MacDougall wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2019 4:04 pm
Nope. I am not down. Sharing baseless and contextless thoughts right now has minor benefit for a possibility of suppressing good conversation. The Mafia don't even have anything to dodge here. They can say whatever because on day 0 and GTH nobody will hold them to account later. If you want to know who people suspect just read the thread.
It sounds to me like you are struggling to fake scum hunt.
Ultra wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2019 10:09 pm
Best part of multiball is seeing scum doing some of the legwork for us by accusing each other
Who’d the scums doing legwork?
You and NUTella
throw in MM somewhere
If you look at those links to past games nutella just provided, I was also town in Vault Hunt, Hogwarts, andShockheaded Peter... although I don’t think two of those are representative of my normal play, and I was a pate sub into Hogwarts. So uh It’s Always Sunny would be the most recent representative town game for me. Because you definitely asked.
I’ll show you all how gosh darn town I am soon enough. Unless you’re gonna hyper tinfol because of ScrimmageJimmyJay.
Tryna manipulate the image of what your "representative" town game is eh
Lol do you remember my play in Vault Hunt?
oh.....yeah. kinda. lol fair. I was in Japan so was also suuuuper low effort in that one
Ultra wrote: ↑Thu May 16, 2019 9:38 pm
Question regarding the no claims rule - does that mean if you're the cop/tracker/whatever you can't state your results?
Ultra wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2019 10:09 pm
Best part of multiball is seeing scum doing some of the legwork for us by accusing each other
Who’d the scums doing legwork?
You and NUTella
throw in MM somewhere
If you look at those links to past games nutella just provided, I was also town in Vault Hunt, Hogwarts, andShockheaded Peter... although I don’t think two of those are representative of my normal play, and I was a pate sub into Hogwarts. So uh It’s Always Sunny would be the most recent representative town game for me. Because you definitely asked.
I’ll show you all how gosh darn town I am soon enough. Unless you’re gonna hyper tinfol because of ScrimmageJimmyJay.
You're not the type of player I'll need meta reads for
but you have plenty of time to breathe and do your thing and after seeing all your hard work and effort
nutella wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2019 1:11 pm
Jackofhearts2005 would you mind having a still image for an avatar for once. the fast movement makes it really hard for me to focus on reading posts
That is the entire point of moving avatars.
Well if you insist on that it's anti-town.
I thought this was in praise of Jack's dynamic avatars. How serious was this complaint?
It was serious. I know he's proud of his gif skills and that's great but it is highly distracting.
MacDougall wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2019 3:59 pm
GTH is the perfect game for a supertown deepwolf type to call for. It makes them look busy and shows them where the juicy mislynches are.
What would be the more civilian thing to do is read the thread and find who is bad and burn them alive for it.
Yet you're not doing that civilian thing.
Instead you're shitting on my effort at finding civilians and shitting on Sloonei's effort to coordinate something.
When you've finished cleaning yourself up and washing your hands, I'd like to see some serious civilian play from you.
Remember the list of five things from the scrimmage postgame discussion? You shouldn't expect him to do all those high effort things. Mac has provided some of his early gut reads, which is what town Mac does best.
And yeah, I know this sounds inconsistent with my earlier take on Mac's take on Epi. I was defending Epi against Mac and now I'm defending Mac against Epi. Go figure. Yall are shitty at understanding how each other play.
If Mac was a civilian, he'd get me a beer and make it snappy.
Luxurious wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2019 7:23 pm
Is there any chance we can get day 0 to end earlier than 48 hours
I made Day 0 48 hours because I won't be available on Sunday until quite late (around 11 Central Time). If people want me to start Day 1 tonight I can, but I'd prefer to get y'all's preference first.
We’ve basically already started with Day 1 festivities. Designating this Day 1 for 72 hours would be preferable to an extra 24 hours of Day 0. In my opinion.
Aye
nutella wrote: ↑Wed Feb 21, 2018 2:56 pm
@DrWilgy don't post any more k
JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Wilgy's vote is an enigma of science. Philosophers are known to throw their tomes across the auditorium in a fit of frustration after failing to solve its mystery.
insertnamehere wrote: ↑Wed Jun 28, 2017 11:50 pm
WTF was up with Wilgy's entire deal?
JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Wilgy's vote is an enigma of science. Philosophers are known to throw their tomes across the auditorium in a fit of frustration after failing to solve its mystery.
insertnamehere wrote: ↑Wed Jun 28, 2017 11:50 pm
WTF was up with Wilgy's entire deal?
JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Wilgy's vote is an enigma of science. Philosophers are known to throw their tomes across the auditorium in a fit of frustration after failing to solve its mystery.
insertnamehere wrote: ↑Wed Jun 28, 2017 11:50 pm
WTF was up with Wilgy's entire deal?
JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Wilgy's vote is an enigma of science. Philosophers are known to throw their tomes across the auditorium in a fit of frustration after failing to solve its mystery.
insertnamehere wrote: ↑Wed Jun 28, 2017 11:50 pm
WTF was up with Wilgy's entire deal?
Ultra wrote: ↑Thu May 16, 2019 10:28 pm
Forgot that the felicity player can't just post results
In that case, what we might want to try a coordinated effort to allow the felicity player to "claim indirectly"
Here's what I'm thinking, if all of us come together and decide on D1 that nobody is allowed to cast a vote, except for the felicity player who casts a vote on her peek, we get whoever we want out D1.
This doesn't break the claiming rules as far as I understand, because anybody can still step forth and vote. But if someone else does vote, we'll still know one is felicity and one is scum. So still a net +
This would be angleshooting and would be a violation of rules. And there’s no way to get players to buy in. And it is absolutely not worth the loss of civilian votes on Day 1. This plan would set us way back.
I propose we stick to the gameplan of making noise and hunting scum.
I see nothing wrong with his plan. I don't see how it sets us way back when we literally get a free scum outed D1 for the vig to shoot at the next NP and we'll still use our reads and whatnot to lynch someone else D1. The only problem is I guess angleshooting which I fail to see.
I really ain't liking this post Sloonei. I ain't liking a lot of your posts tbh. Your questions at Ultra are pinging me the wrong. Like scum tryna get a feel for his opponent to know if to be wary of them or not or maybe kill them. I mean if you want to know how he plays as town, just watch him play from D1 forth. His answers won't really tell me you much.
Ultra wrote: ↑Thu May 16, 2019 10:28 pm
Forgot that the felicity player can't just post results
In that case, what we might want to try a coordinated effort to allow the felicity player to "claim indirectly"
Here's what I'm thinking, if all of us come together and decide on D1 that nobody is allowed to cast a vote, except for the felicity player who casts a vote on her peek, we get whoever we want out D1.
This doesn't break the claiming rules as far as I understand, because anybody can still step forth and vote. But if someone else does vote, we'll still know one is felicity and one is scum. So still a net +
This would be angleshooting and would be a violation of rules. And there’s no way to get players to buy in. And it is absolutely not worth the loss of civilian votes on Day 1. This plan would set us way back.
I propose we stick to the gameplan of making noise and hunting scum.
I see nothing wrong with his plan. I don't see how it sets us way back when we literally get a free scum outed D1 for the vig to shoot at the next NP and we'll still use our reads and whatnot to lynch someone else D1. The only problem is I guess angleshooting which I fail to see.
I really ain't liking this post Sloonei. I ain't liking a lot of your posts tbh. Your questions at Ultra are pinging me the wrong. Like scum tryna get a feel for his opponent to know if to be wary of them or not or maybe kill them. I mean if you want to know how he plays as town, just watch him play from D1 forth. His answers won't really tell me you much.
Ultra wrote: ↑Thu May 16, 2019 10:28 pm
Forgot that the felicity player can't just post results
In that case, what we might want to try a coordinated effort to allow the felicity player to "claim indirectly"
Here's what I'm thinking, if all of us come together and decide on D1 that nobody is allowed to cast a vote, except for the felicity player who casts a vote on her peek, we get whoever we want out D1.
This doesn't break the claiming rules as far as I understand, because anybody can still step forth and vote. But if someone else does vote, we'll still know one is felicity and one is scum. So still a net +
This would be angleshooting and would be a violation of rules. And there’s no way to get players to buy in. And it is absolutely not worth the loss of civilian votes on Day 1. This plan would set us way back.
I propose we stick to the gameplan of making noise and hunting scum.
I see nothing wrong with his plan. I don't see how it sets us way back when we literally get a free scum outed D1 for the vig to shoot at the next NP and we'll still use our reads and whatnot to lynch someone else D1. The only problem is I guess angleshooting which I fail to see.
I really ain't liking this post Sloonei. I ain't liking a lot of your posts tbh. Your questions at Ultra are pinging me the wrong. Like scum tryna get a feel for his opponent to know if to be wary of them or not or maybe kill them. I mean if you want to know how he plays as town, just watch him play from D1 forth. His answers won't really tell me you much.
Ultra proposed a plan which would be against the rules. I told him it would he against the rules.
I also thought he was suggesting that everyone should abstain from voting on Day 1. I expressed skepticism of that plan.
I get to know players by asking them questions. If you suspect me for doing that, I recommend looking at the previous game ISO I linked to earlier. If you think I should sit back and not do anything on Day 1, then you’re probably scum.
Ultra wrote: ↑Thu May 16, 2019 10:20 pm
How come nobody has commented on my suggestion
Because people are cautious about engaging in role-specific chatter this early in the game. It’s not a bad proposal. I haven’t looked close enough at the role list to say whether or not it’s the best.
Well, look.
I know what the role says.
I spoke bourbonese.
Ultra wrote: ↑Thu May 16, 2019 10:28 pm
Forgot that the felicity player can't just post results
In that case, what we might want to try a coordinated effort to allow the felicity player to "claim indirectly"
Here's what I'm thinking, if all of us come together and decide on D1 that nobody is allowed to cast a vote, except for the felicity player who casts a vote on her peek, we get whoever we want out D1.
This doesn't break the claiming rules as far as I understand, because anybody can still step forth and vote. But if someone else does vote, we'll still know one is felicity and one is scum. So still a net +
I'm torn on you.
That you are advocating the use of a civilian role to find an independent is fishy.
Fishy my ass. The role that's being outed is better used early than later, that way its peek can be utilized much sooner and the risk of being killed would be less. Also, they immediately become vanilla after the use so mafia or any other scum killing doesn't have much an incentive to kill them anymore. If you guys don't wanna waste the DP, we can just lynch someone else and have the vig kill the person who was peeked.
Also, the indie is not just any indie, it's a damn cult, the world's most hated anti-town. I'd like them dead sooner than later.
Ultra wrote: ↑Thu May 16, 2019 10:28 pm
Forgot that the felicity player can't just post results
In that case, what we might want to try a coordinated effort to allow the felicity player to "claim indirectly"
Here's what I'm thinking, if all of us come together and decide on D1 that nobody is allowed to cast a vote, except for the felicity player who casts a vote on her peek, we get whoever we want out D1.
This doesn't break the claiming rules as far as I understand, because anybody can still step forth and vote. But if someone else does vote, we'll still know one is felicity and one is scum. So still a net +
This would be angleshooting and would be a violation of rules. And there’s no way to get players to buy in. And it is absolutely not worth the loss of civilian votes on Day 1. This plan would set us way back.
I propose we stick to the gameplan of making noise and hunting scum.
I see nothing wrong with his plan. I don't see how it sets us way back when we literally get a free scum outed D1 for the vig to shoot at the next NP and we'll still use our reads and whatnot to lynch someone else D1. The only problem is I guess angleshooting which I fail to see.
I really ain't liking this post Sloonei. I ain't liking a lot of your posts tbh. Your questions at Ultra are pinging me the wrong. Like scum tryna get a feel for his opponent to know if to be wary of them or not or maybe kill them. I mean if you want to know how he plays as town, just watch him play from D1 forth. His answers won't really tell me you much.
Ultra proposed a plan which would be against the rules. I told him it would he against the rules.
I also thought he was suggesting that everyone should abstain from voting on Day 1. I expressed skepticism of that plan.
I get to know players by asking them questions. If you suspect me for doing that, I recommend looking at the previous game ISO I linked to earlier. If you think I should sit back and not do anything on Day 1, then you’re probably scum.
I'm having trouble seeing how it's against the rules.
Nigga what? How does watching how Ultra is playing from D1+ translate to sitting back and not doing anything D1? That line of thinking don't follow mate.
Ultra wrote: ↑Thu May 16, 2019 10:20 pm
How come nobody has commented on my suggestion
Because people are cautious about engaging in role-specific chatter this early in the game. It’s not a bad proposal. I haven’t looked close enough at the role list to say whether or not it’s the best.
Well, look.
I know what the role says.
I spoke bourbonese.
Ultra wrote: ↑Thu May 16, 2019 10:28 pm
Forgot that the felicity player can't just post results
In that case, what we might want to try a coordinated effort to allow the felicity player to "claim indirectly"
Here's what I'm thinking, if all of us come together and decide on D1 that nobody is allowed to cast a vote, except for the felicity player who casts a vote on her peek, we get whoever we want out D1.
This doesn't break the claiming rules as far as I understand, because anybody can still step forth and vote. But if someone else does vote, we'll still know one is felicity and one is scum. So still a net +
I'm torn on you.
That you are advocating the use of a civilian role to find an independent is fishy.
Fishy my ass. The role that's being outed is better used early than later, that way its peek can be utilized much sooner and the risk of being killed would be less. Also, they immediately become vanilla after the use so mafia or any other scum killing doesn't have much an incentive to kill them anymore. If you guys don't wanna waste the DP, we can just lynch someone else and have the vig kill the person who was peeked.
Also, the indie is not just any indie, it's a damn cult, the world's most hated anti-town. I'd like them dead sooner than later.
You know, you're kind of funny.
Do you like reading rules or do you prefer paying no attention to them?
Ultra wrote: ↑Thu May 16, 2019 10:28 pm
Forgot that the felicity player can't just post results
In that case, what we might want to try a coordinated effort to allow the felicity player to "claim indirectly"
Here's what I'm thinking, if all of us come together and decide on D1 that nobody is allowed to cast a vote, except for the felicity player who casts a vote on her peek, we get whoever we want out D1.
This doesn't break the claiming rules as far as I understand, because anybody can still step forth and vote. But if someone else does vote, we'll still know one is felicity and one is scum. So still a net +
This would be angleshooting and would be a violation of rules. And there’s no way to get players to buy in. And it is absolutely not worth the loss of civilian votes on Day 1. This plan would set us way back.
I propose we stick to the gameplan of making noise and hunting scum.
I see nothing wrong with his plan. I don't see how it sets us way back when we literally get a free scum outed D1 for the vig to shoot at the next NP and we'll still use our reads and whatnot to lynch someone else D1. The only problem is I guess angleshooting which I fail to see.
I really ain't liking this post Sloonei. I ain't liking a lot of your posts tbh. Your questions at Ultra are pinging me the wrong. Like scum tryna get a feel for his opponent to know if to be wary of them or not or maybe kill them. I mean if you want to know how he plays as town, just watch him play from D1 forth. His answers won't really tell me you much.
Ultra proposed a plan which would be against the rules. I told him it would he against the rules.
I also thought he was suggesting that everyone should abstain from voting on Day 1. I expressed skepticism of that plan.
I get to know players by asking them questions. If you suspect me for doing that, I recommend looking at the previous game ISO I linked to earlier. If you think I should sit back and not do anything on Day 1, then you’re probably scum.
I'm having trouble seeing how it's against the rules.
Nigga what? How does watching how Ultra is playing from D1+ translate to sitting back and not doing anything D1? That line of thinking don't follow mate.
Ultra wrote: ↑Thu May 16, 2019 10:28 pm
Forgot that the felicity player can't just post results
In that case, what we might want to try a coordinated effort to allow the felicity player to "claim indirectly"
Here's what I'm thinking, if all of us come together and decide on D1 that nobody is allowed to cast a vote, except for the felicity player who casts a vote on her peek, we get whoever we want out D1.
This doesn't break the claiming rules as far as I understand, because anybody can still step forth and vote. But if someone else does vote, we'll still know one is felicity and one is scum. So still a net +
This would be angleshooting and would be a violation of rules. And there’s no way to get players to buy in. And it is absolutely not worth the loss of civilian votes on Day 1. This plan would set us way back.
I propose we stick to the gameplan of making noise and hunting scum.
I see nothing wrong with his plan. I don't see how it sets us way back when we literally get a free scum outed D1 for the vig to shoot at the next NP and we'll still use our reads and whatnot to lynch someone else D1. The only problem is I guess angleshooting which I fail to see.
I really ain't liking this post Sloonei. I ain't liking a lot of your posts tbh. Your questions at Ultra are pinging me the wrong. Like scum tryna get a feel for his opponent to know if to be wary of them or not or maybe kill them. I mean if you want to know how he plays as town, just watch him play from D1 forth. His answers won't really tell me you much.
Ultra proposed a plan which would be against the rules. I told him it would he against the rules.
I also thought he was suggesting that everyone should abstain from voting on Day 1. I expressed skepticism of that plan.
I get to know players by asking them questions. If you suspect me for doing that, I recommend looking at the previous game ISO I linked to earlier. If you think I should sit back and not do anything on Day 1, then you’re probably scum.
I'm having trouble seeing how it's against the rules.
Nigga what? How does watching how Ultra is playing from D1+ translate to sitting back and not doing anything D1? That line of thinking don't follow mate.
Have you read the rules?
No claiming and no info dumping. Having an invest role use its peek and then vote for the person who they peeked ain't breaking any of these rules.
Ultra wrote: ↑Thu May 16, 2019 10:28 pm
Forgot that the felicity player can't just post results
In that case, what we might want to try a coordinated effort to allow the felicity player to "claim indirectly"
Here's what I'm thinking, if all of us come together and decide on D1 that nobody is allowed to cast a vote, except for the felicity player who casts a vote on her peek, we get whoever we want out D1.
This doesn't break the claiming rules as far as I understand, because anybody can still step forth and vote. But if someone else does vote, we'll still know one is felicity and one is scum. So still a net +
This would be angleshooting and would be a violation of rules. And there’s no way to get players to buy in. And it is absolutely not worth the loss of civilian votes on Day 1. This plan would set us way back.
I propose we stick to the gameplan of making noise and hunting scum.
I see nothing wrong with his plan. I don't see how it sets us way back when we literally get a free scum outed D1 for the vig to shoot at the next NP and we'll still use our reads and whatnot to lynch someone else D1. The only problem is I guess angleshooting which I fail to see.
I really ain't liking this post Sloonei. I ain't liking a lot of your posts tbh. Your questions at Ultra are pinging me the wrong. Like scum tryna get a feel for his opponent to know if to be wary of them or not or maybe kill them. I mean if you want to know how he plays as town, just watch him play from D1 forth. His answers won't really tell me you much.
Ultra proposed a plan which would be against the rules. I told him it would he against the rules.
I also thought he was suggesting that everyone should abstain from voting on Day 1. I expressed skepticism of that plan.
I get to know players by asking them questions. If you suspect me for doing that, I recommend looking at the previous game ISO I linked to earlier. If you think I should sit back and not do anything on Day 1, then you’re probably scum.
I'm having trouble seeing how it's against the rules.
Nigga what? How does watching how Ultra is playing from D1+ translate to sitting back and not doing anything D1? That line of thinking don't follow mate.
Have you read the rules?
No claiming and no info dumping. Having an invest role use its peek and then vote for the person who they peeked ain't breaking any of these rules.
I missed having you around wilgy.
