Willow [Endgame]
Moderator: Community Team
- Elohcin
- Hitman
- Posts in topic: 37
- Posts: 5596
- Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2013 8:21 pm
- Location: North Carolina
Re: Willow [Night 3]
Okay, maybe I will say one more thing....SIX posts in a row screams desperate baddie.
Banners are cool, but a pain to scroll through so...
I've won a lot of games. I've hosted some games. The end.
- Kate
- LAMIST Supatown
- Posts in topic: 76
- Posts: 6940
- Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2012 10:51 pm
- Location: Connecticut
- Gender: Female
- Preferred Pronouns: She/Her
Re: Willow [Night 3]
I don't know how to multiquote. Never have.
Re: Willow [Night 3]
Twenty more minutes for Night 3.
Stream my music for free: https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/
Re: Willow [Night 3]
Night 3: Not a Woman?
Nobody knew who won the drinking contest because the losers had all passed out, and the winner was dancing and singing Nelwyn folk songs.
An angry patron named Lug brought the festivities to an end.
“Not a woman?” he bellowed. “Not a woman?”
Lug’s fist was ready to meet someone’s face, and he didn’t care whose. Unfortunately, one of the drunken revelers didn’t wake in time to avoid his wrath...
It is now Day 4. You have 24 hours to lynch someone.
Stream my music for free: https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/
- Elohcin
- Hitman
- Posts in topic: 37
- Posts: 5596
- Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2013 8:21 pm
- Location: North Carolina
Re: Willow [Day 4]
How's that for not joining a bandwagon, kate? 

Banners are cool, but a pain to scroll through so...
I've won a lot of games. I've hosted some games. The end.
- Kate
- LAMIST Supatown
- Posts in topic: 76
- Posts: 6940
- Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2012 10:51 pm
- Location: Connecticut
- Gender: Female
- Preferred Pronouns: She/Her
Re: Willow [Day 4]
What do you mean? Because you didn't kill me?Elohcin wrote:How's that for not joining a bandwagon, kate?
- Elohcin
- Hitman
- Posts in topic: 37
- Posts: 5596
- Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2013 8:21 pm
- Location: North Carolina
Re: Willow [Day 4]
I couldn't kill you

For real though. No, you said baddies join bandwagons and civvies start them. So....I thought I would prove my civviness.


For real though. No, you said baddies join bandwagons and civvies start them. So....I thought I would prove my civviness.

Banners are cool, but a pain to scroll through so...
I've won a lot of games. I've hosted some games. The end.
- Kate
- LAMIST Supatown
- Posts in topic: 76
- Posts: 6940
- Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2012 10:51 pm
- Location: Connecticut
- Gender: Female
- Preferred Pronouns: She/Her
Re: Willow [Day 4]
Oh. Funny.Elohcin wrote:I couldn't kill you![]()
For real though. No, you said baddies join bandwagons and civvies start them. So....I thought I would prove my civviness.

- Sorsha
- Money Launderer
- Posts in topic: 22
- Posts: 2128
- Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2013 8:26 pm
- Location: MKE
Re: Willow [Night 3]
Because Bavmorda was the one looking for the baby? Now that Bav is dead the baby isn't really an issue anymore.... Thats my guess.juliets wrote:CherlindreaEpignosis wrote: I no longer need PMs from Vohnkar, Cherlindrea, or Nockmaar Death Dogs.
Searches for Elora Danan's guardian each Night. If she is successful (or if Elora Danan comes to her), she will return the child to Willow. If Willow is no more, she will return the child to someone she trusts.
Can someone help me out with this? Why would Epi no longer need pm's from Cherlinda? I understand why he doesn't need the Death Dog related pms since Bavmorda is dead but I don't understand why not Cherlindrea. Probably something I missed on my read through.
Kate, why did you think you wouldn't die if you got the most votes?








- Kate
- LAMIST Supatown
- Posts in topic: 76
- Posts: 6940
- Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2012 10:51 pm
- Location: Connecticut
- Gender: Female
- Preferred Pronouns: She/Her
Re: Willow [Day 4]
Because I misread another players role and how it relates to mine specifically.
- insertnamehere
- Made Man
- Posts in topic: 92
- Posts: 6808
- Joined: Mon Dec 24, 2012 10:40 am
- Location: Twin Peaks, Washington
Re: Willow [Day 4]
I need an eye roll smiley.Kate wrote:Because I misread another players role and how it relates to mine specifically.
- Kate
- LAMIST Supatown
- Posts in topic: 76
- Posts: 6940
- Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2012 10:51 pm
- Location: Connecticut
- Gender: Female
- Preferred Pronouns: She/Her
Re: Willow [Day 4]
Inh take a second and open your mind. Maybe read the roles and see if you could come up with what I'm saying. Cuz seriously, you're wrong.insertnamehere wrote:I need an eye roll smiley.Kate wrote:Because I misread another players role and how it relates to mine specifically.
- DharmaHelper
- Capo Regime (Street Boss)
- Posts in topic: 77
- Posts: 16565
- Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2012 7:29 pm
- juliets
- Dancing Pancake
- Posts in topic: 20
- Posts: 16430
- Joined: Mon Dec 24, 2012 3:16 pm
- Location: Moobyworld
- Gender: Female
- Preferred Pronouns: she/her/hers
- Aka: jules
- Contact:
Re: Willow [Day 4]
Why is it that people do not believe Kate? I read the roles and her responses and it seems pretty clear she could be one of those roles. Maybe she's a baddie because kate is nothing if not clever but I can't help thinking she's just as easily good as bad. And Elohcin, you are so much unlike yourself this game, not just that you arent saying a lot but what you are saying seems a little...harsh? I don't know if that's quite the right word, it may be too heavy. But anyway, why the sudden radical style change?
Spoiler: show
- insertnamehere
- Made Man
- Posts in topic: 92
- Posts: 6808
- Joined: Mon Dec 24, 2012 10:40 am
- Location: Twin Peaks, Washington
Re: Willow [Day 4]
I have no reason to believe that she is other than her word. And no offense, but I don't trust any of you sons of guns.juliets wrote:Why is it that people do not believe Kate? I read the roles and her responses and it seems pretty clear she could be one of those roles. Maybe she's a baddie because kate is nothing if not clever but I can't help thinking she's just as easily good as bad. And Elohcin, you are so much unlike yourself this game, not just that you arent saying a lot but what you are saying seems a little...harsh? I don't know if that's quite the right word, it may be too heavy. But anyway, why the sudden radical style change?
- juliets
- Dancing Pancake
- Posts in topic: 20
- Posts: 16430
- Joined: Mon Dec 24, 2012 3:16 pm
- Location: Moobyworld
- Gender: Female
- Preferred Pronouns: she/her/hers
- Aka: jules
- Contact:
Re: Willow [Day 4]
So INH can you share any more than that with us without outing yourself?
Spoiler: show
- insertnamehere
- Made Man
- Posts in topic: 92
- Posts: 6808
- Joined: Mon Dec 24, 2012 10:40 am
- Location: Twin Peaks, Washington
Re: Willow [Day 4]
This is going to sound like vague bull, but unless I was blocked yesterday, I think that a certain player who I don't want to possibly out is the role that Kate is claiming. There's roughly a 41% chance.juliets wrote:So INH can you share any more than that with us without outing yourself?
That's better then the 1/9 chance with Kate.
- Kate
- LAMIST Supatown
- Posts in topic: 76
- Posts: 6940
- Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2012 10:51 pm
- Location: Connecticut
- Gender: Female
- Preferred Pronouns: She/Her
Re: Willow [Day 4]
I'm not sure what role you think I'm "claiming" but I don't see anyway that anyone could figure it out other than one turn of events which did not occur.insertnamehere wrote:This is going to sound like vague bull, but unless I was blocked yesterday, I think that a certain player who I don't want to possibly out is the role that Kate is claiming. There's roughly a 41% chance.juliets wrote:So INH can you share any more than that with us without outing yourself?
That's better then the 1/9 chance with Kate.
The baby is no longer an element of the game I don't thjnk. But she was safe the entire time she was.
- insertnamehere
- Made Man
- Posts in topic: 92
- Posts: 6808
- Joined: Mon Dec 24, 2012 10:40 am
- Location: Twin Peaks, Washington
Re: Willow [Day 4]
Epignosis wrote:
Willow
Willow is the custodian of the child of the prophecy: Elora Danan. If Willow (or anyone with the child) receives a vote, then he must give up Elora that Night to someone he trusts.
Meegosh
Protects Willow from all Night actions, but cannot prevent Willow from having to pass the baby to someone else.
- juliets
- Dancing Pancake
- Posts in topic: 20
- Posts: 16430
- Joined: Mon Dec 24, 2012 3:16 pm
- Location: Moobyworld
- Gender: Female
- Preferred Pronouns: she/her/hers
- Aka: jules
- Contact:
Re: Willow [Night 3]
I'm looking back over some posts and asking a few questions about things I don't quite understand. Again, bear with me please.
Also thank you Sorsha for the explanation on Cherlinda.
And thank you INH for your answer, though I'm still trying to make sense of it.
bea, I'm not quite sure what you mean here. What kind of evidence would you expect to see of someone's vote being forced?bea wrote: And really - the forced voters was something I was thinking of as well but I'm not sure I'm seeing evidence of any vote being forced? I would think that would be a stronger presence in the game?
Eloh, I'm not quite sure what you are saying Kate is lying about. Are you saying she is lying about her saying she will not being lynched? Have you considered the civ possibility for her saying this?Elohcin wrote: To recap:
Kate has absolutely nothing to go on. She was only trying to LOOK as if she was contributing by saying, "I want to reread elo", waiting a little bit, and then voting me. Ten bucks says she didn't even read one quote from me. Like I said. She just wants tot look like she is being a good little civ and helping her team out. I see right through it.
And she stated several times about not being lynched so it is a bad idea to try. Do we trust a liar? I think not!!!
Also thank you Sorsha for the explanation on Cherlinda.
And thank you INH for your answer, though I'm still trying to make sense of it.
Spoiler: show
- Elohcin
- Hitman
- Posts in topic: 37
- Posts: 5596
- Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2013 8:21 pm
- Location: North Carolina
Re: Willow [Day 4]
Jules, you were the very person to convince me to change my play style. I have done it and now you're questioning it.juliets wrote:Why is it that people do not believe Kate? I read the roles and her responses and it seems pretty clear she could be one of those roles. Maybe she's a baddie because kate is nothing if not clever but I can't help thinking she's just as easily good as bad. And Elohcin, you are so much unlike yourself this game, not just that you arent saying a lot but what you are saying seems a little...harsh? I don't know if that's quite the right word, it may be too heavy. But anyway, why the sudden radical style change?

To answer your other question. I had not considered Kate thinking that she could not be lynched b/c of a certain civ role. I have not talked about this issue since before she mentioned that. Last I talked about it was when she kept claiming she wouldn't be lynched even though Epi said there were no lynch manipulations/protections. I called that a lie, yes. As to her thinking she was unlynchable b/c of certain role.....I can understand that....but if it is true, she ahsn't been paying too much attention. Epi made it clear that this was a straightforward game from the beginning. Kate could be civ...I'll give you that. But, I think she is jumping on me b/c she thinks I am an easy target. And yes, from previous games, one might think so. But not any longer. I have changed my style, I am in ONE game at a time, and I am committed! I am paying close attention and am going to call others out when they stand up, point a finger, and scream "baddie, baddie" just b/c they think they can get someone lynched that way. Kate has nothing on me and I dare say she ever reread me before voting me that day. She just needed someone to pick on so she could look as if she was a contributing civ. It is my opinion that kate is bad. I wish I could get others to give their opinion on the situation. I don't mind being bitchslapped if I am being ridiculous about the situation. But I really think Kate is out of her mind with her accusations.
Banners are cool, but a pain to scroll through so...
I've won a lot of games. I've hosted some games. The end.
- juliets
- Dancing Pancake
- Posts in topic: 20
- Posts: 16430
- Joined: Mon Dec 24, 2012 3:16 pm
- Location: Moobyworld
- Gender: Female
- Preferred Pronouns: she/her/hers
- Aka: jules
- Contact:
Re: Willow [Day 4]
Ehoh, so first, lol that I convinced you to be more participative! You are right I did indeed urge you to and only being in one game helps. So I believe you there, though I'm still shocked I had that much impact.
I'm with you on hoping people will discuss this issue more. I will re-read Kate's thoughts about you and see if they make sense to me. I'm glad to at least know you see the possibility that she might be good - that was really the point I was trying to make when I posted earlier. Not that she is definitely good but that there is a chance that she is good. I'm trying still to figure out what INH is talking about, that there is a 41% chance someone else could be a certain role. I haven't gotten to a 41% in any of my calculations, not to say that he isn't telling the truth. Other than that piece of information I see a 50% chance she is good or bad.
Like I said, I will re-read her with respect to you. It sounds like at this point the fact that she suspects you and in your view for nothing is what puts you over the line that she is bad. Can anyone else comment? I know its a weekend day but I'm hoping we can get some discussion going. I'm interested in other people who you think might be bad for one thing.
I'm with you on hoping people will discuss this issue more. I will re-read Kate's thoughts about you and see if they make sense to me. I'm glad to at least know you see the possibility that she might be good - that was really the point I was trying to make when I posted earlier. Not that she is definitely good but that there is a chance that she is good. I'm trying still to figure out what INH is talking about, that there is a 41% chance someone else could be a certain role. I haven't gotten to a 41% in any of my calculations, not to say that he isn't telling the truth. Other than that piece of information I see a 50% chance she is good or bad.
Like I said, I will re-read her with respect to you. It sounds like at this point the fact that she suspects you and in your view for nothing is what puts you over the line that she is bad. Can anyone else comment? I know its a weekend day but I'm hoping we can get some discussion going. I'm interested in other people who you think might be bad for one thing.
Spoiler: show
- Kate
- LAMIST Supatown
- Posts in topic: 76
- Posts: 6940
- Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2012 10:51 pm
- Location: Connecticut
- Gender: Female
- Preferred Pronouns: She/Her
Re: Willow [Day 4]
Out of my mind? Wow. You have changed your tone.
I do not think you are an easy target. I think you're a bad target who needs to be lynched. I see how now you are softening you accusation. Kate, may be a civ...sure. But wrap up that post with kate is out of her mind. Which is it elo?
My posts on you are solid. You subtly defended Svs then tried to keep her from getting lynched by jumping on any other name mentioned. Unfortunately for you I lived.
I do not think you are an easy target. I think you're a bad target who needs to be lynched. I see how now you are softening you accusation. Kate, may be a civ...sure. But wrap up that post with kate is out of her mind. Which is it elo?
My posts on you are solid. You subtly defended Svs then tried to keep her from getting lynched by jumping on any other name mentioned. Unfortunately for you I lived.
- Elohcin
- Hitman
- Posts in topic: 37
- Posts: 5596
- Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2013 8:21 pm
- Location: North Carolina
Re: Willow [Day 4]
Thank you Juliets for doing a reread on the kate and me thing. I do value your input and anyone else who is willing to contribute. I really think I am right in this. Again, to be concise. I went after Kate b/c she jumped on me without explaination, b/c she claimed she couldn't be lynched, and b/c she continued to be defensive with a tone that was not calm and collected. This screams baddie to me.
Oh, and this is actually the third game I have played since deciding to change my play style. I've gotten gradually more aggressive, yes, but it is better than not saying anything like many off the players in this game.

Oh, and this is actually the third game I have played since deciding to change my play style. I've gotten gradually more aggressive, yes, but it is better than not saying anything like many off the players in this game.
No softening here. I never defended SVS....I had a gut feeling the baddies could have been using her to draw attention away form them. It still could have been true....except....it wasn'tKate wrote:Out of my mind? Wow. You have changed your tone.
I do not think you are an easy target. I think you're a bad target who needs to be lynched. I see how now you are softening you accusation. Kate, may be a civ...sure. But wrap up that post with kate is out of her mind. Which is it elo?
My posts on you are solid. You subtly defended Svs then tried to keep her from getting lynched by jumping on any other name mentioned. Unfortunately for you I lived.

Banners are cool, but a pain to scroll through so...
I've won a lot of games. I've hosted some games. The end.
- Marmot
- Marmot
- Posts in topic: 56
- Posts: 30973
- Joined: Sat Jan 11, 2014 11:21 am
- Location: Oregon
- Gender: Genderfluid
- Preferred Pronouns: they/them
- Aka: Marmot
- Contact:
Re: Willow [Day 4]
I think I see what is going on. I'm willing to vote Kate, but is there any chance you could expound on this a bit? As in, why do you think there's a decent chance Kate has the role you imagine?insertnamehere wrote:This is going to sound like vague bull, but unless I was blocked yesterday, I think that a certain player who I don't want to possibly out is the role that Kate is claiming. There's roughly a 41% chance.juliets wrote:So INH can you share any more than that with us without outing yourself?
That's better then the 1/9 chance with Kate.

Banners and Stuff
Spoiler: show
Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Wed Dec 16, 2020 7:33 pm Just how many days of "let's yeet them tomorrow" can a mafioso survive?
The answer: all of them, if you are a marmot.
- insertnamehere
- Made Man
- Posts in topic: 92
- Posts: 6808
- Joined: Mon Dec 24, 2012 10:40 am
- Location: Twin Peaks, Washington
Re: Willow [Day 4]
Read Meegosh's role. Especially the part about protecting Willow from all NA's. Then read this:Metalmarsh89 wrote: I think I see what is going on. I'm willing to vote Kate, but is there any chance you could expound on this a bit? As in, why do you think there's a decent chance Kate has the role you imagine?
Sorsha wrote: Kate, why did you think you wouldn't die if you got the most votes?
And my reaction to this bit of role hinting:Kate wrote:Because I misread another players role and how it relates to mine specifically.
I've probably pushed the boundaries of what I can say without Epi getting on my posterior. Anyway, ignoring all of the statistics and role hinting, I just think Kate is acting very suspicious, far more so than Elo. I'm going to vote for her.insertnamehere wrote: I need an eye roll smiley.
- Kate
- LAMIST Supatown
- Posts in topic: 76
- Posts: 6940
- Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2012 10:51 pm
- Location: Connecticut
- Gender: Female
- Preferred Pronouns: She/Her
Re: Willow [Day 4]
Exactly my point.insertnamehere wrote:Epignosis wrote:
Willow
Willow is the custodian of the child of the prophecy: Elora Danan. If Willow (or anyone with the child) receives a vote, then he must give up Elora that Night to someone he trusts.
Meegosh
Protects Willow from all Night actions, but cannot prevent Willow from having to pass the baby to someone else.
Inh I believe you are civ. if I get lynched here mark my words and vote elo next.
- insertnamehere
- Made Man
- Posts in topic: 92
- Posts: 6808
- Joined: Mon Dec 24, 2012 10:40 am
- Location: Twin Peaks, Washington
Re: Willow [Day 4]
kKate wrote:Exactly my point.insertnamehere wrote:Epignosis wrote:
Willow
Willow is the custodian of the child of the prophecy: Elora Danan. If Willow (or anyone with the child) receives a vote, then he must give up Elora that Night to someone he trusts.
Meegosh
Protects Willow from all Night actions, but cannot prevent Willow from having to pass the baby to someone else.
Inh I believe you are civ. if I get lynched here mark my words and vote elo next.
- Kate
- LAMIST Supatown
- Posts in topic: 76
- Posts: 6940
- Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2012 10:51 pm
- Location: Connecticut
- Gender: Female
- Preferred Pronouns: She/Her
Re: Willow [Day 4]
Yup.DharmaHelper wrote:I just realized this game is 50% Willow Spire.
- Kate
- LAMIST Supatown
- Posts in topic: 76
- Posts: 6940
- Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2012 10:51 pm
- Location: Connecticut
- Gender: Female
- Preferred Pronouns: She/Her
Re: Willow [Day 4]
Now I almost hope to be lynched just so you'll look like the fool you are acting like.insertnamehere wrote:kKate wrote:Exactly my point.insertnamehere wrote:Epignosis wrote:
Willow
Willow is the custodian of the child of the prophecy: Elora Danan. If Willow (or anyone with the child) receives a vote, then he must give up Elora that Night to someone he trusts.
Meegosh
Protects Willow from all Night actions, but cannot prevent Willow from having to pass the baby to someone else.
Inh I believe you are civ. if I get lynched here mark my words and vote elo next.
- Marmot
- Marmot
- Posts in topic: 56
- Posts: 30973
- Joined: Sat Jan 11, 2014 11:21 am
- Location: Oregon
- Gender: Genderfluid
- Preferred Pronouns: they/them
- Aka: Marmot
- Contact:
Re: Willow [Day 4]
So you think it's just BS then? That's the only way I see that being bad. So unless that is the case, I don't see how Kate could be bad. And I agree that elo seems to be the next best option.

Banners and Stuff
Spoiler: show
Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Wed Dec 16, 2020 7:33 pm Just how many days of "let's yeet them tomorrow" can a mafioso survive?
The answer: all of them, if you are a marmot.
Re: Willow [Day 4]
I actually think that both Elo and Kate could be civvies. I think Elo is acting very differently than she has in previous games I've played, and I thought it was in indication of trying to look like a civvie hunting baddies down, but she claims she's deliberately trying to change her game, and if that's true, I really like the new Elo.
Then we have Kate trying to hint at being something and there's a part of me that thinks she might be telling the truth, especially since we don't have anyone else calling her a liar, at least for that thing. Granted, that person could be TH, but I doubt it. But then,if she's telling the truth, she has no way of knowing Elo's alignment, so I don't get it.
I have to be honest here, I'm worried about DH. He hasn't voted for SVS this whole time. He voted for llama, and he's been doing nothing to catch baddies. If anything, he's been laying real low. There's a chance I'm going to vote for him, because I'm not sure if I can pick one between Elo and Kate
Then we have Kate trying to hint at being something and there's a part of me that thinks she might be telling the truth, especially since we don't have anyone else calling her a liar, at least for that thing. Granted, that person could be TH, but I doubt it. But then,if she's telling the truth, she has no way of knowing Elo's alignment, so I don't get it.
I have to be honest here, I'm worried about DH. He hasn't voted for SVS this whole time. He voted for llama, and he's been doing nothing to catch baddies. If anything, he's been laying real low. There's a chance I'm going to vote for him, because I'm not sure if I can pick one between Elo and Kate







Re: Willow [Day 4]
By the way, who won the poll last night? I wasn't here to see the results and it's not on the list of polls







- Kate
- LAMIST Supatown
- Posts in topic: 76
- Posts: 6940
- Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2012 10:51 pm
- Location: Connecticut
- Gender: Female
- Preferred Pronouns: She/Her
Re: Willow [Day 4]
I believe it was a 2 way tie. The night post said it was a secret or summat.
You and bea iirc.
You and bea iirc.
Re: Willow [Day 4]
Thanks.Kate wrote:I believe it was a 2 way tie. The night post said it was a secret or summat.
You and bea iirc.
Oh well, I guess we know who won it then, lol. Sorry.
Kate, do you have anything you can say about what I said?







- juliets
- Dancing Pancake
- Posts in topic: 20
- Posts: 16430
- Joined: Mon Dec 24, 2012 3:16 pm
- Location: Moobyworld
- Gender: Female
- Preferred Pronouns: she/her/hers
- Aka: jules
- Contact:
Re: Willow [Day 4]
I share your concern. Plus he called one of Kate's votes a "fly by" when it wasn't - she did post about her vote. To me a fly by is you vote and don't post. She also said she was busy that night - she was. We had a nightpost in our game, which she is in charge of and which takes prep work right up to lynch time. There was something else that pinged me but it escapes me right now. Anyway, I'd like to hear dh's response to being suspected and I know he is in an afternoon long game so I'm not sure he'll be out in time.FZ. wrote:I actually think that both Elo and Kate could be civvies. I think Elo is acting very differently than she has in previous games I've played, and I thought it was in indication of trying to look like a civvie hunting baddies down, but she claims she's deliberately trying to change her game, and if that's true, I really like the new Elo.
Then we have Kate trying to hint at being something and there's a part of me that thinks she might be telling the truth, especially since we don't have anyone else calling her a liar, at least for that thing. Granted, that person could be TH, but I doubt it. But then,if she's telling the truth, she has no way of knowing Elo's alignment, so I don't get it.
I have to be honest here, I'm worried about DH. He hasn't voted for SVS this whole time. He voted for llama, and he's been doing nothing to catch baddies. If anything, he's been laying real low. There's a chance I'm going to vote for him, because I'm not sure if I can pick one between Elo and Kate
Spoiler: show
- Kate
- LAMIST Supatown
- Posts in topic: 76
- Posts: 6940
- Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2012 10:51 pm
- Location: Connecticut
- Gender: Female
- Preferred Pronouns: She/Her
Re: Willow [Day 4]
First off I don't think she's a civvie for a second. I've played quite a few games with elo and she gets drama overload when accused as a baddie which I'm seeing here.FZ. wrote:I actually think that both Elo and Kate could be civvies. I think Elo is acting very differently than she has in previous games I've played, and I thought it was in indication of trying to look like a civvie hunting baddies down, but she claims she's deliberately trying to change her game, and if that's true, I really like the new Elo.
Then we have Kate trying to hint at being something and there's a part of me that thinks she might be telling the truth, especially since we don't have anyone else calling her a liar, at least for that thing. Granted, that person could be TH, but I doubt it. But then,if she's telling the truth, she has no way of knowing Elo's alignment, so I don't get it.
I have to be honest here, I'm worried about DH. He hasn't voted for SVS this whole time. He voted for llama, and he's been doing nothing to catch baddies. If anything, he's been laying real low. There's a chance I'm going to vote for him, because I'm not sure if I can pick one between Elo and Kate
I made a stupid mistake which was caused by a lack of attention to the game. I'm also hosting right now. I just had an idea of what something was and never went back to look...I guess because I thought I knew

I think I know about elo because my case is solid. She was washy washy about Svs. She jumped on what she hoped would be a Kate wagon. And I've played with her before. I really think she's bad.
- Kate
- LAMIST Supatown
- Posts in topic: 76
- Posts: 6940
- Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2012 10:51 pm
- Location: Connecticut
- Gender: Female
- Preferred Pronouns: She/Her
Re: Willow [Day 4]
The only thing I can add as to dh is that he was at least originally looking at me, which is wrong. But you can def be wrong as a civ. I'm pretty neutral on him.
Re: Willow [Day 4]
I think baddies can't afford to vote without saying a single word, because it will automatically garner attention, so I assume if they wanted to do a "fly by" they'd do it more like that. So that actually doesn't look so bad to me. But I do want to hear more from him. He also said that when he would have things to say, he would. I'm finding it hard to believe he still has nothing to say.juliets wrote:I share your concern. Plus he called one of Kate's votes a "fly by" when it wasn't - she did post about her vote. To me a fly by is you vote and don't post. She also said she was busy that night - she was. We had a nightpost in our game, which she is in charge of and which takes prep work right up to lynch time. There was something else that pinged me but it escapes me right now. Anyway, I'd like to hear dh's response to being suspected and I know he is in an afternoon long game so I'm not sure he'll be out in time.FZ. wrote:I actually think that both Elo and Kate could be civvies. I think Elo is acting very differently than she has in previous games I've played, and I thought it was in indication of trying to look like a civvie hunting baddies down, but she claims she's deliberately trying to change her game, and if that's true, I really like the new Elo.
Then we have Kate trying to hint at being something and there's a part of me that thinks she might be telling the truth, especially since we don't have anyone else calling her a liar, at least for that thing. Granted, that person could be TH, but I doubt it. But then,if she's telling the truth, she has no way of knowing Elo's alignment, so I don't get it.
I have to be honest here, I'm worried about DH. He hasn't voted for SVS this whole time. He voted for llama, and he's been doing nothing to catch baddies. If anything, he's been laying real low. There's a chance I'm going to vote for him, because I'm not sure if I can pick one between Elo and Kate
Fair enough. I haven't played with her when she was a baddie, so I don't know how she'd be. I was and still am hoping that this is a more involved civvie, but maybe it isn't. I did feel she was more involved throughout the game and not just throwing unbased accusations, so I can't bring myself to vote her yet, just based on what you're saying, because I don't know for sure you are a civvie.Kate wrote:First off I don't think she's a civvie for a second. I've played quite a few games with elo and she gets drama overload when accused as a baddie which I'm seeing here.FZ. wrote:I actually think that both Elo and Kate could be civvies. I think Elo is acting very differently than she has in previous games I've played, and I thought it was in indication of trying to look like a civvie hunting baddies down, but she claims she's deliberately trying to change her game, and if that's true, I really like the new Elo.
Then we have Kate trying to hint at being something and there's a part of me that thinks she might be telling the truth, especially since we don't have anyone else calling her a liar, at least for that thing. Granted, that person could be TH, but I doubt it. But then,if she's telling the truth, she has no way of knowing Elo's alignment, so I don't get it.
I have to be honest here, I'm worried about DH. He hasn't voted for SVS this whole time. He voted for llama, and he's been doing nothing to catch baddies. If anything, he's been laying real low. There's a chance I'm going to vote for him, because I'm not sure if I can pick one between Elo and Kate
I made a stupid mistake which was caused by a lack of attention to the game. I'm also hosting right now. I just had an idea of what something was and never went back to look...I guess because I thought I knew![]()
I think I know about elo because my case is solid. She was washy washy about Svs. She jumped on what she hoped would be a Kate wagon. And I've played with her before. I really think she's bad.







- Sorsha
- Money Launderer
- Posts in topic: 22
- Posts: 2128
- Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2013 8:26 pm
- Location: MKE
Re: Willow [Day 3]
I don't trust Eloh or Kate but I'm leaning a bit more towards a Kate vote today. I feel like the only evidence against Eloh is that she slightly defended SVS at one point. Kate did so as well saying she thought the case llama had against SVS was a vendetta against her. Also, I re-read quite a few players last night and a lot of players were giving SVS the botd early on, myself included, not everyone of them could be baddies. What puts Kate a bit higher on the list are a couple of comments from SVS:
I think if Kate was civvie SVS wouldn't really care if kate got the noose over her. She voted Dom out of self preservation, why not Kate? I'm seeing this as possible distancing, anyone else?
Here she is asking "why are you voting Kate? I doubt she is bad" and saying the case on Kate is based mainly on an association with her (SVS). Then trying to turn the lynch to inh.S~V~S wrote:I apparently don't need one today, lol.insertnamehere wrote:Good defense.S~V~S wrote:Why are you all lynching Kate? I doubt she is bad.
I expected to come in here after work, and find myself 90% dead, and then this inexplicable turn of events happens.
I said previously that i suspent INH, and this kinda just reinforces it for me. No one has been talking about anything but me FOR DAYS, and now INH leads us to lynch...someone else? the only reason i can see for that is to keep the distraction around.
Yes i did, I said i thought INH was suspicious like days ago, before he joined Llama & THs erroneous crusade on me. The whole Kate is bad case is mainly based on association with me, so why are people lynching her before me? They want to keep the distraction around, if i am the only topic of discussion, they can skate.FZ. wrote:Is there anyone you would like to lynch? Because up until now, I don't think there is one person you mentioned for a lynchS~V~S wrote:Why are you all lynching Kate? I doubt she is bad.
So that where my vote is going, since for once i have the luxury of not having to save myself. I am voting for INH
I think if Kate was civvie SVS wouldn't really care if kate got the noose over her. She voted Dom out of self preservation, why not Kate? I'm seeing this as possible distancing, anyone else?








- Kate
- LAMIST Supatown
- Posts in topic: 76
- Posts: 6940
- Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2012 10:51 pm
- Location: Connecticut
- Gender: Female
- Preferred Pronouns: She/Her
Re: Willow [Day 4]
*sigh*
- Kate
- LAMIST Supatown
- Posts in topic: 76
- Posts: 6940
- Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2012 10:51 pm
- Location: Connecticut
- Gender: Female
- Preferred Pronouns: She/Her
Re: Willow [Day 3]
She's my best friend Irl. She does that. I can't explain why. And it's not like I always (or ever ) return the favor. Maybe she knew she was going down that day or the next why not keep me alive? Best I got for someone else's motivations.Sorsha wrote:I don't trust Eloh or Kate but I'm leaning a bit more towards a Kate vote today. I feel like the only evidence against Eloh is that she slightly defended SVS at one point. Kate did so as well saying she thought the case llama had against SVS was a vendetta against her. Also, I re-read quite a few players last night and a lot of players were giving SVS the botd early on, myself included, not everyone of them could be baddies. What puts Kate a bit higher on the list are a couple of comments from SVS:
Here she is asking "why are you voting Kate? I doubt she is bad" and saying the case on Kate is based mainly on an association with her (SVS). Then trying to turn the lynch to inh.S~V~S wrote:I apparently don't need one today, lol.insertnamehere wrote:Good defense.S~V~S wrote:Why are you all lynching Kate? I doubt she is bad.
I expected to come in here after work, and find myself 90% dead, and then this inexplicable turn of events happens.
I said previously that i suspent INH, and this kinda just reinforces it for me. No one has been talking about anything but me FOR DAYS, and now INH leads us to lynch...someone else? the only reason i can see for that is to keep the distraction around.
Yes i did, I said i thought INH was suspicious like days ago, before he joined Llama & THs erroneous crusade on me. The whole Kate is bad case is mainly based on association with me, so why are people lynching her before me? They want to keep the distraction around, if i am the only topic of discussion, they can skate.FZ. wrote:Is there anyone you would like to lynch? Because up until now, I don't think there is one person you mentioned for a lynchS~V~S wrote:Why are you all lynching Kate? I doubt she is bad.
So that where my vote is going, since for once i have the luxury of not having to save myself. I am voting for INH
I think if Kate was civvie SVS wouldn't really care if kate got the noose over her. She voted Dom out of self preservation, why not Kate? I'm seeing this as possible distancing, anyone else?
Re: Willow [Day 3]
That's quite a lame excuseKate wrote:She's my best friend Irl. She does that. I can't explain why. And it's not like I always (or ever ) return the favor. Maybe she knew she was going down that day or the next why not keep me alive? Best I got for someone else's motivations.Sorsha wrote:I don't trust Eloh or Kate but I'm leaning a bit more towards a Kate vote today. I feel like the only evidence against Eloh is that she slightly defended SVS at one point. Kate did so as well saying she thought the case llama had against SVS was a vendetta against her. Also, I re-read quite a few players last night and a lot of players were giving SVS the botd early on, myself included, not everyone of them could be baddies. What puts Kate a bit higher on the list are a couple of comments from SVS:
Here she is asking "why are you voting Kate? I doubt she is bad" and saying the case on Kate is based mainly on an association with her (SVS). Then trying to turn the lynch to inh.S~V~S wrote:I apparently don't need one today, lol.insertnamehere wrote:Good defense.S~V~S wrote:Why are you all lynching Kate? I doubt she is bad.
I expected to come in here after work, and find myself 90% dead, and then this inexplicable turn of events happens.
I said previously that i suspent INH, and this kinda just reinforces it for me. No one has been talking about anything but me FOR DAYS, and now INH leads us to lynch...someone else? the only reason i can see for that is to keep the distraction around.
Yes i did, I said i thought INH was suspicious like days ago, before he joined Llama & THs erroneous crusade on me. The whole Kate is bad case is mainly based on association with me, so why are people lynching her before me? They want to keep the distraction around, if i am the only topic of discussion, they can skate.FZ. wrote:Is there anyone you would like to lynch? Because up until now, I don't think there is one person you mentioned for a lynchS~V~S wrote:Why are you all lynching Kate? I doubt she is bad.
So that where my vote is going, since for once i have the luxury of not having to save myself. I am voting for INH
I think if Kate was civvie SVS wouldn't really care if kate got the noose over her. She voted Dom out of self preservation, why not Kate? I'm seeing this as possible distancing, anyone else?









- juliets
- Dancing Pancake
- Posts in topic: 20
- Posts: 16430
- Joined: Mon Dec 24, 2012 3:16 pm
- Location: Moobyworld
- Gender: Female
- Preferred Pronouns: she/her/hers
- Aka: jules
- Contact:
Re: Willow [Day 4]
Honestly FZ. I have known both these women for years and am good friends with them both, and it sounds exactly like something S~V~S would do. I can see why you might think it is lame but it was the first thing I thought when I saw that post. I would not expect S~V~S to do that with a teammate.
Spoiler: show
Re: Willow [Day 4]
Don't I feel like the outsider
I don't know how to read all those I know how she is arguments, because of course I don't, and all I have to go by are my intuitions and what's in the thread. I really want to trust Kate, and look at me, I'm giving her reasons myself, but I've let SVS get by long enough for two very active civvies to die.

I don't know how to read all those I know how she is arguments, because of course I don't, and all I have to go by are my intuitions and what's in the thread. I really want to trust Kate, and look at me, I'm giving her reasons myself, but I've let SVS get by long enough for two very active civvies to die.







Re: Willow [Day 4]
And by the way, if you three are so close and claim to be so familiar with what the other would do, how did Kate not see SVS was a baddie? Did you just replace Andrew tonight, or was it before SVS died? I can't remember







- Kate
- LAMIST Supatown
- Posts in topic: 76
- Posts: 6940
- Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2012 10:51 pm
- Location: Connecticut
- Gender: Female
- Preferred Pronouns: She/Her
Re: Willow [Day 4]
I admittedly was not paying attn. I'm hosting a largish game on rev. My posts up until yesterday were ridiculously low for me. I'm not a low poster as a civ or a baddie.
Re: Willow [Day 4]
Okay.Kate wrote:I admittedly was not paying attn. I'm hosting a largish game on rev. My posts up until yesterday were ridiculously low for me. I'm not a low poster as a civ or a baddie.
Where did Sorsha go? Where are the rest? How long til deadline?






