Cards Against Humanity [GAME OVER]

Moderator: Community Team

What's fun until it gets weird?

Poll ended at Thu Feb 06, 2014 12:11 am

Epignosis
0
No votes
Elohcin
5
56%
kneel4justice
0
No votes
Ace
0
No votes
BWT
0
No votes
SVS
1
11%
Trying to murder someone and failing. Repeatedly. Super awkward. (Host/deads/nons)
3
33%
 
Total votes: 9
User avatar
Mister Rearranger
Drug Dealer
Posts in topic: 81
Posts: 1256
Joined: Sat Nov 09, 2013 9:04 pm
Location: A Black Hole Somewhere in New York

Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 4]

#701

Post by Mister Rearranger »

The beat is witches brew, but beware this shit is potent
E.E. cummin' on her face, now that's poetry in motion

:DJ:
We find comfort among those who agree with us - growth among those who don't.

Image
User avatar
DharmaHelper
Capo Regime (Street Boss)
Posts in topic: 90
Posts: 16565
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2012 7:29 pm

Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 4]

#702

Post by DharmaHelper »

I believe it was the wise and profound Socrates that once said: "To the window, to the wall, to the sweat drop down my balls."
our Linkitis is our lives.

Image
ImageImage
ImageImage
User avatar
kneel4justice
Drug Dealer
Posts in topic: 125
Posts: 855
Joined: Sat Nov 30, 2013 9:35 pm

Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 4]

#703

Post by kneel4justice »

DharmaHelper wrote:Goddamn kids and their rappity rap.
Image
Image
User avatar
insertnamehere
Made Man
Posts in topic: 63
Posts: 6808
Joined: Mon Dec 24, 2012 10:40 am
Location: Twin Peaks, Washington

Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 4]

#704

Post by insertnamehere »

Ah yes, Nicki Minaj. Author of such detailed trips into the to human psyche as "Stupid Ho".


[quote=Modern Shakesphere]These hoes so musty hoes is so crusty
These bitches is my sons and I don't want custody
These hoes so musty hoes is so crusty
These bitches is my sons and I don't want custody[/quote]

[quote=Modern Shakesphere]
You could suck my diznick, if you take these jizzes
You don’t like them disses, give my ass some kisses
Yeah they know what this is, give bitches the business[/quote]

And of course the unforgettable chorus and hook that ties the song together in a culmination, no, the apex of modern music over the last twenty years.

[quote=Tupac Probably In Disguise]
You a stupid ho, you a you a stupid ho
You a stupid ho, you a you a stupid ho
You a stupid ho, you a you a stupid ho[/quote]
WILD AT HEART MAFIA
SIGN UP NOW
viewtopic.php?f=33&t=1679


Spoiler: show
Image

Image Image Image
User avatar
Mister Rearranger
Drug Dealer
Posts in topic: 81
Posts: 1256
Joined: Sat Nov 09, 2013 9:04 pm
Location: A Black Hole Somewhere in New York

Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 4]

#705

Post by Mister Rearranger »

Looks like this thread has been:

Image
We find comfort among those who agree with us - growth among those who don't.

Image
User avatar
Hedgeowl
Money Launderer
Posts in topic: 53
Posts: 1999
Joined: Mon May 13, 2013 9:10 am
Location: Virginia

Re: Cards Against Humanity [Night 3]

#706

Post by Hedgeowl »

S~V~S wrote:I don't recall that, but that does not mean it did not happen, obv. Generally, I am not a fan of fly bys, and most people are not. I don't recall Sorsha doing this in the past, but lord knows my memory is not all that lol.
I understand not having time and wanting to not miss a vote, but I think everyone should give a reason. Otherwise what is the point of the game? Votes, reasons given are a huge part of the analysis and discussion and where those who prefer pings vibes etc get their vibes from too. So yeah, I dont like no dirve-by, fly-by, sail-by voting.

Dang civvie Ninja! Way to end the Llama wont die saga. Love playing with you Logan! I only wished we had learned his role, but this saves another lynch from being used. Seems like its time for some analyzing.

My current list of suspects: Dom, rey, and DH. I will he back to explore these peeps further and encourage others to do the same.
Turnip Head wrote: We need to lynch Pennsylvania Bitch.
ImageImageImage
ImageImageImage
User avatar
Bass_the_Clever
Money Launderer
Posts in topic: 37
Posts: 2034
Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2013 8:33 pm
Location: DMV

Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 4]

#707

Post by Bass_the_Clever »

So what are people'a thoughts on the super bowl
Spoiler: show
ImageImageImageImageImageImageImageImage
Image
acrosstheaether wrote:If Bass_the_Clever is mafia, he is a clever mafia.
User avatar
insertnamehere
Made Man
Posts in topic: 63
Posts: 6808
Joined: Mon Dec 24, 2012 10:40 am
Location: Twin Peaks, Washington

Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 4]

#708

Post by insertnamehere »

Bass_the_Clever wrote:So what are people'a thoughts on the super bowl
Who's playing?
WILD AT HEART MAFIA
SIGN UP NOW
viewtopic.php?f=33&t=1679


Spoiler: show
Image

Image Image Image
User avatar
kneel4justice
Drug Dealer
Posts in topic: 125
Posts: 855
Joined: Sat Nov 30, 2013 9:35 pm

Re: Cards Against Humanity [Night 3]

#709

Post by kneel4justice »

Hedgeowl wrote:
S~V~S wrote:I don't recall that, but that does not mean it did not happen, obv. Generally, I am not a fan of fly bys, and most people are not. I don't recall Sorsha doing this in the past, but lord knows my memory is not all that lol.
I understand not having time and wanting to not miss a vote, but I think everyone should give a reason. Otherwise what is the point of the game? Votes, reasons given are a huge part of the analysis and discussion and where those who prefer pings vibes etc get their vibes from too. So yeah, I dont like no dirve-by, fly-by, sail-by voting.

Dang civvie Ninja! Way to end the Llama wont die saga. Love playing with you Logan! I only wished we had learned his role, but this saves another lynch from being used. Seems like its time for some analyzing.

My current list of suspects: Dom, rey, and DH. I will he back to explore these peeps further and encourage others to do the same.
Can you provide some explanations for your list of suspects? I probably missed them, so a summary would be nice.

As far as Dom, we got off to a rocky start because we were kind of accusing each other under false circumstances. However, I am suspicious of him because I felt like during his vote making decision he was playing confused, it's completely possible that his confusion was genuine, but to me it just struck me as something a scum would do. Later seeing that the following day he voted JJ while he claimed to be suspicious of Llama but not sure it was Llama's baddie behavior, I am very much thinking he was looking for ways to avoid lynching Llama and they could be baddies.
Rey, I haven't paid enough attention to. I will try to work on that, but nothing caught my eye, obviously.
As for DH, I keep repeating it, but he compared himself (?) to FZ, yet was not out of the gates, IMO and I have to wonder why he wasn't? Aside from that I just haven't got any clear townie vibes, or any strong feeling really, and since he compared himself to FZ I was kind of expecting him to be front and center, maybe I expected too much and that is my fault. Not sure!

Aside from those I am concerned about BWT, because he said he wasn't worried about the vote as we had plenty of time (day 1) but yet he ended up randomizing (or self voting) and he just didn't seem to be taking things serious, as I'd expect a townie to. He reminded me of WWE where he gave up but that was so early on that he would have had no reason to want to give up, so either he just doesn't want to be a baddie or it has nothing to do with his alignment.
Then Epi for being so quiet (although I am wondering if this is still in character as far as the I don't care if you suspect me attitude & he just has two major levels, extra quiet and extra talkative), who I now feel better about, but don't know if he is just perhaps on an opposing scum team, so I am keeping that in mind.
Image
User avatar
Bass_the_Clever
Money Launderer
Posts in topic: 37
Posts: 2034
Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2013 8:33 pm
Location: DMV

Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 4]

#710

Post by Bass_the_Clever »

insertnamehere wrote:
Bass_the_Clever wrote:So what are people'a thoughts on the super bowl
Who's playing?
Denver Broncos and the Seattle Sea hawks . It should be a great game.
Spoiler: show
ImageImageImageImageImageImageImageImage
Image
acrosstheaether wrote:If Bass_the_Clever is mafia, he is a clever mafia.
User avatar
Flyin' High
Corrupt Union Official
Posts in topic: 68
Posts: 754
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 4:28 pm

Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 4]

#711

Post by Flyin' High »

Thanks for the votes in the night poll!

RIP in pieces you silly llama.

So, since llama survived 2 lynches I think it's safe to assume he wasn't the Taint, but was Balls Deep. If that's the case, then I don't think the Pixelated Bukkakae role could have voted for Sorsha Day 1.

Things we know or can logically deduce:
We know Day 1 resulted in a tie.
llama was part of Mafia Team 1 (not the team with the Pixelated Bukkake)
Pixelated Bukkake's vote is worth 2 and any player who votes the same as PB but isn't a teammate has a vote worth 1.5

Scenario 1 among the votes for Sorsha:
Player 1 is Pixelated Bukkake, vote = 2
Player 2 is Teammate of PB, vote = 1
Player 3 is llama, not a teammate of PB, vote = 1.5
Vote total = 4.5
Result = NOT A TIE

Scenario 2 among the votes for Sorsha:
Player 1 is Pixelated Bukkake, vote = 2
Player 2 is not a teammate of PB, vote = 1.5
Player 3 is llama, not a teammate of PB, vote = 1.5
Vote total = 5
Result = NOT A TIE

Scenario 3 among the votes for Sorsha:
Player 1 is not Pixelated Bukkake, vote = 1
Player 2 is not Pixelated Bukkake, vote = 1
Player 3 is not Pixelated Bukkake, vote = 1
Penis envy prize winner used extra vote on Sorsha
Vote total = 4
Result = TIE

If someone sees another scenario that can result in a Day 1 tie that I missed, please post it.
Flyin' High wrote:The breakdown of votes against would look like this:
Player 1 (Pixelated Bukkake) vote worth 2
Player 2 (llamataint) vote worth 1
Player 3 (not a teammate) vote worth 1.5
Player 4 (not a teammate) vote worth 1.5
Player 5 (not a teammate) vote worth 1.5
Player 6 (not a teammate) vote worth 1.5
Total = 9 votes
That would have caused john to be lynched over llama Day 2.
Based on the likely breakdown of votes against john Day 2 the most likely and plausible scenario for john to be lynched over llama Day 2 is if the Pixelated Bukkake was among his voters. And I think we can rule out any of the Day 1 Sorsha voters as being the Pixelated Bukkake since those scenarios don't result in a tie.

Players who voted for Sorsha Day 1: Dom, Mister Rearranger, llama

Players who voted for johnjjs Day 2: Dom, insertnamehere, Flyin' High, llama, AceofSpaces, reywaS

Based on this, neither Dom nor llama are the Pixelated Bukkake. Which leaves INH, me, Aces, and reywaS as possible candidates for that role. I am not that role.

I plan to read back through the posts of INH, Aces, and rey to see if anything stands out.
ImageImage

Image
User avatar
insertnamehere
Made Man
Posts in topic: 63
Posts: 6808
Joined: Mon Dec 24, 2012 10:40 am
Location: Twin Peaks, Washington

Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 4]

#712

Post by insertnamehere »

Bass_the_Clever wrote:
insertnamehere wrote:
Bass_the_Clever wrote:So what are people'a thoughts on the super bowl
Who's playing?
Denver Broncos and the Seattle Sea hawks . It should be a great game.
Who won? (This is how I get all of my knowledge of sports.)
WILD AT HEART MAFIA
SIGN UP NOW
viewtopic.php?f=33&t=1679


Spoiler: show
Image

Image Image Image
User avatar
birdwithteeth11
Loan Shark
Posts in topic: 37
Posts: 3076
Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2012 11:58 am
Location: Kentucky

Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 4]

#713

Post by birdwithteeth11 »

Interesting post, FH. I need to read through all those people later, but based on how I feel right now, I would lean towards rey. His quietness is starting to concern me. And I never like "quiet rey" as it is.
User avatar
reywaS
Money Launderer
Posts in topic: 30
Posts: 1790
Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2012 12:58 pm
Location: The Clouds

Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 4]

#714

Post by reywaS »

Well, that's lame.
Some day, Some day
Some day I'll, I wanna wear a starry crown
User avatar
Mister Rearranger
Drug Dealer
Posts in topic: 81
Posts: 1256
Joined: Sat Nov 09, 2013 9:04 pm
Location: A Black Hole Somewhere in New York

Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 4]

#715

Post by Mister Rearranger »

INH and Rey both made apology posts to JJ that screamed bullsh*t to me.

DH and Aces have had a very strange dynamic between them that I mean to study closer.
We find comfort among those who agree with us - growth among those who don't.

Image
User avatar
AceofSpaces
Corrupt Union Official
Posts in topic: 54
Posts: 803
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2012 12:48 pm

Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 4]

#716

Post by AceofSpaces »

Flyin' High wrote:Thanks for the votes in the night poll!

RIP in pieces you silly llama.

So, since llama survived 2 lynches I think it's safe to assume he wasn't the Taint, but was Balls Deep. If that's the case, then I don't think the Pixelated Bukkakae role could have voted for Sorsha Day 1.

Things we know or can logically deduce:
We know Day 1 resulted in a tie.
llama was part of Mafia Team 1 (not the team with the Pixelated Bukkake)
Pixelated Bukkake's vote is worth 2 and any player who votes the same as PB but isn't a teammate has a vote worth 1.5

Scenario 1 among the votes for Sorsha:
Player 1 is Pixelated Bukkake, vote = 2
Player 2 is Teammate of PB, vote = 1
Player 3 is llama, not a teammate of PB, vote = 1.5
Vote total = 4.5
Result = NOT A TIE

Scenario 2 among the votes for Sorsha:
Player 1 is Pixelated Bukkake, vote = 2
Player 2 is not a teammate of PB, vote = 1.5
Player 3 is llama, not a teammate of PB, vote = 1.5
Vote total = 5
Result = NOT A TIE

Scenario 3 among the votes for Sorsha:
Player 1 is not Pixelated Bukkake, vote = 1
Player 2 is not Pixelated Bukkake, vote = 1
Player 3 is not Pixelated Bukkake, vote = 1
Penis envy prize winner used extra vote on Sorsha
Vote total = 4
Result = TIE

If someone sees another scenario that can result in a Day 1 tie that I missed, please post it.
Flyin' High wrote:The breakdown of votes against would look like this:
Player 1 (Pixelated Bukkake) vote worth 2
Player 2 (llamataint) vote worth 1
Player 3 (not a teammate) vote worth 1.5
Player 4 (not a teammate) vote worth 1.5
Player 5 (not a teammate) vote worth 1.5
Player 6 (not a teammate) vote worth 1.5
Total = 9 votes
That would have caused john to be lynched over llama Day 2.
Based on the likely breakdown of votes against john Day 2 the most likely and plausible scenario for john to be lynched over llama Day 2 is if the Pixelated Bukkake was among his voters. And I think we can rule out any of the Day 1 Sorsha voters as being the Pixelated Bukkake since those scenarios don't result in a tie.

Players who voted for Sorsha Day 1: Dom, Mister Rearranger, llama

Players who voted for johnjjs Day 2: Dom, insertnamehere, Flyin' High, llama, AceofSpaces, reywaS

Based on this, neither Dom nor llama are the Pixelated Bukkake. Which leaves INH, me, Aces, and reywaS as possible candidates for that role. I am not that role.

I plan to read back through the posts of INH, Aces, and rey to see if anything stands out.
That's a nice breakdown, but I'm not the butt. I need to reorganize my thoughts now and try and root out some evil.
User avatar
DharmaHelper
Capo Regime (Street Boss)
Posts in topic: 90
Posts: 16565
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2012 7:29 pm

Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 4]

#717

Post by DharmaHelper »

Mister Rearranger wrote:INH and Rey both made apology posts to JJ that screamed bullsh*t to me.

DH and Aces have had a very strange dynamic between them that I mean to study closer.
Shit Ace I think he's on to us.
our Linkitis is our lives.

Image
ImageImage
ImageImage
User avatar
insertnamehere
Made Man
Posts in topic: 63
Posts: 6808
Joined: Mon Dec 24, 2012 10:40 am
Location: Twin Peaks, Washington

Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 4]

#718

Post by insertnamehere »

I'm going to pretend I'm Vompatti, and not give a reason for my vote, k?

Ture?
k?
Ture?
k?
Ture?
k?
Ture?
k?
Ture?
k?
Ture?
k?
Ture?
k?
Ture?
k?
Ture?
k?
Ture?
k?
WILD AT HEART MAFIA
SIGN UP NOW
viewtopic.php?f=33&t=1679


Spoiler: show
Image

Image Image Image
User avatar
DharmaHelper
Capo Regime (Street Boss)
Posts in topic: 90
Posts: 16565
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2012 7:29 pm

Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 4]

#719

Post by DharmaHelper »

insertnamehere wrote:I'm going to pretend I'm Vompatti, and not give a reason for my vote, k?

Ture?
k?
Ture?
k?
Ture?
k?
Ture?
k?
Ture?
k?
Ture?
k?
Ture?
k?
Ture?
k?
Ture?
k?
Ture?
k?
Image
our Linkitis is our lives.

Image
ImageImage
ImageImage
User avatar
kneel4justice
Drug Dealer
Posts in topic: 125
Posts: 855
Joined: Sat Nov 30, 2013 9:35 pm

Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 4]

#720

Post by kneel4justice »

insertnamehere wrote:I'm going to pretend I'm Vompatti, and not give a reason for my vote, k?

Ture?
k?
Ture?
k?
Ture?
k?
Ture?
k?
Ture?
k?
Ture?
k?
Ture?
k?
Ture?
k?
Ture?
k?
Ture?
k?
Really? I would appreciate some reasoning because I myself suspect BWT and would like to know why others do.
Image
User avatar
Flyin' High
Corrupt Union Official
Posts in topic: 68
Posts: 754
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 4:28 pm

Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 4]

#721

Post by Flyin' High »

kneel4justice wrote:Really? I would appreciate some reasoning because I myself suspect BWT and would like to know why others do.
Why are you suspicious of BWT? I have him in the back of my mind as being suspicious, but need to read back to remember why. He's on my list of people to reread.

I read back through INH, Aces, and rey.

INH's posts are mostly joke-sy in nature.

Aces missed the first day of the game. He was fairly suspicious of john (as was I so I can't fault him for that alone).

Rey defended llama early on, voted john Day 2, then after I posted my analysis he changed his tune on llama. However, if rey was defending llama because they are teammates, that means he isn't the PB.

Anyway, I still have some reading back to do since none of the 3 stood out as definitely bad and I don't want to randomly guess here.
ImageImage

Image
User avatar
Mister Rearranger
Drug Dealer
Posts in topic: 81
Posts: 1256
Joined: Sat Nov 09, 2013 9:04 pm
Location: A Black Hole Somewhere in New York

Re: Cards Against Humanity [Night 3]

#722

Post by Mister Rearranger »

kneel4justice wrote: Aside from those I am concerned about BWT, because he said he wasn't worried about the vote as we had plenty of time (day 1) but yet he ended up randomizing (or self voting) and he just didn't seem to be taking things serious, as I'd expect a townie to. He reminded me of WWE where he gave up but that was so early on that he would have had no reason to want to give up, so either he just doesn't want to be a baddie or it has nothing to do with his alignment.
Then Epi for being so quiet (although I am wondering if this is still in character as far as the I don't care if you suspect me attitude & he just has two major levels, extra quiet and extra talkative), who I now feel better about, but don't know if he is just perhaps on an opposing scum team, so I am keeping that in mind. [/color]
Otay then.

*votes BWiT*
We find comfort among those who agree with us - growth among those who don't.

Image
User avatar
insertnamehere
Made Man
Posts in topic: 63
Posts: 6808
Joined: Mon Dec 24, 2012 10:40 am
Location: Twin Peaks, Washington

Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 4]

#723

Post by insertnamehere »

kneel4justice wrote:
insertnamehere wrote:I'm going to pretend I'm Vompatti, and not give a reason for my vote, k?

Ture?
k?
Ture?
k?
Ture?
k?
Ture?
k?
Ture?
k?
Ture?
k?
Ture?
k?
Ture?
k?
Ture?
k?
Ture?
k?
Really? I would appreciate some reasoning because I myself suspect BWT and would like to know why others do.
You want an explanation for a vote? You must be new around here...
WILD AT HEART MAFIA
SIGN UP NOW
viewtopic.php?f=33&t=1679


Spoiler: show
Image

Image Image Image
User avatar
Hedgeowl
Money Launderer
Posts in topic: 53
Posts: 1999
Joined: Mon May 13, 2013 9:10 am
Location: Virginia

Re: Cards Against Humanity [Night 3]

#724

Post by Hedgeowl »

kneel4justice wrote:
Hedgeowl wrote:
S~V~S wrote:I don't recall that, but that does not mean it did not happen, obv. Generally, I am not a fan of fly bys, and most people are not. I don't recall Sorsha doing this in the past, but lord knows my memory is not all that lol.
I understand not having time and wanting to not miss a vote, but I think everyone should give a reason. Otherwise what is the point of the game? Votes, reasons given are a huge part of the analysis and discussion and where those who prefer pings vibes etc get their vibes from too. So yeah, I dont like no dirve-by, fly-by, sail-by voting.

Dang civvie Ninja! Way to end the Llama wont die saga. Love playing with you Logan! I only wished we had learned his role, but this saves another lynch from being used. Seems like its time for some analyzing.

My current list of suspects: Dom, rey, and DH. I will he back to explore these peeps further and encourage others to do the same.
Can you provide some explanations for your list of suspects? I probably missed them, so a summary would be nice.

As far as Dom, we got off to a rocky start because we were kind of accusing each other under false circumstances. However, I am suspicious of him because I felt like during his vote making decision he was playing confused, it's completely possible that his confusion was genuine, but to me it just struck me as something a scum would do. Later seeing that the following day he voted JJ while he claimed to be suspicious of Llama but not sure it was Llama's baddie behavior, I am very much thinking he was looking for ways to avoid lynching Llama and they could be baddies.
Rey, I haven't paid enough attention to. I will try to work on that, but nothing caught my eye, obviously.
As for DH, I keep repeating it, but he compared himself (?) to FZ, yet was not out of the gates, IMO and I have to wonder why he wasn't? Aside from that I just haven't got any clear townie vibes, or any strong feeling really, and since he compared himself to FZ I was kind of expecting him to be front and center, maybe I expected too much and that is my fault. Not sure!

Aside from those I am concerned about BWT, because he said he wasn't worried about the vote as we had plenty of time (day 1) but yet he ended up randomizing (or self voting) and he just didn't seem to be taking things serious, as I'd expect a townie to. He reminded me of WWE where he gave up but that was so early on that he would have had no reason to want to give up, so either he just doesn't want to be a baddie or it has nothing to do with his alignment.
Then Epi for being so quiet (although I am wondering if this is still in character as far as the I don't care if you suspect me attitude & he just has two major levels, extra quiet and extra talkative), who I now feel better about, but don't know if he is just perhaps on an opposing scum team, so I am keeping that in mind.
Dom and Rey crossed my radar for their defense of llama early on and as you say confusion over why I said he survived twice. Once that was cleared and FH made a very clear cut case suddenly Rey saw what we were talking about and both of them dropped it completely. Now Rey and llama were an indy teamies who antogonized each other the whole game in AGods recently, so it doesn't seem quite their style if they were baddies together, but I made a note of it.

I will have to look back over BWT because I wasn't 100% sure about his explanation, but honestly didnt entirely understand what happened, beyond he voted early and was confused.

You're right, Epi does swing both ways :drums: :D He can be über talkative and then slide back into quiet, especially if multiple games are going on at a time. So I don't tend to think of it as indicative in alignment necessarily.

Haven't caught up yet, but it appears I need to as votes are starting to role in...

Linki inh :rolleyes:
Turnip Head wrote: We need to lynch Pennsylvania Bitch.
ImageImageImage
ImageImageImage
User avatar
Mister Rearranger
Drug Dealer
Posts in topic: 81
Posts: 1256
Joined: Sat Nov 09, 2013 9:04 pm
Location: A Black Hole Somewhere in New York

Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 4]

#725

Post by Mister Rearranger »

insertnamehere wrote:
kneel4justice wrote:
insertnamehere wrote:I'm going to pretend I'm Vompatti, and not give a reason for my vote, k?

Ture?
k?
Ture?
k?
Ture?
k?
Ture?
k?
Ture?
k?
Ture?
k?
Ture?
k?
Ture?
k?
Ture?
k?
Ture?
k?
Really? I would appreciate some reasoning because I myself suspect BWT and would like to know why others do.
You want an explanation for a vote? You must be new around here...
Sturth!

Image
We find comfort among those who agree with us - growth among those who don't.

Image
User avatar
AceofSpaces
Corrupt Union Official
Posts in topic: 54
Posts: 803
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2012 12:48 pm

Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 4]

#726

Post by AceofSpaces »

I've decided to vote for BWT. Seems the smartest way to go for me right now.
User avatar
AceofSpaces
Corrupt Union Official
Posts in topic: 54
Posts: 803
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2012 12:48 pm

Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 4]

#727

Post by AceofSpaces »

reywaS wrote:Well, that's lame.

Nice deflection. :p
User avatar
Hedgeowl
Money Launderer
Posts in topic: 53
Posts: 1999
Joined: Mon May 13, 2013 9:10 am
Location: Virginia

Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 4]

#728

Post by Hedgeowl »

Ok, that was a shorter catch-up than I thought. Thanks for the analysis FH! Based on the assumptions we have to work with I can't see any other options. A lot of us missed the Day 1 vote which may make this harder. Dom was on my radar for his potential votes protecting Llama and still is after your analysis.

PB would have to be very careful how they voted since we could easily track them down if it was too close or a tie after a few votes. Since they were probably not voting for Llama or Sorsha it's a safer bet that they voted someone unlikely to get many votes or didnt vote at all. What gets me is why would PB vote JJ if llama were a big suspect? Since its likely they weren't on the same baddie team it would make the most sense to vote for llama and get "civv credit" for lynching a baddie. Granted at the time I didn't see the case on JJ and hadn't played with him before, where others really seemed to see something.

It would also really work in the favor of PBs team if someone like FH (potential PB) made an excellent analysis for a potential baddie on the other team, which everyone found really helpful especially once llama was lynched. Then got out in front of the PB analysis and threw out names like Rey, inh, and ace. You have been sooo helpful which I greatly appreciate, but I am trying to remain skeptical as well.
birdwithteeth11 wrote:Interesting post, FH. I need to read through all those people later, but based on how I feel right now, I would lean towards rey. His quietness is starting to concern me. And I never like "quiet rey" as it is.
BWT was brought up by k4j just before FHs post, but rather than addressing any suspicions against him he jumps at the possibility that rey is bad. Doesn't help his case here at all frankly. Maybe I am wrong since I haven't played with rey as much as others, but I tend to think of quiet rey as civ rey. I would love to hear BwT address some suspicions brought against him. It would clearly be in his best interest as well. I won't be here around the vote, so can't wait long either.

Honestly reading through today my list has changed a bit:
BWT
Dom
FH
Rey
Turnip Head wrote: We need to lynch Pennsylvania Bitch.
ImageImageImage
ImageImageImage
User avatar
Sorsha
Money Launderer
Posts in topic: 45
Posts: 2128
Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2013 8:26 pm
Location: MKE

Re: Cards Against Humanity [Night 3]

#729

Post by Sorsha »

Epignosis wrote:I'm a top, not a bottom, asshole.

that's what she said
1
ImageImageImageImageImageImageImageImage
User avatar
DharmaHelper
Capo Regime (Street Boss)
Posts in topic: 90
Posts: 16565
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2012 7:29 pm

Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 4]

#730

Post by DharmaHelper »

Went with BWT.
our Linkitis is our lives.

Image
ImageImage
ImageImage
User avatar
Bass_the_Clever
Money Launderer
Posts in topic: 37
Posts: 2034
Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2013 8:33 pm
Location: DMV

Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 4]

#731

Post by Bass_the_Clever »

I voted Rey
Spoiler: show
ImageImageImageImageImageImageImageImage
Image
acrosstheaether wrote:If Bass_the_Clever is mafia, he is a clever mafia.
User avatar
Sorsha
Money Launderer
Posts in topic: 45
Posts: 2128
Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2013 8:26 pm
Location: MKE

Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 4]

#732

Post by Sorsha »

reywaS wrote:Well, that's lame.
That's what she said

2
ImageImageImageImageImageImageImageImage
User avatar
Sorsha
Money Launderer
Posts in topic: 45
Posts: 2128
Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2013 8:26 pm
Location: MKE

Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 4]

#733

Post by Sorsha »

DharmaHelper wrote: Shit Ace I think he's on to us.
That's what she said

3
ImageImageImageImageImageImageImageImage
User avatar
Bass_the_Clever
Money Launderer
Posts in topic: 37
Posts: 2034
Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2013 8:33 pm
Location: DMV

Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 4]

#734

Post by Bass_the_Clever »

I went with rey because I feel like he was backing llama up a little to much and it pinged me when he said he didn't look over the roles that well. I think if you were really trying to find mafia you would have read and tried to understand the roles especially after someone survived a day one lynch.
Spoiler: show
ImageImageImageImageImageImageImageImage
Image
acrosstheaether wrote:If Bass_the_Clever is mafia, he is a clever mafia.
User avatar
Sorsha
Money Launderer
Posts in topic: 45
Posts: 2128
Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2013 8:26 pm
Location: MKE

Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 4]

#735

Post by Sorsha »

Epignosis wrote:I do not understand the pollquestion.
That's what she said

4
ImageImageImageImageImageImageImageImage
User avatar
Sorsha
Money Launderer
Posts in topic: 45
Posts: 2128
Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2013 8:26 pm
Location: MKE

Re: Cards Against Humanity [Night 3]

#736

Post by Sorsha »

Hedgeowl wrote:
S~V~S wrote:I don't recall that, but that does not mean it did not happen, obv. Generally, I am not a fan of fly bys, and most people are not. I don't recall Sorsha doing this in the past, but lord knows my memory is not all that lol.
I understand not having time and wanting to not miss a vote, but I think everyone should give a reason. Otherwise what is the point of the game? Votes, reasons given are a huge part of the analysis and discussion and where those who prefer pings vibes etc get their vibes from too. So yeah, I dont like no dirve-by, fly-by, sail-by voting.

Dang civvie Ninja! Way to end the Llama wont die saga. Love playing with you Logan! I only wished we had learned his role, but this saves another lynch from being used. Seems like its time for some analyzing.

My current list of suspects: Dom, rey, and DH. I will he back to explore these peeps further and encourage others to do the same.
That's what she said

5
ImageImageImageImageImageImageImageImage
User avatar
Sorsha
Money Launderer
Posts in topic: 45
Posts: 2128
Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2013 8:26 pm
Location: MKE

Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 4]

#737

Post by Sorsha »

Bass_the_Clever wrote:I went with rey because I feel like he was backing llama up a little to much and it pinged me when he said he didn't look over the roles that well. I think if you were really trying to find mafia you would have read and tried to understand the roles especially after someone survived a day one lynch.
That's what she said

6
ImageImageImageImageImageImageImageImage
User avatar
Sorsha
Money Launderer
Posts in topic: 45
Posts: 2128
Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2013 8:26 pm
Location: MKE

Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 4]

#738

Post by Sorsha »

Hedgeowl wrote: BWT was brought up by k4j just before FHs post, but rather than addressing any suspicions against him he jumps at the possibility that rey is bad. Doesn't help his case here at all frankly. Maybe I am wrong since I haven't played with rey as much as others, but I tend to think of quiet rey as civ rey. I would love to hear BwT address some suspicions brought against him. It would clearly be in his best interest as well. I won't be here around the vote, so can't wait long either.

Honestly reading through today my list has changed a bit:
BWT
Dom
FH
Rey
That's what she said

7
ImageImageImageImageImageImageImageImage
User avatar
Sorsha
Money Launderer
Posts in topic: 45
Posts: 2128
Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2013 8:26 pm
Location: MKE

Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 4]

#739

Post by Sorsha »

Hedgeowl wrote:Ok, that was a shorter catch-up than I thought. Thanks for the analysis FH! Based on the assumptions we have to work with I can't see any other options. A lot of us missed the Day 1 vote which may make this harder. Dom was on my radar for his potential votes protecting Llama and still is after your analysis.
y
That's what she said

8
ImageImageImageImageImageImageImageImage
User avatar
Epignosis
Skeletor
Posts in topic: 142
Posts: 40711
Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2012 12:59 pm

Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 4]

#740

Post by Epignosis »

birdwithteeth11 was my Day 1 suspicion because he went random right after saying he didn't like when people did that. I'm voting him.
Stream my music for free: https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/
User avatar
reywaS
Money Launderer
Posts in topic: 30
Posts: 1790
Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2012 12:58 pm
Location: The Clouds

Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 4]

#741

Post by reywaS »

Bass_the_Clever wrote:I went with rey because I feel like he was backing llama up a little to much and it pinged me when he said he didn't look over the roles that well. I think if you were really trying to find mafia you would have read and tried to understand the roles especially after someone survived a day one lynch.
Except that I never comb over the roles with a fine toothed comb....especially early in the game. I'm lazy.

Also, who publically backs up team mates? That doesn't sound like something I would do.
Some day, Some day
Some day I'll, I wanna wear a starry crown
User avatar
Flyin' High
Corrupt Union Official
Posts in topic: 68
Posts: 754
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 4:28 pm

Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 4]

#742

Post by Flyin' High »

Hedgeowl wrote:Ok, that was a shorter catch-up than I thought. Thanks for the analysis FH! Based on the assumptions we have to work with I can't see any other options. A lot of us missed the Day 1 vote which may make this harder. Dom was on my radar for his potential votes protecting Llama and still is after your analysis.

PB would have to be very careful how they voted since we could easily track them down if it was too close or a tie after a few votes. Since they were probably not voting for Llama or Sorsha it's a safer bet that they voted someone unlikely to get many votes or didnt vote at all. What gets me is why would PB vote JJ if llama were a big suspect? Since its likely they weren't on the same baddie team it would make the most sense to vote for llama and get "civv credit" for lynching a baddie. Granted at the time I didn't see the case on JJ and hadn't played with him before, where others really seemed to see something.

It would also really work in the favor of PBs team if someone like FH (potential PB) made an excellent analysis for a potential baddie on the other team, which everyone found really helpful especially once llama was lynched. Then got out in front of the PB analysis and threw out names like Rey, inh, and ace. You have been sooo helpful which I greatly appreciate, but I am trying to remain skeptical as well.
birdwithteeth11 wrote:Interesting post, FH. I need to read through all those people later, but based on how I feel right now, I would lean towards rey. His quietness is starting to concern me. And I never like "quiet rey" as it is.
BWT was brought up by k4j just before FHs post, but rather than addressing any suspicions against him he jumps at the possibility that rey is bad. Doesn't help his case here at all frankly. Maybe I am wrong since I haven't played with rey as much as others, but I tend to think of quiet rey as civ rey. I would love to hear BwT address some suspicions brought against him. It would clearly be in his best interest as well. I won't be here around the vote, so can't wait long either.

Honestly reading through today my list has changed a bit:
BWT
Dom
FH
Rey
I totally understand you keeping me on the list for potential PBers. Hopefully I can prove in time that I am a civvie. :fiesta:

Reading back through BWT's post, these two coupled together stood out to me. In the first one he says that john's self-vote stuck out, but then chooses to randomize. And even says it's something he normally hates doing.
birdwithteeth11 wrote:I have to leave for work soon, and won't have time to check in before the deadline. I'm not very sure about anyone quite yet, and the only thing that's stuck out is John's self-vote. Instead, I'm going to try something I normally hate people doing because I feel like it: randomizing!

I did a 1-18 generator (in order of everyone's name in the lynch poll), and got #5, so Bass. Sorry man!
birdwithteeth11 wrote:
johns2jj wrote:
thellama73 wrote:
johns2jj wrote:
Flyin' High wrote:John, why did you decide to switch your vote to Aces, specifically?

I sort of feel like john showing back up in the thread after voting himself and receiving a second vote is indicative of being told in BTSC to come back to the thread...but his self-vote post uses the phrasing "don't know who to vote for yet", so I'm unsure.
It is night here and I was relaxing watching a movie so I decided to come back to the thread and check on it. I chose aces because I don't think anyone else will vote him and I won't be partially responsible for a civ death.
Intentionally voting for someone you don't think is bad because you know they won't get lynched is not my idea of helpful civ behavior. It's a way of avoiding accountability.
Avoiding accountability was more or less exactly what I stated. I did not want to be partially responsible for a civ 's death. I am starting to get some minor pings on a few people and if they form into something more concrete I will share them I just don't want to point fingers yet.
The bolded part in particular really set alarm bells off in my head. But at the same time, I can't see John being THAT obvious about it if he was bad. Or would he pull a WIFOM?... :ponder:
He says that john stating he was avoiding acountability with his Day 1 vote set alarm bells off in his head. But isn't randomizing on Day 1 another form of avoiding accountability?

He missed the Day 2 vote so not much to glean there. And Day 3 we all voted llama so...

Anyway, since I am unsure which of the 3 (INH, Aces, or rey is the PB) I am going to vote BWT because I don't feel like he's playing his civ game.

(Woah, what's with all of the BWT votes? :huh: Gonna stick with my suspicion, but I feel a bit wary since I'm apparently the 6th person to vote him today...)
ImageImage

Image
User avatar
Sorsha
Money Launderer
Posts in topic: 45
Posts: 2128
Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2013 8:26 pm
Location: MKE

Re: Cards Against Humanity [Night 3]

#743

Post by Sorsha »

Hedgeowl wrote:
You're right, Epi does swing both ways :drums: :D He can be über talkative and then slide back into quiet, especially if multiple games are going on at a time. So I don't tend to think of it as indicative in alignment necessarily.

Haven't caught up yet, but it appears I need to as votes are starting to role in...

Linki inh :rolleyes:
That's what's she said

9
ImageImageImageImageImageImageImageImage
User avatar
reywaS
Money Launderer
Posts in topic: 30
Posts: 1790
Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2012 12:58 pm
Location: The Clouds

Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 4]

#744

Post by reywaS »

voted BWT
Some day, Some day
Some day I'll, I wanna wear a starry crown
User avatar
Sorsha
Money Launderer
Posts in topic: 45
Posts: 2128
Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2013 8:26 pm
Location: MKE

Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 4]

#745

Post by Sorsha »

Hedgeowl wrote:Ok, that was a shorter catch-up than I thought. Thanks for the analysis FH! Based on the assumptions we have to work with I can't see any other options. A lot of us missed the Day 1 vote which may make this harder. Dom was on my radar for his potential votes protecting Llama and still is after your analysis.

PB would have to be very careful how they voted since we could easily track them down if it was too close or a tie after a few votes. Since they were probably not voting for Llama or Sorsha it's a safer bet that they voted someone unlikely to get many votes or didnt vote at all. What gets me is why would PB vote JJ if llama were a big suspect? Since its likely they weren't on the same baddie team it would make the most sense to vote for llama and get "civv credit" for lynching a baddie. Granted at the time I didn't see the case on JJ and hadn't played with him before, where others really seemed to see something.
That's what she said

10
ImageImageImageImageImageImageImageImage
User avatar
Sorsha
Money Launderer
Posts in topic: 45
Posts: 2128
Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2013 8:26 pm
Location: MKE

Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 4]

#746

Post by Sorsha »

Might as well stick with bwt for the vote today, seems to have the most evidence from what I did actually read. I haven't had much time to keep up with this game that past couple of days... I'm back at wok tonight though and she have time for catch up.
ImageImageImageImageImageImageImageImage
User avatar
Hedgeowl
Money Launderer
Posts in topic: 53
Posts: 1999
Joined: Mon May 13, 2013 9:10 am
Location: Virginia

Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 4]

#747

Post by Hedgeowl »

Glad I could provide Sorsha with such useful ahem material. ;)

The name of the game is BWT, although again voting with no reason seems unhelpful. Thank you once again for the analysis FH I had forgotten about his random vote and seeming backstep. I am really hoping your teamies are throwing you under the bus on this like Llama BWT.

Votes BWT/b]
Turnip Head wrote: We need to lynch Pennsylvania Bitch.
ImageImageImage
ImageImageImage
User avatar
kneel4justice
Drug Dealer
Posts in topic: 125
Posts: 855
Joined: Sat Nov 30, 2013 9:35 pm

Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 4]

#748

Post by kneel4justice »

On the phone. I voted BWT. I did not realize people were so suspicious? Do people usually come together for one suspect on this site? In WWE people were so divided, this is new. But I was open to voting BWT and Dom.
Image
User avatar
S~V~S
Captain Obvious
Posts in topic: 184
Posts: 21291
Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2012 8:56 am
Location: Lawn Guyland
Gender: Female

Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 4]

#749

Post by S~V~S »

I have to agree with Epi o.O

BWTs Day One vote was opportunistic, which is how I view bad BLT, also on phone, but want to make sure i vote as I may not be home in time.

*Vote BLT*
Skip softly, my moonbeams, for I have heard tell
That the stairs up to heaven lead straight down to hell
Image
Image
User avatar
S~V~S
Captain Obvious
Posts in topic: 184
Posts: 21291
Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2012 8:56 am
Location: Lawn Guyland
Gender: Female

Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 4]

#750

Post by S~V~S »

BWT, W, lolol, not BLT. Freaking autocorrect grrr
Skip softly, my moonbeams, for I have heard tell
That the stairs up to heaven lead straight down to hell
Image
Image
Post Reply

Return to “Previous Side Missions”