It was something like that in survivor.
Only problem is that when we die in this game, we don't die completely. So IDK.
It was something like that in survivor.
Sure it's valid, any theory is valid. It just makes me twitchy when people (not you, just generic people) try to position a theory as a fact in the context of a game (not in the context of actual science ) I just chose your post to reply to. Simmer down, buckaroo.speedchuck wrote: ↑Fri Mar 02, 2018 12:19 pmIt's a VALID theory. Even if it's not true, the possibility exists, and makes any protection target of mine less firm and more squishy.S~V~S wrote: ↑Fri Mar 02, 2018 12:16 pmThat's a theory. The host asked us not to discuss whether any of us were killed AFTER we started discussing it. Since everyone posted between the first night when we might have expected a kill, and the time we were asked not to discuss our state of life, and no one mentioned it? It seems an odd conclusion to jump to, that kills are happening and the host isn't telling us about them.speedchuck wrote: ↑Fri Mar 02, 2018 11:23 am If none of our nightkills show up, then it doesn't really matter who I might have protected as a doctor, does it? Not that I'm saying I did protect nutella. But if the other side gets our nightkills, and we theirs, then . No reason to put stock in my townfirms, right?
I'm not jumping to conclusions. Did you see all those 'if's up there?
There’s the issue of old powers and new powers
What is all this, please?S~V~S wrote: ↑Fri Mar 02, 2018 12:16 pm That's a theory. The host asked us not to discuss whether any of us were killed AFTER we started discussing it. Since everyone posted between the first night when we might have expected a kill, and the time we were asked not to discuss our state of life, and no one mentioned it? It seems an odd conclusion to jump to, that kills are happening and the host isn't telling us about them.
And I said "not you" grumble grumble back
Here you go~colonialbob wrote: ↑Fri Mar 02, 2018 1:04 pmWhat is all this, please?S~V~S wrote: ↑Fri Mar 02, 2018 12:16 pm That's a theory. The host asked us not to discuss whether any of us were killed AFTER we started discussing it. Since everyone posted between the first night when we might have expected a kill, and the time we were asked not to discuss our state of life, and no one mentioned it? It seems an odd conclusion to jump to, that kills are happening and the host isn't telling us about them.
Did I just miss something big?
A link would be nice.
Golden wrote: ↑Thu Mar 01, 2018 7:14 pmI’m not sure who would do so without infodumping. There will be absolutely no claiming from any person that you have died or not died.DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Thu Mar 01, 2018 7:11 pm I'm clean so far but I'm not sure who would admit if they'd been killed.
We'll stay one boring tribe until SVS and Quin MERCILESSLY AND BRUTALLY BETRAY ME, THEIR CLOSEST AND MOST LOYAL FRIEND WHO LOVES THEM, ROBBING ME OF THE SWEET REWARD OF MERGER
“It’s been two days. HOW HAS NO ONE DIED?”
DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Fri Mar 02, 2018 2:35 pmWe'll stay one boring tribe until SVS and Quin MERCILESSLY AND BRUTALLY BETRAY ME, THEIR CLOSEST AND MOST LOYAL FRIEND WHO LOVES THEM, ROBBING ME OF THE SWEET REWARD OF MERGER
Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Fri Mar 02, 2018 5:16 pm Lack of scumhunting is bothering me even tho I'm on phone and not doing anything.
Voted for Nutella because I recall suspecting her yesterday.
Do something guys. Anything.
I gotta say this sounds pretty scummy DDL.Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Fri Mar 02, 2018 5:16 pm Lack of scumhunting is bothering me even tho I'm on phone and not doing anything.
Voted for Nutella because I recall suspecting her yesterday.
Do something guys. Anything.
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Sat Aug 21, 2021 3:24 pm Always good to remember that there is no such thing as a Mafia circumstance that is worth real human emotion. Sometimes it will naturally come out, but it can be contained if we just remember that this is a game on a message board forum that 99.99% of the population of the Earth has never heard of before. No matter how successful anyone is, it means just about nothing.
I flipped my read on him ages ago.
I think he's town. Therefore I support him.
For the record, I don't hold anything against Dom for missing out on MK, and I rather wish nutella hadn't brought that up, because I'm not angry at all. Every game I have ever hosted has had inactives as far as I can remember. I'm used to it by now. All but one of my inactives even got replaced (and the one that didn't was because it might screw with an independent's win condition, so I left it alone).S~V~S wrote: ↑Fri Mar 02, 2018 7:01 amI could go with DDL or Nutella. I thought DDL was bad early on, but felt more strongly about Chuck. I need to reread Quin (and yesterdays thread in general. After the morning, I was busy at work and did not get much internet time, then after work I had to do some stuff with my brother, so more of the same. I just skimmed for the most part).
Other than that I don't feel actively bad about anyone specifically. While I don't necessarily agree with Epis approach in all things. It is very weird seeing Epi, whom I associate with one kind of behavior) channeling a person I assocoate with another~ it is my belief that while you can learn from others, you should always be you. At first I did not see much of Epi in the game he is now playing, but now that I know where to look I think I have found him. But I still have the squidgies about him. (Not sure how to explain squidgies, it was a word my Mom used. It's like that feeling you get in the pit of your tummy when you don't quite feel sick, but almost, coupled with nervousness. It's like a less intense version of "willies").
Part of my issue with Nutella was that I thought she could be bad with Epi specifically. Not so much speaking for him as bringing a chatroom vibe into the thread. Like I could envisage the conversation, Dom and Epi getting in each others faces out here in the thread, Epi venting about, how dare he, he screwed up MK, etc. I have seen it happen in chatrooms I was in before, where some sort of stress or drama spilled over in some form into the thread, but no one really picked up on it. I am not sure I am explaining this well, but if it has ever happened to you, you know what I mean. Overall her "big picture" still looks baddish to me, even with Epi removed from the equation. But I need to read her again, I would like more than "Baddish Big Picture".
I would like to see more from Dom.
Other than that, for various reasons of my own, I feel fairly good about everyone else.
Hey was it 29 people that missed votes or 29 cumulative missed votes in Star wars?Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Mar 02, 2018 9:26 pmFor the record, I don't hold anything against Dom for missing out on MK, and I rather wish nutella hadn't brought that up, because I'm not angry at all. Every game I have ever hosted has had inactives as far as I can remember. I'm used to it by now. All but one of my inactives even got replaced (and the one that didn't was because it might screw with an independent's win condition, so I left it alone).S~V~S wrote: ↑Fri Mar 02, 2018 7:01 amI could go with DDL or Nutella. I thought DDL was bad early on, but felt more strongly about Chuck. I need to reread Quin (and yesterdays thread in general. After the morning, I was busy at work and did not get much internet time, then after work I had to do some stuff with my brother, so more of the same. I just skimmed for the most part).
Other than that I don't feel actively bad about anyone specifically. While I don't necessarily agree with Epis approach in all things. It is very weird seeing Epi, whom I associate with one kind of behavior) channeling a person I assocoate with another~ it is my belief that while you can learn from others, you should always be you. At first I did not see much of Epi in the game he is now playing, but now that I know where to look I think I have found him. But I still have the squidgies about him. (Not sure how to explain squidgies, it was a word my Mom used. It's like that feeling you get in the pit of your tummy when you don't quite feel sick, but almost, coupled with nervousness. It's like a less intense version of "willies").
Part of my issue with Nutella was that I thought she could be bad with Epi specifically. Not so much speaking for him as bringing a chatroom vibe into the thread. Like I could envisage the conversation, Dom and Epi getting in each others faces out here in the thread, Epi venting about, how dare he, he screwed up MK, etc. I have seen it happen in chatrooms I was in before, where some sort of stress or drama spilled over in some form into the thread, but no one really picked up on it. I am not sure I am explaining this well, but if it has ever happened to you, you know what I mean. Overall her "big picture" still looks baddish to me, even with Epi removed from the equation. But I need to read her again, I would like more than "Baddish Big Picture".
I would like to see more from Dom.
Other than that, for various reasons of my own, I feel fairly good about everyone else.
It was some shit like both.DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Fri Mar 02, 2018 9:27 pmHey was it 29 people that missed votes or 29 cumulative missed votes in Star wars?Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Mar 02, 2018 9:26 pmFor the record, I don't hold anything against Dom for missing out on MK, and I rather wish nutella hadn't brought that up, because I'm not angry at all. Every game I have ever hosted has had inactives as far as I can remember. I'm used to it by now. All but one of my inactives even got replaced (and the one that didn't was because it might screw with an independent's win condition, so I left it alone).S~V~S wrote: ↑Fri Mar 02, 2018 7:01 amI could go with DDL or Nutella. I thought DDL was bad early on, but felt more strongly about Chuck. I need to reread Quin (and yesterdays thread in general. After the morning, I was busy at work and did not get much internet time, then after work I had to do some stuff with my brother, so more of the same. I just skimmed for the most part).
Other than that I don't feel actively bad about anyone specifically. While I don't necessarily agree with Epis approach in all things. It is very weird seeing Epi, whom I associate with one kind of behavior) channeling a person I assocoate with another~ it is my belief that while you can learn from others, you should always be you. At first I did not see much of Epi in the game he is now playing, but now that I know where to look I think I have found him. But I still have the squidgies about him. (Not sure how to explain squidgies, it was a word my Mom used. It's like that feeling you get in the pit of your tummy when you don't quite feel sick, but almost, coupled with nervousness. It's like a less intense version of "willies").
Part of my issue with Nutella was that I thought she could be bad with Epi specifically. Not so much speaking for him as bringing a chatroom vibe into the thread. Like I could envisage the conversation, Dom and Epi getting in each others faces out here in the thread, Epi venting about, how dare he, he screwed up MK, etc. I have seen it happen in chatrooms I was in before, where some sort of stress or drama spilled over in some form into the thread, but no one really picked up on it. I am not sure I am explaining this well, but if it has ever happened to you, you know what I mean. Overall her "big picture" still looks baddish to me, even with Epi removed from the equation. But I need to read her again, I would like more than "Baddish Big Picture".
I would like to see more from Dom.
Other than that, for various reasons of my own, I feel fairly good about everyone else.
That was my thinking too about him being independent. Glad the role is gone regardless.Long Con wrote: ↑Fri Mar 02, 2018 9:44 am I think Scotty was more likely evil, and on an evil team. I agree that the insanifying power is too weak on its own to support an Indy role, and it fits in better on a team. If he's bad, then it's an indicator that we're dealing with two baddie teams here, which means we shouldn't be townclearing anyone just because they spearheaded a baddie lynch.
I do have two points that suggest he's Indy as well though - one, his "flavour text" says he wants to reap *all* souls... so that seems to be against everyone - and two, he has two lives, and it would be supercool to have a tiny innocuous role enter second life as some Indy powerhouse role.
S~V~S wrote: ↑Fri Mar 02, 2018 7:31 am Also (sorry for the multi posts in a row, but no one is here before I go to work)
@ Epignosis
Other than her not being "townfirmed" what would be your reasoning for a Nutella vote? Given this, your last real mention of her before your discussion with her over Scottys affiliation:
[mention]Epignosis[/mention] yeah, looking at it it is kinda vague, sorry, lol.Epignosis wrote: ↑Wed Feb 28, 2018 9:21 pm First off, I gave a solid reason why speedchuck was good. People didn't listen because ties.
speedchuck, I'm sorry I couldn't be here to advocate for you, but Wednesdays are whirlwinds of activity for me until after 7pm.
speedchuck must have said this because he was bad, right?speedchuck wrote: ↑Mon Feb 26, 2018 6:58 pm Maybe the mafia is spread across tribes and the only nightkill was over there?
But no, they had a lynch as well.
I am thinking there was a failed nightkill on Pikaside.
nutella got a 90% approval rating from speedchuck. speedchuck speculated that it would be unfair for there to be two lynches going on but not two Night kills. speedchuck was the protector, likely protected nutella, and there was no Night kill over here, but there was one over there. Splitting the game up, upon reflection, makes sense due to the fact that it's twice a long, so splitting it up with two lynches and two Night kills would hasten progress.
I do not believe any of this should clear nutella, given the array of circumstances that might have influenced his action. However, I regard it a point in her favor.
Nothing is conclusive, except that
speedchuck
5
36%
Voters: DharmaHelper, Dom, S~V~S, Long Con, Dragon D. Luffy
These people should be more scrutinized and reevaluated for traces of evil.
In the post I quoted, you talk about why you felt pretty OK about Nutella. Now she is on your short list for a vote. What changed?
The host said people can keep talking if they've only died once.Long Con wrote: ↑Fri Mar 02, 2018 10:58 am Also, how could we lie about whether or not we have died before? Does that imply that there are non-public deaths happening? WTF you guys will be like "Oh, Long Con seems to be silenced today!" and then "Wow, it's lasting through the night!" "Is LC just AFK on vacation or something?" But no I just died and no one knew.
Or was misdirected.DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Fri Mar 02, 2018 11:24 amEither Fridge is anti-town and intentionally wasted their power on Cbob or Fridge didn't send in a PM.Some roles will have their targets randomised if you do not send a PM, so if you want to make a tactical choice not to use your night power, please PM the host to check first.
Then what is the other team doing with themselves all Day?
This is reasonable.DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Fri Mar 02, 2018 2:44 pm RE: Kills Theory
I don't see the point in dividing us into two tribes if half the game (Either NKs or Lynches) Is useless for either tribe. Since we have 2 lives to start (~22 people, ~44 lives, not sure on the exact player count) It makes sense to me that Both lynches and both NKs (if there are multiple mafia, which it seems like there are IMO) are going through, we're just not getting our NK results to protect from the exact concern a few of us brought up early game (One-Lifers getting targeted down.)
All that to say I'm firmly in the camp that thinks We're getting their NK results and they're getting ours. Which is curious because if *we* didn't have a kill over here either by block or by just not having a kill, then *they* would get "No one has been killed" as their message even though Scotty has been killed, as an example.
Where is nutella on my shortlist?