Girl Genius (END)

[Jackofhearts2005]

......hello-o-ooo??!?? kinda expected to have more to read here lol

I am not going to argue with it since I am so far behind.

[nutella]

Cool cool cool so Jack is bad. Good to know

[Jackofhearts2005]

Cool cool cool so Jack is bad. Good to know

[Jackofhearts2005]

Stranger Things gifs are the new The Thing gifs.

[Long Con]

I’m not familiar enough with the gambit to know nonstandard lines so this might go off the rails pretty quickly.

1. d4 d5
2. e4 dxe4
3. Nc3 f5
4. Bf4 h6

[Long Con]

Neee to read the whole set up...

How's it going with the read, Poison?

[nutella]

.....oh yeah who is that and what happened to them lol

[Lunalee]

Wow Epi I did make you work. Appreciate the insight though.

@Lunalee I would like to hear what you have to say about Epi's points.

short answer, I jumped into the game and voted when I shouldn't have.
long answer, when I play with new names I easily forget who people are and who I had formed opinions on. I also was on my phone before end of day and didn't know how to navigate well enough to check who I had opinions on the previous day. Also I was at a wedding that started at lynch time and didn't feel comfortable using my phone for long before the ceremony started.

Bear with me folks, I'll try to be a bit more competent even though I'm on vacation this week.

[Lunalee]

RIP dizzy, and guess I can't read sig for shit. I like owner's "cluster" theory and think Mac is town; would be willing to lynch epi for sure.

I don’t like this.

yeah, me neither.

[Lunalee]

So anyone thinks me correctly declaring Rej town but failing to save him to be scum?

Nobody cares.

What's your opinion of Lunalee?

My opinion:

[VOTE: Lunalee] aubergine

yeah, No. That was too easy of an opinion

[Creature]

I won’t be judging Tony based on that post alone. He was crafty as hell in Fallout.

doesn't look very crafty here however.

What makes you say that? “Not looking crafty” would be part of the craft.

I mean his posts doesn't seem to necessity a lot of craft.

[Creature]

......hello-o-ooo??!?? kinda expected to have more to read here lol

I think Jack is town from the above posts.

[juliets]

Wow Epi I did make you work. Appreciate the insight though.

@Lunalee I would like to hear what you have to say about Epi's points.

short answer, I jumped into the game and voted when I shouldn't have.
long answer, when I play with new names I easily forget who people are and who I had formed opinions on. I also was on my phone before end of day and didn't know how to navigate well enough to check who I had opinions on the previous day. Also I was at a wedding that started at lynch time and didn't feel comfortable using my phone for long before the ceremony started.

Bear with me folks, I'll try to be a bit more competent even though I'm on vacation this week.

Thanks Luna. I have sympathy for your phone posting issue because I also have problems with it. And your explanation about the wedding sounds sincere. I'm dead tired though and will have to think about this some more tomorrow and re-visit Epi's post.

[juliets]

[VOTE: Mac] aubergine

nova, can you talk about your vote? What are you seeing?

[Epignosis]

Wow Epi I did make you work. Appreciate the insight though.

@Lunalee I would like to hear what you have to say about Epi's points.

short answer, I jumped into the game and voted when I shouldn't have.
long answer, when I play with new names I easily forget who people are and who I had formed opinions on. I also was on my phone before end of day and didn't know how to navigate well enough to check who I had opinions on the previous day. Also I was at a wedding that started at lynch time and didn't feel comfortable using my phone for long before the ceremony started.

Bear with me folks, I'll try to be a bit more competent even though I'm on vacation this week.

I understand real life intrusions, but I cannot judge them. I can only judge what happened in here.

There were, on Day 1, 24 people eligible to vote. Only 17 did. You are one of them, and your vote was instrumental in saving one person and lynching another. If you were as uninformed as you claim, why not vote in such a way as to avoid impacting the votes of those who were here and informed?

If you are innocent, then there are a number of unfortunate scenarios that had to occur all at once.
If you are guilty, there's only one.

[JaggedJimmyJay]

[mention]Dragon D. Luffy[/mention]

Hello everyone. I apologize sincerely for the long delay in announcing this -- it was my own oversight. I've been quite squished under the weight of graduate school manuscripting and such. I am the facilitator though, or the moderator on duty. If anyone is feeling irritated from this point forward about any matters pertaining to the game, or just feels like sending a PM -- get that sucker into my inbox stat. I am happy to talk with you.

Likewise, if you think I have missed something that has already transpired demanding MoD attention, please let me know privately. Everyone continue to enjoy the game!

[Epignosis]

If anyone objects to a Lunalee lynch, I'd like to hear why sooner rather than later.

[Jackofhearts2005]

I’m not familiar enough with the gambit to know nonstandard lines so this might go off the rails pretty quickly.

1. d4 d5
2. e4 dxe4
3. Nc3 f5
4. Bf4 h6

Secret codes?

[Quin]

Sorry all. Been under the hammer with thesis stuff so I've barely done more than skim Day 2, if you can call it that. Still am, so I'd appreciate it if someone linked me to big stuff. Lunalee comes to mind, but I'll look into whatever wallposts I skipped myself.

Laying off Creature now. He seems to be in the game now rather than criticising it from the sidelines. No beefs with his content either.

Bazinga.

[Quin]

I’m not familiar enough with the gambit to know nonstandard lines so this might go off the rails pretty quickly.

1. d4 d5
2. e4 dxe4
3. Nc3 f5
4. Bf4 h6

Secret codes?

Yes. I'm ignoring them.

[Jackofhearts2005]

@Dragon D. Luffy

Hello everyone. I apologize sincerely for the long delay in announcing this -- it was my own oversight. I've been quite squished under the weight of graduate school manuscripting and such. I am the facilitator though, or the moderator on duty. If anyone is feeling irritated from this point forward about any matters pertaining to the game, or just feels like sending a PM -- get that sucker into my inbox stat. I am happy to talk with you.

Likewise, if you think I have missed something that has already transpired demanding MoD attention, please let me know privately. Everyone continue to enjoy the game!

Got away with posting that Zootopia/Fire Emblem porn.

[Quin]

I read Epi's case. It boils down to 'Lunalee voted for Rej despite not expressing suspicion of him instead of timmer (no votes) or Creature (who was a wagon). The Michelle thing is nothing.

Her defence wasn't based on suspicion. To vote Lunalee based on Epi's case, you need to believe she is lying here:

Wow Epi I did make you work. Appreciate the insight though.

@Lunalee I would like to hear what you have to say about Epi's points.

short answer, I jumped into the game and voted when I shouldn't have.
long answer, when I play with new names I easily forget who people are and who I had formed opinions on. I also was on my phone before end of day and didn't know how to navigate well enough to check who I had opinions on the previous day. Also I was at a wedding that started at lynch time and didn't feel comfortable using my phone for long before the ceremony started.

Bear with me folks, I'll try to be a bit more competent even though I'm on vacation this week.

I think she's telling the truth. It doesn't make her town, but I wouldn't vote for her.

[Epignosis]

I read Epi's case. It boils down to 'Lunalee voted for Rej despite not expressing suspicion of him instead of timmer (no votes) or Creature (who was a wagon). The Michelle thing is nothing.

Her defence wasn't based on suspicion. To vote Lunalee based on Epi's case, you need to believe she is lying here:

Wow Epi I did make you work. Appreciate the insight though.

@Lunalee I would like to hear what you have to say about Epi's points.

short answer, I jumped into the game and voted when I shouldn't have.
long answer, when I play with new names I easily forget who people are and who I had formed opinions on. I also was on my phone before end of day and didn't know how to navigate well enough to check who I had opinions on the previous day. Also I was at a wedding that started at lynch time and didn't feel comfortable using my phone for long before the ceremony started.

Bear with me folks, I'll try to be a bit more competent even though I'm on vacation this week.

I think she's telling the truth. It doesn't make her town, but I wouldn't vote for her.

If she's telling the truth, I have to believe four different things that are independently very hard to believe.

[Epignosis]

I'm perfectly willing to hear that Lunalee is innocent, but for me to move my hand, I will need a more convincing place to go.

[Quin]

I read Epi's case. It boils down to 'Lunalee voted for Rej despite not expressing suspicion of him instead of timmer (no votes) or Creature (who was a wagon). The Michelle thing is nothing.

Her defence wasn't based on suspicion. To vote Lunalee based on Epi's case, you need to believe she is lying here:

Wow Epi I did make you work. Appreciate the insight though.

@Lunalee I would like to hear what you have to say about Epi's points.

short answer, I jumped into the game and voted when I shouldn't have.
long answer, when I play with new names I easily forget who people are and who I had formed opinions on. I also was on my phone before end of day and didn't know how to navigate well enough to check who I had opinions on the previous day. Also I was at a wedding that started at lynch time and didn't feel comfortable using my phone for long before the ceremony started.

Bear with me folks, I'll try to be a bit more competent even though I'm on vacation this week.

I think she's telling the truth. It doesn't make her town, but I wouldn't vote for her.

If she's telling the truth, I have to believe four different things that are independently very hard to believe.

And yet she used four of them.

[Quin]

I'm perfectly willing to hear that Lunalee is innocent, but for me to move my hand, I will need a more convincing place to go.

I'm not gonna have time to find a suspect on my own, so I'm hoping on people to present that case to me.

[Epignosis]

I read Epi's case. It boils down to 'Lunalee voted for Rej despite not expressing suspicion of him instead of timmer (no votes) or Creature (who was a wagon). The Michelle thing is nothing.

Her defence wasn't based on suspicion. To vote Lunalee based on Epi's case, you need to believe she is lying here:

Wow Epi I did make you work. Appreciate the insight though.

@Lunalee I would like to hear what you have to say about Epi's points.

short answer, I jumped into the game and voted when I shouldn't have.
long answer, when I play with new names I easily forget who people are and who I had formed opinions on. I also was on my phone before end of day and didn't know how to navigate well enough to check who I had opinions on the previous day. Also I was at a wedding that started at lynch time and didn't feel comfortable using my phone for long before the ceremony started.

Bear with me folks, I'll try to be a bit more competent even though I'm on vacation this week.

I think she's telling the truth. It doesn't make her town, but I wouldn't vote for her.

If she's telling the truth, I have to believe four different things that are independently very hard to believe.

And yet she used four of them.

Used four of what?

[Quin]

I read Epi's case. It boils down to 'Lunalee voted for Rej despite not expressing suspicion of him instead of timmer (no votes) or Creature (who was a wagon). The Michelle thing is nothing.

Her defence wasn't based on suspicion. To vote Lunalee based on Epi's case, you need to believe she is lying here:

Wow Epi I did make you work. Appreciate the insight though.

@Lunalee I would like to hear what you have to say about Epi's points.

short answer, I jumped into the game and voted when I shouldn't have.
long answer, when I play with new names I easily forget who people are and who I had formed opinions on. I also was on my phone before end of day and didn't know how to navigate well enough to check who I had opinions on the previous day. Also I was at a wedding that started at lynch time and didn't feel comfortable using my phone for long before the ceremony started.

Bear with me folks, I'll try to be a bit more competent even though I'm on vacation this week.

I think she's telling the truth. It doesn't make her town, but I wouldn't vote for her.

If she's telling the truth, I have to believe four different things that are independently very hard to believe.

And yet she used four of them.

Used four of what?

I find it hard to believe that someone would come up with four hard to believe excuses as a defence for their vote as scum. It's too much. Also it was three.

[Epignosis]

I read Epi's case. It boils down to 'Lunalee voted for Rej despite not expressing suspicion of him instead of timmer (no votes) or Creature (who was a wagon). The Michelle thing is nothing.

Her defence wasn't based on suspicion. To vote Lunalee based on Epi's case, you need to believe she is lying here:

Wow Epi I did make you work. Appreciate the insight though.

@Lunalee I would like to hear what you have to say about Epi's points.

short answer, I jumped into the game and voted when I shouldn't have.
long answer, when I play with new names I easily forget who people are and who I had formed opinions on. I also was on my phone before end of day and didn't know how to navigate well enough to check who I had opinions on the previous day. Also I was at a wedding that started at lynch time and didn't feel comfortable using my phone for long before the ceremony started.

Bear with me folks, I'll try to be a bit more competent even though I'm on vacation this week.

I think she's telling the truth. It doesn't make her town, but I wouldn't vote for her.

If she's telling the truth, I have to believe four different things that are independently very hard to believe.

And yet she used four of them.

Used four of what?

I find it hard to believe that someone would come up with four hard to believe excuses as a defence for their vote as scum. It's too much. Also it was three.

I didn't say she had four hard-to-believe excuses.

I said there were four different things I would have to believe in order for me to believe she is innocent. All four of those things would have to be true for her to be a civilian.

[TonyStarkPrime]

[mention]Long Con[/mention]
1. d4 d5
2. e4 dxe4
3. Nc3 f5
4. Bf4 h6
5. Qh5


No secret codes

[TonyStarkPrime]

I read Epi's case. It boils down to 'Lunalee voted for Rej despite not expressing suspicion of him instead of timmer (no votes) or Creature (who was a wagon). The Michelle thing is nothing.

Her defence wasn't based on suspicion. To vote Lunalee based on Epi's case, you need to believe she is lying here:

short answer, I jumped into the game and voted when I shouldn't have.
long answer, when I play with new names I easily forget who people are and who I had formed opinions on. I also was on my phone before end of day and didn't know how to navigate well enough to check who I had opinions on the previous day. Also I was at a wedding that started at lynch time and didn't feel comfortable using my phone for long before the ceremony started.

Bear with me folks, I'll try to be a bit more competent even though I'm on vacation this week.

I think she's telling the truth. It doesn't make her town, but I wouldn't vote for her.

If she's telling the truth, I have to believe four different things that are independently very hard to believe.

And yet she used four of them.

Used four of what?

I find it hard to believe that someone would come up with four hard to believe excuses as a defence for their vote as scum. It's too much. Also it was three.

I didn't say she had four hard-to-believe excuses.

I said there were four different things I would have to believe in order for me to believe she is innocent. All four of those things would have to be true for her to be a civilian.

And those things are?

[Epignosis]

I read Epi's case. It boils down to 'Lunalee voted for Rej despite not expressing suspicion of him instead of timmer (no votes) or Creature (who was a wagon). The Michelle thing is nothing.

Her defence wasn't based on suspicion. To vote Lunalee based on Epi's case, you need to believe she is lying here:



I think she's telling the truth. It doesn't make her town, but I wouldn't vote for her.

If she's telling the truth, I have to believe four different things that are independently very hard to believe.

And yet she used four of them.

Used four of what?

I find it hard to believe that someone would come up with four hard to believe excuses as a defence for their vote as scum. It's too much. Also it was three.

I didn't say she had four hard-to-believe excuses.

I said there were four different things I would have to believe in order for me to believe she is innocent. All four of those things would have to be true for her to be a civilian.

And those things are?

You also are making me work.

1) That she confused Creature for Rej
2) That she voted at the last minute despite it being an inopportune time
3) That she innocently voted for a civilian when the person she said she said she suspected was up for lynch
4) That she felt the need to vote at all despite being uninformed (as she claimed).

That's a lot to buy.

[TonyStarkPrime]

Interesting. 2 is the only one that I feel like I need to believe without having read Luna’s posts today but I think on defense trying to make excuses about a vote is a very bad line.

[Epignosis]

Further, she's not contributing to a civilian win.

I don't know what else a person has to do to show she isn't on the side of the civilians.

[Epignosis]

If you don't want to lynch Lunalee, I will equally advocate a Creature lynch, and I've moved my vote accordingly.

[Dom]

......hello-o-ooo??!?? kinda expected to have more to read here lol

do you know that you have control of the amount of content in the thread?

[Epignosis]

......hello-o-ooo??!?? kinda expected to have more to read here lol

do you know that you have control of the amount of content in the thread?

I don't know that we've ever seen eye-to-eye more than we have lately.

[Epignosis]

Does anyone else have a stake in this or what?

[Dom]

......hello-o-ooo??!?? kinda expected to have more to read here lol

do you know that you have control of the amount of content in the thread?

I don't know that we've ever seen eye-to-eye more than we have lately.

i'm uncomfortable.

[Dom]

[VOTE: nutella] aubergine

[Dom]

epi i don't love this girll lunalee thing but vote for creature thing
it's like...
the thing you said lunalee is doing

[Epignosis]

......hello-o-ooo??!?? kinda expected to have more to read here lol

do you know that you have control of the amount of content in the thread?

I don't know that we've ever seen eye-to-eye more than we have lately.

i'm uncomfortable.

No. You're getting old.

[Epignosis]

epi i don't love this girll lunalee thing but vote for creature thing
it's like...
the thing you said lunalee is doing

I believe they are teammates, and I've said as much.

If one is bad, I want the other lynched.

[Epignosis]

Lunalee said Creature was bad but didn't say the same about Rej, and yet voted Rej instead of Creature, and cites confusion.

That isn't anything like what I'm doing.

[Epignosis]

Again, if you have a different opinion, by all means, please push another lynch candidate.

[Epignosis]

And I'm back on Lunalee. I think I'm right.

[Dom]

sure i'll buy tht 30% off
but like... you're pushing her hard?


linki: you're back on her vote.

what think you of nutella?

[Epignosis]

sure i'll buy tht 30% off
but like... you're pushing her hard?


linki: you're back on her vote.

what think you of nutella?

Why wouldn't I push Lunalee hard? She's my top suspect. What would you have me do?

I suck at nutella. I have been right once in nineteen tries. I leave her alone and let others figure her out (or kill her).

As it stands, I would lynch her.

[Epignosis]

If I didn't vote Luna or Creature, it'd be Michelle, as I said.

[Epignosis]

Tony, your pet suspect has pissed all over your carpet.

Time to get a new pet.