelming.Mesk514 wrote: ↑Wed Nov 22, 2017 3:47 amTbf, the most recent game i hosted had 750 posts and it was a 5 day long game.... We are only day 2 and this game has heavily surpassed that. I don't know any of you, I don't know your play styles, how you speak... how you act when you lie..... THAT is how I play mafia, like it or not. I see some of you referencing older games, I can't do that... You can't necessarily do that for me as well but let's chat lol. mind you as well I haven't been active, I apologize BUT it's just so overwhelming.
What are you trying to say?sprityo wrote: ↑Mon Nov 20, 2017 4:41 pmSo cut and dry, what does this tie back to? What are you trying to say?Long Con wrote: ↑Mon Nov 20, 2017 4:34 pm As for the cbob and mesk no-vote posts... they're empty filler. Neither of them are in any way real or substantial gameplay. There was nothing about mesk's "dirt" comment that should lead to any alignment decisions. IF you really feel the need to read into it, it indicates a general ignorance or the game structure, which doesn't show as good or bad. And I don't feel like it was even that. Does anyone disagree with this?
And the Rocket Man lyrics response is equally devoid of value. So Epi would have spared his vote for any player who acknowledged his Elton John joke. Why? It doesn't even plant a seed that could grow into a suspicion, it doesn't put anyone on the spot, the only effect is to make cbob slightly more comfortable.
I never really thought about that, actually. It'd be more likely that they're both town if that's the case, but one shouldn't entirely disregard the tinfoil that one (or even both) of them are his teammates.Long Con wrote: ↑Mon Nov 20, 2017 9:46 pmThat's the opposite of how most people in the thread feel, I think. On any particular subject? Surely not about Epignosis.
Elohcin: ok, I think I have a different way of explaining it.
Quin thought Epi was buddying mesk and bob. In order for him to be right, that Epi is a baddie doing some buddying, he is assuming that mesk and bob are Civ. Are you with me on that?
I believe her.Elohcin wrote: ↑Mon Nov 20, 2017 8:53 pmAre you still angry from the previous game with epi where he found you out as mafia?
quote=Sloonei post_id=381309 time=1511158093 user_id=405]
Put a vote on Spacedaisy. Do we believe her guilt to be coming from a place of empathy for game hosts everywhere, or from her role card?
What does Elohcin thinks about the people "kind of" wanting to vote for him? Maybe she's answered this. if not, I'd like one.Elohcin wrote:I agree with this.Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Mon Nov 20, 2017 8:39 am I don't like this Epi lynch. Feels like there's a bunch of scum surrounding him like vultures waiting to see if they can lynch him or not. Lots of people "kind of" wanting to vote for him.
Posting but still catching up.
I'm not Elohcin, but when I'm presented with a counter that doesn't ...inspire... me, I'm inclined to press further. Not wait until the lynch is over and I'm prodded with the argument again. I feel like Elohcin just wanted somewhere to put her vote and was pressed for time.Elohcin wrote: ↑Tue Nov 21, 2017 2:42 pmI still feel like you were voting epi for a nonsense reason which is what mafia will do.Long Con wrote: ↑Tue Nov 21, 2017 1:36 pm I see Elohcin!
That's why you voted for me, Eloh, and I feel like you gained clarity about the misunderstanding. You understood that I didn't "make up a reason to accuse Epi", and yet you left your vote on me. Why?Elohcin wrote: ↑Mon Nov 20, 2017 9:34 pm Oh. My. Goodness. Reading this thread is like listening to my children bicker. I'm not done catching up, but I'm over it. This.post below is why I'm voting LC. He admits to making up a reason to accuse epi of being bad. This ia what mafia have to do to look like they are scum-hunting.
Epignosis wrote: ↑Mon Nov 20, 2017 5:40 pmAh. An assumption. Three of them, actually. Glad to hear you admit it.
You have to assume three people are civilians to arrive at the conclusion that I am bad. Let that sink in.
Yet I can't say I'm not going to vote a guy because of Elton John or that I raised an opinion regarding Mesk's response to being big or little. Too bad you didn't quote the next line to "Rocket Man." Because then I would have been buddying you.
I don't know shit about Epi aside from that he likes beer and is good at math, but Epi pretended to be ignorant of statistics in a previous Lost game when bad. When he busts out little stuff like this (underlined) I think well of him.Epignosis wrote: ↑Tue Nov 21, 2017 11:16 am Outside of lynching mafia, that was the best possible Day 1 outcome one could hope for.
I agree with Spacedaisy's post below, but would like to add some commentary.
The most likely scenario is that one of the Long Con voters is Everest. Five out of nineteen is 26.3%.Spacedaisy wrote: ↑Tue Nov 21, 2017 3:43 am I disagree with the Sutter Buttes one. We have not yet had a night in which to turn any actions in. The Sutter Buttes hide a fellow little mountain at night and it decreases the vote tally against them the following day. I think this can be discounted as a reason for what occurred.
If Everest, then it might not be her
If Aconcagua, then it is her
If Pico Cristobal Colon, then it doesn't have to be her, but they must be someone who feels confident using their one time power to save her...
If Matterhorn, ??? we just don't know enough to eliminate this one
Disregarding Sutter Buttes for reasons already stated above...
Olympus Mons, same boat as Matterhorn
This doesn't clear her, but her survival is in no way a clear indication of her being bad. in fact I think her behavior might actually be explained by a couple of these possibilities and leans me even more towards my previous belief that Nutella is not bad.
nutella being Aconcagua is 5.3%.
nutella being Pico Cristobal Colon is 5.3%, while five missing voters is 26.3%. Additionally, it isn't common practice to stop the very first lynch, when the least amount of information is available.
With all the revealed vote manipulation abilities in play, I am less inclined to believe Matterhorn's ability relates to vote manipulation.
I agree that the Sutter Buttes ability was not in play Day 1.
With all the revealed vote manipulation abilities in play, I am less inclined to believe Olympus Mons' ability relates to vote manipulation.
Two more observations:
First, nutella was interested in making it a tie, which implies an advantage to be had on her part if the result was a tie.
Second, this autocorrect folly:
Okay then.
All of these circumstances point to nutella as being cleared. I see no scenario outside of the independent (or an unwise intervention on the part of Senhor 1492) that points to nutella being bad.
And if she is bad, I swear by Fuck Mountain I will flip a table.
I understanding why you don't like it but I recall random pressure votes really being Sloonei's playstyle.Quin wrote: ↑Tue Nov 21, 2017 2:06 am> You throw votes out like candy on Day 1Sloonei wrote: ↑Tue Nov 21, 2017 2:02 amhuh?Quin wrote: ↑Tue Nov 21, 2017 1:45 amI asked you to explain why you'd say that about Epi but not throw a vote there to support it, and you told me about the criteria that would have earned Epi your final vote.Sloonei wrote: ↑Tue Nov 21, 2017 1:41 amNoQuin wrote: ↑Tue Nov 21, 2017 1:38 amSloonei, are you a little mountain?Sloonei wrote: ↑Tue Nov 21, 2017 1:36 amMy final Day 1 vote is not the same as a Day 1 pressure vote. I like for that one to be reasoned and informed. All the other ones are just me poking people with a stick. I was saying that I hadn't been convinced that Epi was deserving of a final vote, but that the door was not shut on it.
Epi's not getting my vote today.
> I use the word candy because I've given up on my own country's vocabulary
> You suspect Epi but won't put the final vote on him at that time
> I question why he didn't at least earn a pressure vote
> You tell me that your final vote is cast when it's well reasoned
> This exchange does not make me happy
Agree with this. There is a chance someone else is Everest and voted against the Nutella lynch, but the implication she knew it would be a tie gives a high chance she is a civ. Assuming she is not manipulating that in the first place.Spacedaisy wrote: ↑Tue Nov 21, 2017 3:43 am I disagree with the Sutter Buttes one. We have not yet had a night in which to turn any actions in. The Sutter Buttes hide a fellow little mountain at night and it decreases the vote tally against them the following day. I think this can be discounted as a reason for what occurred.
If Everest, then it might not be her
If Aconcagua, then it is her
If Pico Cristobal Colon, then it doesn't have to be her, but they must be someone who feels confident using their one time power to save her...
If Matterhorn, ??? we just don't know enough to eliminate this one
Disregarding Sutter Buttes for reasons already stated above...
Olympus Mons, same boat as Matterhorn
This doesn't clear her, but her survival is in no way a clear indication of her being bad. in fact I think her behavior might actually be explained by a couple of these possibilities and leans me even more towards my previous belief that Nutella is not bad.
That's not the argument I'm trying to makeDragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Wed Nov 22, 2017 9:03 amI understanding why you don't like it but I recall random pressure votes really being Sloonei's playstyle.Quin wrote: ↑Tue Nov 21, 2017 2:06 am> You throw votes out like candy on Day 1Sloonei wrote: ↑Tue Nov 21, 2017 2:02 amhuh?Quin wrote: ↑Tue Nov 21, 2017 1:45 amI asked you to explain why you'd say that about Epi but not throw a vote there to support it, and you told me about the criteria that would have earned Epi your final vote.Sloonei wrote: ↑Tue Nov 21, 2017 1:41 amNoQuin wrote: ↑Tue Nov 21, 2017 1:38 amSloonei, are you a little mountain?Sloonei wrote: ↑Tue Nov 21, 2017 1:36 am
My final Day 1 vote is not the same as a Day 1 pressure vote. I like for that one to be reasoned and informed. All the other ones are just me poking people with a stick. I was saying that I hadn't been convinced that Epi was deserving of a final vote, but that the door was not shut on it.
Epi's not getting my vote today.
> I use the word candy because I've given up on my own country's vocabulary
> You suspect Epi but won't put the final vote on him at that time
> I question why he didn't at least earn a pressure vote
> You tell me that your final vote is cast when it's well reasoned
> This exchange does not make me happy
This site has a "no asshatery" zero tolerance policy, so do not insult people. But throwing a couple non-directed swears every now and then is fine. We are all adults here (excluding maybe Kyle but he doesn't count).
Ninja's by Daisy.Spacedaisy wrote: ↑Tue Nov 21, 2017 4:30 am Oh also, welcome to the site and it's nice to meet you!
We occasionally hold family friendly games, but the game outline will clearly stipulate the language rules for that game. And they are rare. We try not to censor language, we only hold fast to our one absolutely line in the sand which is basically that we don't allow any slurs against any person or group based upon their race, gender, religion, sexual orientation, etc. So pretty much "Don't be a dick" sums it up for us. All other language is fair play. But we do tend to try and treat each other with respect while we call each other scummy lying wolves.
You would like to play mafia in Naruto Forums I think.
The Syndicate is an alien civilization that came to the internet a few years ago and brought customs that were unknown to the inhabitants of Earth. So far they have done a decent job integrating with the human species, having changed some of their classic sustoms such as banning changing of votes and not letting dead players win (though both are unnoficial and some hosts still do them), but they still have some weird alien habits that to this day are weird to us Earthlings. Although some Earthlings like me like to copy their customs and take them to other sites, like Rainbow Lists and Gman's Technicolor Vote Tally.
Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Tue Nov 21, 2017 2:40 pm Kyle looks better two pages later.
I agree with Nutella's assertion about Epi vs LC back and forth. Or about every back and forth, tbh. I usually automatically skim it when I notice it's just two players arguing semantics over and over and whatnot.
That said, Nutella's post complaining about them gave me a bad vibe.
Okay 12 pages left.
Epi is going to reply with "I've only done that once in mafia syndicate".Long Con wrote: ↑Tue Nov 21, 2017 3:45 pmSo, according to you, Epi and I must have been sitting in BTSC, rubbing our hands together going, "Oh boy, let's get into it in the thread! This is going to be great! Just watch us cruise to victory by arguing about some logical misundestanding on Day 1, and then BOOM, we win and they'll never know what hit them! "Spacedaisy wrote: ↑Tue Nov 21, 2017 3:39 pmThe only sense I can make of it is that you and LC are baddie teammates who planned to go after each other.
I can't believe you actually think this.
Oh damn ninja'd again.Epignosis wrote: ↑Tue Nov 21, 2017 4:08 pmAnother common unfounded belief about me. I don't know why it keeps coming up. I most certainly do not like the idea of bussing a teammate right off the bat (or ever). I've done it literally one time in history (DDL in Guess Who?) and it was for the sheer novelty of it, as I had never done it before. The only other occasions I recall bussing a teammate was out of necessity because the teammate had already talked himself into a corner and there wasn't any coming back from it (Scotty in one of G-Man's games was one of those rare instances).Spacedaisy wrote: ↑Tue Nov 21, 2017 3:58 pmI have played on baddie teams with Epi, I most certainly do believe that he would love to bus his teammate right off the bat.Long Con wrote: ↑Tue Nov 21, 2017 3:45 pmSo, according to you, Epi and I must have been sitting in BTSC, rubbing our hands together going, "Oh boy, let's get into it in the thread! This is going to be great! Just watch us cruise to victory by arguing about some logical misundestanding on Day 1, and then BOOM, we win and they'll never know what hit them! "Spacedaisy wrote: ↑Tue Nov 21, 2017 3:39 pmThe only sense I can make of it is that you and LC are baddie teammates who planned to go after each other.
I can't believe you actually think this.
I didn't really want to get LC lynched outside of the mindset that, whether he was good or not, if he got lynched, I wouldn't have to waste my time with his crappy accusations against me. I knew that was my mindset, and that I had been there before, and that if LC isn't bad and I'm only dissatisfied with his performance, I'm not helping myself by trying to get him lynched.Spacedaisy wrote: ↑Tue Nov 21, 2017 3:58 pm And you guys always go after each other, every game you play together without fail. You both know to do otherwise would look suspicious. I doubt the topic of your shouting at each other was worked out in advance. So now you are telling me you think it was all a misunderstanding? You don't believe Epi is supicious?
My issue with your whole back and forth was this, you were reaching to the max and you know it. And Epi didn't respond like someone who really wants to get you lynched even though he should have if he were civ. Neither of you behaved normally in this.
Linki: That possibility is the only thing making me feel like this might all be tinfoiling and exactly why I didn't vote for LC in the last lynch. Also why I have decided either you two are baddies together or you (Epi) are civ.
Doing the same thing over and over isn't normal. Learning from the past is.
"A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little mountains."
That depends on what you think LC's intent is.speedchuck wrote: ↑Tue Nov 21, 2017 6:23 pmLC would not have, as scum, taken one of the danciest, hardest-to-lynch targets and formed a stupid argument to try and lynch him. My meta on LC says this sincere, earnest, and suicidal lynchlust comes from a town headspace.speedchuck wrote: ↑Mon Nov 20, 2017 7:53 pm (Basically I would think LC is scum but following such a stupid argument if he didn't genuinely see something in Epi is suicidal)
(And that's a town meta read on LC for me)
And seriously, who would target Epi as their easy D1 lynch?
Motive-wise, it makes zero sense for LC to be scum outside of tinfoil land.
Yeah but in this game I actually agree with him all the way.
WhatQuin wrote: ↑Wed Nov 22, 2017 7:17 amWhat are you trying to say?sprityo wrote: ↑Mon Nov 20, 2017 4:41 pmSo cut and dry, what does this tie back to? What are you trying to say?Long Con wrote: ↑Mon Nov 20, 2017 4:34 pm As for the cbob and mesk no-vote posts... they're empty filler. Neither of them are in any way real or substantial gameplay. There was nothing about mesk's "dirt" comment that should lead to any alignment decisions. IF you really feel the need to read into it, it indicates a general ignorance or the game structure, which doesn't show as good or bad. And I don't feel like it was even that. Does anyone disagree with this?
And the Rocket Man lyrics response is equally devoid of value. So Epi would have spared his vote for any player who acknowledged his Elton John joke. Why? It doesn't even plant a seed that could grow into a suspicion, it doesn't put anyone on the spot, the only effect is to make cbob slightly more comfortable.
You are interpreted it wrong.Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Tue Nov 21, 2017 8:25 pmI have four times as many posts as you, you're annoyed at all the posts but me stopping posting for the night is bad indicative.Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Tue Nov 21, 2017 7:29 pmThis post gives me a very political vibe.Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Mon Nov 20, 2017 10:55 pm I've said my piece on today's lynch. Plenty of other people haven't provided much content so I'll give them a chance to catch up or speak.
I'll be lurking until EOD in case anyone has questions or I need to move my vote.
I hate politicians.
K.