S~V~S wrote:Now see, i would have put that in sarcastic orange :nod:
FixedFZ says:A sense of humor, and popular. You must be one hell of a catch

Moderator: Community Team
S~V~S wrote:Now see, i would have put that in sarcastic orange :nod:
FixedFZ says:A sense of humor, and popular. You must be one hell of a catch
Epignosis wrote:If llama is good, it means we exist in a universe in which multitasking llama can call out the first of two mafia while simultaneously calling out two civilians.
I don't want to live in that universe.
The fact that you take suspicions so seriously makes me very suspicious of you.S~V~S wrote:![]()
Do too have one, I laugh a lot and so do those who know me well~ but I have been lynched SO MANY TIMES for blowing off a question i thought was a joke, lol. For me suspicions are srs bsns, and if someone asks me a question i do them the courtesy of assuming they are serious.
FZ. wrote:SureMister Rearranger wrote:Can I haz suspicionz?
Should I take your suspicion of him seriously? Not much else to do so far. Or I could just keep the playful banter going for pages and pages. So yes Mister Rearranger, you can haz some too.insertnamehere wrote:The fact that you take suspicions so seriously makes me very suspicious of you.S~V~S wrote:![]()
Do too have one, I laugh a lot and so do those who know me well~ but I have been lynched SO MANY TIMES for blowing off a question i thought was a joke, lol. For me suspicions are srs bsns, and if someone asks me a question i do them the courtesy of assuming they are serious.
Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Wed Dec 16, 2020 7:33 pm Just how many days of "let's yeet them tomorrow" can a mafioso survive?
The answer: all of them, if you are a marmot.
I am always serious 100% of the time.Metalmarsh89 wrote:Should I take your suspicion of him seriously? Not much else to do so far. Or I could just keep the playful banter going for pages and pages. So yes Mister Rearranger, you can haz some too.insertnamehere wrote:The fact that you take suspicions so seriously makes me very suspicious of you.S~V~S wrote:![]()
Do too have one, I laugh a lot and so do those who know me well~ but I have been lynched SO MANY TIMES for blowing off a question i thought was a joke, lol. For me suspicions are srs bsns, and if someone asks me a question i do them the courtesy of assuming they are serious.
I would comment, but I'm too depressed to proceed since SVS sarcastically implied that I am not a good catch.S~V~S wrote:*Falls Over Dead*
Epignosis wrote:If llama is good, it means we exist in a universe in which multitasking llama can call out the first of two mafia while simultaneously calling out two civilians.
I don't want to live in that universe.
Well, I guess we'll just both be depressed and horrible this game.S~V~S wrote:After you said i had no sense of humor
Epignosis wrote:If llama is good, it means we exist in a universe in which multitasking llama can call out the first of two mafia while simultaneously calling out two civilians.
I don't want to live in that universe.
Brian?insertnamehere wrote: I am always serious 100% of the time.
Boo games are ridiculously complicated, so I wish you luck with that!thellama73 wrote:Well, since I'm not reading any of the host posts, this should be interesting.Hedgeowl wrote:I just realized the downside of this format is that we can't all sit around a table having boo read the instructions to us, while some pay attention, some zone out when they get it, others just figure it out as the games starts, and the rest never quite figure it all out, but still manage to win somehow.Epignosis wrote:I'm still on chapter 17 of the instructions.
Thank you, BWT. I bet you're a good catch.birdwithteeth11 wrote: Boo games are ridiculously complicated, so I wish you luck with that!
Epignosis wrote:If llama is good, it means we exist in a universe in which multitasking llama can call out the first of two mafia while simultaneously calling out two civilians.
I don't want to live in that universe.
I was going to mention this too. I guess we can be ignorant together!Dom wrote:I usually die in Boo games, so I guess I'm pretty ignorant.![]()
Why thank you, llama! I bet you're a good catch too!thellama73 wrote:Thank you, BWT. I bet you're a good catch.birdwithteeth11 wrote: Boo games are ridiculously complicated, so I wish you luck with that!
<Pointed glare at SVS>
Turnip Head wrote: We need to lynch Pennsylvania Bitch.
No.FZ. wrote:I know. I'm just teasing you. Don't take me seriously...or do.S~V~S wrote:Actually it is just playful banter, we do ALOT of that around here, we have not, and never will discourage fluff.I'm in a weird mood. Ignore me
@linki: no, Kitty. It was a joke. But it doesn't mean they can't be.
Does SVS always regard everything at face value?
i haven't heard that word in so long... such nostalgia <3Mister Rearranger wrote:FZ. wrote:SureMister Rearranger wrote:Can I haz suspicionz?*glomps*
After only 2 games on this site, I've given up trying on day0. People just reply with sarcastic come backs. So I say, if you can't beat then, join them.Hedgeowl wrote:So anybody here actually good at catching baddies?
Is your way of trying to make me suspicious of SVS in a not so subtle way? Or did you think her reactions were genuinely too serious?Dom wrote:No.FZ. wrote:I know. I'm just teasing you. Don't take me seriously...or do.S~V~S wrote:Actually it is just playful banter, we do ALOT of that around here, we have not, and never will discourage fluff.I'm in a weird mood. Ignore me
@linki: no, Kitty. It was a joke. But it doesn't mean they can't be.
Does SVS always regard everything at face value?
I found her to be neither civvie or baddie here. I found her being herself.FZ. wrote:Is your way of trying to make me suspicious of SVS in a not so subtle way? Or did you think her reactions were genuinely too serious?Dom wrote:No.FZ. wrote:I know. I'm just teasing you. Don't take me seriously...or do.S~V~S wrote:Actually it is just playful banter, we do ALOT of that around here, we have not, and never will discourage fluff.I'm in a weird mood. Ignore me
@linki: no, Kitty. It was a joke. But it doesn't mean they can't be.
Does SVS always regard everything at face value?
That's an easy way outDom wrote:I found her to be neither civvie or baddie here. I found her being herself.FZ. wrote:Is your way of trying to make me suspicious of SVS in a not so subtle way? Or did you think her reactions were genuinely too serious?Dom wrote:No.FZ. wrote:I know. I'm just teasing you. Don't take me seriously...or do.S~V~S wrote:Actually it is just playful banter, we do ALOT of that around here, we have not, and never will discourage fluff.I'm in a weird mood. Ignore me
@linki: no, Kitty. It was a joke. But it doesn't mean they can't be.
Does SVS always regard everything at face value?
I don't think it means much to her alignment.
So you're complaining about the endless banter yet doing nothing to progress the game. Make me think you just want to seem serious without really delivering.Metalmarsh89 wrote:Should I take your suspicion of him seriously? Not much else to do so far. Or I could just keep the playful banter going for pages and pages. So yes Mister Rearranger, you can haz some too.insertnamehere wrote:The fact that you take suspicions so seriously makes me very suspicious of you.S~V~S wrote:![]()
Do too have one, I laugh a lot and so do those who know me well~ but I have been lynched SO MANY TIMES for blowing off a question i thought was a joke, lol. For me suspicions are srs bsns, and if someone asks me a question i do them the courtesy of assuming they are serious.
Turnip Head wrote: We need to lynch Pennsylvania Bitch.
And some people use the time to cast aspersions on other people's desirability as mate.S~V~S wrote:Dom had that Avi for quite a while, as I recall.
And Day Zero is a day to get the feel of things, and the feel of people. Since you can't vote to lynch anyhow, alot of people use the time to settle into the thread before we go into the cat/mouse phase.
Epignosis wrote:If llama is good, it means we exist in a universe in which multitasking llama can call out the first of two mafia while simultaneously calling out two civilians.
I don't want to live in that universe.
Thanks it must be my iPad then. Dom is normal again, but BWT has a smiley instead as his avi. Oh well.S~V~S wrote:Dom had that Avi for quite a while, as I recall.
And Day Zero is a day to get the feel of things, and the feel of people. Since you can't vote to lynch anyhow, alot of people use the time to settle into the thread before we go into the cat/mouse phase.
Turnip Head wrote: We need to lynch Pennsylvania Bitch.
I would never abuse my powers like that?Hedgeowl wrote:Anybody else see Dom's avatar as BWTs old one? Dom have you been drinking and avatar switching with your new mod powers or is it my device making things go cray cray?
He went and posted in the Game of Champions thread, as a matter of fact.reywaS wrote:nub DharmaHelper.
Are you going to a temple or something to meditate on your thoughts before sharing them with us?
Bouncing two games atm, ya caught meMister Rearranger wrote:He went and posted in the Game of Champions thread, as a matter of fact.reywaS wrote:nub DharmaHelper.
Are you going to a temple or something to meditate on your thoughts before sharing them with us?
Lying already, are we DH?![]()
While I feel your pain, last game you were pushing people more by this point already, and even though you were an indi, you said you chose to work with the civvies. So should I take it that this is how you play when a baddie?thellama73 wrote:And some people use the time to cast aspersions on other people's desirability as mate.S~V~S wrote:Dom had that Avi for quite a while, as I recall.
And Day Zero is a day to get the feel of things, and the feel of people. Since you can't vote to lynch anyhow, alot of people use the time to settle into the thread before we go into the cat/mouse phase.
I don't think I understand what you mean.FZ. wrote:While I feel your pain, last game you were pushing people more by this point already, and even though you were an indi, you said you chose to work with the civvies. So should I take it that this is how you play when a baddie?thellama73 wrote:And some people use the time to cast aspersions on other people's desirability as mate.S~V~S wrote:Dom had that Avi for quite a while, as I recall.
And Day Zero is a day to get the feel of things, and the feel of people. Since you can't vote to lynch anyhow, alot of people use the time to settle into the thread before we go into the cat/mouse phase.
Epignosis wrote:If llama is good, it means we exist in a universe in which multitasking llama can call out the first of two mafia while simultaneously calling out two civilians.
I don't want to live in that universe.
I mean that you're dwelling too much on something that is off topic. I'm just wondering if it's convenient playing that card.I kind of liked the way you played in the Shawshank game, so I say: Less moping more huntingthellama73 wrote:I don't think I understand what you mean.FZ. wrote:While I feel your pain, last game you were pushing people more by this point already, and even though you were an indi, you said you chose to work with the civvies. So should I take it that this is how you play when a baddie?thellama73 wrote:And some people use the time to cast aspersions on other people's desirability as mate.S~V~S wrote:Dom had that Avi for quite a while, as I recall.
And Day Zero is a day to get the feel of things, and the feel of people. Since you can't vote to lynch anyhow, alot of people use the time to settle into the thread before we go into the cat/mouse phase.
Okay, I see. Thanks for clarifying. I guess I would respond in two ways. First, I went after people in Shawshank because I saw things to go after. I haven't seen anything of note to go after here yet. That doesn't mean I am not looking.FZ. wrote: I mean that you're dwelling too much on something that is off topic. I'm just wondering if it's convenient playing that card.I kind of liked the way you played in the Shawshank game, so I say: Less moping more hunting
Epignosis wrote:If llama is good, it means we exist in a universe in which multitasking llama can call out the first of two mafia while simultaneously calling out two civilians.
I don't want to live in that universe.
I really like your posts so far this game, they feel like the FZ I know from KSITE. That being said, I do wonder what is up with that comment about having given up trying on Day 0, clearly that is not that case? Which I am glad it is not, but I am having trouble following why you've said that but you have went on to "try". It's just a contradiction and I wonder if there is a reason behind it such as you feel you need to make yourself look as good as possible right off the bat?FZ. wrote:After only 2 games on this site, I've given up trying on day0. People just reply with sarcastic come backs. So I say, if you can't beat then, join them.Hedgeowl wrote:So anybody here actually good at catching baddies?
Though I have to say, it makes it so much easier for the baddies to blend in. Right now, I'm not sure who is more suspicious: those trying to scum hunt, or those that are just talking about everything but the game.
I did not play Shawshank but I understand that, there really is not much to go off of yet. If you kept your reply at that I would feel okay about you, but the "terrible record of finding baddies" sets of alarm bells in my head. While at least you included details, I see scum use their track record as an excuse quite often.thellama73 wrote:Okay, I see. Thanks for clarifying. I guess I would respond in two ways. First, I went after people in Shawshank because I saw things to go after. I haven't seen anything of note to go after here yet. That doesn't mean I am not looking.FZ. wrote: I mean that you're dwelling too much on something that is off topic. I'm just wondering if it's convenient playing that card.I kind of liked the way you played in the Shawshank game, so I say: Less moping more hunting
Second, I am making somewhat of a conscious effort to improve on my generally terrible record of finding baddies. I think that too often, early in the game, I manufacture cases on people because I am desperate to find something on which to base my vote, and this biases my thinking later in the game. Just look at all the times I relentlessly pursued Hedgeowl only to have her flip civ. I am trying not to do that this game. I am playing it laid back, waiting to see if anything catches my eye. It's still early yet, and we have plenty of time before the first lynch.
I was wondering were you were. It seems you are affected by the syndicate curse toothellama73 wrote:Okay, I see. Thanks for clarifying. I guess I would respond in two ways. First, I went after people in Shawshank because I saw things to go after. I haven't seen anything of note to go after here yet. That doesn't mean I am not looking.FZ. wrote: I mean that you're dwelling too much on something that is off topic. I'm just wondering if it's convenient playing that card.I kind of liked the way you played in the Shawshank game, so I say: Less moping more hunting
Second, I am making somewhat of a conscious effort to improve on my generally terrible record of finding baddies. I think that too often, early in the game, I manufacture cases on people because I am desperate to find something on which to base my vote, and this biases my thinking later in the game. Just look at all the times I relentlessly pursued Hedgeowl only to have her flip civ. I am trying not to do that this game. I am playing it laid back, waiting to see if anything catches my eye. It's still early yet, and we have plenty of time before the first lynch.[/quot
Thanks for answering. The second paragraph is a little contradictory to the first one, since you didn't make that conscious decision last game, did you?
Anyway, I know there's plenty of time before the lynch, I just like to push things forward because how are we going to be anywhere better next day if all we do is joke around?
kneel4justice wrote:I really like your posts so far this game, they feel like the FZ I know from KSITE. That being said, I do wonder what is up with that comment about having given up trying on Day 0, clearly that is not that case? Which I am glad it is not, but I am having trouble following why you've said that but you have went on to "try". It's just a contradiction and I wonder if there is a reason behind it such as you feel you need to make yourself look as good as possible right off the bat?FZ. wrote:After only 2 games on this site, I've given up trying on day0. People just reply with sarcastic come backs. So I say, if you can't beat then, join them.Hedgeowl wrote:So anybody here actually good at catching baddies?
Though I have to say, it makes it so much easier for the baddies to blend in. Right now, I'm not sure who is more suspicious: those trying to scum hunt, or those that are just talking about everything but the game.
FZ. wrote: I was wondering were you were. It seems you are affected by the syndicate curse toobecause after only one game, you're not your usual aggressive self as I'm used to even this early in the game.
I think I meant that I've given up hope people will actually do something. It doesn't mean I won't try, even if I tone it down a bit until the rest decide to actually join the game...
Did anything catch your eye so far?
@linki: I know, I was trying to remember who was the baddie that said it not so long ago. But I've said that in the past as well, and I was a civ, so I can't fault him for that