Quick glance at Rej
Rej wrote: ↑Mon Dec 09, 2019 7:51 am
sig wrote: ↑Sun Dec 08, 2019 8:08 pm
Rej wrote: ↑Sun Dec 08, 2019 7:53 pm
sig wrote: ↑Sun Dec 08, 2019 4:21 pm
Creature wrote: ↑Sun Dec 08, 2019 3:57 pm
Considering 17 players usually means 4 mafia in a town v mafia singleball but also considering this site is weird, I'd say 3 mafia with chances of a handful of third parties
I could see that, I don't recall ever playing a Nova game though which does make it a bit more murky.
I'd say 3-4 mafia and two third parties probably with survivorish roles, I don't think the game could support a SK given how small it is and there being role reveals. It's also possible one of the third parties is a mechanism against role claiming, if they're not I'd be wary of the mafia having a role that could punish a player for revealing info/claiming.
the way you imply he third parties being survivorish is worrying me
I note it down
It's an obvious assumption to make given the player pool.
1.5 years mafia experience, and I havent ever seen someone comming D0 implying that third parties might be survivorish. Lmao, this is scummy af and I dont know how else to judge this random wild assumption.
I just think that you could be harmful (possible third) who tries to downplay the scum/thirds in general in this game.
Thats why I said noteworthy.
This is an odd post. I've never played with Rej and I don't know where else he's played, but I'm not inclined to read sig in the way that Rej is proposing here. It seems like an odd thing to latch onto for what appears to be Rej's first read of the game.
Rej wrote: ↑Mon Dec 09, 2019 7:59 am
nutella wrote: ↑Mon Dec 09, 2019 1:27 am
Dom wrote: ↑Mon Dec 09, 2019 1:04 am
nutella wrote: ↑Sun Dec 08, 2019 6:14 pm
Lol creature is town
[VOTE:
nutella] aubergine
Eh?
Dom probably suspects you of basing your town gutread on Creature on TMI. (My first guess).
I also give Creature a townread, but he set his vote and he was quite engageful. Tho my read on him bases on post-voting.
Why did you give him a towncard?
I also don't know why he responded to this. [mention]Rej[/mention] why did you respond to this?
DDL posted a fairly length case on Rej and he responded
with this, which... does not really address anything. He just kinda shrugs at DDL's point about his stance(s) on Creature. That's basically nothing. Then he votes for DDL, but changes to Dragomir in his next post. Both look like
omgus.
I'm uninspired. I like the DDL case that exists in here.