Hogwarts Mafia - END

[Long Con]

Reasons?

If you want to hold up the name of Ravenclaw, you ought to read the rules.

I am not following this, help a brother out.

[JaggedJimmyJay]

This Glorf talk reminds me of the presence of Veritaserum. This game has lie detection - can we lie-detect any post successfully, or are there restrictions? Some games have a rule that you can't LD answers to direct questions, to avoid everyone lining up and saying "I am a Civilian" as an automatic checkable phrase. Also, what happens when Glorf is given Veritaserum? Super-honesty?

This seems like a question better directed toward the host than the game at large, which gives me the impression you didn't ask it because you care about the answer.

[DharmaHelper]

I'm going to have essentially zero time until Tuesday night or Wednesday. While I'm not here y'all best find excuses to do work and not excuses to do fuck all. Epi's recent grumbles are valid.

[VOTE: Quin] aubergine, because he said some shit I didn't like earlier. He provided a token response to Epi's dig at juliets which just looked like "this is where I am supposed to interject with this here comment" instead of "this is a problem and I want to address it".

What was my dig at juliets?

I answered this already in response to juliets, you'll see it soon enough.

I didn't have a "dig" at juliets.

My comment was that we are not mafia partners because I like to discuss things with my mafia teammates, and I "spoiled" something for juliets (even though I PUT THE DAMN THING IN SPOILER TAGS), so we are not bad together in BTSC.

You don't have to believe that, of course, but I threw it out there anyway.

This whole discussion is primo levels of silly.

[timmer]

Oh, by the way, I checked Turnip Head and he is bad.

Voting Turnip Head.

Epi aren't the abilities used at night? We haven't had a game night yet. Or am I missing something (there were A LOT of things to digest in game Set-Up).

Hey all! Just want to point out that I find it difficult to believe that juliets was confused by this post. Like, even I can remember that people say shit like this on day 1. Thank you.

[JaggedJimmyJay]

This whole discussion is primo levels of silly.

The part you've just played in it has been the least meaningful.

[timmer]

Oh and what the christ... as I went to post that, I got the "some posts were made while you were slow-ass typing on your phone" msg but the posts were all cut off and only the right hand side was visible? That a thing?

[Quin]

Oh and what the christ... as I went to post that, I got the "some posts were made while you were slow-ass typing on your phone" msg but the posts were all cut off and only the right hand side was visible? That a thing?

This just happened to me.

[DharmaHelper]

This whole discussion is primo levels of silly.

The part you've just played in it has been the least meaningful.

Meow.

[Quin]

juliets, Epi says you’re not on his team. Whaddya say to that?

All you're doing is asking juliets for a read on Epi. It's no more "token" than my bull, 3J.

[Quin]

that would be less token for those of you who are somewhat competent in the english language

[Long Con]

My comment was that we are not mafia partners because I like to discuss things with my mafia teammates, and I "spoiled" something for juliets (even though I PUT THE DAMN THING IN SPOILER TAGS), so we are not bad together in BTSC.

This logic seems unsound. Do you mean that you pre-discuss everything you say in the thread with your teammates when you're bad?

[JaggedJimmyJay]

juliets, Epi says you’re not on his team. Whaddya say to that?

All you're doing is asking juliets for a read on Epi. It's no more "token" than my bull, 3J.

I was asking juliets to respond in some capacity to what I interpreted to be an accusation. You ponderfaced Epignosis as if he'd said something suspicious. What was the point of your post?

[Epignosis]

I didn't have a "dig" at juliets.

My comment was that we are not mafia partners because I like to discuss things with my mafia teammates, and I "spoiled" something for juliets (even though I PUT THE DAMN THING IN SPOILER TAGS), so we are not bad together in BTSC.

You don't have to believe that, of course, but I threw it out there anyway.

Oh.

What do you think of Quin's response?

I don't suspect him for it. I think he saw something in it, and went after it. I think that's a good mark for him, even if he was erroneous.

[Quin]

juliets, Epi says you’re not on his team. Whaddya say to that?

All you're doing is asking juliets for a read on Epi. It's no more "token" than my bull, 3J.

I was asking juliets to respond in some capacity to what I interpreted to be an accusation. You ponderfaced Epignosis as if he'd said something suspicious. What was the point of your post?

It's a legal requirement in mafia for someone to respond in kind when a player mentions not being somebody's teammate.

[JaggedJimmyJay]

This logic seems unsound.

What does that mean to you?

[DharmaHelper]

Seems like a dumb premise to me is all.

Like, am I supposed to believe that remark/spoiler was meant specifically for Juliets? Or that if you were bad with Juliets the first thing you talk about in BTSC is "Hey I haven't read all the books please don't spoil this specific thing for me" or w/e?

I dunno. Seems like a dumb hill to die on.

[Quin]

I didn't have a "dig" at juliets.

My comment was that we are not mafia partners because I like to discuss things with my mafia teammates, and I "spoiled" something for juliets (even though I PUT THE DAMN THING IN SPOILER TAGS), so we are not bad together in BTSC.

You don't have to believe that, of course, but I threw it out there anyway.

Oh.

What do you think of Quin's response?

I don't suspect him for it. I think he saw something in it, and went after it. I think that's a good mark for him, even if he was erroneous.

You think too much of me.

[Epignosis]

My comment was that we are not mafia partners because I like to discuss things with my mafia teammates, and I "spoiled" something for juliets (even though I PUT THE DAMN THING IN SPOILER TAGS), so we are not bad together in BTSC.

This logic seems unsound. Do you mean that you pre-discuss everything you say in the thread with your teammates when you're bad?

There isn't any logic to it. I've been bad with juliets before, and juliets loves chat (see: discord). We would have been talking this stuff up, and juliets asks questions about things even when bad.

So my point is this:

juliets and I are not bad teammates together.

Use that. Work with it. Bye.

[Epignosis]

Not really "bye." I'm still here. Just doing things.

[DharmaHelper]

My comment was that we are not mafia partners because I like to discuss things with my mafia teammates, and I "spoiled" something for juliets (even though I PUT THE DAMN THING IN SPOILER TAGS), so we are not bad together in BTSC.

This logic seems unsound. Do you mean that you pre-discuss everything you say in the thread with your teammates when you're bad?

There isn't any logic to it. I've been bad with juliets before, and juliets loves chat (see: discord). We would have been talking this stuff up, and juliets asks questions about things even when bad.

So my point is this:

juliets and I are not bad teammates together.

Use that. Work with it. Bye.

Cheeky way to best Veritiserum or Epi being Epi?

[JaggedJimmyJay]

Seems like a dumb premise to me is all.

Like, am I supposed to believe that remark/spoiler was meant specifically for Juliets? Or that if you were bad with Juliets the first thing you talk about in BTSC is "Hey I haven't read all the books please don't spoil this specific thing for me" or w/e?

I dunno. Seems like a dumb hill to die on.

It probably is a dumb premise. Do you read any of the players involved any particular way as a result of that dumb premise?

[DharmaHelper]

Seems like a dumb premise to me is all.

Like, am I supposed to believe that remark/spoiler was meant specifically for Juliets? Or that if you were bad with Juliets the first thing you talk about in BTSC is "Hey I haven't read all the books please don't spoil this specific thing for me" or w/e?

I dunno. Seems like a dumb hill to die on.

It probably is a dumb premise. Do you read any of the players involved any particular way as a result of that dumb premise?

Not currently. I'm not particularly interested in digging into it and trying to squeeze the rock, so to speak. No juice there. Not worth my brain power. Moving on.

[JaggedJimmyJay]

Use that. Work with it. Bye.

Quin and I are not teammates, because I've busted his balls. You don't have to believe that of course, but if it's true how will you use that information to progress your hunt under the present game conditions?

[Epignosis]

Use that. Work with it. Bye.

Quin and I are not teammates, because I've busted his balls. You don't have to believe that of course, but if it's true how will you use that information to progress your hunt under the present game conditions?

I don't hate it.

[JaggedJimmyJay]

Not currently. I'm not particularly interested in digging into it and trying to squeeze the rock, so to speak. No juice there. Not worth my brain power. Moving on.

Understandable. Your next challenge is to create a rock more worth squeezing.

[DharmaHelper]

Not currently. I'm not particularly interested in digging into it and trying to squeeze the rock, so to speak. No juice there. Not worth my brain power. Moving on.

Understandable. Your next challenge is to create a rock more worth squeezing.

It's relatively late, my sleep schedule is fucked, and I win games when I troll you and refuse to add anything of value to discussion.

2/3 of those things means I'll dig my heels in and do some rock-squeezing tomorrow.

[Epignosis]

I lost money because the Packers discovered they had running backs.

So if I'm pissy tonight, do pardon me.

[Epignosis]

I suspect these people: JJJ, TH, DH, and timmer in no particular order.

[Epignosis]

Oh, by the way, I checked Turnip Head and he is bad.

Voting Turnip Head.

Epi aren't the abilities used at night? We haven't had a game night yet. Or am I missing something (there were A LOT of things to digest in game Set-Up).

Hey all! Just want to point out that I find it difficult to believe that juliets was confused by this post. Like, even I can remember that people say shit like this on day 1. Thank you.

juliets = / = timmer

[DharmaHelper]

I suspect these people: JJJ, TH, DH, and timmer in no particular order.

*puts on sherlock holmes hat*

Is that because we're all posting on this page of the thread

[DharmaHelper]

Damnit TH's last post was last page. Foiled again.

[Epignosis]

I suspect these people: JJJ, TH, DH, and timmer in no particular order.

*puts on sherlock holmes hat*

Is that because we're all posting on this page of the thread

You're filler.

[DharmaHelper]

I suspect these people: JJJ, TH, DH, and timmer in no particular order.

*puts on sherlock holmes hat*

Is that because we're all posting on this page of the thread

You're filler.

I'm filler on your list or do you mean "your filler"

[timmer]

Seriously though, does the left half of the posts thing happen on all phones? Do I need a new background skin thing?

[Quin]

Seriously though, does the left half of the posts thing happen on all phones? Do I need a new background skin thing?

No, it happened on my computer a bit earlier. For now best just post and read what people have said after.

[Long Con]

My comment was that we are not mafia partners because I like to discuss things with my mafia teammates, and I "spoiled" something for juliets (even though I PUT THE DAMN THING IN SPOILER TAGS), so we are not bad together in BTSC.

This logic seems unsound. Do you mean that you pre-discuss everything you say in the thread with your teammates when you're bad?

There isn't any logic to it. I've been bad with juliets before, and juliets loves chat (see: discord). We would have been talking this stuff up, and juliets asks questions about things even when bad.

So my point is this:

juliets and I are not bad teammates together.

Use that. Work with it. Bye.

Geez. Okay. Sorry I asked.

[Epignosis]

My comment was that we are not mafia partners because I like to discuss things with my mafia teammates, and I "spoiled" something for juliets (even though I PUT THE DAMN THING IN SPOILER TAGS), so we are not bad together in BTSC.

This logic seems unsound. Do you mean that you pre-discuss everything you say in the thread with your teammates when you're bad?

There isn't any logic to it. I've been bad with juliets before, and juliets loves chat (see: discord). We would have been talking this stuff up, and juliets asks questions about things even when bad.

So my point is this:

juliets and I are not bad teammates together.

Use that. Work with it. Bye.

Geez. Okay. Sorry I asked.

I wasn't aiming to be rude. I thought all the cool kids said "Bye" at the end of their posts, indicating they had summed up their points.

I didn't mean to offend by initiating shitty cultural norms.

[Epignosis]

I just wrote "initiating shitty cultural norms" when I meant " imitating shitty cultural norms."

Why the fuck am I so low on bourbon?

[karavalenge]

I'd like to think of all of my fellow Slytherin as teammates.

[Owner of a Lonely Heart]

It's relatively late, my sleep schedule is fucked, and I win games when I troll you and refuse to add anything of value to discussion.

2/3 of those things means I'll dig my heels in and do some rock-squeezing tomorrow.

Hi, it's good to play with you again, though I'm still suspicious of you.

[VOTE: DharmaHelper] aubergine

[Epignosis]

It's relatively late, my sleep schedule is fucked, and I win games when I troll you and refuse to add anything of value to discussion.

2/3 of those things means I'll dig my heels in and do some rock-squeezing tomorrow.

Hi, it's good to play with you again, though I'm still suspicious of you.

[VOTE: DharmaHelper] aubergine

"Still?"

[Owner of a Lonely Heart]

It's relatively late, my sleep schedule is fucked, and I win games when I troll you and refuse to add anything of value to discussion.

2/3 of those things means I'll dig my heels in and do some rock-squeezing tomorrow.

Hi, it's good to play with you again, though I'm still suspicious of you.

[VOTE: DharmaHelper] aubergine

"Still?"

In the Firefly game we played together, I was suspicious of him the whole game. I just couldn't bring myself to trust him sadly. We were actually on the same side though. Rip.

[Owner of a Lonely Heart]

I suspect these people: JJJ, TH, DH, and timmer in no particular order.

Enlighten me about the JJJ read.

[DharmaHelper]

It's relatively late, my sleep schedule is fucked, and I win games when I troll you and refuse to add anything of value to discussion.

2/3 of those things means I'll dig my heels in and do some rock-squeezing tomorrow.

Hi, it's good to play with you again, though I'm still suspicious of you.

[VOTE: DharmaHelper] aubergine

Cool.

[Epignosis]

I suspect these people: JJJ, TH, DH, and timmer in no particular order.

Enlighten me about the JJJ read.

I think his treatment of Quin is fishy.

[Owner of a Lonely Heart]

I think his treatment of Quin is fishy.

What about Quin do you like so far?

[Owner of a Lonely Heart]

Cool.

I thought you were done for the day. What changed your mind?

[Epignosis]

It's relatively late, my sleep schedule is fucked, and I win games when I troll you and refuse to add anything of value to discussion.

2/3 of those things means I'll dig my heels in and do some rock-squeezing tomorrow.

Hi, it's good to play with you again, though I'm still suspicious of you.

[VOTE: DharmaHelper] aubergine

"Still?"

In the Firefly game we played together, I was suspicious of him the whole game. I just couldn't bring myself to trust him sadly. We were actually on the same side though. Rip.

So you are voting DH because he was a civilian in the a completely different game and you suspected him there?

[DharmaHelper]

Cool.

I thought you were done for the day. What changed your mind?

I didn't say I was done for the day, I said I'm tired and I don't think I'd be able to dig into the thread productively.

[Epignosis]

I think his treatment of Quin is fishy.

What about Quin do you like so far?

Are you reading the thread or not?