[END] Super Meat Boy Mafia

#301

birdwithteeth11 wrote:
thellama73 wrote:Aso, Jigsaw, Dom, Nevinera, Elohcin and Lizzy (although Lizzy claims to have been silenced for a day)
Outside of Lizzy, I wouldn't mind examining the rest of them. I think there's definitely a possibility there's a baddie hiding amongst one of them.

Although if it is true that Lizzy was not silenced, then I would add her to that group.

#302

#303

I interpreted this as Lizzy claiming to be silenced. Perhaps that was naive of me.

Lizzy wrote:
thellama73 wrote:
Lizzy wrote:Why is no-one dying?

I anted to tell you that I admired the courage of your self vote and your willingness to sacrifice one of your own lives for the sake of others.

I was silenced too.

#304

Ahem!

I was silenced too.

although Lizzy claims to have been silenced for a day

Well?

#305

"For a period of time" then, if you're going to insist on semantics.

#306

I am pretty sure she only said that after she was unsilenced, so she is theoretically one of the people who chose/could not post for some reason. I'm not sure why it makes a difference though, as blaming silent people is just as likely to make you bad as being silent is.

#307

A Person wrote:I am pretty sure she only said that after she was unsilenced, so she is theoretically one of the people who chose/could not post for some reason. I'm not sure why it makes a difference though, as blaming silent people is just as likely to make you bad as being silent is.

I wasn't blaming her. I was pointing out that her being silenced could explain her low post count, since Mongoose suggested we look at low posters hiding behind the wall of silly. That is sort of the opposite of blaming.

#308

thellama73 wrote:"For a period of time" then, if you're going to insist on semantics.

Hem hem

This is not a matter of semantics, Mr Llama. This is a matter of putting words in mouth. Detention, Mr. Llama. ^__^

#309

thellama73 wrote:
A Person wrote:I am pretty sure she only said that after she was unsilenced, so she is theoretically one of the people who chose/could not post for some reason. I'm not sure why it makes a difference though, as blaming silent people is just as likely to make you bad as being silent is.

I wasn't blaming her. I was pointing out that her being silenced could explain her low post count, since Mongoose suggested we look at low posters hiding behind the wall of silly. That is sort of the opposite of blaming.

I was just confused because the only way she could mention being silenced is if it had already happened and was over. She's been fairly quiet since then so could still be a part of the list. My other comment concerned the entire idea of looking at silent people.

#310

I'm getting strong civvie vibes from Matt.

#311

I'm getting a migraine vibe from matt

#312

A Person wrote:I'm getting a migraine vibe from matt

My grain is an oat.

#313

A Person wrote:I'm getting a migraine vibe from matt

Awwww

Nom excedrin and ibuprophen k. I woke up with a nice migraine this morning but I managed to get rid of it before I went swimming. :A

#314

Lizzy wrote:
A Person wrote:I'm getting a migraine vibe from matt
Awwww Nom excedrin and ibuprophen k. I woke up with a nice migraine this morning but I managed to get rid of it before I went swimming. :A

ture, i will k. I'm glad you could get rid of your migraine

I'm eating dark chocolate which has a tiny bit of caffeine in it so it should theoretically be therapeutic.

#315

A Person wrote:
Lizzy wrote:
A Person wrote:I'm getting a migraine vibe from matt
Awwww Nom excedrin and ibuprophen k. I woke up with a nice migraine this morning but I managed to get rid of it before I went swimming. :A
ture, i will k. I'm glad you could get rid of your migraine
I'm eating dark chocolate which has a tiny bit of caffeine in it so it should theoretically be therapeutic.

:A Nais. I almost bought chocolate with Earl Grey yesterday. Also, the Earl Grey Royal is decent, butt the jasmine flavour is too strong. :\ So still the Twinings loose leaf is the best thus far. And if you want brilliant carbonara, apparently you should boil the pasta in lapsang. :A

#316

Lizzy wrote:
A Person wrote:
Lizzy wrote:
A Person wrote:I'm getting a migraine vibe from matt
Awwww Nom excedrin and ibuprophen k. I woke up with a nice migraine this morning but I managed to get rid of it before I went swimming. :A
ture, i will k. I'm glad you could get rid of your migraine
I'm eating dark chocolate which has a tiny bit of caffeine in it so it should theoretically be therapeutic.
:A Nais. I almost bought chocolate with Earl Grey yesterday. Also, the Earl Grey Royal is decent, butt the jasmine flavour is too strong. :\ So still the Twinings loose leaf is the best thus far. And if you want brilliant carbonara, apparently you should boil the pasta in lapsang. :A

I've never made carbonara but cooking with lapsang is something I want to do (when i have lots of excess lapsang ddks)

#317

Don't be such a teas.

#318

birdwithteeth11 wrote:
thellama73 wrote:Aso, Jigsaw, Dom, Nevinera, Elohcin and Lizzy (although Lizzy claims to have been silenced for a day)
Outside of Lizzy, I wouldn't mind examining the rest of them. I think there's definitely a possibility there's a baddie hiding amongst one of them.

Not me!

#319

Elohcin wrote:
birdwithteeth11 wrote:
thellama73 wrote:Aso, Jigsaw, Dom, Nevinera, Elohcin and Lizzy (although Lizzy claims to have been silenced for a day)
Outside of Lizzy, I wouldn't mind examining the rest of them. I think there's definitely a possibility there's a baddie hiding amongst one of them.
Not me!

Because innocent people are always the first to say, "Don't examine me! Look over there instead!"

#320

thellama73 wrote:
Mongoose wrote:You'd know what a real baddie would do? S/he just sit back while we made absolute weasels of ourselves. Who has been particularly quiet lately ?

DisgruntledPorcupine wrote:Sorry for not being around much

:O!

So I'm going to risk missing the vote in order to have time to let things develop. Seeing as how things are today I'll probably get back in time though.

#321

thellama73 wrote:
Elohcin wrote:
birdwithteeth11 wrote:
thellama73 wrote:Aso, Jigsaw, Dom, Nevinera, Elohcin and Lizzy (although Lizzy claims to have been silenced for a day)
Outside of Lizzy, I wouldn't mind examining the rest of them. I think there's definitely a possibility there's a baddie hiding amongst one of them.
Not me!
Because innocent people are always the first to say, "Don't examine me! Look over there instead!"

I think that tendency is pretty well an across-the-board trait, fairly uncorrelated with the civ/bad axis.

I've been quiet because I'm barely playing - I check in every few hours, but I never really have time to do much in the way of analysis (and I don't feel like there has been much to work with so far either). I think Llama is being zany because he's bored, because he's not in a chat with anyone, and I think Mongoose is joining him because he's contagious - I can't read anything about her status from that fact.

I'm still kind of confused by the game, actually - I'm unclear on what many of our attributes actually *do*, and I don't really understand how we're supposed to have any chance, unless the baddies have much less life than the civs. But maybe the odds are bad, and Fetus just got really lucky last night?

#322

Thanks for the vote of confidence, Nev! I think you are civ as well.

#323

Everyone keeps saying I'm bored. I'm not bored. I could never be bored in one of MP's amazing, exciting games. I'm just a rabblerouser anarchist who thrives on chaos.

#324

thellama73 wrote:Everyone keeps saying I'm bored. I'm not bored. I could never be bored in one of MP's amazing, exciting games. I'm just a rabblerouser anarchist who thrives on chaos.

Nev made a good point though. If you are not bored fine, but you may have more time on your hands not having btsc too. Granted based on frequency of player posting even if you do have btsc, you might be bored in that too.

I am considering Bwt as a vote currently for jumping on your low poster bandwagon. There's not much to go on in this game so far, but latching on to the low poster excuse doesn't feel good to me.

#325

I think Hedge's comment on llama's theory was weird....
also hello to MR and rose! : 0 )

#326

Hedgeowl wrote:
thellama73 wrote:"Oh, Miss HedgeBaddie?" said the friendly little llama, his wool glinting with its natural oils in the hot Peruvian sun.

"Yes?" said the wicked owl from her home in the horrible-hedge.

"I steal one of your lives! Yoink!" The llama then galloped away, frolicking merrily over hill and dale.
This might be the most majestic "No U" I have ever seen.

The majestic llama, prancing over the plains of meat. You are now reading this in Richard Attenborough's voice.
But I'll second the sketchiness of BWT on the low poster thing. Always a convenient diversionary tactic.

#327

Hedgeowl wrote: I am considering Bwt as a vote currently for jumping on your low poster bandwagon. There's not much to go on in this game so far, but latching on to the low poster excuse doesn't feel good to me.

Whoa there Missi Pyle!

It's not my bandwagon. Mongoose was the one who suggested looking at low posters. I just compiled a list of names.

#328

Boomslang wrote: The majestic llama, prancing over the plains of meat. You are now reading this in Richard Attenborough's voice.

Do you mean David Attenborough?

#329

thellama73 wrote:
Elohcin wrote:
birdwithteeth11 wrote:
thellama73 wrote:Aso, Jigsaw, Dom, Nevinera, Elohcin and Lizzy (although Lizzy claims to have been silenced for a day)
Outside of Lizzy, I wouldn't mind examining the rest of them. I think there's definitely a possibility there's a baddie hiding amongst one of them.
Not me!
Because innocent people are always the first to say, "Don't examine me! Look over there instead!"

And if I had said nothing it would have been, "Elohcin hasn't said anything to defend herself."

#330

And for clarification:

"Let's examine low posters." != "Let's lynch a low poster."

#331

Elohcin wrote: And if I had said nothing it would have been, "Elohcin hasn't said anything to defend herself."

Only a baddie would make such a response. I'm on to you, Tasha.

#332

Hedgeowl wrote: I am considering Bwt as a vote currently for jumping on your low poster bandwagon. There's not much to go on in this game so far, but latching on to the low poster excuse doesn't feel good to me.

Says the same Hedgie who jumped on the Devin bandwagon.

#333

We have a core problem here:

1) We don't gain any concrete information until somebody dies.
2) Normally people die when we lynch them, in this game people just take damage.
3) Scattering our vote around like last time will result in lots of people being hurt (and easier for baddies to kill) and us gaining no real information until the endgame.

Sadly, I don't see any actual solutions to that problem - bandwagoning is mostly 'hope we get lucky'.. Does anyone else see some way to not lose this game? Maybe we'll be able to uncover more information as the game unfolds via mechanics like on night 0?

#334

Nevinera wrote:We have a core problem here:

1) We don't gain any concrete information until somebody dies.
2) Normally people die when we lynch them, in this game people just take damage.
3) Scattering our vote around like last time will result in lots of people being hurt (and easier for baddies to kill) and us gaining no real information until the endgame.

Sadly, I don't see any actual solutions to that problem - bandwagoning is mostly 'hope we get lucky'.. Does anyone else see some way to not lose this game? Maybe we'll be able to uncover more information as the game unfolds via mechanics like on night 0?

Yes, that's true, because we don't know anyone's life tally. We could lose 3 or more civs in one night by vote spreading.

Let's only spread good ole Kosher schmear and not the vote.

That said, how are we going to get this lot to agree on anything?

Also, I'd like us to chat strategy for sending in our night levels.

#335

Hey errbody!

Gonna try to read through this whole shebang in 3 hours, since it seems my predecessor missed the previous poll.

#336

Mongoose wrote:
Nevinera wrote:We have a core problem here:

1) We don't gain any concrete information until somebody dies.
2) Normally people die when we lynch them, in this game people just take damage.
3) Scattering our vote around like last time will result in lots of people being hurt (and easier for baddies to kill) and us gaining no real information until the endgame.

Sadly, I don't see any actual solutions to that problem - bandwagoning is mostly 'hope we get lucky'.. Does anyone else see some way to not lose this game? Maybe we'll be able to uncover more information as the game unfolds via mechanics like on night 0?
Yes, that's true, because we don't know anyone's life tally. We could lose 3 or more civs in one night by vote spreading.

Let's only spread good ole Kosher schmear and not the vote.

That said, how are we going to get this lot to agree on anything?

Also, I'd like us to chat strategy for sending in our night levels.

If we jump on bandwagons we could lose 3 or more civs in 3 or more consecutive nights. If we spread it we could lose 3 or more civs in one night while waiting 3 or more nights till that happens. In other words... this will be a looooooooooooong game. Unless, of course, you vote the Lizzy Act.

#337

Nevinera wrote: Does anyone else see some way to not lose this game? Maybe we'll be able to uncover more information as the game unfolds via mechanics like on night 0?

I've recognized these same problems and have come to the conclusion that the only way not to lose is to not try to win, which I think I have been doing admirably.

#338

Dom wrote:I think Hedge's comment on llama's theory was weird....
also hello to MR and rose! : 0 )

Which comment was that? It's not like you not quote it.

thellama73 wrote:
Hedgeowl wrote: I am considering Bwt as a vote currently for jumping on your low poster bandwagon. There's not much to go on in this game so far, but latching on to the low poster excuse doesn't feel good to me.
Whoa there Missi Pyle!

It's not my bandwagon. Mongoose was the one who suggested looking at low posters. I just compiled a list of names.

Fair point, Mongoose' wagon. I wasn't actually accusing you of anything, but rather bwt. Why so quick to defend? It actually makes you look worse in mÿ eyes since you took Mongoose's thought and put names to it to suspect. However, bwt is the one I am most suspicious of right now.

Lizzy wrote:
Hedgeowl wrote: I am considering Bwt as a vote currently for jumping on your low poster bandwagon. There's not much to go on in this game so far, but latching on to the low poster excuse doesn't feel good to me.
Says the same Hedgie who jumped on the Devin bandwagon.

Bandwagons happen all the time. It's usually how people get lynched, civvies and baddies. The bandwagon wasn't the suspicious part as much to me as the low poster bandwagoning. It seems way to convenient to go after low posters again. Someone brings this up every game. Don't think I didn't notice bwt defended you miss Lizzy and here you are attacking me. Teamies what what?

#339

Hedgeowl wrote:Why so quick to defend?

Lizzy wrote:This is a matter of putting words in my mouth.

#340

Hedgeowl wrote: Bandwagons happen all the time. It's usually how people get lynched, civvies and baddies. The bandwagon wasn't the suspicious part as much to me as the low poster bandwagoning. It seems way to convenient to go after low posters again. Someone brings this up every game. Don't think I didn't notice bwt defended you miss Lizzy and here you are attacking me. Teamies what what?

Still a bandwagon.

I must have missed the part where he was defending me.

And he's not that lucky.

#341

Lizzy wrote:
Hedgeowl wrote: Bandwagons happen all the time. It's usually how people get lynched, civvies and baddies. The bandwagon wasn't the suspicious part as much to me as the low poster bandwagoning. It seems way to convenient to go after low posters again. Someone brings this up every game. Don't think I didn't notice bwt defended you miss Lizzy and here you are attacking me. Teamies what what?
Still a bandwagon. I must have missed the part where he was defending me. And he's not that lucky.

HedgeBaddie is running scared and careening out of control.

#342

Okay everyone is saying a lot and nothing at all in RE: confirming suspects. (that is not meant to be a criticism).

Who are anyone's suspects? It's weirdly hard for me to follow who any of you are actively suspecting for whatever reason.

Let me see if I can summarize some of our suspects and PLEASE correct me I'm wrong.

* Hedge suspects Llama, Birdy and LIzzy

* Llama suspects Lizzy, Hedge, possibly DP and maybe Eloh?

* Dom suspects Hedge, or at least finds her comments weird

Nev, who are you looking at today? Any one else want to chime in?

#343

Since wrathofgod isn't playing anymore, I am tempted to throw my vote that way.

#344

birdwithteeth11 wrote:
thellama73 wrote:Aso, Jigsaw, Dom, Nevinera, Elohcin and Lizzy (although Lizzy claims to have been silenced for a day)
Outside of Lizzy, I wouldn't mind examining the rest of them. I think there's definitely a possibility there's a baddie hiding amongst one of them.

Lizzy, here he is deflecting attention away from you on Llama's list.

Mongoose, that is my understanding right now as well. I would list it bwt, lizzy, llama (with possible dom addition spending on his explanation).

I must be top of llama's list though since he voted for me already.m

Linki-you know rose or mr subbed in for him right?

#345

Hedgeowl wrote:
birdwithteeth11 wrote:
thellama73 wrote:Aso, Jigsaw, Dom, Nevinera, Elohcin and Lizzy (although Lizzy claims to have been silenced for a day)
Outside of Lizzy, I wouldn't mind examining the rest of them. I think there's definitely a possibility there's a baddie hiding amongst one of them.
Lizzy, here he is deflecting attention away from you on Llama's list.

Mongoose, that is my understanding right now as well. I would list it bwt, lizzy, llama (with possible dom addition spending on his explanation).

I must be top of llama's list though since he voted for me already.m

Linki-you know rose or mr subbed in for him right?

No U right back at ya.

(let's use this eye as a ping pong ball for our exchange; Llama and Dom can join in)

Also, you missed a BWT post.

#346

Hedgeowl wrote:Linki-you know rose or mr subbed in for him right?

I do, but I'm hoping a vote for them won't be redirected to their subs.

#347

thellama73 wrote:
Nevinera wrote: Does anyone else see some way to not lose this game? Maybe we'll be able to uncover more information as the game unfolds via mechanics like on night 0?
I've recognized these same problems and have come to the conclusion that the only way not to lose is to not try to win, which I think I have been doing admirably.

Does that mean you picked Hedge because you think she is a civ and lynching a civ would help us not win the game? Walk me through your thought process on your vote.

#348

As to BWT defending Lizzy, to me it didn't read as someone defending her as much as he waas trying to give her space as someone who was silenced/cursed etc. It wasn't that long ago that poor Artemis got lynched while authentically cursed in American Gods.

#349

Mongoose wrote: * Llama suspects Lizzy, Hedge, possibly DP and maybe Eloh?

Not quite right. I suspect Hedge and Elo for their eagerness to jump on my odd behavior as a reason to find me suspicious. They both should know better. It seemed a convenient and easy thing for baddies to do. I don't suspect Lizzy. I don't really suspect DP that much either. I do suspect INH and I also kind of suspect you, for the same reason as Elohcin, though you were pretty quick to backpedal.

Linki: Mongoose. Oh, no. HedgeBaddie is definitely a baddie.

#350

thellama73 wrote:
Elohcin wrote: And if I had said nothing it would have been, "Elohcin hasn't said anything to defend herself."
Only a baddie would make such a response. I'm on to you, Tasha.

Eh, I'm not worried. You don't scare me

Honestly, I don't think you're really pinged by me at all. And, I definitely get civvie vibes from you. I admit that you pinged me a bit at first with your "odd behavior" but there was one post that you made that turned things around for me. You're okay in my book.