these are the parts that I am bothered by:
Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Tue May 08, 2018 4:46 pm
I guess I’ll go ahead and
[VOTE:
epignosis] aubergine
I tend to give Epi some leeway for bs cases, head butting and general grumpiness/laziness but I expect something to come of it eventually.
I like Jimmy's rainbow (save Juliets, who I’m not sure why people are voting for) and the Epi case but I can’t shake a bad feeling about him. Driving me up the wall over here. Waiting for the shoe to drop. Just not sure what kinda shoe it is.
Linki: I’ll read those Nova beefs in a bit. Nova is in one ear out the other for me.
you guess you'll vote for epi, implying it's a thing you ended up doing instead of making an active choice to do so. you acknowledge that epi is known for similar behavior except that it's usually less so and more directed. you mention having a bad feeling about epi that you can't shake, but the bad feeling was never actually mentioned before this post, most of your posts about epi before this are soft circumstantial defenses of epi relating to meta or his relationship to jjj
Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Tue May 08, 2018 8:22 pm
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Tue May 08, 2018 8:15 pm
Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Tue May 08, 2018 8:13 pm
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Tue May 08, 2018 8:11 pm
Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Tue May 08, 2018 8:10 pm
I'm not 100% sure of either of you.
I'm 100% sure of Avito's alignment.
I was talking about a Day 2 read.
Epignosis is tied for the tally lead.
He doesn't like a lynch of sprityo, his tie buddy.
He doesn't like a lynch of juliets, the only other person in decent range.
Is he a mafioso?
I never give up no matter my alignment so I don’t know what to do with a player who does.
Game theory say scum going for pitty (or in this case confusion?) but that doesn’t bear out irl.
Either way, it’s annoying.
but then strike 2 here, in response to jjj pointing out that Epignosis is acting in a way which is specifically not self-protective or at least avoiding the path of least resistance, you claim that epi is giving up/allowing himself to be lynched or going for pity or whatever which seems like it's both avoiding the actual question jay asked as well as avoiding the ugly idea that "hey maybe the guy I voted for has some visible civ qualities"
this post prepares for Epi's lynch in the "he was acting bad so he deserved to be lynched, why should I be to blame?" way, instead of the "am i considering all angles to this?" way, and that's why i dislike it.