That would imply that either the lead wagon is incorrect or I am (which is clearly an impossibility because I'm never wrong)... What is the line here? is Hally being saved or are they lynching scum?
nutella wrote: ↑Wed Feb 21, 2018 2:56 pm
@DrWilgy don't post any more k
JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Wilgy's vote is an enigma of science. Philosophers are known to throw their tomes across the auditorium in a fit of frustration after failing to solve its mystery.
insertnamehere wrote: ↑Wed Jun 28, 2017 11:50 pm
WTF was up with Wilgy's entire deal?
DrWilgy wrote: ↑Thu Oct 15, 2020 2:14 pm
Hally voting 112 means they aren't w/w right?
That would imply that either the lead wagon is incorrect or I am (which is clearly an impossibility because I'm never wrong)... What is the line here? is Hally being saved or are they lynching scum?
That is the question, isn't it? Or maybe 112 and Hally are both town.
JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Wilgy's vote is an enigma of science. Philosophers are known to throw their tomes across the auditorium in a fit of frustration after failing to solve its mystery.
insertnamehere wrote: ↑Wed Jun 28, 2017 11:50 pm
WTF was up with Wilgy's entire deal?
DrWilgy wrote: ↑Thu Oct 15, 2020 2:14 pm
Hally voting 112 means they aren't w/w right?
That would imply that either the lead wagon is incorrect or I am (which is clearly an impossibility because I'm never wrong)... What is the line here? is Hally being saved or are they lynching scum?
That is the question, isn't it? Or maybe 112 and Hally are both town.
If that is the question, do you think that I am on a team with 112 or Hally?
nutella wrote: ↑Wed Feb 21, 2018 2:56 pm
@DrWilgy don't post any more k
JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Wilgy's vote is an enigma of science. Philosophers are known to throw their tomes across the auditorium in a fit of frustration after failing to solve its mystery.
insertnamehere wrote: ↑Wed Jun 28, 2017 11:50 pm
WTF was up with Wilgy's entire deal?
Long Con wrote: ↑Thu Oct 15, 2020 2:19 pm
And I keep really wanting to suspect tedxtr, but apparently his Tony stuff was spot on and so he isn't a candidate either.
something tells me you won't have to worry about that
Long Con wrote: ↑Thu Oct 15, 2020 2:19 pm
And I keep really wanting to suspect tedxtr, but apparently his Tony stuff was spot on and so he isn't a candidate either.
something tells me you won't have to worry about that
Long Con wrote: ↑Thu Oct 15, 2020 2:19 pm
And I keep really wanting to suspect tedxtr, but apparently his Tony stuff was spot on and so he isn't a candidate either.
something tells me you won't have to worry about that
Why not?
I'm not making it to F3 unless one of the scums are either Poison or 112.
Long Con wrote: ↑Thu Oct 15, 2020 2:19 pm
And I keep really wanting to suspect tedxtr, but apparently his Tony stuff was spot on and so he isn't a candidate either.
something tells me you won't have to worry about that
Why not?
I'm not making it to F3 unless one of the scums are either Poison or 112.
Long Con wrote: ↑Thu Oct 15, 2020 2:19 pm
And I keep really wanting to suspect tedxtr, but apparently his Tony stuff was spot on and so he isn't a candidate either.
something tells me you won't have to worry about that
Why not?
I'm not making it to F3 unless one of the scums are either Poison or 112.
Or Ash?
i'm probably the most lack claire on the TSP wagon
if I go to F3 then it means I was wrong on one of my reads that I didn't show skepticism towards, really not that complicated
Long Con wrote: ↑Thu Oct 15, 2020 2:19 pm
And I keep really wanting to suspect tedxtr, but apparently his Tony stuff was spot on and so he isn't a candidate either.
something tells me you won't have to worry about that
Why not?
I'm not making it to F3 unless one of the scums are either Poison or 112.
Or Ash?
i'm probably the most lack claire on the TSP wagon
if I go to F3 then it means I was wrong on one of my reads that I didn't show skepticism towards, really not that complicated
Oh, it's about your reads and how fallible you are. Ok.
JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Wilgy's vote is an enigma of science. Philosophers are known to throw their tomes across the auditorium in a fit of frustration after failing to solve its mystery.
insertnamehere wrote: ↑Wed Jun 28, 2017 11:50 pm
WTF was up with Wilgy's entire deal?
JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Wilgy's vote is an enigma of science. Philosophers are known to throw their tomes across the auditorium in a fit of frustration after failing to solve its mystery.
insertnamehere wrote: ↑Wed Jun 28, 2017 11:50 pm
WTF was up with Wilgy's entire deal?
JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Wilgy's vote is an enigma of science. Philosophers are known to throw their tomes across the auditorium in a fit of frustration after failing to solve its mystery.
insertnamehere wrote: ↑Wed Jun 28, 2017 11:50 pm
WTF was up with Wilgy's entire deal?
tony has 6 votes. are we just doing that? idk if we should. but idk who i’d rather do and i don’t really feel comfortable advocating against it when i don’t really have a counter option
weh
This
nutella wrote: ↑Wed Feb 21, 2018 2:56 pm
@DrWilgy don't post any more k
JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Wilgy's vote is an enigma of science. Philosophers are known to throw their tomes across the auditorium in a fit of frustration after failing to solve its mystery.
insertnamehere wrote: ↑Wed Jun 28, 2017 11:50 pm
WTF was up with Wilgy's entire deal?
JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Wilgy's vote is an enigma of science. Philosophers are known to throw their tomes across the auditorium in a fit of frustration after failing to solve its mystery.
insertnamehere wrote: ↑Wed Jun 28, 2017 11:50 pm
WTF was up with Wilgy's entire deal?