The Hobbit Mafia: Day 12

[insertnamehere]

Wait, I misread the post Epig quoted. I apologize.


Regardless, you have had plenty of time to post plenty of things with very little value. However, you claim you don't have the time to name a suspicion and such.

OK, a joke is something I can make on my phone, on the bus, at work. A suspicion is something I can spend hours analyzing and judging. I simply don't have as much time as I would like to do that.

[Marmot]

But you're suddenly plenty chatty when people start talking about lynching you, I see.

OK, let's do the time warp.

I usually post and vote in a thread a few hours before the poll ends. See any game I have ever played for proof. So, me checking in on the thread before a lynch, seeing that people have suspicions of me, and then responding to those suspicions, is suspicious to you?

You checked in last night too, but never posted. There were people talking about you too, primarily llama and Dom.

Linki @ Dom: You are all 'seemingly' ganging up on INH.

Who is "all"?

In addition, discussing someone is NOT ganging up on them. Did we gang up on TH? A Person? Snow Dog? Mongoose? MP? Elohcin? FZ?

The INH discussion has generated input from several parties. You, llama, and Epi have all made rather simultaneous cases, and even BWT offered a controversial suspicion. Actually, llama hasn't really made a case, but he's definitely prodding. I'm staying objective at the moment, because INH did mention IRL issues which I'm expecting him to expound on a little.

I think this is the second time that llama has wanted to vote for you this game, but you've 'changed' his mind. And you're not the only one it has happened to. Does llama always waffle this much? Or is it his poor track record in this game?

[insertnamehere]

OK, let's do the time warp.

I usually post and vote in a thread a few hours before the poll ends. See any game I have ever played for proof.

Very well.

In X-Men (a full game, 48 hour Days), you were on an evil team of 7, and you had a total of 23 posts in the span of eight game Days, and I don't think you were hosting a game at all during any of that time.

In Willow (a speed game, 24 hour Days), you were civilian, and you had 85 posts in the span of nine game Days.

OK, during X-Men, I was having a very hectic time in my life. I wish that I could have participated more, I really do. Usually, during that game, I would check in a few hours before the end of the lynch, and choose someone to vote. I was going to do that today, but I now have to spend time responding to all the stuff against me.

[fingersplints]

Wait, I misread the post Epig quoted. I apologize.


Regardless, you have had plenty of time to post plenty of things with very little value. However, you claim you don't have the time to name a suspicion and such.

OK, a joke is something I can make on my phone, on the bus, at work. A suspicion is something I can spend hours analyzing and judging. I simply don't have as much time as I would like to do that.

You can quickly post something relevant as well from the phone though. I don't see why it has to take hours.

[Marmot]

OK, let's do the time warp.

I usually post and vote in a thread a few hours before the poll ends. See any game I have ever played for proof.

Very well.

In X-Men (a full game, 48 hour Days), you were on an evil team of 7, and you had a total of 23 posts in the span of eight game Days, and I don't think you were hosting a game at all during any of that time.

In Willow (a speed game, 24 hour Days), you were civilian, and you had 85 posts in the span of nine game Days.

To be fair, INH was hosting the Stanley Parable game for much of that time.

[insertnamehere]

I find Dom's questions pretty typical for him, llama. I don't think that it is indicative of his baddie game.
I've brought up my suspicion of inh before. I think he is
using the Vomps lynch to his advantage (Figuring we won't want to lynch another player for their off topic posting). I still think it's likely he is the last of the Moira Goblins based
off his interactions with MP and FZ.

When have I even brought up the Vomps lynch? Direct me to that post, please.

Where did I say you brought it up? Why would you post in the thread what your baddie tactic is?

Fuck me. So now you are suspicious of me for simply existing after Vomps was lynched.

I'm allowed to make deductions based off your behavior and what I think about it.

Oh good, no way I can defend myself against that one, can I? Nice choice.

Also, so much yellow and orange is hurting my eyes and I can't really see it ;(

lol

[insertnamehere]

Wait, I misread the post Epig quoted. I apologize.


Regardless, you have had plenty of time to post plenty of things with very little value. However, you claim you don't have the time to name a suspicion and such.

OK, a joke is something I can make on my phone, on the bus, at work. A suspicion is something I can spend hours analyzing and judging. I simply don't have as much time as I would like to do that.

You can quickly post something relevant as well from the phone though. I don't see why it has to take hours.

I try not to make suspicion willy-nilly, as people seem to do.

[insertnamehere]

OK, let's do the time warp.

I usually post and vote in a thread a few hours before the poll ends. See any game I have ever played for proof.

Very well.

In X-Men (a full game, 48 hour Days), you were on an evil team of 7, and you had a total of 23 posts in the span of eight game Days, and I don't think you were hosting a game at all during any of that time.

In Willow (a speed game, 24 hour Days), you were civilian, and you had 85 posts in the span of nine game Days.

To be fair, INH was hosting the Stanley Parable game for much of that time.

Great. Now Dom is going to post again: "Oh my god, he's using the hosting defense again! AHH!!"

[Epignosis]

Just to be clear MM, I haven't made a case on INH. People wanted to discuss him, so I put together that post to lay out observable facts.

OK, let's do the time warp.

I usually post and vote in a thread a few hours before the poll ends. See any game I have ever played for proof.

Very well.

In X-Men (a full game, 48 hour Days), you were on an evil team of 7, and you had a total of 23 posts in the span of eight game Days, and I don't think you were hosting a game at all during any of that time.

In Willow (a speed game, 24 hour Days), you were civilian, and you had 85 posts in the span of nine game Days.

To be fair, INH was hosting the Stanley Parable game for much of that time.

You are correct. X-Men was April 1 - May 23 and SP was April 15-May 18.

[fingersplints]

Wait, I misread the post Epig quoted. I apologize.


Regardless, you have had plenty of time to post plenty of things with very little value. However, you claim you don't have the time to name a suspicion and such.

OK, a joke is something I can make on my phone, on the bus, at work. A suspicion is something I can spend hours analyzing and judging. I simply don't have as much time as I would like to do that.

You can quickly post something relevant as well from the phone though. I don't see why it has to take hours.

I try not to make suspicion willy-nilly, as people seem to do.

So rather than just make them willy-nilly don't make them at all. I'm trying to be open minded here, but your responses today and previously when questioned you have seemed unecesaarily hostile. I know it can be frustrating being suspected and busy, but you seem to be refusing to even acknowledge that you can understand where the suspicion is coming from.

[Snow Dog]

Does this hostility mean he's bad though? Not necessarily.

[fingersplints]

And I wasn't joking about the colors. I honestly can't even read the yellow on my phone :/ was just posting it kinda FYI

[fingersplints]

Does this hostility mean he's bad though? Not necessarily.

It doesn't make him good either.

[Snow Dog]

Does this hostility mean he's bad though? Not necessarily.

It doesn't make him good either.

So where does that lead us? No further down the road that's for sure.

Seriously though, in your opinion, who is usually more hostile in this situation. A cornered baddie or a fed up civvie?

[Epignosis]

In Bioshock, INH was civilian and through Day 8, only had 20 posts (3 of which were gibberish).

In Harry Potter, INH was evil and through Day 5, he had 73 posts.

[Epignosis]

So:

X-Men (Full) / bad / low poster
Bioshock (Full) / good / low poster
Harry Potter (Full) / bad / high poster
Willow (Speed) / good / high poster

[Snow Dog]

I am totally 100% a baddie.

Truth in jest?

[Dom]

Wait, I misread the post Epig quoted. I apologize.


Regardless, you have had plenty of time to post plenty of things with very little value. However, you claim you don't have the time to name a suspicion and such.

OK, a joke is something I can make on my phone, on the bus, at work. A suspicion is something I can spend hours analyzing and judging. I simply don't have as much time as I would like to do that.

You can't name anyone you're suspicious of without a huge post/analysis?
You can only link to GIFS, write backwards, post extensively in a color reserved for sarcasm in order to mock others?

The INH discussion has generated input from several parties. You, llama, and Epi have all made rather simultaneous cases, and even BWT offered a controversial suspicion. Actually, llama hasn't really made a case, but he's definitely prodding. I'm staying objective at the moment, because INH did mention IRL issues which I'm expecting him to expound on a little.

I think this is the second time that llama has wanted to vote for you this game, but you've 'changed' his mind. And you're not the only one it has happened to. Does llama always waffle this much? Or is it his poor track record in this game?

What you seem to forget is that Llama's suspicion of me has always been compounded with a suspicion of you (based on MP, if I am not mistaken). He has dropped it twice. Therefore he has dropped BOTH of us twice. In addition, I do not think this is indicative of a baddie Llama. I think we are seeing a civvie llama who is unsure of his actions.

However, your post is unsettling to me, tbh. Why are you prodding ME on what LLAMA has done?

Also, so much yellow and orange is hurting my eyes and I can't really see it ;(

lol

[/quote]
I am so sick of this attitude. I am so so so so so so SO sick of it.

I won't comment on how that was incredibly rude, but I will comment on how it is representative of your actions all game. Rather than bringing up points, saying what you think of people/different suspicions and events, etc you have mocked people all game. You deliberately do things that you know piss people off; you are purposefully avoiding actual discussion by being unnecessarily hostile, evasive, and off-putting.

I try not to make suspicion willy-nilly, as people seem to do.

"The suspicion of me was brought up out of no-where, has no basis, and should not be considered"
Is that an accurate translation?

Does this hostility mean he's bad though? Not necessarily.

It doesn't make him good either.

So where does that lead us? No further down the road that's for sure.

Seriously though, in your opinion, who is usually more hostile in this situation. A cornered baddie or a fed up civvie?

Snow Dog, you don't find it strange that INH always has the time to address the points made against him, to overreact, to yell bloody murder that he's being ganged up on... but he never seems to have the time to post other things of value? When he isn't being discussed he goes right back to jokes and lolz. He doesn't contribute.
He says he does, but a Nikki Minaj GIF and a vague post about who you agree with/voting for yourself in a baddie lynch is not exactly what I would call contribution.

[Snow Dog]

To be honest Dom, it seemed to me that INH wasn't taking this game seriously at all. That is until juliets said she'd vote someone whose posts didn't contribute. Then INH went crazy overreaction on her. He later claimed he was joking then as well.

He is fishy.

[thellama73]

What you seem to forget is that Llama's suspicion of me has always been compounded with a suspicion of you (based on MP, if I am not mistaken). He has dropped it twice. Therefore he has dropped BOTH of us twice. In addition, I do not think this is indicative of a baddie Llama. I think we are seeing a civvie llama who is unsure of his actions.

However, your post is unsettling to me, tbh. Why are you prodding ME on what LLAMA has done?

I don't think this is quite accurate. Wile my suspicion of MetalMarsh and you were originally concurrent, they weren't dependent on each other. My second suspicion of you did not come hand in hand with one of MetalMarsh (although I have certainly not ruled him out).

INH's behavior since being accused does not make me feel better about him. I want to say this as delicately as possible, because I don't want to offend anyone and I realize that people have lives, but the "I have real life issues" excuse is starting to wear thin for me. It is too easy of a "get out of jail free" card these days, with every single person brought up for inactivity instantly falling back on it and expecting to get a pass. Some people do have real life issues, but I don't like setting the precedent that baddies can use it without any question at all.

INH seems to have had plenty of time to respond to the accusations against him, but no time to say anything about anyone else. As has been pointed out, his game ended a while ago, so that excuse is gone. The little time he does have has not been used wisely or productively. The indignation and anger seems calculated to get people to back off. I am more distrustful of him by the hour.

[kneel4justice]

K4J - I was all gung-ho to vote for him today, but some of his defenses are making me back off and wonder. Mostly because they seem really genuine to me. If he is bad, I think it's far more likely that he is a Town Goblin than Smaug.

WOW!
I'm so glad to hear you were gung-ho but didn't post a single thing about me throughout the day, when you were obviously reading! I would think someone who was gung-ho would surely have had input throughout the day, no?
It's quite obvious you were just going to be another bandwagoner near the end, and I am guessing you've backed off because you've seen quite a few people start to at least entertain the idea that my defenses were sincere.

[Dom]

To be honest Dom, it seemed to me that INH wasn't taking this game seriously at all. That is until juliets said she'd vote someone whose posts didn't contribute. Then INH went crazy overreaction on her. He later claimed he was joking then as well.

He is fishy.

That's precisely my point: INH, since the beginning of the game, has had plenty of time to say that everyone suspecting him is wrong. He, however, claims that he doesn't have the time to truly contribute other material. He made a few splashes in the wake of MP/FZ and continued with a few posts on Mongoose. However, other than that, I am unsure of what INH is thinking/doing this game.

I don't think this is quite accurate. Wile my suspicion of MetalMarsh and you were originally concurrent, they weren't dependent on each other. My second suspicion of you did not come hand in hand with one of MetalMarsh (although I have certainly not ruled him out).

INH's behavior since being accused does not make me feel better about him. I want to say this as delicately as possible, because I don't want to offend anyone and I realize that people have lives, but the "I have real life issues" excuse is starting to wear thin for me. It is too easy of a "get out of jail free" card these days, with every single person brought up for inactivity instantly falling back on it and expecting to get a pass. Some people do have real life issues, but I don't like setting the precedent that baddies can use it without any question at all.

INH seems to have had plenty of time to respond to the accusations against him, but no time to say anything about anyone else. As has been pointed out, his game ended a while ago, so that excuse is gone. The little time he does have has not been used wisely or productively. The indignation and anger seems calculated to get people to back off. I am more distrustful of him by the hour.

Llama, I apologize, that was not the way I meant that post. I believe you brought up metal marsh during the time we all discussed alternatives to the boogs lynch. I meant that MM and I were brought up together and dropped, and both of us have been twice-- so why is it suspicious if t happens to me, but not him? Does that make sense?
I do think that INH's anger/indignation is faked/calculated in order to make people not want to deal with it.




Epig, I have thought about the data you brought up, and I am not sure I think it is relevant to my thoughts of INH. My point is not that he is merely a low poster. My point is that INH is being a low poster when his name isn't being thrown around and suddenly is a high poster with fervor when his name is brought up.

[fingersplints]

Does this hostility mean he's bad though? Not necessarily.

It doesn't make him good either.

So where does that lead us? No further down the road that's for sure.

Seriously though, in your opinion, who is usually more hostile in this situation. A cornered baddie or a fed up civvie?

I've seen both. That isn't the only point being raised about him though.

[thellama73]

Llama, I apologize, that was not the way I meant that post. I believe you brought up metal marsh during the time we all discussed alternatives to the boogs lynch. I meant that MM and I were brought up together and dropped, and both of us have been twice-- so why is it suspicious if t happens to me, but not him? Does that make sense?

Yep! Thanks.

[Marmot]

The INH discussion has generated input from several parties. You, llama, and Epi have all made rather simultaneous cases, and even BWT offered a controversial suspicion. Actually, llama hasn't really made a case, but he's definitely prodding. I'm staying objective at the moment, because INH did mention IRL issues which I'm expecting him to expound on a little.

I think this is the second time that llama has wanted to vote for you this game, but you've 'changed' his mind. And you're not the only one it has happened to. Does llama always waffle this much? Or is it his poor track record in this game?

What you seem to forget is that Llama's suspicion of me has always been compounded with a suspicion of you (based on MP, if I am not mistaken). He has dropped it twice. Therefore he has dropped BOTH of us twice. In addition, I do not think this is indicative of a baddie Llama. I think we are seeing a civvie llama who is unsure of his actions.

However, your post is unsettling to me, tbh. Why are you prodding ME on what LLAMA has done?

I was looking for feedback on llama's meta and its presence in this game, and asking llama directly would not be a good course of action, especially if he is bad. And you are mistaken about his suspicion of me. He's only mentioned it once that I know of, but for entirely different reasons than his suspicions of you. He just threw our names together on Day 1 because we happened to be number one and two on his list (in no particular order). And this recent resurgence of it has nothing to do with me.

Linki: Ok so we're on the same page there.

[insertnamehere]

I am totally 100% a baddie.

Truth in jest?

[insertnamehere]

Wait, I misread the post Epig quoted. I apologize.


Regardless, you have had plenty of time to post plenty of things with very little value. However, you claim you don't have the time to name a suspicion and such.

OK, a joke is something I can make on my phone, on the bus, at work. A suspicion is something I can spend hours analyzing and judging. I simply don't have as much time as I would like to do that.

You can't name anyone you're suspicious of without a huge post/analysis?
You can only link to GIFS, write backwards, post extensively in a color reserved for sarcasm in order to mock others?

You ask rhetorical questions too much also? We both know that you are purposefully ignoring many of my posts in order to undermine me. Can you say something that isn't completely subjective to you, and your interpretation as to how to play mafia?

Also, so much yellow and orange is hurting my eyes and I can't really see it ;(

lol

I am so sick of this attitude. I am so so so so so so SO sick of it.

I won't comment on how that was incredibly rude, but I will comment on how it is representative of your actions all game. Rather than bringing up points, saying what you think of people/different suspicions and events, etc you have mocked people all game. You deliberately do things that you know piss people off; you are purposefully avoiding actual discussion by being unnecessarily hostile, evasive, and off-putting.

Oh great, now Dom is personally insulting me. Fantastic.

I try not to make suspicion willy-nilly, as people seem to do.

"The suspicion of me was brought up out of no-where, has no basis, and should not be considered"
Is that an accurate translation?
Feel free to read into it as much as you like.

Does this hostility mean he's bad though? Not necessarily.

It doesn't make him good either.

So where does that lead us? No further down the road that's for sure.

Seriously though, in your opinion, who is usually more hostile in this situation. A cornered baddie or a fed up civvie?

Snow Dog, you don't find it strange that INH always has the time to address the points made against him, to overreact, to yell bloody murder that he's being ganged up on... but he never seems to have the time to post other things of value? When he isn't being discussed he goes right back to jokes and lolz. He doesn't contribute.
He says he does, but a Nikki Minaj GIF and a vague post about who you agree with/voting for yourself in a baddie lynch is not exactly what I would call contribution.

I'm sorry that all of my posts don't correspond to the Dom Scale of Participation, Attitude, and Decency™.

[insertnamehere]

To be honest Dom, it seemed to me that INH wasn't taking this game seriously at all. That is until juliets said she'd vote someone whose posts didn't contribute. Then INH went crazy overreaction on her. He later claimed he was joking then as well.

He is fishy.

That's precisely my point: INH, since the beginning of the game, has had plenty of time to say that everyone suspecting him is wrong. He, however, claims that he doesn't have the time to truly contribute other material. He made a few splashes in the wake of MP/FZ and continued with a few posts on Mongoose. However, other than that, I am unsure of what INH is thinking/doing this game.
OK, maybe my priorities when posting are wrong. I sometimes put jokes and humor before suspicions and cases. If I knew that Dom would be personally offended by that fact, I may have re-thought things. If you all don't lynch me, I'll genuinely try to improve how I play. I've been doing this for almost three years, and still barely have a handle on how to play. The only thing I am remotely good at is hosting, designing games, and hiding my intentions, regardless of my alignment. The fact that you are now angry at me for that last part makes me wonder if you've ever played with me before.

I don't think this is quite accurate. Wile my suspicion of MetalMarsh and you were originally concurrent, they weren't dependent on each other. My second suspicion of you did not come hand in hand with one of MetalMarsh (although I have certainly not ruled him out).

INH's behavior since being accused does not make me feel better about him. I want to say this as delicately as possible, because I don't want to offend anyone and I realize that people have lives, but the "I have real life issues" excuse is starting to wear thin for me. It is too easy of a "get out of jail free" card these days, with every single person brought up for inactivity instantly falling back on it and expecting to get a pass. Some people do have real life issues, but I don't like setting the precedent that baddies can use it without any question at all.

INH seems to have had plenty of time to respond to the accusations against him, but no time to say anything about anyone else. As has been pointed out, his game ended a while ago, so that excuse is gone. The little time he does have has not been used wisely or productively. The indignation and anger seems calculated to get people to back off. I am more distrustful of him by the hour.

Llama, I apologize, that was not the way I meant that post. I believe you brought up metal marsh during the time we all discussed alternatives to the boogs lynch. I meant that MM and I were brought up together and dropped, and both of us have been twice-- so why is it suspicious if t happens to me, but not him? Does that make sense?
I do think that INH's anger/indignation is faked/calculated in order to make people not want to deal with it.

If I was anywhere near good enough to pull that off, I wouldn't be in this position.

[kneel4justice]

So, what do people think of my last post to BWT?
It is hard for me to read INH because I think at this point it is personality under fire, regardless of alignment and IDK how to read that.

[nijuukyugou]

Wow on many things.

Yikes, didn't realize I was posting less than a deadie since Day 1 My apologies for being so quiet. Not making any excuses - I am shy at first, but I'll try to post a bit more

I've read...many things. I'd like to go back and look back at the cases against k4j and MM, but I've been quite interested in the INH discussion, since it's been so prevalent in the last few hours. I notice:

a) That INH was absent, as people said, until his name was brought up today, and there was an explosion of defensive posts. Now, I can understand that one would check in to respond to accusations against oneself. Perfectly logical. But at the extent it's been going? And suddenly today, on lynch day? Smells fishy.

b) The posts are defensive, understandably, but as at least one other person said, in an explosive, rather sarcastic way on many occasions. It's difficult to take you seriously or look at someone else, or even bring an argument forth with you, when your responses are so caustic. You can't blame people if that looks like a wild animal (AKA baddie) being cornered. I also notice that your recent posts do not contribute anything new to the conversation. I am curious, INH - if you are not the baddie, or if we shouldn't be suspicious of you for the reasons stated, then who should we look at? Are there other arguments you can put forth towards your "goodness" besides the ones you've stated for being quiet (IRL and hosting)? Because I didn't see those in your responses so far.

[Epignosis]

So INH was bad in X-Men and Harry Potter. In X-Men, he didn't even post on the day he got lynched. In Harry Potter, he started posting nonsense.

In Willow, INH was civilian (he also responded in orange then for what it's worth), and it was the most focused game I've ever witnessed him play.

I don't know what to make of INH this time. He is not my #1 suspect though. I'm eager to look back at A Person / Kylemii 2.0. No Moria kills for a while, then he subs in, and boom, the kills start again. That's a hell of a coincidence.

[thellama73]

So INH was bad in X-Men and Harry Potter. In X-Men, he didn't even post on the day he got lynched. In Harry Potter, he started posting nonsense.

In Willow, INH was civilian (he also responded in orange then for what it's worth), and it was the most focused game I've ever witnessed him play.

I don't know what to make of INH this time. He is not my #1 suspect though. I'm eager to look back at A Person / Kylemii 2.0. No Moria kills for a while, then he subs in, and boom, the kills start again. That's a hell of a coincidence.

My only qualm about this is that AP wasn't that inactive. As I said earlier, he only missed one lynch vote. Do you really think he was missing all the PMs?

[Dom]

I am totally 100% a baddie.

Truth in jest?

Not sure if intentionally ironic or...

You ask rhetorical questions too much also? We both know that you are purposefully ignoring many of my posts in order to undermine me. Can you say something that isn't completely subjective to you, and your interpretation as to how to play mafia?

Oh great, now Dom is personally insulting me. Fantastic.

Feel free to read into it as much as you like.

I'm sorry that all of my posts don't correspond to the Dom Scale of Participation, Attitude, and Decency™.

[/quote]
I have two things to say:

1) If you don't want someone to "personally insult" you, don't be mean to people. Don't deal what you can't take. Someone said they had a hard time reading the color you were posting in and you mocked them by responding to the complaint in that color. If that is not intentionally off-putting, I don't know what is.
2) You don't even address anything. I am saying that you don't have suspicions, you don't have thoughts, and you just continue to prove my own point.

INH, I am not angry with you. I do not take personal offense in the way you play. I have played this game for five or six years. I have dealt with drama and personal attacks that most could not imagine to happen over an internet game.
It think you are baddie. I think you are hiding behind smoke screens of anger and over defensiveness to hide your intentions.

[Bullzeye]

I was pretty sure I'd vote Snow today but every single one of INH's posts in the past few hours have made me want to vote him more and more. He's overreactive, blows things out of proportion, and generally kinda rude with it. He's getting my vote today.

[thellama73]

I was pretty sure I'd vote Snow today but every single one of INH's posts in the past few hours have made me want to vote him more and more. He's overreactive, blows things out of proportion, and generally kinda rude with it. He's getting my vote today.

Yeah, I'm sold as well, and I already have some ideas about who his teammates might be.

*Votes INH*

[Epignosis]

I've done a bit of analysis of the Boogs voters and the related posts, and I think there's now only one elf remaining, and I think I know who that is.

In addition, we know no one was being saved on Day 6 (clearly), but we do not know that for Day 7.

More to come as I cogitate on this.

[thellama73]

I've done a bit of analysis of the Boogs voters and the related posts, and I think there's now only one elf remaining, and I think I know who that is.

In addition, we know no one was being saved on Day 6 (clearly), but we do not know that for Day 7.

More to come as I cogitate on this.

I was just looking at the roles and cannot find any civ way for a vote to be forced. That makes me feel better about MetalMarsh.

[fingersplints]

I don't see any reason to hold my vote. INH this vote is not personal. I have thought you were a baddie for some time now.

[Epignosis]

So INH was bad in X-Men and Harry Potter. In X-Men, he didn't even post on the day he got lynched. In Harry Potter, he started posting nonsense.

In Willow, INH was civilian (he also responded in orange then for what it's worth), and it was the most focused game I've ever witnessed him play.

I don't know what to make of INH this time. He is not my #1 suspect though. I'm eager to look back at A Person / Kylemii 2.0. No Moria kills for a while, then he subs in, and boom, the kills start again. That's a hell of a coincidence.

My only qualm about this is that AP wasn't that inactive. As I said earlier, he only missed one lynch vote. Do you really think he was missing all the PMs?

He never sent his PM in for Are You Being Served? He was Mr. Humphries and could have prevented his own removal from the game.

Granted, Night 6 was very short. So that would only mean accidentally missing one PM (Night 4).

[kneel4justice]

I was pretty sure I'd vote Snow today but every single one of INH's posts in the past few hours have made me want to vote him more and more. He's overreactive, blows things out of proportion, and generally kinda rude with it. He's getting my vote today.

Yeah, I'm sold as well, and I already have some ideas about who his teammates might be.

*Votes INH*

I had suspected INH very early on in the game but overtime I started wondering if it was just his personality that was making me suspicions. He is very reactive and sometimes it can come off as harsh, I just don't know if it has anything to do with his alignment. I want to be able to make up my mind and go with the feeling I had earlier on, but IDK. I am not sure where else my vote would go at this point. I guess I still find either Splints or you as shady, but I now have doubts on both of you.

[kneel4justice]

Oh, and BWT, but next to none have commented on that.

[thellama73]

So INH was bad in X-Men and Harry Potter. In X-Men, he didn't even post on the day he got lynched. In Harry Potter, he started posting nonsense.

In Willow, INH was civilian (he also responded in orange then for what it's worth), and it was the most focused game I've ever witnessed him play.

I don't know what to make of INH this time. He is not my #1 suspect though. I'm eager to look back at A Person / Kylemii 2.0. No Moria kills for a while, then he subs in, and boom, the kills start again. That's a hell of a coincidence.

My only qualm about this is that AP wasn't that inactive. As I said earlier, he only missed one lynch vote. Do you really think he was missing all the PMs?

He never sent his PM in for Are You Being Served? He was Mr. Humphries and could have prevented his own removal from the game.

Granted, Night 6 was very short. So that would only mean accidentally missing one PM (Night 4).

Ah, insider knowledge. Excellent!

[Dom]

I am voting INH.

[Epignosis]

Additionally, Kylemii has been back in for almost five real time days now, but hasn't said anything of note. He posted before he knew his role. Imagine subbing into the last Moria goblin role, which is basically a LMS role that can only kill on even Nights, and THEN see a replacement get quickly taken down who had subbed in for another quiet player.

Consider how demoralizing that might be.

[Epignosis]

I voted for Kylemii (as did INH apparently).

[fingersplints]

So, what do people think of my last post to BWT?

I have been meaning to reread him. From memory his posts have struck me as infrequent, but generally reasonable. But I also feel he has been flying below the radar a little bit.

[kneel4justice]

Just looked at the votes and saw INH voted for Kyle, and realized that during his entire defense he really didn't speak about any suspicions, which is a classic baddie under fire move, so that is on it's way to convincing me to vote for him.

I also forgot to mention, I didn't like this from him, because I felt like this could have been a baddie trying to piggyback on a suspicion without doing much.

He says he does, but a Nicki Minaj GIF and a vague post about who you agree with/voting for yourself in a baddie lynch is not exactly what I would call contribution.

I fixed it!

After seeing the tally, I'm voting for INH.

[kneel4justice]

So, what do people think of my last post to BWT?

I have been meaning to reread him. From memory his posts have struck me as infrequent, but generally reasonable. But I also feel he has been flying below the radar a little bit.

And the time he didn't fly under the radar was when he was insanified. Lol

[thellama73]

So, what do people think of my last post to BWT?

I have been meaning to reread him. From memory his posts have struck me as infrequent, but generally reasonable. But I also feel he has been flying below the radar a little bit.

And the time he didn't fly under the radar was when he was insanified. Lol

If INH flips bad, I bet you dollars to donuts that BWT is his teammate.

[kneel4justice]

So, what do people think of my last post to BWT?

I have been meaning to reread him. From memory his posts have struck me as infrequent, but generally reasonable. But I also feel he has been flying below the radar a little bit.

And the time he didn't fly under the radar was when he was insanified. Lol

If INH flips bad, I bet you dollars to donuts that BWT is his teammate.

Interesting, I didn't notice any interaction from the two. Was there any?