Actually ew
Don't want to be in a wagon with realet anymore
Moderator: Community Team
is a policy lynch D3 even a policy lynch at that stage? with long intense DPs? I thought policy lynches occur quite early.Rej wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 10:49 pmhe said D3, this means he gives you a chance, he is either town or you both are mafia mates, I doubt latter one for now
Policy lynches should never happenRej wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 10:53 pmis a policy lynch D3 even a policy lynch at that stage? with long intense DPs? I thought policy lynches occur quite early.Rej wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 10:49 pmhe said D3, this means he gives you a chance, he is either town or you both are mafia mates, I doubt latter one for now
i dont have a read on then so its not an issue reallyEpignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 10:45 pmI'm going to vote for Enrique.therealet wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 8:08 pmEpignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 8:03 pmtherealet wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 5:30 pmEpignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 1:02 pmThis is disingenuous.
The purpose of this is to grant its author permission to string together lynches while prioritizing the more vocal of the two. A lynched civilian nova leaves room for therealet to double-down on a lynch for his other "suspect."
even if someone disagrees with u buddy doesnt mean theyre disingenuous
if you can see clearly in your catchup my tone around them shifted, i changed my mind, and it was easyThis is an empty post that looks busy but is vapid in its conclusion. Worse, it isn't even true. I had done nothing up to the point of this post.
just because i say 'everybody' dont take it as a personal attack, i may have said 'everybody' but im not including everybody, i know full well not everyone has posted and i assumed people would have the common sense to understand i wasnt referring to everyone
Eh? How are you disagreeing with me? You answered nova's question and I called your response disingenuous.even if someone disagrees with u buddy doesnt mean theyre disingenuous
if you can see clearly in your catchup my tone around them shifted, i changed my mind, and it was easy
youre going to make me look bad by ignoring the fact that i clearly stated i had already changed my mind? ok
So you don't mean the things you say.just because i say 'everybody' dont take it as a personal attack, i may have said 'everybody' but im not including everybody, i know full well not everyone has posted and i assumed people would have the common sense to understand i wasnt referring to everyone
That must come in handy when you're mafia.
youre strawmanning
Never am.
How do you feel about that?
[VOTE: Enrique] aubergine
yes i did such because dom was wolfier than u
well when youre the suggested policy lynch target ofc thats how its going to look
Yeah, it's an issue.therealet wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 11:09 pmi dont have a read on then so its not an issue reallyEpignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 10:45 pmI'm going to vote for Enrique.therealet wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 8:08 pmEpignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 8:03 pmtherealet wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 5:30 pmEpignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 1:02 pmThis is disingenuous.
The purpose of this is to grant its author permission to string together lynches while prioritizing the more vocal of the two. A lynched civilian nova leaves room for therealet to double-down on a lynch for his other "suspect."
even if someone disagrees with u buddy doesnt mean theyre disingenuous
if you can see clearly in your catchup my tone around them shifted, i changed my mind, and it was easyThis is an empty post that looks busy but is vapid in its conclusion. Worse, it isn't even true. I had done nothing up to the point of this post.
just because i say 'everybody' dont take it as a personal attack, i may have said 'everybody' but im not including everybody, i know full well not everyone has posted and i assumed people would have the common sense to understand i wasnt referring to everyone
Eh? How are you disagreeing with me? You answered nova's question and I called your response disingenuous.even if someone disagrees with u buddy doesnt mean theyre disingenuous
if you can see clearly in your catchup my tone around them shifted, i changed my mind, and it was easy
youre going to make me look bad by ignoring the fact that i clearly stated i had already changed my mind? ok
So you don't mean the things you say.just because i say 'everybody' dont take it as a personal attack, i may have said 'everybody' but im not including everybody, i know full well not everyone has posted and i assumed people would have the common sense to understand i wasnt referring to everyone
That must come in handy when you're mafia.
youre strawmanning
Never am.
How do you feel about that?
[VOTE: Enrique] aubergine
Same could be said about someone in the other end
This was at 12:06am EST.
I made that post at 1:11am.
The disparity for me is that therealet didn't give a toss that I voted Long Con to see the poll, but there was expressed concern when I changed to Enrique.
This isn't a pain to read. I did in about 30 minutes.
therealet is not being honest at all. Hence the unnecessarily qualifier.
Horseshit.
Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 11:47 pmThis was at 12:06am EST.
therealet made nine posts after that.
I made that post at 1:11am.
Now there's a lull.
I'm in bed.
Nothing is going on.
At 4:26pm EST:
The disparity for me is that therealet didn't give a toss that I voted Long Con to see the poll, but there was expressed concern when I changed to Enrique.
More horseshit:
This isn't a pain to read. I did in about 30 minutes.
Phony frustration.
therealet is not being honest at all. Hence the unnecessarily qualifier.
Horseshit.
If everybody was misunderstanding everyone else, then you have a conclusion from the first read. The second reading should be to ensure you haven't missed anything.
"Painfully" is an adverb. Adverbs are qualifiers.
That you used "painfully bad" means have a clear conclusion that means you have no need to reread anyway.
You are mafia.
I'll stop there.
[VOTE: therealet] aubergine
That isn't what happened. That's revisionism.i can take u voting someone to just see the poll at first, but do it a second time and i point it out
You said nothing.
You didn't "point it out."
You are mafia.
Which posts of yours have meaning then?
ur using a tinfoil and a read off my genuineness to pursue a read you are very confident in
I don't even know what I just read.
Epignosis wrote: ↑Sat Jan 04, 2020 12:03 am And what's more:
That isn't what happened. That's revisionism. it is exactly what happened and this entire post does nothing but explain it for mei can take u voting someone to just see the poll at first, but do it a second time and i point it out
I voted LC to see the poll.
You said nothing.
I changed my vote not because I needed to "See the poll a second time" (what a silly accusation, since I could already see it), but because: i never said 'to see the poll a second time', your original goal was just to view the poll, and since long con had 2 votes you switched to enrique as to keep viewing the poll
You didn't "point it out." i did, look at the last post u quoted
You gave me unnecessary advice while my vote was on Enrique:
You are mafia.
Epignosis wrote: ↑Sat Jan 04, 2020 12:11 amI don't even know what I just read.
i can take u voting someone to just see the poll at first, but do it a second time and i point it out
i never said 'to see the poll a second time'
You don't mean what you say, so you're no fun to talk to either.therealet wrote: ↑Sat Jan 04, 2020 12:13 amEpignosis wrote: ↑Sat Jan 04, 2020 12:11 amI don't even know what I just read.
im genuinely not enjoying talking to you when you cherrypick information you want to respond to and just grab those that help your agenda
its not fun
and im not going to continue
first post is a bad phrasing referring to you voting enrique to retain yourself seeing the poll
If it's bad phrasing on your part, then why accuse me of having an agenda and "cherry picking?"
Let's talk about this post.Tedexter wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 7:11 am I actually might be down with lynching Dom. I don't like the things he's focusing on. It's nothing substantiated, only things that are taken at face value. Superficial stuff. Like talking about activity. Sure, devoid of any context, that's scummy. But does that alone make someone scum though? hm.
You always rude when you're bad?
Hi friend-- miss u
"I need to have an opinion, so here it is"therealet wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 5:16 pm+1 on the dom stuffTedexter wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 7:11 am I actually might be down with lynching Dom. I don't like the things he's focusing on. It's nothing substantiated, only things that are taken at face value. Superficial stuff. Like talking about activity. Sure, devoid of any context, that's scummy. But does that alone make someone scum though? hm.
I'm down to give sabie a town read as well, she has to put more work in to get a conclusive read.
I think I'm good sitting at nova - et - sabie town for now. With the further explanation that sabie is town for weak reasoning, I don't want my legacy to be "yeah, sabie is locked town". She doesn't really seem that interested in solving the game and I don't know whether that's influenced by IRL or because she has TMI. She seems more excited engaging in off-topic stuff then actually writing stuff out and figuring the game.
I'm going on et's hand with the sabie town read, although something holds me back from accepting it 100%.
its like hes focusing on useless points as a way to force content
bruh...Tedexter wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 6:43 pm No, I think Dom is scummy because of reasons already mentioned, but Et’s vote is worse in and of itself. That plus Epi’s remark on et kind of adds up in that uncertainty. The vote from et felt really opportunistic, it feels like he jumped on voting dom by using my post more than him having an actual reasoning, et was at 2 votes and Dom was sitting at 2, et just made him top lynch candidate with that vote.
Point is if Dom flips green then Et is probably scum. Weird dichotomy but I think at least one of them is scum. I am aware I’m wrong on one of them but I don’t know who.
why do you care about that?
what the fridge is this saying?
lol-ingEpignosis wrote: ↑Sat Jan 04, 2020 12:11 amI don't even know what I just read.
lol-ing more.Epignosis wrote: ↑Sat Jan 04, 2020 12:19 amIf it's bad phrasing on your part, then why accuse me of having an agenda and "cherry picking?"
Can't you accept some responsibility for your own communication?
has it been the 23 hours or summat from what i just read?
That's not what I hoped you would say, but it sounds honest.