Linki: Yeah, you know it's bad if you forget to vote and I remember.

Wat
Moderator: Community Team
Epignosis wrote:If llama is good, it means we exist in a universe in which multitasking llama can call out the first of two mafia while simultaneously calling out two civilians.
I don't want to live in that universe.
The parasite destroys the fish's tongue, and then attaches itself to the stub of what was once its tongue and becomes the fish's new tongue.birdwithteeth11 wrote:Vomps, I really hope you'll decipher whatever it is you're saying if you end up surviving. Because I'm clueless.
Linki: Yeah, you know it's bad if you forget to vote and I remember.
Wat
Based on nutella's lynch, llama randomizes in the case of a tie.thellama73 wrote:You civilians sure are lucky I decided to count Elohcin's vote. Random.org was gunning for MetalMarsh. :P
And no, the game is not over.
Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Wed Dec 16, 2020 7:33 pm Just how many days of "let's yeet them tomorrow" can a mafioso survive?
The answer: all of them, if you are a marmot.
Yeah, that would be my guess as well, that llama simply randomized with ties. Come to think of it, I think Rob is the only host I've seen who doesn't do that with ties.Metalmarsh89 wrote:Based on nutella's lynch, llama randomizes in the case of a tie.thellama73 wrote:You civilians sure are lucky I decided to count Elohcin's vote. Random.org was gunning for MetalMarsh. :P
And no, the game is not over.
So we can't automatically assume bwt's or vomp's vote was worth extra, because INH may have just gotten unlucky.
And I don't know how anyone else feels about this, but it looks like llama slipped up here. I may get slammed for looking too much into this, but llama seems to imply in this post that the civvies are lucky that nutella was lynched over me, meaning I am civvie. Take it how you will.
I made no such slip up and I would never reveal identities in lynch posts, but good for you for trying.Metalmarsh89 wrote: And I don't know how anyone else feels about this, but it looks like llama slipped up here. I may get slammed for looking too much into this, but llama seems to imply in this post that the civvies are lucky that nutella was lynched over me, meaning I am civvie. Take it how you will.
Epignosis wrote:If llama is good, it means we exist in a universe in which multitasking llama can call out the first of two mafia while simultaneously calling out two civilians.
I don't want to live in that universe.
birdwithteeth11 wrote:Well, I went with INH. I'm still willing to give Vomps the benefit of the doubt for now. Sorry if you're a civ, INH.
I think this is for the best. I'm not leaning toward Vomps at all (although he'd make a natural independent).S~V~S wrote:That makes me want to ote MM again tomorrow, tbh. We have another lynch survivor, so i would like to revisit the MM discussion.
Mongoose wrote:I think this is for the best. I'm not leaning toward Vomps at all (although he'd make a natural independent).S~V~S wrote:That makes me want to ote MM again tomorrow, tbh. We have another lynch survivor, so i would like to revisit the MM discussion.
Turnip Head wrote: We need to lynch Pennsylvania Bitch.
Yes, but as we saw with epig, just because Vomps failed to explain his vote doesn't make him necessarily bad.birdwithteeth11 wrote:Why the eye, Dom?
I'm still leaning towards MM being civ, so I'm not sure I want to look there. Vomps is one I would consider though. Given the way the lynch went down, I could possibly be wrong about him. Not to mention that once he was un-insanified, he didn't bother explaining his vote for INH. Or any of his other posts for that matter.
That's a good point. You can communicate pretty clearly through haikus, horoscopes, and weather reports. That does seem a bit like "One of these things is not like the others."Hedgeowl wrote:Mongoose wrote:I think this is for the best. I'm not leaning toward Vomps at all (although he'd make a natural independent).S~V~S wrote:That makes me want to ote MM again tomorrow, tbh. We have another lynch survivor, so i would like to revisit the MM discussion.
Who survived? I am not Adverse to discussing MM, but am inclined to think he's most likely civ.
The reason i think vomps was faking was the first time we have seen true insanification this game.
Good point. But if he's not going to explain it, then what do you make of his vote? Because I think it's either 1) nonsensical, 2) has a hidden agenda, 3) is info-related. Those are the only possibilities I see here.MovingPictures07 wrote:Yes, but as we saw with epig, just because Vomps failed to explain his vote doesn't make him necessarily bad.birdwithteeth11 wrote:Why the eye, Dom?
I'm still leaning towards MM being civ, so I'm not sure I want to look there. Vomps is one I would consider though. Given the way the lynch went down, I could possibly be wrong about him. Not to mention that once he was un-insanified, he didn't bother explaining his vote for INH. Or any of his other posts for that matter.
Insanification is hard. Have you ever been insanified with the engive he obviously was using?Mongoose wrote:That's a good point. You can communicate pretty clearly through haikus, horoscopes, and weather reports. That does seem a bit like "One of these things is not like the others."Hedgeowl wrote:Mongoose wrote:I think this is for the best. I'm not leaning toward Vomps at all (although he'd make a natural independent).S~V~S wrote:That makes me want to ote MM again tomorrow, tbh. We have another lynch survivor, so i would like to revisit the MM discussion.
Who survived? I am not Adverse to discussing MM, but am inclined to think he's most likely civ.
The reason i think vomps was faking was the first time we have seen true insanification this game.
He's almost always nonsensical.birdwithteeth11 wrote:Good point. But if he's not going to explain it, then what do you make of his vote? Because I think it's either 1) nonsensical, 2) has a hidden agenda, 3) is info-related. Those are the only possibilities I see here.MovingPictures07 wrote:Yes, but as we saw with epig, just because Vomps failed to explain his vote doesn't make him necessarily bad.birdwithteeth11 wrote:Why the eye, Dom?
I'm still leaning towards MM being civ, so I'm not sure I want to look there. Vomps is one I would consider though. Given the way the lynch went down, I could possibly be wrong about him. Not to mention that once he was un-insanified, he didn't bother explaining his vote for INH. Or any of his other posts for that matter.
@Vomps: Are you still reading the thread or not?
Epignosis wrote:If llama is good, it means we exist in a universe in which multitasking llama can call out the first of two mafia while simultaneously calling out two civilians.
I don't want to live in that universe.
What? I'm the only one who's survived a lynch.S~V~S wrote:That makes me want to ote MM again tomorrow, tbh. We have another lynch survivor, so i would like to revisit the MM discussion.
I feel like this is directed at someone but I can't figure out who. I guess someone's post was deleted.thellama73 wrote:General Announcement: Please check to make sure you are still alive before posting on topic in the thread. Thanks very much.
Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Wed Dec 16, 2020 7:33 pm Just how many days of "let's yeet them tomorrow" can a mafioso survive?
The answer: all of them, if you are a marmot.
Read again, Hedgie.Hedgeowl wrote:Mongoose wrote:I think this is for the best. I'm not leaning toward Vomps at all (although he'd make a natural independent).S~V~S wrote:That makes me want to ote MM again tomorrow, tbh. We have another lynch survivor, so i would like to revisit the MM discussion.
Who survived? I am not Adverse to discussing MM, but am inclined to think he's most likely civ.
The reason i think vomps was faking was the first time we have seen true insanification this game.
I misremembered something, BWT. Sorry!birdwithteeth11 wrote:Why the eye, Dom?
I'm still leaning towards MM being civ, so I'm not sure I want to look there. Vomps is one I would consider though. Given the way the lynch went down, I could possibly be wrong about him. Not to mention that once he was un-insanified, he didn't bother explaining his vote for INH. Or any of his other posts for that matter.
Most definitely not.birdwithteeth11 wrote:Good point. But if he's not going to explain it, then what do you make of his vote? Because I think it's either 1) nonsensical, 2) has a hidden agenda, 3) is info-related. Those are the only possibilities I see here.MovingPictures07 wrote:Yes, but as we saw with epig, just because Vomps failed to explain his vote doesn't make him necessarily bad.birdwithteeth11 wrote:Why the eye, Dom?
I'm still leaning towards MM being civ, so I'm not sure I want to look there. Vomps is one I would consider though. Given the way the lynch went down, I could possibly be wrong about him. Not to mention that once he was un-insanified, he didn't bother explaining his vote for INH. Or any of his other posts for that matter.
@Vomps: Are you still reading the thread or not?
Will you come back and play with us please, sug?Vompatti wrote:Most definitely not.birdwithteeth11 wrote:Good point. But if he's not going to explain it, then what do you make of his vote? Because I think it's either 1) nonsensical, 2) has a hidden agenda, 3) is info-related. Those are the only possibilities I see here.MovingPictures07 wrote:Yes, but as we saw with epig, just because Vomps failed to explain his vote doesn't make him necessarily bad.birdwithteeth11 wrote:Why the eye, Dom?
I'm still leaning towards MM being civ, so I'm not sure I want to look there. Vomps is one I would consider though. Given the way the lynch went down, I could possibly be wrong about him. Not to mention that once he was un-insanified, he didn't bother explaining his vote for INH. Or any of his other posts for that matter.
@Vomps: Are you still reading the thread or not?
kMongoose wrote:Will you come back and play with us please, sug?Vompatti wrote:Most definitely not.birdwithteeth11 wrote:Good point. But if he's not going to explain it, then what do you make of his vote? Because I think it's either 1) nonsensical, 2) has a hidden agenda, 3) is info-related. Those are the only possibilities I see here.MovingPictures07 wrote:Yes, but as we saw with epig, just because Vomps failed to explain his vote doesn't make him necessarily bad.birdwithteeth11 wrote:Why the eye, Dom?
I'm still leaning towards MM being civ, so I'm not sure I want to look there. Vomps is one I would consider though. Given the way the lynch went down, I could possibly be wrong about him. Not to mention that once he was un-insanified, he didn't bother explaining his vote for INH. Or any of his other posts for that matter.
@Vomps: Are you still reading the thread or not?
It looked fairly true to me, and we have 2 hex/potion people in this game, perhaps they insanify via different methods. I have seen probably half a dozen different insanifiers. Vomps looked like one I have seen before, so I am not sure what you mean by "true" insanification.Hedgeowl wrote:Mongoose wrote:I think this is for the best. I'm not leaning toward Vomps at all (although he'd make a natural independent).S~V~S wrote:That makes me want to ote MM again tomorrow, tbh. We have another lynch survivor, so i would like to revisit the MM discussion.
Who survived? I am not Adverse to discussing MM, but am inclined to think he's most likely civ.
The reason i think vomps was faking was the first time we have seen true insanification this game.
I'm so sorry about that, lol, I got caught up dealing with Fight Club and then realized I had barely missed the deadline here. Fail!S~V~S wrote:It looked fairly true to me, and we have 2 hex/potion people in this game, perhaps they insanify via different methods. I have seen probably half a dozen different insanifiers. Vomps looked like one I have seen before, so I am not sure what you mean by "true" insanification.Hedgeowl wrote:Mongoose wrote:I think this is for the best. I'm not leaning toward Vomps at all (although he'd make a natural independent).S~V~S wrote:That makes me want to ote MM again tomorrow, tbh. We have another lynch survivor, so i would like to revisit the MM discussion.
Who survived? I am not Adverse to discussing MM, but am inclined to think he's most likely civ.
The reason i think vomps was faking was the first time we have seen true insanification this game.
And I was on phone, I did not realize it was a tie, I thought INH had less votes. Tomorrow i am going to vote BWT again, or Vomps. And :P at MP, you pushed me to make a decision, then did not show up, lol. I could have voted closer to the end than I did, and I would have voted Vomp to save INH.
Ok, I see the other possible insanifier role now. I think Vomps is using a "real" insanifier, but had thought he was faking it. I am not as sure now. Granted he posted so much while insanified and now nada.S~V~S wrote:It looked fairly true to me, and we have 2 hex/potion people in this game, perhaps they insanify via different methods. I have seen probably half a dozen different insanifiers. Vomps looked like one I have seen before, so I am not sure what you mean by "true" insanification.Hedgeowl wrote:Mongoose wrote:I think this is for the best. I'm not leaning toward Vomps at all (although he'd make a natural independent).S~V~S wrote:That makes me want to ote MM again tomorrow, tbh. We have another lynch survivor, so i would like to revisit the MM discussion.
Who survived? I am not Adverse to discussing MM, but am inclined to think he's most likely civ.
The reason i think vomps was faking was the first time we have seen true insanification this game.
And I was on phone, I did not realize it was a tie, I thought INH had less votes. Tomorrow i am going to vote BWT again, or Vomps. And :P at MP, you pushed me to make a decision, then did not show up, lol. I could have voted closer to the end than I did, and I would have voted Vomp to save INH.
Turnip Head wrote: We need to lynch Pennsylvania Bitch.
I don't know if it's relevant but I've never been insanified before and probably couldn't even have found the insanifier on the interwebz on my own had I wanted to fake it.Hedgeowl wrote:Ok, I see the other possible insanifier role now. I think Vomps is using a "real" insanifier, but had thought he was faking it. I am not as sure now. Granted he posted so much while insanified and now nada.S~V~S wrote:It looked fairly true to me, and we have 2 hex/potion people in this game, perhaps they insanify via different methods. I have seen probably half a dozen different insanifiers. Vomps looked like one I have seen before, so I am not sure what you mean by "true" insanification.Hedgeowl wrote:Mongoose wrote:I think this is for the best. I'm not leaning toward Vomps at all (although he'd make a natural independent).S~V~S wrote:That makes me want to ote MM again tomorrow, tbh. We have another lynch survivor, so i would like to revisit the MM discussion.
Who survived? I am not Adverse to discussing MM, but am inclined to think he's most likely civ.
The reason i think vomps was faking was the first time we have seen true insanification this game.
And I was on phone, I did not realize it was a tie, I thought INH had less votes. Tomorrow i am going to vote BWT again, or Vomps. And :P at MP, you pushed me to make a decision, then did not show up, lol. I could have voted closer to the end than I did, and I would have voted Vomp to save INH.
I would, butt not for nefariosuris reasons k.Vompatti wrote:By the way, I wonder who might have found it beneficial and/or entertaining to insanify me?
Epignosis wrote:If llama is good, it means we exist in a universe in which multitasking llama can call out the first of two mafia while simultaneously calling out two civilians.
I don't want to live in that universe.
Epignosis wrote:If llama is good, it means we exist in a universe in which multitasking llama can call out the first of two mafia while simultaneously calling out two civilians.
I don't want to live in that universe.
Yeah, I'm just not seeing the case on him either. I might read back and see what Hedgeowl was thinking or who she was looking at, because I can't think of anyone who would have wanted her dead.Mongoose wrote:I reread MM during my catchup and analysis portion of the program and I'm not inclined to really concentrate there today.
Me neither. Honestly, it reminds me of roles where that person gets to post their thoughts in the thread. It's usually bad to take it as gospel, so I might look into it a bit, but it probably won't change my opinion of Vomps that much.MovingPictures07 wrote:RIP Hedge!
I'm not sure what the Tarot card reading means at all. Lol.
This sounds like someone who is getting more and more powerful via survivingVompatti wrote:I would generally interpret that card as some kind of a profound transformation or purification, but in the context of this game I must point out that in the tree of life Death is on the path between Netzah and Tifaret, which speaks strongly for the theory that if I survive the next lynch and/or night kill attempt, I will gloriously lead us into victory!
That makes me wonder what the *secrets* of the Abramelin role are. Could it be a recruit/absorption type thing?S~V~S wrote:This sounds like someone who is getting more and more powerful via survivingVompatti wrote:I would generally interpret that card as some kind of a profound transformation or purification, but in the context of this game I must point out that in the tree of life Death is on the path between Netzah and Tifaret, which speaks strongly for the theory that if I survive the next lynch and/or night kill attempt, I will gloriously lead us into victory!
If so, I'm really pi$$ed I've not been recruited. What does Abramelin have against furry ferret-type beasts?Vompatti wrote:That makes me wonder what the *secrets* of the Abramelin role are. Could it be a recruit/absorption type thing?S~V~S wrote:This sounds like someone who is getting more and more powerful via survivingVompatti wrote:I would generally interpret that card as some kind of a profound transformation or purification, but in the context of this game I must point out that in the tree of life Death is on the path between Netzah and Tifaret, which speaks strongly for the theory that if I survive the next lynch and/or night kill attempt, I will gloriously lead us into victory!