Retrocausality Mafia - ENDGAME: A Reprieve in the Desert

[Turnip Head]

I hope I'm not the only one taking this seriously

[Epignosis]

What happens if we run into a version of ourselves from the past?

The question is do you fight or make love?

[Turnip Head]

What happens if we run into a version of ourselves from the past?

The question is do you fight or make love?

Might as well try both.

[ColinIsCool]

If I could travel back in time, I would definitely try to punch myself in the face.

[dunya]

Hi guys and gals! I'll be facilitating your adventures through time. Please PM me any time you feel frustrated or just need to vent about something with someone. Remember to have fun, keep your hands and feet inside the time machine, and may the best team win.

Would you like to join the sisterhood of the time-traveling pants?

[Epignosis]

If I could travel back in time, I would definitely try to punch myself in the face.

You're willing to wait that long in line?

[Golden]

What happens if we run into a version of ourselves from the past?

Did your past self meet you? If not, then this can't happen.

There's only three plausible options:

1) There is a singular universe, and so your experience of the past is exactly what happened; or
2) There is a multiverse, in which case if you meet a version of yourself from the past, that person is not you; or
3) There will be plot holes in your life story.

Don't forget, retrocausality is about the future effecting the past. So, it's possible you could create the multiverse, but it's also entirely possible that the point of this game is to demonstrate that retrocausality is an illusion designed to keep you pacified.

[Scotty]

What happens if we run into a version of ourselves from the past?

Did your past self meet you? If not, then this can't happen.

There's only three plausible options:

1) There is a singular universe, and so your experience of the past is exactly what happened; or
2) There is a multiverse, in which case if you meet a version of yourself from the past, that person is not you; or
3) There will be plot holes in your life story.

Don't forget, retrocausality is about the future effecting the past. So, it's possible you could create the multiverse, but it's also entirely possible that the point of this game is to demonstrate that retrocausality is an illusion designed to keep you pacified.

*affecting

[speedchuck]

Don't forget, retrocausality is about the future effecting the past.

Oooohhhh, thaaat's what it means.

[Turnip Head]

What happens if we run into a version of ourselves from the past?

Did your past self meet you? If not, then this can't happen.

There's only three plausible options:

1) There is a singular universe, and so your experience of the past is exactly what happened; or
2) There is a multiverse, in which case if you meet a version of yourself from the past, that person is not you; or
3) There will be plot holes in your life story.

Don't forget, retrocausality is about the future effecting the past. So, it's possible you could create the multiverse, but it's also entirely possible that the point of this game is to demonstrate that retrocausality is an illusion designed to keep you pacified.

hmm okay... Should I be doing anything with my hands? Peel offa butterfly's wings or something?

What should I be trying to retro cause?

[Epignosis]

What happens if we run into a version of ourselves from the past?

Did your past self meet you? If not, then this can't happen.

There's only three plausible options:

1) There is a singular universe, and so your experience of the past is exactly what happened; or
2) There is a multiverse, in which case if you meet a version of yourself from the past, that person is not you; or
3) There will be plot holes in your life story.

Don't forget, retrocausality is about the future effecting the past. So, it's possible you could create the multiverse, but it's also entirely possible that the point of this game is to demonstrate that retrocausality is an illusion designed to keep you pacified.

*affecting

Golden's use of "effecting" is correct.

[Scotty]

What happens if we run into a version of ourselves from the past?

Did your past self meet you? If not, then this can't happen.

There's only three plausible options:

1) There is a singular universe, and so your experience of the past is exactly what happened; or
2) There is a multiverse, in which case if you meet a version of yourself from the past, that person is not you; or
3) There will be plot holes in your life story.

Don't forget, retrocausality is about the future effecting the past. So, it's possible you could create the multiverse, but it's also entirely possible that the point of this game is to demonstrate that retrocausality is an illusion designed to keep you pacified.

*affecting

Golden's use of "effecting" is correct.

*currect

[MacDougall]

Here!

[VOTE: ColinisCool] aubergine

Sig is scum. Wrap it up.

[MacDougall]

Woahhhh

So we can claim but shouldn’t all claim at once? What is flavor claim? I prefer strawberry over vanilla

Bad

[Scotty]

Woahhhh

So we can claim but shouldn’t all claim at once? What is flavor claim? I prefer strawberry over vanilla

Bad

Whatchu got against strawberry?

[sig]

Here!

[VOTE: ColinisCool] aubergine

Sig is scum. Wrap it up.

[MacDougall]

Well I warned you all I’d be quieter than usual in this game and, see? I was being honest about that.

Bad

[Golden]

What happens if we run into a version of ourselves from the past?

Did your past self meet you? If not, then this can't happen.

There's only three plausible options:

1) There is a singular universe, and so your experience of the past is exactly what happened; or
2) There is a multiverse, in which case if you meet a version of yourself from the past, that person is not you; or
3) There will be plot holes in your life story.

Don't forget, retrocausality is about the future effecting the past. So, it's possible you could create the multiverse, but it's also entirely possible that the point of this game is to demonstrate that retrocausality is an illusion designed to keep you pacified.

*affecting

This is ludicrous when we are talking about cause and effect. Stupid language.

[Golden]

What happens if we run into a version of ourselves from the past?

Did your past self meet you? If not, then this can't happen.

There's only three plausible options:

1) There is a singular universe, and so your experience of the past is exactly what happened; or
2) There is a multiverse, in which case if you meet a version of yourself from the past, that person is not you; or
3) There will be plot holes in your life story.

Don't forget, retrocausality is about the future effecting the past. So, it's possible you could create the multiverse, but it's also entirely possible that the point of this game is to demonstrate that retrocausality is an illusion designed to keep you pacified.

hmm okay... Should I be doing anything with my hands? Peel offa butterfly's wings or something?

What should I be trying to retro cause?

If you’re mafia, you should be trying to go back in time to kill yourself.

If you’re civilian - just write yourself letters to keep you from being in the wrong place at the wrong time.

[Golden]

Well I warned you all I’d be quieter than usual in this game and, see? I was being honest about that.

Bad

Here we go again.

[Scotty]

Well I warned you all I’d be quieter than usual in this game and, see? I was being honest about that.

Bad

Here we go again.

Except he was good in that game.

So this must mean he’s good again,.,rightt?

[Golden]

Well I warned you all I’d be quieter than usual in this game and, see? I was being honest about that.

Bad

Here we go again.

Except he was good in that game.

So this must mean he’s good again,.,rightt?

I have no read on Mac in this game. I don't presume he's good just because he's been good in similar circumstances in the past. It could just as easily be an intentional move to get me to read him as town. Also, I think there's been at least once he's done this and been bad (Talking Heads), but I'm not 100% certain of that.

[Sloonei]

I want to get married on the ocean!

[Quin]

HI IM HERE AND TYPING IN CAPS TO PSYCHE MYSELF UP FOR THIS GAME BECAUSE I PROMISED I WOULD BE ALL OVER IT THIS TIME OKAY YEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

ok but after the 18th is when i'll have the most time for this, i've got to finish up a project over the next few days.

[Epignosis]

Well I warned you all I’d be quieter than usual in this game and, see? I was being honest about that.

Bad

Here we go again.

Except he was good in that game.

So this must mean he’s good again,.,rightt?

I have no read on Mac in this game. I don't presume he's good just because he's been good in similar circumstances in the past. It could just as easily be an intentional move to get me to read him as town. Also, I think there's been at least once he's done this and been bad (Talking Heads), but I'm not 100% certain of that.

Golden-Mac

Teammates 2483

[ColinIsCool]

If I could travel back in time, I would definitely try to punch myself in the face.

You're willing to wait that long in line?

I’ve got time travel, I can just skip around and find a good spot.

[Epignosis]

If I could travel back in time, I would definitely try to punch myself in the face.

You're willing to wait that long in line?

I’ve got time travel, I can just skip around and find a good spot.

And correct your comma splice.

[ColinIsCool]

That’s lower priority than punching myself in the face, but I’m sure I have room for it sometime.

[MacDougall]

Well I warned you all I’d be quieter than usual in this game and, see? I was being honest about that.

Bad

Here we go again.

Yep. Bad.

[MacDougall]

Well I warned you all I’d be quieter than usual in this game and, see? I was being honest about that.

Bad

Here we go again.

Except he was good in that game.

So this must mean he’s good again,.,rightt?

I have no read on Mac in this game. I don't presume he's good just because he's been good in similar circumstances in the past. It could just as easily be an intentional move to get me to read him as town. Also, I think there's been at least once he's done this and been bad (Talking Heads), but I'm not 100% certain of that.

Golden-Mac

Teammates 2483

Good, but wrong.

[Turnip Head]

I'm gonna go save Lincoln at the theater and just see what happens I guess

[Golden]

Well I warned you all I’d be quieter than usual in this game and, see? I was being honest about that.

Bad

Here we go again.

Except he was good in that game.

So this must mean he’s good again,.,rightt?

I have no read on Mac in this game. I don't presume he's good just because he's been good in similar circumstances in the past. It could just as easily be an intentional move to get me to read him as town. Also, I think there's been at least once he's done this and been bad (Talking Heads), but I'm not 100% certain of that.

Golden-Mac

Teammates 2483

Good, but wrong.

I hope he’s right. We make a good team.

[ColinIsCool]

Is Day 0 24 hrs?

[Spacedaisy]

I just tried to “Like” nutella’s post but realized that function isn’t available on Syndicate for at least another few years

Ooh, I too would like this feature on the syndicate.

I've looked into it before, have yet to find the extension for it.

[speedchuck]

Is Day 0 24 hrs?

Day 0 is until D1 starts.

I've been meaning to ask the thread: What time of day is good for day starts/day ends? Day 1 will be starting tomorrow, but I'm flexible as to when our phase-changes will be taking place.

[ColinIsCool]

I’ve been good with the 8 to 10 pm EST games have been running on here but I’m not particular.

[MacDougall]

Bad

Here we go again.

Except he was good in that game.

So this must mean he’s good again,.,rightt?

I have no read on Mac in this game. I don't presume he's good just because he's been good in similar circumstances in the past. It could just as easily be an intentional move to get me to read him as town. Also, I think there's been at least once he's done this and been bad (Talking Heads), but I'm not 100% certain of that.

Golden-Mac

Teammates 2483

Good, but wrong.

I hope he’s right. We make a good team.

Bad boys bad boys watcha gonna do watcha gonna do when they cum4u?

[Epignosis]

Teammates.

[MacDougall]

Teammates.

Possible

[Scotty]

Teammates.

I am in agreement with this.

Good game! You all played hard!

[insertnamehere]

Here we go again.

Except he was good in that game.

So this must mean he’s good again,.,rightt?

I have no read on Mac in this game. I don't presume he's good just because he's been good in similar circumstances in the past. It could just as easily be an intentional move to get me to read him as town. Also, I think there's been at least once he's done this and been bad (Talking Heads), but I'm not 100% certain of that.

Golden-Mac

Teammates 2483

Good, but wrong.

I hope he’s right. We make a good team.

Bad boys bad boys watcha gonna do watcha gonna do when they cum4u?

"LIKE!"

[MacDougall]

As usual day 1 Mac is right. I told you all Golden was scum.

[Golden]

As usual day 1 Mac is right. I told you all Golden was scum.

I legitimately don’t have the energy to fight you on this this time.

Suffice to say I’d advise everyone else to pay attention to the fact that Mac cannot claim ‘as usual’ in respect of me since he has always been wrong and still is.

Perhaps one day he’ll learn I’m only bad when he gets to day two and realises I haven’t pinged him yet.

[ColinIsCool]

As usual day 1 Mac is right. I told you all Golden was scum.

I legitimately don’t have the energy to fight you on this this time.

Does his accusation feel serious to you?

[Golden]

As usual day 1 Mac is right. I told you all Golden was scum.

I legitimately don’t have the energy to fight you on this this time.

Does his accusation feel serious to you?

It’s never been flippant before.

Macs day one guy is fucking legendary. And pretty good. But for whatever reason he doesn’t get me.

[MacDougall]

As usual day 1 Mac is right. I told you all Golden was scum.

I legitimately don’t have the energy to fight you on this this time.

Does his accusation feel serious to you?

It’s never been flippant before.

Macs day one guy is fucking legendary. And pretty good. But for whatever reason he doesn’t get me.

So you would have me believe that I am wrong AGAIN!?

[insertnamehere]

As usual day 1 Mac is right. I told you all Golden was scum.

I legitimately don’t have the energy to fight you on this this time.

Does his accusation feel serious to you?

It’s never been flippant before.

Macs day one guy is fucking legendary. And pretty good. But for whatever reason he doesn’t get me.

So you would have me believe that I am wrong AGAIN!?

I mean, yeah, if a roulette ball lands on a black space three or four times in a row, there's definitely a higher chance that it'd land on a red space on the next spin. That's just common sense.

[MacDougall]

As usual day 1 Mac is right. I told you all Golden was scum.

I legitimately don’t have the energy to fight you on this this time.

Does his accusation feel serious to you?

It’s never been flippant before.

Macs day one guy is fucking legendary. And pretty good. But for whatever reason he doesn’t get me.

So you would have me believe that I am wrong AGAIN!?

I mean, yeah, if a roulette ball lands on a black space three or four times in a row, there's definitely a higher chance that it'd land on a red space on the next spin. That's just common sense.

Agreed.

[Golden]

As usual day 1 Mac is right. I told you all Golden was scum.

I legitimately don’t have the energy to fight you on this this time.

Does his accusation feel serious to you?

It’s never been flippant before.

Macs day one guy is fucking legendary. And pretty good. But for whatever reason he doesn’t get me.

So you would have me believe that I am wrong AGAIN!?

It doesn't really matter what you believe.

[insertnamehere]

[mention]speedchuck[/mention]

Important game mechanic related question:

Will the title of the game thread be updated each phase with a new pun?