[ENDGAME] - The Fellowship of the Ring Mafia (LoTR I)

[timmer]

The discussion astound rabbit is been mostly that he hasn't played in forever. Even long con who had played with rabbit more then almost anyone admitted that it had been awhile and he's not sure of rabbits norm.

Discussion of a potential meta is different than discussion of any established meta imo

[Sloonei]

Tie Broken.

Why Long Con?

Why didn't you move?

I just got home not even 10 minutes ago. I barely know what's happening.
Why did you vote for Long Con?

[Marmot]

Fog on the Barrow-Downs

In the Barrow-Downs reside the Wights. They enjoy tying things up.

So do you apparently.


No one has been lynched.


Night 1 has begun. You have until 20:00 EST to submit your night actions.

[nutella]

The discussion astound rabbit is been mostly that he hasn't played in forever. Even long con who had played with rabbit more then almost anyone admitted that it had been awhile and he's not sure of rabbits norm.

Discussion of a potential meta is different than discussion of any established meta imo

this does nothing to explain why you think DF is suspicious

[nutella]

oh.... no lynch.... ..... k

[Epignosis]

Tie Broken.

Why Long Con?

Why didn't you move?

I just got home not even 10 minutes ago. I barely know what's happening.
Why did you vote for Long Con?

I had three fourths of a coin.

[Kylemii]

though with that said, I am absolutely not breaking a 6 way tie.

You've seemed really concerned with how your vote will be viewed... that said, its day 1 and I kind of understand.

No, i'm not really concerned about that. I'm just not confident enough to be the one who personally decides who dies first out of 1/3 of the living players

[Long Con]

What a crazy random happenstance... I survived!

[Epignosis]

This is the worst possible outcome.

[Long Con]

This is the worst possible outcome.

That is a matter of perspective.

[Epignosis]

This is the worst possible outcome.

That is a matter of perspective.

I get that. I'm operating under some assumptions here.

[timmer]

The discussion astound rabbit is been mostly that he hasn't played in forever. Even long con who had played with rabbit more then almost anyone admitted that it had been awhile and he's not sure of rabbits norm.

Discussion of a potential meta is different than discussion of any established meta imo

this does nothing to explain why you think DF is suspicious

Of course it does? If he voted for any other lesser contributor the odds of his vote being weighed against known meta would be higher. On day 1, avoiding that kind of thing is a ping for me.

[Sloonei]

Tie Broken.

Why Long Con?

Why didn't you move?

I just got home not even 10 minutes ago. I barely know what's happening.
Why did you vote for Long Con?

I had three fourths of a coin.

So either you voluntarily voted for Long Con, or you attempted to randomize today's lynch result. Which was it and why did you make your choice?

[Epignosis]

Tie Broken.

Why Long Con?

Why didn't you move?

I just got home not even 10 minutes ago. I barely know what's happening.
Why did you vote for Long Con?

I had three fourths of a coin.

So either you voluntarily voted for Long Con, or you attempted to randomize today's lynch result. Which was it and why did you make your choice?

Kiss my ass.

[nutella]

The discussion astound rabbit is been mostly that he hasn't played in forever. Even long con who had played with rabbit more then almost anyone admitted that it had been awhile and he's not sure of rabbits norm.

Discussion of a potential meta is different than discussion of any established meta imo

this does nothing to explain why you think DF is suspicious

Of course it does? If he voted for any other lesser contributor the odds of his vote being weighed against known meta would be higher. On day 1, avoiding that kind of thing is a ping for me.

Oh... I guess I understand now. But looking at his post I don't agree. His reasoning for voting rabbit makes sense.

[Sloonei]

[mention]timmer[/mention] what is your read on rabbit?

[timmer]

The discussion astound rabbit is been mostly that he hasn't played in forever. Even long con who had played with rabbit more then almost anyone admitted that it had been awhile and he's not sure of rabbits norm.

Discussion of a potential meta is different than discussion of any established meta imo

this does nothing to explain why you think DF is suspicious

Of course it does? If he voted for any other lesser contributor the odds of his vote being weighed against known meta would be higher. On day 1, avoiding that kind of thing is a ping for me.

Oh... I guess I understand now. But looking at his post I don't agree. His reasoning for voting rabbit makes sense.

Don't agree, I can deal with

[timmer]

@timmer what is your read on rabbit?

He coasted thru day 1. He was basically a less jokey Wilgy. No alignment feel on that, though.

[rabbit8]

The discussion astound rabbit is been mostly that he hasn't played in forever. Even long con who had played with rabbit more then almost anyone admitted that it had been awhile and he's not sure of rabbits norm.

Discussion of a potential meta is different than discussion of any established meta imo

this does nothing to explain why you think DF is suspicious

Of course it does? If he voted for any other lesser contributor the odds of his vote being weighed against known meta would be higher. On day 1, avoiding that kind of thing is a ping for me.

Oh... I guess I understand now. But looking at his post I don't agree. His reasoning for voting rabbit makes sense.

Are you ill? Did I read that shit right? Bad, Nutella.

I quickly read through to catch up, and don't have really strong reads atm. I will go ahead and *vote Rabbit* for now since he's made a fair few posts but seems to be avoiding casebuilding or even on-topic engagement.

Why me, why not Epi? The same fucking case could be made, Yeah.

Bullshit reason, but not indicative of alignment IMO . Since all of our votes were complete fucking bullshit.

[rabbit8]

@timmer what is your read on rabbit?

He coasted thru day 1. He was basically a less jokey Wilgy. No alignment feel on that, though.

Coasted, fuck that shit and the meta bullshit cases and so on for that. Now, day one again, and something to actually discuss.

Later though.

[rabbit8]

What a crazy random happenstance... I survived!

Disingenuous much?

[Kylemii]

@timmer what is your read on rabbit?

He coasted thru day 1. He was basically a less jokey Wilgy. No alignment feel on that, though.

I'm glad I'm not the only one who sees the resemblance.

[Long Con]

What a crazy random happenstance... I survived!

Disingenuous much?

Rhetorical who?

[rabbit8]

What a crazy random happenstance... I survived!

Disingenuous much?

Rhetorical who?

[DFaraday]

I'm going to put my vote on DFaraday.

I agree with his briefest of points about rabbit, that he hasn't contributed much, but then again, neither has Wilgy (all jokes), neither has DF himself ( posts), or novaselinenever (barely here), neither have I, really. In a game full of quiet players, singling one out who doesn't have an established meta while others with established metas run rampant with jokes etc and you give them a pass just feels cheap and like something a mafia would do. Why tangle with a meta people know when you can vote the new guy?

Timmer is, intentionally or not, misrepresenting my admittedly terrible case.

My point was specifically that Rabbit seemed to have a high post count and low on-topic content. I went back and looked, at the time I voted Rabbit had made about 15 posts, Wilgy had made 12 (and literally half of those were posted altogether as a meme reference), and I had made one. And about half the players in this game (myself included) have quite a bit of experience playing with Rabbit in the past. I certainly remember him as always being jokey and strange, but also making insightful observations and taking strong stances. He does seem to have been engaging more later in the day, to be fair.

If anything, Timmer seems to be taking an easy option here and setting up a quiet player who makes weak votes as an easy target.

[DFaraday]

The discussion astound rabbit is been mostly that he hasn't played in forever. Even long con who had played with rabbit more then almost anyone admitted that it had been awhile and he's not sure of rabbits norm.

Discussion of a potential meta is different than discussion of any established meta imo

this does nothing to explain why you think DF is suspicious

Of course it does? If he voted for any other lesser contributor the odds of his vote being weighed against known meta would be higher. On day 1, avoiding that kind of thing is a ping for me.

Oh... I guess I understand now. But looking at his post I don't agree. His reasoning for voting rabbit makes sense.

Are you ill? Did I read that shit right? Bad, Nutella.

I quickly read through to catch up, and don't have really strong reads atm. I will go ahead and *vote Rabbit* for now since he's made a fair few posts but seems to be avoiding casebuilding or even on-topic engagement.

Why me, why not Epi? The same fucking case could be made, Yeah.

Bullshit reason, but not indicative of alignment IMO . Since all of our votes were complete fucking bullshit.

Yeah, I could have voted Epi, but I was speed reading and your posts stood out to me more (in the wrong way). I fully admit it was a weak reason though.

[MacDougall]

Posting

[MacDougall]

I think we made the best decision I was able to come up with. That's all we can ask for in any lynch.

[rabbit8]

I think we made the best decision I was able to come up with. That's all we can ask for in any lynch.

^^


Unrelated:
DF I figured that's how you came to vote for me. But for someone to say it makes sense, eh????

I think it was a weird comment by nutella.

[Long Con]

" I will go ahead and *vote Rabbit* for now since he's made a fair few posts but seems to be avoiding casebuilding or even on-topic engagement."

That was DF's voting reason. It makes sense to me as well. Your rebuttal was "why not Epi?"

Your rebuttal makes no sense. So, DF votes Epi for the same reason, and then Epi says "why not rabbit8?" The man only has one vote to cast, and no two players are identical, despite whatever similarities you want to showcase. DFaraday thought you were avoiding engagement, and that's a reasonable thing to think a baddie would do. It's not a smoking gun, but to say it makes no sense is wrong.

[rabbit8]

lol, sure. go with it.

[rabbit8]

" I will go ahead and *vote Rabbit* for now since he's made a fair few posts but seems to be avoiding casebuilding or even on-topic engagement."

That was DF's voting reason. It makes sense to me as well. Your rebuttal was "why not Epi?"

Your rebuttal makes no sense. So, DF votes Epi for the same reason, and then Epi says "why not rabbit8?" The man only has one vote to cast, and no two players are identical, despite whatever similarities you want to showcase. DFaraday thought you were avoiding engagement, and that's a reasonable thing to think a baddie would do. It's not a smoking gun, but to say it makes no sense is wrong.

My overall abstract point was about nutella's discussion with Timmer. I actually have no issue with DFs vote, thus:

I think we made the best decision I was able to come up with. That's all we can ask for in any lynch.

^^


Unrelated:
DF I figured that's how you came to vote for me. But for someone to say it makes sense, eh????

I think it was a weird comment by nutella.

the comment in red.

The argument made against me.... one could have been made against another poster or two. DF jumped on ME, not someone else. I thought it was odd. Timmer pointed this out, Nutella disagreement with him is more what I have issue with. Not because of DFs vote. I never once took issue with his vote. I take issue with Nutella and her buddying to DF in this way.

The discussion astound rabbit is been mostly that he hasn't played in forever. Even long con who had played with rabbit more then almost anyone admitted that it had been awhile and he's not sure of rabbits norm.

Discussion of a potential meta is different than discussion of any established meta imo

this does nothing to explain why you think DF is suspicious

Of course it does? If he voted for any other lesser contributor the odds of his vote being weighed against known meta would be higher. On day 1, avoiding that kind of thing is a ping for me.

Oh... I guess I understand now. But looking at his post I don't agree. His reasoning for voting rabbit makes sense.

In red, yes accusing someone of something more than one person is doing is odd when you use that as a reason to vote and Timmer seeing that and thinking DF might be suspicious is odd.

LC and Nutella need to be lynched.

[Long Con]

That is so weeeeak.

So I'm defending my teammate nutella from your scary onslaught of flimsy accusation.

Just so we're clear, is that what you really believe?

[rabbit8]

Onslaught? Where was this?

[Long Con]

I'm just trying to get inside your head and understand this accusation that nut and I are teammates.

[Jackofhearts2005]

Onslaught? Where was this?

[rabbit8]

I'm just trying to get inside your head and understand this accusation that nut and I are teammates.

lol, oh that was hyperbole. Come on man. You know, and I know, you will know when I actually want to go after you and that I wont hide behind some pseudo-quasi accusation. I'm not that weak. I was trying to get a reaction out of nutella, but it seems that it's you I got one from.

I found the exchange between Timmer and nutella, from nutellas side.

[rabbit8]

I'm just trying to get inside your head and understand this accusation that nut and I are teammates.

lol, oh that was hyperbole. Come on man. You know, and I know, you will know when I actually want to go after you and that I wont hide behind some pseudo-quasi accusation. I'm not that weak. I was trying to get a reaction out of nutella, but it seems that it's you I got one from.

I found the exchange between Timmer and nutella, from nutellas side.

[rabbit8]

I found the exchange between Timmer and nutella, from nutellas side.

Let me finsish that thought,

,from nutellas side. it seemed unauthentic.

[nutella]

All authenticity here. I said what I thought about DF. I'm not necessarily defending him, I'm just saying that his D1 vote made as much sense as any D1 vote and I stated that I disagreed with Timmer's assessment. You can think what you think about me but you're wrong.

[rabbit8]

All authenticity here. I said what I thought about DF. I'm not necessarily defending him, I'm just saying that his D1 vote made as much sense as any D1 vote and I stated that I disagreed with Timmer's assessment. You can think what you think about me but you're wrong.

I don't think you were defending DF.

I don't think you're bad, but I have a feeling you're mafia.
If anything can be assumed about the sociological climate, that's what matters.

[nutella]

...what

[rabbit8]

I feelz you're bad.

[Kylemii]

I haven't played with INH since The Old Times, has he played a lot in recent history?

[Sloonei]

I haven't played with INH since The Old Times, has he played a lot in recent history?

He's a fairly regular player around these parts lately, yeah. Why do you ask?

[Sloonei]

I found the exchange between Timmer and nutella, from nutellas side.

Let me finsish that thought,

,from nutellas side. it seemed unauthentic.

Can you highlight the specific posts or comments that seemed inauthentic to you?

[rabbit8]

The discussion astound rabbit is been mostly that he hasn't played in forever. Even long con who had played with rabbit more then almost anyone admitted that it had been awhile and he's not sure of rabbits norm.

Discussion of a potential meta is different than discussion of any established meta imo

this does nothing to explain why you think DF is suspicious

Of course it does? If he voted for any other lesser contributor the odds of his vote being weighed against known meta would be higher. On day 1, avoiding that kind of thing is a ping for me.

Oh... I guess I understand now. But looking at his post I don't agree. His reasoning for voting rabbit makes sense.

To Slo from anti-Slo with hate, or love, your choice.

[Kylemii]

I haven't played with INH since The Old Times, has he played a lot in recent history?

He's a fairly regular player around these parts lately, yeah. Why do you ask?

he just seems very familiar to how he was back then lol

it's like deja vu

[Marmot]

DAY 1 LYNCH

Who wants the Ring for evil purposes?
Poll ended at Thu Feb 01, 2018 6:00:09 pm
Please note that if you vote, your vote will be visible.


Ambray
2
12%
Voters: DrWilgy, nutella

DFaraday
3
18%
Voters: rabbit8, timmer, Long Con

DrWilgy
1
6%
Voters: Kylemii

Epignosis
0
No votes
Voters: None

Glorfindel
0
No votes
Voters: None

insertnamehere
0
No votes
Voters: None

Jackofhearts2005
0
No votes
Voters: None

Kylemii
1
6%
Voters: insertnamehere

Long Con
3
18%
Voters: Sloonei, Ambray, Epignosis

MacDougall
1
6%
Voters: Jackofhearts2005

novaselinenever
0
No votes
Voters: None

nutella
2
12%
Voters: Glorfindel, novaselinenever

rabbit8
1
6%
Voters: DFaraday

Sloonei
1
6%
Voters: MacDougall

timmer
0
No votes
Voters: None

Ricochet (Host/Faculty/Non-players)
2
12%
Voters: Marmot, JaggedJimmyJay
Total votes: 17

[insertnamehere]

I haven't played with INH since The Old Times, has he played a lot in recent history?

He's a fairly regular player around these parts lately, yeah. Why do you ask?

he just seems very familiar to how he was back then lol

it's like deja vu

I’m assuming you’re referring to my incredible intellect and perception, which have not dulled over time.