There are consequences for not voting.

Moderator: Community Team
Ah onny av 'un pin sa far, 'n it's not eur la posta.S~V~S wrote: And after recent experiences, I will vote for anyone pushing low posters, especially the first few days, not just llama. I just think they're bad, bad, bad.
Epignosis wrote:If llama is good, it means we exist in a universe in which multitasking llama can call out the first of two mafia while simultaneously calling out two civilians.
I don't want to live in that universe.
My darling, you only get one vote.S~V~S wrote:yay no death.
And after recent experiences, I will vote for anyone pushing low posters, especially the first few days, not just llama. I just think they're bad, bad, bad.
And yay for Russti presentingWe don't always agree, but he always has strong analysis
Still gotta get used to playing under this college schedule, haha.Roxy wrote:Porcupine vote in the Poll!!!!!
There are consequences for not voting.
Thanks, MP, 'Goose, and S~V~S! What a warm welcome. It's nice to be back.MovingPictures07 wrote:Wow, so glad to see Russ here and in full presence! Great to play a game with you again, good sir!
Am I interpreting your posts correctly in that you would currently say Llama is your top suspicion, or is that incorrect?
Regarding spreads vs. not on Day 1, I would think spread votes would be in a baddie team's favor more so than a straight up lynch. They can much more easily control the vote and avoid a Day 1 baddie lynch and cause some chaos. However, they could also run the risk of outing themselves, so that's a consideration. Additionally, a not spread vote can give very little information, especially when it is a civvie lynch, and many baddies can bandwagon. So I guess it does depend on strategy and what actually happens.
Epignosis wrote:If llama is good, it means we exist in a universe in which multitasking llama can call out the first of two mafia while simultaneously calling out two civilians.
I don't want to live in that universe.
I find that if I go through this with a Cockney accent, it almost makes sense.thellama73 wrote:Movin' dolly mixtures 'as caught me attention by repeated me analysis of day wahn votes almost dicky richard the third for dicky richard the third wifaht addin' aahhht original. for that reason, I intend ter vote for 'im today.
'ave a Gertie Gitana, poppet.juliets wrote:Ah! I got it! This is my cover of Sympathy for the Devil
Epignosis wrote:If llama is good, it means we exist in a universe in which multitasking llama can call out the first of two mafia while simultaneously calling out two civilians.
I don't want to live in that universe.
Rusti, are you saying it's been your experience that llama doesn't normally go for the person who hasn't posted yet? Or if not, what makes his move un-llama like? I'm not doubting you, just trying to understand what specifically is bothering you.Russtifinko wrote:Thanks, MP, 'Goose, and S~V~S! What a warm welcome. It's nice to be back.MovingPictures07 wrote:Wow, so glad to see Russ here and in full presence! Great to play a game with you again, good sir!
Am I interpreting your posts correctly in that you would currently say Llama is your top suspicion, or is that incorrect?
Regarding spreads vs. not on Day 1, I would think spread votes would be in a baddie team's favor more so than a straight up lynch. They can much more easily control the vote and avoid a Day 1 baddie lynch and cause some chaos. However, they could also run the risk of outing themselves, so that's a consideration. Additionally, a not spread vote can give very little information, especially when it is a civvie lynch, and many baddies can bandwagon. So I guess it does depend on strategy and what actually happens.Yay for no death! And since I missed his death, RIP A Person. I've seen you lurking around the thread, and I hope we can avenge you.
Yes, I would say llama is my top suspicion for now. (Again, I admit I may be biased because his attack happened to be on me. I also just find it very un-llama-like.)
I think I'm also saying that a spread Day 1 lynch might be good precisely BECAUSE baddies control it more often than not. In almost every game I've played, you gumshoes have ferreted out who's doing the controlling and lynched them, which is very bad for the baddies indeed.
Epignosis wrote:If llama is good, it means we exist in a universe in which multitasking llama can call out the first of two mafia while simultaneously calling out two civilians.
I don't want to live in that universe.
Epignosis wrote:If llama is good, it means we exist in a universe in which multitasking llama can call out the first of two mafia while simultaneously calling out two civilians.
I don't want to live in that universe.
It wasn't a regurgitation; I did read your post directly above mine and thought you had good points, but was providing what I honestly think about the situation, regardless of whether it's agreeing with your thoughts or not. Reading them back to back I still don't think I just regurgitated exactly what you said.thellama73 wrote:Excellent regurgitation of the post just above yours, MP.MovingPictures07 wrote: Regarding spreads vs. not on Day 1, I would think spread votes would be in a baddie team's favor more so than a straight up lynch. They can much more easily control the vote and avoid a Day 1 baddie lynch and cause some chaos. However, they could also run the risk of outing themselves, so that's a consideration. Additionally, a not spread vote can give very little information, especially when it is a civvie lynch, and many baddies can bandwagon. So I guess it does depend on strategy and what actually happens.
I can't understand these posts by llama at all, but I do see he seems to be saying I caught his attention... for the post I just addressed above this one? Why would that make me baddie??? If that's what he's trying to say, it's utterly ridiculous IMO and if he votes that way, I'll honestly probably vote for him back because if he is a civvie he would be doing none of us any favors by floating such inane reasons to vote, but I find that less likely because it seems very illogical of llama to vote for someone for that reason.Epignosis wrote:I find that if I go through this with a Cockney accent, it almost makes sense.thellama73 wrote:Movin' dolly mixtures 'as caught me attention by repeated me analysis of day wahn votes almost dicky richard the third for dicky richard the third wifaht addin' aahhht original. for that reason, I intend ter vote for 'im today.
I can't understand these posts by llama at all, but I do see he seems to be saying I caught his attention... for the post I just addressed above this one? Why would that make me baddie??? If that's what he's trying to say, it's utterly ridiculous IMO.Epignosis wrote:I find that if I go through this with a Cockney accent, it almost makes sense.thellama73 wrote:Movin' dolly mixtures 'as caught me attention by repeated me analysis of day wahn votes almost dicky richard the third for dicky richard the third wifaht addin' aahhht original. for that reason, I intend ter vote for 'im today.
I'm not sure I see it totally either, but from what I understand, it seems she is voting for S~V~S because she disagrees with her about llama?juliets wrote:Lizzy, I hope you can answer - what reason do you see for voting SVS?
A llama does not respond 'eaven and 'ell ter threats! I am always deeply suspicious of people 'oo agree wif others wifaht addin' thoughts of their Jack Jones. I fin' that is wot ya 'ave been doin' so far this game, and I am votin' for ya. if ya fin' a revenge vote Hammer and Tack is a smart fin' ter do, be me guest! *votes sock bloke*MovingPictures07 wrote: I can't understand these posts by llama at all, but I do see he seems to be saying I caught his attention... for the post I just addressed above this one? Why would that make me baddie??? If that's what he's trying to say, it's utterly ridiculous IMO and if he votes that way, I'll honestly probably vote for him back because if he is a civvie he would be doing none of us any favors by floating such inane reasons to vote, but I find that less likely because it seems very illogical of llama to vote for someone for that reason.
Epignosis wrote:If llama is good, it means we exist in a universe in which multitasking llama can call out the first of two mafia while simultaneously calling out two civilians.
I don't want to live in that universe.
Why the Liz Hurley vote? daan't ya fin' sum more shenanigans might occur this afternoon?thellama73 wrote:A llama does not respond 'eaven and 'ell ter threats! I am always deeply suspicious of people 'oo agree wif others wifaht addin' thoughts of their Jack Jones. I fin' that is wot ya 'ave been doin' so far this game, and I am votin' for ya. if ya fin' a revenge vote Hammer and Tack is a smart fin' ter do, be me guest! *votes sock bloke*MovingPictures07 wrote: I can't understand these posts by llama at all, but I do see he seems to be saying I caught his attention... for the post I just addressed above this one? Why would that make me baddie??? If that's what he's trying to say, it's utterly ridiculous IMO and if he votes that way, I'll honestly probably vote for him back because if he is a civvie he would be doing none of us any favors by floating such inane reasons to vote, but I find that less likely because it seems very illogical of llama to vote for someone for that reason.
llama and your posts make me the happiest host on earth!! <3Mongoose wrote:'ells bells.
Chinese Blind ya Jack Jones businessMongoose wrote:Why the Liz Hurley vote? daan't ya fin' sum more shenanigans might occur this afternoon?thellama73 wrote:A llama does not respond 'eaven and 'ell ter threats! I am always deeply suspicious of people 'oo agree wif others wifaht addin' thoughts of their Jack Jones. I fin' that is wot ya 'ave been doin' so far this game, and I am votin' for ya. if ya fin' a revenge vote Hammer and Tack is a smart fin' ter do, be me guest! *votes sock bloke*MovingPictures07 wrote: I can't understand these posts by llama at all, but I do see he seems to be saying I caught his attention... for the post I just addressed above this one? Why would that make me baddie??? If that's what he's trying to say, it's utterly ridiculous IMO and if he votes that way, I'll honestly probably vote for him back because if he is a civvie he would be doing none of us any favors by floating such inane reasons to vote, but I find that less likely because it seems very illogical of llama to vote for someone for that reason.
Epignosis wrote:If llama is good, it means we exist in a universe in which multitasking llama can call out the first of two mafia while simultaneously calling out two civilians.
I don't want to live in that universe.
Oi, you're talkin' ter a lydy, sir.thellama73 wrote:Chinese Blind ya Jack Jones businessMongoose wrote:Why the Liz Hurley vote? daan't ya fin' sum more shenanigans might occur this afternoon?thellama73 wrote:A llama does not respond 'eaven and 'ell ter threats! I am always deeply suspicious of people 'oo agree wif others wifaht addin' thoughts of their Jack Jones. I fin' that is wot ya 'ave been doin' so far this game, and I am votin' for ya. if ya fin' a revenge vote Hammer and Tack is a smart fin' ter do, be me guest! *votes sock bloke*MovingPictures07 wrote: I can't understand these posts by llama at all, but I do see he seems to be saying I caught his attention... for the post I just addressed above this one? Why would that make me baddie??? If that's what he's trying to say, it's utterly ridiculous IMO and if he votes that way, I'll honestly probably vote for him back because if he is a civvie he would be doing none of us any favors by floating such inane reasons to vote, but I find that less likely because it seems very illogical of llama to vote for someone for that reason.
I was going to agree with you because I have seen thos exact same situation with SVS and Llama before, but then I remembered this is Lizzy. Makes me go allLizzy wrote:Hai! This is my second attempt at posting. Stoopid phone! Anyway, I have to vote now because I am internetless and my phone reception is rubbish, so I'm expecting it to die again. I'll vote for SVS because Llama seems like his old self to me, except more cockney which is quite brilliant. :P
Turnip Head wrote: We need to lynch Pennsylvania Bitch.
Ok, Hedgie let me make sure I understand: are you saying you are considering voting for SVS because you've seen she and llama disagree in past games? And why would that lead you to vote SVS over llama? Maybe I've totally misunderstood what you're saying.Hedgeowl wrote:I was going to agree with you because I have seen thos exact same situation with SVS and Llama before, but then I remembered this is Lizzy. Makes me go allLizzy wrote:Hai! This is my second attempt at posting. Stoopid phone! Anyway, I have to vote now because I am internetless and my phone reception is rubbish, so I'm expecting it to die again. I'll vote for SVS because Llama seems like his old self to me, except more cockney which is quite brilliant. :Pswinging back in forth in my feelings now, but hope you come back befor the vote ans explain more.
Juliets is the bloody only lydy in this rub-a-dub.Mongoose wrote: Oi, you're talkin' ter a lydy, sir.
Epignosis wrote:If llama is good, it means we exist in a universe in which multitasking llama can call out the first of two mafia while simultaneously calling out two civilians.
I don't want to live in that universe.
It seems loike the typical Brad Pitt and tat from Llamer and SVS ter me. I daan't clock that their Hammer and Tack and forf is particularly alarmin' either way; doesn't seem loike a 'ex per se. glad ya 're 'appy wif the results, Roxy!juliets wrote:Ok, Hedgie let me make sure I understand: are you saying you are considering voting for SVS because you've seen she and llama disagree in past games? And why would that lead you to vote SVS over llama? Maybe I've totally misunderstood what you're saying.Hedgeowl wrote:I was going to agree with you because I have seen thos exact same situation with SVS and Llama before, but then I remembered this is Lizzy. Makes me go allLizzy wrote:Hai! This is my second attempt at posting. Stoopid phone! Anyway, I have to vote now because I am internetless and my phone reception is rubbish, so I'm expecting it to die again. I'll vote for SVS because Llama seems like his old self to me, except more cockney which is quite brilliant. :Pswinging back in forth in my feelings now, but hope you come back befor the vote ans explain more.
Fine, vote for me then, but you're wrong about me. I have been posting all of my own thoughts this entire game, and if it just so happens I've agreed with some players, so be it.thellama73 wrote:A llama does not respond 'eaven and 'ell ter threats! I am always deeply suspicious of people 'oo agree wif others wifaht addin' thoughts of their Jack Jones. I fin' that is wot ya 'ave been doin' so far this game, and I am votin' for ya. if ya fin' a revenge vote Hammer and Tack is a smart fin' ter do, be me guest! *votes sock bloke*MovingPictures07 wrote: I can't understand these posts by llama at all, but I do see he seems to be saying I caught his attention... for the post I just addressed above this one? Why would that make me baddie??? If that's what he's trying to say, it's utterly ridiculous IMO and if he votes that way, I'll honestly probably vote for him back because if he is a civvie he would be doing none of us any favors by floating such inane reasons to vote, but I find that less likely because it seems very illogical of llama to vote for someone for that reason.
Not at all. I was just a bit surprised you voted llama for it. It seems like whatver the topic day 1 you clash is all. I think of Lizzy as an earaly randomizer and liking mor solid cases to go on, so becasue of her quick jump makes me wonder if she has something to protect this time.S~V~S wrote:Whether or not we have done this before or not, does that mean you find both of our arguments dismissable?
Turnip Head wrote: We need to lynch Pennsylvania Bitch.
No worries, this was not super clear. I meant I was agreeing with Lizzy's sentiment about why SVS voted for llama over it. However, I also consider Lizzy more likely to randomize early when she doesnt have strong suspicions, so this seems unusual for her. I think I agree with what Mongoose said above too.Mongoose wrote:It seems loike the typical Brad Pitt and tat from Llamer and SVS ter me. I daan't clock that their Hammer and Tack and forf is particularly alarmin' either way; doesn't seem loike a 'ex per se. glad ya 're 'appy wif the results, Roxy!juliets wrote:Ok, Hedgie let me make sure I understand: are you saying you are considering voting for SVS because you've seen she and llama disagree in past games? And why would that lead you to vote SVS over llama? Maybe I've totally misunderstood what you're saying.Hedgeowl wrote:I was going to agree with you because I have seen thos exact same situation with SVS and Llama before, but then I remembered this is Lizzy. Makes me go allLizzy wrote:Hai! This is my second attempt at posting. Stoopid phone! Anyway, I have to vote now because I am internetless and my phone reception is rubbish, so I'm expecting it to die again. I'll vote for SVS because Llama seems like his old self to me, except more cockney which is quite brilliant. :Pswinging back in forth in my feelings now, but hope you come back befor the vote ans explain more.
linki - Them 're spittin' dickie birds, 'oss.
Turnip Head wrote: We need to lynch Pennsylvania Bitch.
Epignosis wrote:If llama is good, it means we exist in a universe in which multitasking llama can call out the first of two mafia while simultaneously calling out two civilians.
I don't want to live in that universe.
Lol, looks like you do toothellama73 wrote:Cor blimey, looks loike svs 'as sum defenders!
You were mom'ed!! It is my game after all! :PMovingPictures07 wrote:Ah crap, quote fail. Why was that one included twice?