FZ. wrote:Back to TH, in the game he was a civ who was NK, he had 22 posts before the first lynch was over. This is a shorter day, and he might have RL things, or other games he's engaged in, but he has 3 posts and I have to tell you, I'm not getting a good feeling about him.
Also, I just looked at the recent game where I was a baddie, and I asked the exact same question I was suspicious of him for....
I tend to work weird hours, especially during the week. Between last night and this morning/afternoon/evening I've been at work for most of this lynch period. What's wrong with me only having 3 posts so far? How can you get a good
or bad feeling for me based only on those three posts?
And why are you comparing my participation/number of posts in this game to a game twice as big, with lynches twice as long?
FZ. wrote:To be honest, there's a chance I'm going to vote for TH because his first post seemed kind of redundant to me with the "is this day 0 or day 1 " because I don't think there was one game where I played here when the game started with day 1 and we actually lynched someone. It felt as he was trying to ask a question just for the sake of asking. I don't have anything else to go on, but I have nothing on other people as well, so he's a possible candidate for me
You may not have played in games that start on Day 1, but I have

I have never until now, however, played in a game that started at 7:00am.
FZ. wrote:One last thing, not that you deserve my help

, the fact that no one other than MP even addressed my suspicions of TH or tried to bandwagon them, makes me think I'm on to something.
Why does this lead you to conclude this? I'm the Mr. Turnips you are suspicious of, and even
I don't know why you're suspicious of me, so I don't fault others for not commenting on it. If everyone ignores your case, and the majority of those people naturally being civvies, why does that make you think you're more likely to be right?
All that said, I am not inclined to treat FZ's BTSC comments with Vomps as anything more than tongue-in-cheek, that's just not an FZ move to screw up that big tbh

Although it would be pretty funny if it ends up being true
I don't understand why Elo is getting flak for her FZ vote, though. My gut tells me that something is off about FZ based on her going so strongly against me on such a small thing on Day 1, but I take pause because of the BTSC thing - I just don't see baddie FZ doing that. But is Elo wrong to suspect FZ at this point? Is she wrong to vote for her? I don't see Elo's vote as opportunistic. I think it's just Elo's strongest ping so far. I'm surprised by Rey and SVS's decision to vote for her based on this.
I am questioning Ms. Goosey's plan to vote for a self-voter (there only being one, the prickly disgruntled one). It doesn't seem like a vote designed to lynch a baddie, unless she genuinely suspects DP for voting himself. But when votes are as spread out as they usually are on Day 1, I'm wary of her adding another to DP's tally for such a contrived reason.
I also thought Dom changing his vote off of FZ to Snow Dog and then asking Vomps to unvote him was a strange chain of events. Seems highly reactionary. For now I'm chalking it up to everyone being exceptionally twitchy on an especially talkative Day 1.