Mafia: A World Asunder - GAME THREAD [Day 13]

[Sloonei]

Has anyone seen Quin? At this point I'd expect to see him angrily hissing at the people accusing him.

I think I spotted him at Bondi Beach.

[insertnamehere]

I love this whole "trust-team" idea that JOH and CBob are throwing around.

Anyone want to openly team up with me? I'm an honorable, trustworthy person, according to the most trustworthy person I know, who is of course myself.

If G-Man sent you a friend request, would you accept or ignore it?

I'd accept, because I'm an earnest, gregarious person. Then, if he continues to act shadily, I might rescind the friendship compact.

[insertnamehere]

To me the only reason a person would vote to tie a lynch that they weren't in danger in is because they are on the tribunal or know who is and they want to save the person that is in the lead during the un-tied period.

Significantly more plausible baddie motives RE: Ties.

Knowing more than meets the eye is far from the only reason that ties happen. At EOD it does look suspicious but it happens many times during the day phase as well. Some people have hunches about and reads on people that lead them to tie up the poll. Poll momentum shifts as the day progresses as well. Your post is very short-sighted, reactive, and dismissive. Anyone else posting it and I’d be somewhat suspicious. But you’re you, so I don’t know if the needle moves much.

this post irks me

Why?

it's short-sighted, reactive, and dismissive. Anyone else posting it and I'd be somewhat suspicious. But it's G-Man, so I don't know if the needle moves much.

You're bad.

Why?

[Sloonei]

Mac is supatowing

Sloonei also feels like supatowning but in a way that's not so hard to fake

We're getting pretty loose with the term supatowning these days. Can't easily fake supatown.

Yeah, I'm just doing the standard Day 1 poo-fling tactic so far. Supertowning doesn't start happening until Day 3 or so.

[insertnamehere]

I love this whole "trust-team" idea that JOH and CBob are throwing around.

Anyone want to openly team up with me? I'm an honorable, trustworthy person, according to the most trustworthy person I know, who is of course myself.

Sure. Let's be friends.

Hiya new best bud!

On a scale of 1 to 10, how genuinely sus are you of DDL? 1 being "I just randomly said something about him to kickstart discussion, and I don't actually believe any of it," and 10 being "I will stake my entire mafia reputation on DDL being bad."

[Sloonei]

Could be but I just have never seen mafia Mac get away with that so I'm not that paranoid about it.

I mean I played with him as a baddie and he just lazily coasted and bandwagoned to victory.

Despite having played with Mac for like... 100 years going back to RYM, I actually have never been able to distinguish between town Mac and scum Mac. But I haven't registered the same level of commitment to his reads as I'd normally get in the like 10 posts he's made this game.

[Sloonei]

Anyone care to guess how many total bad guys there are? We've got two teams. 4 & 4, plus various indies?

[Lunalee]

Are people really suspecting me for the role stuff?

I just liked the puzzle and wanted to see if I could figure it out.

Agreed. Epi doesn't look too bad for pointing out that you could be making a baddie play, but everyone else who has gone, "yeppers, DDL is bad for trying to discuss roles," and jumped on you wagon looks a bit suspect to me.

[insertnamehere]

Are people really suspecting me for the role stuff?

I just liked the puzzle and wanted to see if I could figure it out.

Agreed. Epi doesn't look too bad for pointing out that you could be making a baddie play, but everyone else who has gone, "yeppers, DDL is bad for trying to discuss roles," and jumped on you wagon looks a bit suspect to me.

"LIKE!"

[Lunalee]

Sloonei is supertowning, which is good.

Why? Sloonei also made a game mechanics type post. When DDL does it, he's bad, but when Sloonei does it he's "supertown"?

[nutella]

If I can't check in tomorrow I don't want my vote to be on cbob as a joke, so I am publicly announcing a [VOTE: DDL] aubergine wagon contribution for the foreseeable future.

Yuck

[MacDougall]

Mr Sloo. Tell me how I can do better for you missah. You want me to shine up your shoes real good like? Or maybe wash your feet real good like?

Why am I town? Why is Jack bad?

1. I am really good at tone reading people
2. I have a sixth sense for Darth Sloo and I do not sense him
3. Jack ... is bad?

Your sixth sense has picked up on Darth Sloo in our previous two games together despite him not being there. What's different now?
Why is Jack bad?

And I will never live down the shame of it.

Jack is bad because the voices in my head tell me he is bad.

[MacDougall]

To me the only reason a person would vote to tie a lynch that they weren't in danger in is because they are on the tribunal or know who is and they want to save the person that is in the lead during the un-tied period.

Significantly more plausible baddie motives RE: Ties.

Knowing more than meets the eye is far from the only reason that ties happen. At EOD it does look suspicious but it happens many times during the day phase as well. Some people have hunches about and reads on people that lead them to tie up the poll. Poll momentum shifts as the day progresses as well. Your post is very short-sighted, reactive, and dismissive. Anyone else posting it and I’d be somewhat suspicious. But you’re you, so I don’t know if the needle moves much.

this post irks me

Why?

it's short-sighted, reactive, and dismissive. Anyone else posting it and I'd be somewhat suspicious. But it's G-Man, so I don't know if the needle moves much.

You're bad.

Why?

The voices.

[MacDougall]

Mac is supatowing

Sloonei also feels like supatowning but in a way that's not so hard to fake

That's funny because I feel like Mac is just spewing Macdougall Meta 101 bullshit and it reads as phony baloney garbo.

We have entered unchartered territory here folks.

[Lunalee]

Screw it let's get this over with early or I'll be uneasy for the rest of the game [VOTE: jackofhearts] aubergine

Sorry, but that is not a god reason to vote someone. Anything Jack has done this game to make you suspect him?

[insertnamehere]

If I can't check in tomorrow I don't want my vote to be on cbob as a joke, so I am publicly announcing a [VOTE: DDL] aubergine wagon contribution for the foreseeable future.

Yuck

Right now Colin is probably who I'm closest to voting for, mainly because of that post.

[MacDougall]

Screw it let's get this over with early or I'll be uneasy for the rest of the game [VOTE: jackofhearts] aubergine

Sorry, but that is not a god reason to vote someone. Anything Jack has done this game to make you suspect him?

It's day 1. Nobody has a good reason to vote anyone. Why did you pick nutella to attack? Is it because Jack's your scum teammate? Got eem.

[Lunalee]

Really feeling a Colin vote right now. Mostly for the way he hopped on DDL so early.

[MacDougall]

How about Jack though? Can I offer anyone a nice cool refreshing Jack vote?

[Lunalee]

Screw it let's get this over with early or I'll be uneasy for the rest of the game [VOTE: jackofhearts] aubergine

Sorry, but that is not a god reason to vote someone. Anything Jack has done this game to make you suspect him?

It's day 1. Nobody has a good reason to vote anyone. Why did you pick nutella to attack? Is it because Jack's your scum teammate? Got eem.

I have a good reason to vote Colin. Point invalid.

[insertnamehere]

Screw it let's get this over with early or I'll be uneasy for the rest of the game [VOTE: jackofhearts] aubergine

Sorry, but that is not a god reason to vote someone. Anything Jack has done this game to make you suspect him?

It's day 1. Nobody has a good reason to vote anyone. Why did you pick nutella to attack? Is it because Jack's your scum teammate? Got eem.

I have a good reason to vote Colin. Point invalid.

MAC HAS BEEN ATTACKED

[MacDougall]

Screw it let's get this over with early or I'll be uneasy for the rest of the game [VOTE: jackofhearts] aubergine

Sorry, but that is not a god reason to vote someone. Anything Jack has done this game to make you suspect him?

It's day 1. Nobody has a good reason to vote anyone. Why did you pick nutella to attack? Is it because Jack's your scum teammate? Got eem.

I have a good reason to vote Colin. Point invalid.

That's your opinion though. From the outside looking in your reason sucks. Nutella probably thinks her reason is great too.

Point invalid.

[MacDougall]

Screw it let's get this over with early or I'll be uneasy for the rest of the game [VOTE: jackofhearts] aubergine

Sorry, but that is not a god reason to vote someone. Anything Jack has done this game to make you suspect him?

It's day 1. Nobody has a good reason to vote anyone. Why did you pick nutella to attack? Is it because Jack's your scum teammate? Got eem.

I have a good reason to vote Colin. Point invalid.

MAC HAS BEEN ATTACKED

Sound the alarm. Drop the shutters. Raise the balloons.

[Sloonei]

How about Jack though? Can I offer anyone a nice cool refreshing Jack vote?

What's in it?

[MacDougall]

How about Jack though? Can I offer anyone a nice cool refreshing Jack vote?

What's in it?

Kahlua, lime cordial and alpaca milk.

[Sloonei]

I've seen nothing that's not par for the course with Jack. I have concerns about Colin, but I would not say that they are solid reasons to lynch him just yet. We're not even 24 hours into Day 1 yet.

[Lunalee]

Screw it let's get this over with early or I'll be uneasy for the rest of the game [VOTE: jackofhearts] aubergine

Sorry, but that is not a god reason to vote someone. Anything Jack has done this game to make you suspect him?

It's day 1. Nobody has a good reason to vote anyone. Why did you pick nutella to attack? Is it because Jack's your scum teammate? Got eem.

I have a good reason to vote Colin. Point invalid.

That's your opinion though. From the outside looking in your reason sucks. Nutella probably thinks her reason is great too.

Point invalid.

Nutella's reason has nothing to do with this game or Jacks posts this game. It is completely "Jack fooled me so hard in Hogwarts Mafia that I can't trust him ever again, and therefore want him out of the game"

[MacDougall]

Screw it let's get this over with early or I'll be uneasy for the rest of the game [VOTE: jackofhearts] aubergine

Sorry, but that is not a god reason to vote someone. Anything Jack has done this game to make you suspect him?

It's day 1. Nobody has a good reason to vote anyone. Why did you pick nutella to attack? Is it because Jack's your scum teammate? Got eem.

I have a good reason to vote Colin. Point invalid.

That's your opinion though. From the outside looking in your reason sucks. Nutella probably thinks her reason is great too.

Point invalid.

Nutella's reason has nothing to do with this game or Jacks posts this game. It is completely "Jack fooled me so hard in Hogwarts Mafia that I can't trust him ever again, and therefore want him out of the game"

Is that her reason? How interesting..................................

Nutella's teammate!

[S~V~S]

Ugh, I had a giant multi linki post that takes forever to make on this site and my internet crapped out and I lost it. Here are the pertinents~

If I can't check in tomorrow I don't want my vote to be on cbob as a joke, so I am publicly announcing a [VOTE: DDL] aubergine wagon contribution for the foreseeable future.

Yuck

Agreed, this feels so bandwagon jumpin Blendy McBlenderson to me.

Did you see where I asked you to explain something earlier? After that someone said you were almost acting cursed, so I thought maybe that was it but you seem to be more yourself again. Was all that truthbomb stuff you were posting about related to another game? I did not really understand what you were saying.

Sloonei is supertowning, which is good.

Why? Sloonei also made a game mechanics type post. When DDL does it, he's bad, but when Sloonei does it he's "supertown"?

What about DDLs game strikes you as town to this point? About his own game, not in contrast to Slooneis game, just on his own?

While I agree that I really dislike Colins vote, this post almost feels more like a defense of DDL than a suspicion of Colin, if you get my drift.

@Mac, I will read your Jack posts (assuming you made them?) and will reread his posts. In the past I think I read him pretty well. I have a new dog so I will be spotty but I will be in and out.

[MacDougall]

Oh I just read some Jack posts that pinged me. There's no actual case there.

[timmer]

I hate Day 1. I don't know how you guys do it. I hate so much the voting and trying to make cases based on so little that Day 1's just make me twitchy. As of this moment, I am mostly on the lookout for people who seem to eager to make something out of nothing. Luna's vote fits the bill, for instance.

[MacDougall]

I hate Day 1. I don't know how you guys do it. I hate so much the voting and trying to make cases based on so little that Day 1's just make me twitchy. As of this moment, I am mostly on the lookout for people who seem to eager to make something out of nothing. Luna's vote fits the bill, for instance.

Given this game is so vast and has so much immersion I wouldn't be averse to lynching someone who no shows day 1.

Firstly, there are gonna be near enough to 50% of the players in this game as either Mafia or Indie if the last version is anything to go by. So odds of lynching someone anti-town by just lynching a no show are actually pretty decent.

Secondly, the game is too fun to lynch anyone who is actually keen to play for day 1 reasons imo. I'd love to see a night 1 as active as possible and lynching someone like DDL for instance is just making the game less fun.

[timmer]

Actually, to be more clear, Luna's vote seems fine. I was trying to reference this POST of hers: "Sorry, but that is not a god reason to vote someone. Anything Jack has done this game to make you suspect him?"

I don't like when people try to make big deals out of anyone's day 1 vote, because frankly, to me they ALL are weak votes. Why call one specific one out?

[MacDougall]

Actually, to be more clear, Luna's vote seems fine. I was trying to reference this POST of hers: "Sorry, but that is not a god reason to vote someone. Anything Jack has done this game to make you suspect him?"

I don't like when people try to make big deals out of anyone's day 1 vote, because frankly, to me they ALL are weak votes. Why call one specific one out?

This is what I was getting at with more words.

[S~V~S]

Screw it let's get this over with early or I'll be uneasy for the rest of the game [VOTE: jackofhearts] aubergine

Sorry, but that is not a god reason to vote someone. Anything Jack has done this game to make you suspect him?

It's day 1. Nobody has a good reason to vote anyone. Why did you pick nutella to attack? Is it because Jack's your scum teammate? Got eem.

I have a good reason to vote Colin. Point invalid.

What does your valid suspicion of Colin have to do with Macs question about your attack (and your post did feel rather aggressive to me) on nutella?

I am going to drop a vote on you for now. I don't believe that I (like Sorsha, who you noted had not played with you) have ever played with you. Perhaps this is your normal tone, and if so others will point it out, and then that might give me BOTD. But for now your tone has pinged me enough to vote on it.

[VOTE: Lunalee] aubergine

[Lunalee]

Screw it let's get this over with early or I'll be uneasy for the rest of the game [VOTE: jackofhearts] aubergine

Sorry, but that is not a god reason to vote someone. Anything Jack has done this game to make you suspect him?

It's day 1. Nobody has a good reason to vote anyone. Why did you pick nutella to attack? Is it because Jack's your scum teammate? Got eem.

I have a good reason to vote Colin. Point invalid.

What does your valid suspicion of Colin have to do with Macs question about your attack (and your post did feel rather aggressive to me) on nutella?

I am going to drop a vote on you for now. I don't believe that I (like Sorsha, who you noted had not played with you) have ever played with you. Perhaps this is your normal tone, and if so others will point it out, and then that might give me BOTD. But for now your tone has pinged me enough to vote on it.

[VOTE: Lunalee] aubergine

Hey SVS, I don't know if I've played with you before, but I've seen you around and sort of know about you. My valid suspicion of Colin shows that day one can contain valid suspicions. Mac doesn't think so, and therefore thinks I "attacked" nutella for no reason over her (in my opinon) completely invalid Jack suspicion. Does that clear things up for you?

[Lunalee]

Screw it let's get this over with early or I'll be uneasy for the rest of the game [VOTE: jackofhearts] aubergine

Sorry, but that is not a god reason to vote someone. Anything Jack has done this game to make you suspect him?

It's day 1. Nobody has a good reason to vote anyone. Why did you pick nutella to attack? Is it because Jack's your scum teammate? Got eem.

I have a good reason to vote Colin. Point invalid.

That's your opinion though. From the outside looking in your reason sucks. Nutella probably thinks her reason is great too.

Point invalid.

Nutella's reason has nothing to do with this game or Jacks posts this game. It is completely "Jack fooled me so hard in Hogwarts Mafia that I can't trust him ever again, and therefore want him out of the game"

Is that her reason? How interesting..................................

Nutella's teammate!

Mac, you're cracking me up. I may be wrong about why nutella said she can't trust Jack, but I just assumed it was because of the previous game we were in

[Lunalee]

Screw it let's get this over with early or I'll be uneasy for the rest of the game [VOTE: jackofhearts] aubergine

Sorry, but that is not a god reason to vote someone. Anything Jack has done this game to make you suspect him?

It's day 1. Nobody has a good reason to vote anyone. Why did you pick nutella to attack? Is it because Jack's your scum teammate? Got eem.

I have a good reason to vote Colin. Point invalid.

MAC HAS BEEN ATTACKED

This and your "LIKE" of my other post feel like buddying and it's making me uncomfortable.

[Lunalee]

Who is [mention]Dana[/mention] ?

[timmer]

Screw it let's get this over with early or I'll be uneasy for the rest of the game [VOTE: jackofhearts] aubergine

Sorry, but that is not a god reason to vote someone. Anything Jack has done this game to make you suspect him?

It's day 1. Nobody has a good reason to vote anyone. Why did you pick nutella to attack? Is it because Jack's your scum teammate? Got eem.

I have a good reason to vote Colin. Point invalid.

What does your valid suspicion of Colin have to do with Macs question about your attack (and your post did feel rather aggressive to me) on nutella?

I am going to drop a vote on you for now. I don't believe that I (like Sorsha, who you noted had not played with you) have ever played with you. Perhaps this is your normal tone, and if so others will point it out, and then that might give me BOTD. But for now your tone has pinged me enough to vote on it.

[VOTE: Lunalee] aubergine

Hey SVS, I don't know if I've played with you before, but I've seen you around and sort of know about you. My valid suspicion of Colin shows that day one can contain valid suspicions. Mac doesn't think so, and therefore thinks I "attacked" nutella for no reason over her (in my opinon) completely invalid Jack suspicion. Does that clear things up for you?

[timmer]

(Just bugging, I like any excuse to use that meme)

[timmer]

Hey SVS, I don't know if I've played with you before, but I've seen you around and sort of know about you. My valid suspicion of Colin shows that day one can contain valid suspicions. Mac doesn't think so, and therefore thinks I "attacked" nutella for no reason over her (in my opinon) completely invalid Jack suspicion. Does that clear things up for you?

Out of curiosity, what do you sort of know about S~V~S?

[insertnamehere]

Screw it let's get this over with early or I'll be uneasy for the rest of the game [VOTE: jackofhearts] aubergine

Sorry, but that is not a god reason to vote someone. Anything Jack has done this game to make you suspect him?

It's day 1. Nobody has a good reason to vote anyone. Why did you pick nutella to attack? Is it because Jack's your scum teammate? Got eem.

I have a good reason to vote Colin. Point invalid.

MAC HAS BEEN ATTACKED

This and your "LIKE" of my other post feel like buddying and it's making me uncomfortable.

So what you're saying is that you don't want to be in a trust team with me?

[S~V~S]

Screw it let's get this over with early or I'll be uneasy for the rest of the game [VOTE: jackofhearts] aubergine

Sorry, but that is not a god reason to vote someone. Anything Jack has done this game to make you suspect him?

It's day 1. Nobody has a good reason to vote anyone. Why did you pick nutella to attack? Is it because Jack's your scum teammate? Got eem.

I have a good reason to vote Colin. Point invalid.

What does your valid suspicion of Colin have to do with Macs question about your attack (and your post did feel rather aggressive to me) on nutella?

I am going to drop a vote on you for now. I don't believe that I (like Sorsha, who you noted had not played with you) have ever played with you. Perhaps this is your normal tone, and if so others will point it out, and then that might give me BOTD. But for now your tone has pinged me enough to vote on it.

[VOTE: Lunalee] aubergine

Hey SVS, I don't know if I've played with you before, but I've seen you around and sort of know about you. My valid suspicion of Colin shows that day one can contain valid suspicions. Mac doesn't think so, and therefore thinks I "attacked" nutella for no reason over her (in my opinon) completely invalid Jack suspicion. Does that clear things up for you?

I understood the context, what got my eye was that you did not respond to his direct point, and redirected the conversation. Plus you sound somewhat confrontational when people suspect someone YOU don't think deserves scrutiny. Like, "here's my totes valid day one suspish but YOUR suspicion is weak because I don't find them suspect." Again this may just be you and how you play which would explain why I am the only person struck with it.

Linki w/timmer, good question.

[Lunalee]

(Just bugging, I like any excuse to use that meme)

Haha, I like it. But yeah, I probably should have put valid in quotes.

[Lunalee]

Hey SVS, I don't know if I've played with you before, but I've seen you around and sort of know about you. My valid suspicion of Colin shows that day one can contain valid suspicions. Mac doesn't think so, and therefore thinks I "attacked" nutella for no reason over her (in my opinon) completely invalid Jack suspicion. Does that clear things up for you?

Out of curiosity, what do you sort of know about S~V~S?

So um, speedchuck played game of champions with her last year, before I even joined the site, and he ranted to me about her suspecting him.

[Lunalee]

Screw it let's get this over with early or I'll be uneasy for the rest of the game [VOTE: jackofhearts] aubergine

Sorry, but that is not a god reason to vote someone. Anything Jack has done this game to make you suspect him?

It's day 1. Nobody has a good reason to vote anyone. Why did you pick nutella to attack? Is it because Jack's your scum teammate? Got eem.

I have a good reason to vote Colin. Point invalid.

MAC HAS BEEN ATTACKED

This and your "LIKE" of my other post feel like buddying and it's making me uncomfortable.

So what you're saying is that you don't want to be in a trust team with me?

No, because I don't know if I can trust you yet.

[S~V~S]

Hey SVS, I don't know if I've played with you before, but I've seen you around and sort of know about you. My valid suspicion of Colin shows that day one can contain valid suspicions. Mac doesn't think so, and therefore thinks I "attacked" nutella for no reason over her (in my opinon) completely invalid Jack suspicion. Does that clear things up for you?

Out of curiosity, what do you sort of know about S~V~S?

So um, speedchuck played game of champions with her last year, before I even joined the site, and he ranted to me about her suspecting him.

Yeah he aggressively defended the guy with the blinking neon "Baddie" sign on his head. Good times.

If people who know you better than I that I feel ok about tell me this is your norm, I am open to moving my vote. Plenty of day one weirdness in this thread lol.

But for now I'm good.

[insertnamehere]

Sorry, but that is not a god reason to vote someone. Anything Jack has done this game to make you suspect him?

It's day 1. Nobody has a good reason to vote anyone. Why did you pick nutella to attack? Is it because Jack's your scum teammate? Got eem.

I have a good reason to vote Colin. Point invalid.

MAC HAS BEEN ATTACKED

This and your "LIKE" of my other post feel like buddying and it's making me uncomfortable.

So what you're saying is that you don't want to be in a trust team with me?

No, because I don't know if I can trust you yet.

rude

[Lunalee]

Hey SVS, I don't know if I've played with you before, but I've seen you around and sort of know about you. My valid suspicion of Colin shows that day one can contain valid suspicions. Mac doesn't think so, and therefore thinks I "attacked" nutella for no reason over her (in my opinon) completely invalid Jack suspicion. Does that clear things up for you?

Out of curiosity, what do you sort of know about S~V~S?

So um, speedchuck played game of champions with her last year, before I even joined the site, and he ranted to me about her suspecting him.

Yeah he aggressively defended the guy with the blinking neon "Baddie" sign on his head. Good times.

If people who know you better than I that I feel ok about tell me this is your norm, I am open to moving my vote. Plenty of day one weirdness in this thread lol.

But for now I'm good.

I would like to tell you a list of references who can attest to my civ game, but I get mislynched pretty often, because apparently I don't know how to play like a civ.