Alison wrote: ↑Mon Mar 01, 2021 5:18 pm
staypositivefriend wrote: ↑Mon Mar 01, 2021 5:17 pm
Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 01, 2021 3:17 pm
Dom wrote: ↑Mon Mar 01, 2021 3:16 pm
A looooooooooooot of players were around last night when I voted spf.
No one really jumped on to it.
If spf were civ I'd imagine a baddie or two might hop right on.
This sounds reasonable.
I kinda tldr all of Sloonei's case for SPF isn't townie enough. Probably later.
^^this is the only post that i actively dislike from jack
not sure if i could articulate why
my main concern is the noise to signal ratio
like he's just active lurking if you iso him and look at the totality of his content
i get what you mean
after thinking about it, there are two things about that post from jack that i dislike:
1. i dislike that jack has a strong opinion about the dynamic surrounding the early momentum on me in the same post where he admits to "skimming" and not having an opinion about the "case" against me
2. i dislike that jack promises more content in the future - this is an incredibly nitpicky point but i've just noticed that scum have a tendency to talk about all the stuff that they're "going" to do in the future
like, when i'm scum, i feel pressured to give my opinion on ~~everything~~, so it's pretty common for me to make posts that say: "i'll probably do this later" if i want to sidestep a point while still looking like i'm engaged in the solving process
and jack doing that "sidestep" while
still seeming to have an opinion about the dynamics of the pressure on me just rubs me the wrong way a bit