I took no offense, no worries.

Moderator: Community Team
I don’t suspect *everyone*, but I’m not outright ruling anyone out on Day Two. Results can be faked or doctored. It’s just part of the game.
The bottom 4 are almost interchangeable for me right now, some of those because of their view of me. Like, if a few people can view me as town but you can’t, that strikes me that your possible end game may be different than theirs. I know I’m town, so I’m more trusting of those who show that they have good instincts.ColinIsCool wrote: ↑Mon Jul 13, 2020 7:32 pmWhat is it about Tony that makes him your biggest suspect right now?
For those who are unfamiliar, this is the HCRealms way. Their games are heavily flavored, the flavor itself is often relevant to the game, and their setups are extremely mechanical -- so much so that behavioral hunting is often squelched or doesn't even exist. It's almost a different game. This is not meant to disparage, but rather to describe. This is the core difference to The Syndicate [and many other sites]; while our games do often have mechanical wrinkles, the primary motion to solve them is still in the assessment of behavior. In some games revealing night actions is even against the rules.KitsuShel wrote: ↑Mon Jul 13, 2020 7:29 pm I don’t suspect *everyone*, but I’m not outright ruling anyone out on Day Two. Results can be faked or doctored. It’s just part of the game.
And maybe shot down isn’t quite the right turn of phrase. Moreso how I felt basically being told that trying to figure out the write up didn’t matter, but it mattered to me, because that’s the playstyle I’m used to. Mods oftentimes leave small clues in a write up to help figure out the puzzle. Because that’s exactly how I view a mafia game: like it’s one big puzzle to sort out.
Sounds like maybe I would like the game style over there.JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Mon Jul 13, 2020 7:37 pmFor those who are unfamiliar, this is the HCRealms way. Their games are heavily flavored, the flavor itself is often relevant to the game, and their setups are extremely mechanical -- so much so that behavioral hunting is often squelched or doesn't even exist. It's almost a different game. This is not meant to disparage, but rather to describe. This is the core difference to The Syndicate [and many other sites]; while our games do often have mechanical wrinkles, the primary motion to solve them is still in the assessment of behavior. In some games revealing night actions is even against the rules.KitsuShel wrote: ↑Mon Jul 13, 2020 7:29 pm I don’t suspect *everyone*, but I’m not outright ruling anyone out on Day Two. Results can be faked or doctored. It’s just part of the game.
And maybe shot down isn’t quite the right turn of phrase. Moreso how I felt basically being told that trying to figure out the write up didn’t matter, but it mattered to me, because that’s the playstyle I’m used to. Mods oftentimes leave small clues in a write up to help figure out the puzzle. Because that’s exactly how I view a mafia game: like it’s one big puzzle to sort out.
I tried to review the mafia game you linked Kitsu, but it didn't tell me much for this reason. You played that game per the culture within which you were situated. Everything is about roles, flavors, and actions. There's very little for me to interpret that isn't related to [the puzzle], and I don't know how to apply that to this game (even if this one seems to carry some of those [the puzzle] elements over in its own right).
ya that is kinda turn off for me to be fair
In some games it is (primarily/exclusively open setups with no vanilla players). It used to be a norm and a standard. Now we have just about every kind of game, and many of them are claim-friendly.
Thank you for eloquently putting what I was trying to say. It’s literally almost a different game. I’ve never played where I’m trying to figure out people’s behaviors, and it’s especially hard when I have no context or knowledge of what player’s “normal” behaviors are.JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Mon Jul 13, 2020 7:37 pmFor those who are unfamiliar, this is the HCRealms way. Their games are heavily flavored, the flavor itself is often relevant to the game, and their setups are extremely mechanical -- so much so that behavioral hunting is often squelched or doesn't even exist. It's almost a different game. This is not meant to disparage, but rather to describe. This is the core difference to The Syndicate [and many other sites]; while our games do often have mechanical wrinkles, the primary motion to solve them is still in the assessment of behavior. In some games revealing night actions is even against the rules.KitsuShel wrote: ↑Mon Jul 13, 2020 7:29 pm I don’t suspect *everyone*, but I’m not outright ruling anyone out on Day Two. Results can be faked or doctored. It’s just part of the game.
And maybe shot down isn’t quite the right turn of phrase. Moreso how I felt basically being told that trying to figure out the write up didn’t matter, but it mattered to me, because that’s the playstyle I’m used to. Mods oftentimes leave small clues in a write up to help figure out the puzzle. Because that’s exactly how I view a mafia game: like it’s one big puzzle to sort out.
I tried to review the mafia game you linked Kitsu, but it didn't tell me much for this reason. You played that game per the culture within which you were situated. Everything is about roles, flavors, and actions. There's very little for me to interpret that isn't related to [the puzzle], and I don't know how to apply that to this game (even if this one seems to carry some of those [the puzzle] elements over in its own right).
But is the playstyle similar to where you usually play? Because that would make sense that you’re still able to play your normal way.
Everything is made up and the points don't matter.
Yes! Thought of Calvinball at first, but then I knew WLIIA!
Ah, see, on our site, it’s harder to figure out scum that way. There’s always at least one mafia player who posts just as much as the townies.Wisp wrote: ↑Mon Jul 13, 2020 8:12 pm Hell no, this game is insanely mechanical, and borderline bastard, if I had known this, I would have probably never joined the game
I can't speak on the posts because people in my site tend to lurk, and wolves tend to always fall in the lurkers, outside a few average wolves, and a few notable town players, like Crossbell aka Prophylaxis
Super for you. Would you like a cookie? There’s really nothing else I can say to change your mind, if your mind is made up already that you don’t like my “tone.”ColinIsCool wrote: ↑Mon Jul 13, 2020 8:14 pm [VOTE: Tony] aubergine
for now. not 100% satisfied with Kitsu’s answers but eh
My answer would depend on what kind of cookieKitsuShel wrote: ↑Mon Jul 13, 2020 8:16 pmSuper for you. Would you like a cookie? There’s really nothing else I can say to change your mind, if your mind is made up already that you don’t like my “tone.”ColinIsCool wrote: ↑Mon Jul 13, 2020 8:14 pm [VOTE: Tony] aubergine
for now. not 100% satisfied with Kitsu’s answers but eh![]()
Our house favorites are snickerdoodle, chocolate chip, and oatmeal raisin, so those and banana muffins are my specialty. But I’m a baker, so anything is on the table, lol.ColinIsCool wrote: ↑Mon Jul 13, 2020 8:17 pmMy answer would depend on what kind of cookieKitsuShel wrote: ↑Mon Jul 13, 2020 8:16 pmSuper for you. Would you like a cookie? There’s really nothing else I can say to change your mind, if your mind is made up already that you don’t like my “tone.”ColinIsCool wrote: ↑Mon Jul 13, 2020 8:14 pm [VOTE: Tony] aubergine
for now. not 100% satisfied with Kitsu’s answers but eh![]()
You and Nanook were my #1s right from the start, and I’ve listened to everything you’ve said in this thread. But I can appreciate that this is not an easy game. I’ll vote with you. I’ve openly welcomed any investigation other than straight alignment copping since that wouldn’t help since I’m a miller.
....why are you telling me this?KitsuShel wrote: ↑Mon Jul 13, 2020 8:46 pmYou and Nanook were my #1s right from the start, and I’ve listened to everything you’ve said in this thread. But I can appreciate that this is not an easy game. I’ll vote with you. I’ve openly welcomed any investigation other than straight alignment copping since that wouldn’t help since I’m a miller.
And if I live through the night, I’ll happily name claim during the next day phase.
This answer rubs me the wrong way. It doesn't look like Alison is referring to a player she actually finds "suspicious" (and Epignosis is central in her POE pool). Also that question about bussing does not reflect what has occurred in this game. They've never promoted a lynch of one another -- indeed that parenthetical stands in opposition to the question directly above it. Distancing is not bussing.Alison wrote: ↑Sun Jul 12, 2020 5:50 ammaybe b/c we're both intelligent players who understand that the other person is not getting exed d1 or d2 and prefer to use voting agency in more productive ways?JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Sun Jul 12, 2020 3:48 am Estimated number of times Epignosis has voiced suspicion of Alison: 9-11
Estimated number of times Alison has voiced suspicion of Epignosis: 6-8
Numbers vary because I don't want a single discussion of numerous posts to count more than once.
Number of votes either has placed for the other: 0
![]()
(also, if this is meant to imply an epi/alison wolf team, do you really think epi "i do not bus" gnosis treats his teammate the way he has treated me?)
This strategy frees up the hypothetical mafia redirector to target someone other than the Wisp/Daisy pairing. If those two target different people, the mafia are forced to target one of them to limit the damage to one check. If they both target the same person, the civilians still only get one check and the mafia are free to tamper with someone else. This dynamic regarding "their choice" vs. "town's choice" is a red herring.Alison wrote: ↑Sun Jul 12, 2020 10:36 pmbecause we suspect there is a scum redirector in the game. let's say wisp and daisy target whoever they want. the redirector hits wisp and redirects them, making their result useless. daisy targets [someone of their preference] and gets a result on that.JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Sun Jul 12, 2020 9:39 pm I don't understand why we would ever want Wisp and Daisy checking the same person. Neither of you need to say anymore than you want to say about this/who you're going for, but @Alison please clarify. That strikes me as a major waste.
now consider the alternative idea. daisy and wisp both target the same person. this time, the scum redirector can't target both daisy and wisp. they'll still target wisp to deny max info, but daisy gets the check on the target anyway, and ends up targeting [target of town's preference].
in both cases, wisp gets redirected to someone else, so it's the same there. the difference is daisy's target. if you believe that [target of town's preference] is superior to [target of daisy's preference] - ie. if you believe that town combing through the POE and establishing the towncore over the past few dozen pages can come up with a better value investigation target than whoever daisy chooses to investigate, which I do, simply because town working together is better than one person working alone - then my strategy is superior.
you may be tempted to ask: why not have daisy investigate the target of our choice, and wisp investigates whoever they want to? Because then daisy gets redirected, and wisp investigates [target of their choice], while the investigation status of the person that town chose daisy to investigate is still unknown. so it's still [target of wisp's choice] vs [target of our choice] being better as an investigation target.
The above is one of the top reasons to think this slot is town, “Why?”, simply because she didn’t know what she was by name, which makes her claim for trustworthy, is she the time of person that could fake it? I don’t knowKit wrote:Thank you! That cleared a lot up, thankfully. And yeah, I guess y’all can add me to the Miller list then.
Kit wrote:Gut feeling might be that sprityo, long con, and tony are scum. I feel really good about you and Nanook, but that might also be because you’ve been the most welcoming/informative for me.
I dig it
I mean I thought alison and colin could be but hey either way I'm down with an alison vote.
That's where I'm at (and it's why I wouldn't be inclined to chop Kitsu first among them). I don't particularly care about the "rule of three" [mention]Wisp[/mention], particularly given that at the time all three of those people were bottom-tier POE.
this post is honestly very weirdKitsuShel wrote: ↑Mon Jul 13, 2020 8:46 pmYou and Nanook were my #1s right from the start, and I’ve listened to everything you’ve said in this thread. But I can appreciate that this is not an easy game. I’ll vote with you. I’ve openly welcomed any investigation other than straight alignment copping since that wouldn’t help since I’m a miller.
And if I live through the night, I’ll happily name claim during the next day phase.
yea i’d wanna yeet alison and epi before kitsu i thinkJaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Mon Jul 13, 2020 9:56 pmThat's where I'm at (and it's why I wouldn't be inclined to chop Kitsu first among them). I don't particularly care about the "rule of three" @Wisp, particularly given that at the time all three of those people were bottom-tier POE.
I think Epignosis and Alison can be validly linked to one another and then potentially to non-Kitsus, so there's still room for discussion there.