Cards Against Humanity [GAME OVER]

#351

bet you played Shawshank, right?

#352

#353

I did, yeah. Quite poorly but I played it. How come?

#354

All caught up now, took way too long for me to find time to sit down and read pages. Haha.

I've got some suspicions, but I'll wait until the night post comes up to go through any of them.

#355

I like the changeable vote thing. Wouldn't want to see it in every game, but in a zany one like this, it feels right.

FZ. wrote:Haha, why do we even bother voting. I really hope you are a civ, llama.

And that would be quite an interesting mafia game

I wouldn't hope that. It paints quite a target on him for baddies if that's the case. And if he's bad, based on the roles that can avoid lynches and how they can do it, he's likely vulnerable to the next lynch.

@boo: Will ties result in no lynch? Or will the lynch be randomized?

#356

Mister Rearranger wrote:I like the changeable vote thing. Wouldn't want to see it in every game, but in a zany one like this, it feels right.

FZ. wrote:Haha, why do we even bother voting. I really hope you are a civ, llama.

And that would be quite an interesting mafia game
I wouldn't hope that. It paints quite a target on him for baddies if that's the case. And if he's bad, based on the roles that can avoid lynches and how they can do it, he's likely vulnerable to the next lynch.

@boo: Will ties result in no lynch? Or will the lynch be randomized?

Ties are broken by the Card Czar.

#357

boo wrote: Ties are broken by the Card Czar.

Ooh, good to know.

Thanks!

#358

Night 1 End: Bringin Reagan Back

Ronald Reagan was brought back in time. The time-continuum was not changed. Weird…?

FZ got murdered by… doin’ it in the butt. Well, stay classy FZ.

Today’s question:
Daddy, why is Mommy crying?

FZ. has been killed. Thanks for playing!
It is now Day 2. You have 24 hours to lynch someone, please get your answer cards in in the first 23 hours of the lynch. Metalmarsh is your Card Czar today.

#359

#360

A new civvie role has been added:

16. One Night Stand: Choose one other player to spend the night with. Anything that happens to one happens to the other. If one or the other gets targeted for a kill, protect, curse, etc. then if affects both of them. If the player you spend the night with targets someone you are told who they targeted.

#361

Are we going to see what card won?

#362

boo wrote:Night 1 End: Bringin Reagan Back

Ronald Reagan was brought back in time. The time-continuum was not changed. Weird…?

FZ got murdered by… doin’ it in the butt. Well, stay classy FZ.

Today’s question:
Daddy, why is Mommy crying?

FZ. has been killed. Thanks for playing!
It is now Day 2. You have 24 hours to lynch someone, please get your answer cards in in the first 23 hours of the lynch. Metalmarsh is your Card Czar today.

I think Ronald Reagan was the card that won which I think is pretty funny.

#363

Can I say which card I picked to win?

The card I picked to win I thought was funny.

#364

boo wrote:Night 1 End: Bringin Reagan Back

Ronald Reagan was brought back in time. The time-continuum was not changed. Weird…?

FZ got murdered by… doin’ it in the butt. Well, stay classy FZ.

Today’s question:
Daddy, why is Mommy crying?

FZ. has been killed. Thanks for playing!
It is now Day 2. You have 24 hours to lynch someone, please get your answer cards in in the first 23 hours of the lynch. Metalmarsh is your Card Czar today.

This SUCKS.

#365

kneel4justice wrote:
boo wrote:Night 1 End: Bringin Reagan Back

Ronald Reagan was brought back in time. The time-continuum was not changed. Weird…?

FZ got murdered by… doin’ it in the butt. Well, stay classy FZ.

Today’s question:
Daddy, why is Mommy crying?

FZ. has been killed. Thanks for playing!
It is now Day 2. You have 24 hours to lynch someone, please get your answer cards in in the first 23 hours of the lynch. Metalmarsh is your Card Czar today.
This SUCKS.

RIPiywg FZ! I am surprised FZ was killed early again. Not sure if because she was unknown or because of her suspicions. Will have to do a reread.

#366

RIP FZ, even though you suspected me, I appreciated your dedication to the game. This is exactly what I was talking about how the best participants always die first.

#367

kneel4justice wrote:
boo wrote:Night 1 End: Bringin Reagan Back

Ronald Reagan was brought back in time. The time-continuum was not changed. Weird…?

FZ got murdered by… doin’ it in the butt. Well, stay classy FZ.

Today’s question:
Daddy, why is Mommy crying?

FZ. has been killed. Thanks for playing!
It is now Day 2. You have 24 hours to lynch someone, please get your answer cards in in the first 23 hours of the lynch. Metalmarsh is your Card Czar today.
This SUCKS.

That's what she said.

#368

Um, huh?

#369

Hedgeowl wrote:
kneel4justice wrote:
boo wrote:Night 1 End: Bringin Reagan Back

Ronald Reagan was brought back in time. The time-continuum was not changed. Weird…?

FZ got murdered by… doin’ it in the butt. Well, stay classy FZ.

Today’s question:
Daddy, why is Mommy crying?

FZ. has been killed. Thanks for playing!
It is now Day 2. You have 24 hours to lynch someone, please get your answer cards in in the first 23 hours of the lynch. Metalmarsh is your Card Czar today.
This SUCKS.
RIPiywg FZ! I am surprised FZ was killed early again. Not sure if because she was unknown or because of her suspicions. Will have to do a reread.

FZ was doing quite a bit of baddie hunting on day one so the mafia targeting her isn't really a surprise. She voted for llama but it looks like she would have switched her vote at the end (to me, I think) if anyone else had had enough vote to keep llama from getting the most.

Its kinda hard to tell who she actually found the most suspicious though.

And even though FZ is dead I would hope johns will still answer this for the rest of us....

FZ. wrote:
johns2jj wrote:I did not no vote because it seems some hosts may react to that. I would rather not miss out on anything because I did not vote.
What do you think about llama's suspicions? Would you agree with him if it were someone else and not you?

#370

Sorsha wrote:
Hedgeowl wrote:
kneel4justice wrote:
boo wrote:Night 1 End: Bringin Reagan Back

Ronald Reagan was brought back in time. The time-continuum was not changed. Weird…?

FZ got murdered by… doin’ it in the butt. Well, stay classy FZ.

Today’s question:
Daddy, why is Mommy crying?

FZ. has been killed. Thanks for playing!
It is now Day 2. You have 24 hours to lynch someone, please get your answer cards in in the first 23 hours of the lynch. Metalmarsh is your Card Czar today.
This SUCKS.
RIPiywg FZ! I am surprised FZ was killed early again. Not sure if because she was unknown or because of her suspicions. Will have to do a reread.
FZ was doing quite a bit of baddie hunting on day one so the mafia targeting her isn't really a surprise. She voted for llama but it looks like she would have switched her vote at the end (to me, I think) if anyone else had had enough vote to keep llama from getting the most.

Its kinda hard to tell who she actually found the most suspicious though.

And even though FZ is dead I would hope johns will still answer this for the rest of us....
FZ. wrote:
johns2jj wrote:I did not no vote because it seems some hosts may react to that. I would rather not miss out on anything because I did not vote.
What do you think about llama's suspicions? Would you agree with him if it were someone else and not you?

That's what she said.

#371

S~V~S wrote:Um, huh?

That's what I said.

I'm fairly certain Elohcin is cursed. And I'm loving it.

#372

S~V~S wrote:Um, huh?

It's a game mechanic. One of the roles does this i think.

#373

Well played baddies... well played.

#374

Brilliant :P

#375

We're all fucked aren't we. The baddies in this game are just TOO GOOD.

#376

Yeah, game over.

#377

Sorsha wrote:Yeah, game over.

#378

insertnamehere wrote:We're all fucked aren't we. The baddies in this game are just TOO GOOD.

That's what she said.

Don't give up guys

It is only Day 2.

3

#379

Elohcin wrote:
insertnamehere wrote:We're all fucked aren't we. The baddies in this game are just TOO GOOD.

That's what she said.

Don't give up guys It is only Day 2.

3

Unless the woman has Multiple Personality Disorder, I don't think that instance should count.

I would have preferred:

"The baddies in this game are just TOO GOOD."

"That's what she said."

#380

Epignosis wrote:
Elohcin wrote:
insertnamehere wrote:We're all fucked aren't we. The baddies in this game are just TOO GOOD.

That's what she said.

Don't give up guys It is only Day 2.

3
Unless the woman has Multiple Personality Disorder, I don't think that instance should count.

I would have preferred:

"The baddies in this game are just TOO GOOD."

"That's what she said."

Well unless you are Doin' it in the butt, I don't think you get a say.

1. Doin’ it in the butt: Each night, you may pick one player who must quote another players post every time they post (which they must do at least 10 times) the following day. In each post, the person you picked must bold a part of the quote, and the first line of their post must be ‘That’s what she said.’ in bold, it must make some kind of sense. If they fail to comply, you get to choose who they vote for in the following 3 lynches. Once in the game, you may make another player buttsore, putting 5 votes on them. Kills on odd nights.

#381

Hedgeowl wrote:
Epignosis wrote:
Elohcin wrote:
insertnamehere wrote:We're all fucked aren't we. The baddies in this game are just TOO GOOD.

That's what she said.

Don't give up guys It is only Day 2.

3
Unless the woman has Multiple Personality Disorder, I don't think that instance should count.

I would have preferred:

"The baddies in this game are just TOO GOOD."

"That's what she said."
Well unless you are Doin' it in the butt, I don't think you get a say.

1. Doin’ it in the butt: Each night, you may pick one player who must quote another players post every time they post (which they must do at least 10 times) the following day. In each post, the person you picked must bold a part of the quote, and the first line of their post must be ‘That’s what she said.’ in bold, it must make some kind of sense. If they fail to comply, you get to choose who they vote for in the following 3 lynches. Once in the game, you may make another player buttsore, putting 5 votes on them. Kills on odd nights.

So the same person who killed FZ is the one who gave this curse.

So who has a juvenile sense of humor and likes to kill the talkies?

#382

insertnamehere wrote:We're all fucked aren't we. The baddies in this game are just TOO GOOD.

That's what she said.

Heck, I'll take a two for one. I won't be with internet all day tomorrow so I have get my ten in asap.

4

#383

thellama73 wrote:This is exactly what I was talking about how the best participants always die first.

That's what she said.

#384

Elohcin wrote:
That's what she said.

That's what she said.

#385

FZ. wrote:
johns2jj wrote:I did not no vote because it seems some hosts may react to that. I would rather not miss out on anything because I did not vote.
What do you think about llama's suspicions? Would you agree with him if it were someone else and not you?

I think he may have a grudge against me for how I played in the last game but I can't be for sure. He tends to make passable arguments for those he votes for but as admitted by himself he has lately been lynching civs. I do not know anyone's play style well enough to believe anything they say yet but if you feel he has made a good enough case than I can't dissuade you. I think he is most likely bad because he survived the kill when in this game someone breaks ties.

#386

I am voting llama unless something else changes my mind. I would rather vote someone less active but I don't have enough evidence for them yet. I am on the fence about lynching people who under participate.

#387

Was there a tie?

#388

Sorsha wrote:Was there a tie?

Not an outright one but if the person who won the pen is envy submission used their +1 vote it could of forced the tie. This could indicate that the card czar broke the tie and the other one was bad or that no tie existed and he survived.

#389

Wow, this is going to be very difficult to track people's votes when they can be forced to vote a certain way. And all the +1, ,+2, or +3 votes. This game may be stacked a little for the baddies.

#390

The way you worded that post makes it sound like you thought/knew it was a tie.

And you are the second one to bring up the possibility of a tie in the lynch. And I find that weird... I have to look back and see who the other person was. I think it was MR. Yeah... It was MR.

#391

Sorsha wrote:The way you worded that post makes it sound like you thought/knew it was a tie.

And you are the second one to bring up the possibility of a tie in the lynch. And I find that weird... I have to look back and see who the other person was. I think it was MR. Yeah... It was MR.

I initially felt very sure that it was a tie now that I see other possibilities it may not have been. I feel less confident that llama was the one with the overall highest vote including people's powers, but things are only going to get harder to read as people get "the shit buckets dumped on them" and other permanent +1 powers. Even though I am less confident than initially I still feel strongest about llama.

#392

birdwithteeth11 wrote:I did, yeah. Quite poorly but I played it. How come?

Based on that game, I am not surprised with JJ's play this game at all... you seem to be.

kneel4justice wrote: This SUCKS.

Were you that sure that FZ was good?

#393

And here I thought going to a different site would make me survive longer

Somehow I have a feeling the reasons for killing me here are not the same as those in my home site

#394

Today, unless something changes I cannot be on much, which sucks because I wanted to see what people would do without my giving them any heat, such as Llama because I admit sometimes I get too investigated in the idea that someone is mafia and doing that puts them in a situation where they can't really operate as a townie and are instead defending themselves. That being said, my vote is going on Llama, if I see a reason to change it, I will but the only other person I can see myself voting for right now is BWT. I just think that Llama is pulling on the emotional aspect of the game too much to be a townie, and I tried to consider that what FZ was saying was right because I value her opinion, but I think the emotion got to her because they played with each other before and seem to have a lot of respect for each other. It reminds me too much of MP in WWE Mafia.

To answer your question Dom, I was pretty sure FZ was good because we always seem to have a good ability to read each other, at least in our home games. Everyone else hates that because if we are both townies we team up and are a threat, and when one of us is scum the other catches on very quickly.

#395

I am sorry I was scarce yesterday, I was concentrating on my other game after work.

I do understand what people are saying about John~ and his last few responses seem more like there is some baddieism going on. But up to that point, I am not sure why llama was so sure, when in only his second game John behaves similarly to his prior game in which he gave a very good showing. Had i done as well as he and moved from a BTS into a non-BTS situation, I might have tried to look the same since several people were convinced he was a civ in that game, and I had a hell of a time lynching him.

But this could be my own bias~ I am ever paranoid Llama is throwing people under the bus lol.

FZ obviously touched a never somewhere. Don't feel bad, FZ~ someone obviously feared you, it's a mark of respect (or at least that's what I tell myself all the time).

And poor Eloh, what a tacky curse, lol. I find it odd that Eloh would be targeted, though. She had not really stood out to me at all.

#396

Linki@ K4J~ yeah, this poll ends at a weird time for me, so I will not be around much either, although i did get caught up on my reading this AM.

#397

johns2jj wrote:I am voting llama unless something else changes my mind. I would rather vote someone less active but I don't have enough evidence for them yet. I am on the fence about lynching people who under participate.

I don't have a grudge against you, I just think your bad, and this post does you no favors.
1. There was no tie (that we know about)
2. Even if there was a tie, and the card czar got to break it, how does me surviving it make me bad? That is a non-sequitur.

S~V~S wrote: I do understand what people are saying about John~ and his last few responses seem more like there is some baddieism going on. But up to that point, I am not sure why llama was so sure, when in only his second game John behaves similarly to his prior game in which he gave a very good showing.

I was never "so sure." He was just my best guess on Day 1. His Day 2 posts have made me more confident that I was on to something though.

#398

ebwop: I quoted the wrong post by John there. I meant to quote the one where he says I must be bad because I survived a lynch tie.

#399

johns2jj wrote:
FZ. wrote:
johns2jj wrote:I did not no vote because it seems some hosts may react to that. I would rather not miss out on anything because I did not vote.
What do you think about llama's suspicions? Would you agree with him if it were someone else and not you?
I think he may have a grudge against me for how I played in the last game but I can't be for sure. He tends to make passable arguments for those he votes for but as admitted by himself he has lately been lynching civs. I do not know anyone's play style well enough to believe anything they say yet but if you feel he has made a good enough case than I can't dissuade you. I think he is most likely bad because he survived the kill when in this game someone breaks ties.

That's what she said.
5

#400

Sorsha wrote:Was there a tie?

That's what she said.

6

What's fun until it gets weird?