Game Over! Monty Python and the Holy Grail

[Enrique]

I think he changed his story from "no one said anything to Made" to "I definitely said something to Made." He just went with whatever made Made look worst at the time.

Not to mention going from "I never hesitated about coming out with the Made thing, that was an act" to "You're lying, I never showed any kind of hesitation."

I don't buy the Made case at all, but llama is making sure to bury him no matter what. Why? Because he's in too deep now. He's not even contemplating the possibility that he might be wrong. But why would he care, when he knows Made isn't in his team?

[thellama73]

Are you even reading the thread?

Yes.

[thellama73]

I think he changed his story from "no one said anything to Made" to "I definitely said something to Made." He just went with whatever made Made look worst at the time.

Not to mention going from "I never hesitated about coming out with the Made thing, that was an act" to "You're lying, I never showed any kind of hesitation."

I don't buy the Made case at all, but llama is making sure to bury him no matter what. Why? Because he's in too deep now. He's not even contemplating the possibility that he might be wrong. But why would he care, when he knows Made isn't in his team?

I didn't say "no one said anything to Made." I said that his posts where he says "oh, I have no way of knowing. How would I?" were not in response to a question. That remains true.

I never said "it was an act." You made that up, like you make everything up. I said, it was a deliberate strategy, which is not the same thing as an act, and I have never wavered from saying that.

I am far from being dogmatic on my case. If you can present contradictory evidence, I will happily hear it. So far, however, all you have said is "I don't think Made has BTSC" (based on nothing) and accused me of changing my story (which I have never done.)

[Enrique]

I have no idea whether Made has BTSC. Do we really have to go over this every other post? I simply don't buy your case. I could argue all you've said is "I think Made has BTSC," and similarly, I'd say that's based on nothing.

Maybe, just maybe, llama, you should try to be a bit less vague. Get stuff out of the way. Something like telling Made "Hey, I did ask you if you had teammates, but only after you got weird about it." Emitting that sorta shit doesn't help anybody, except you if you ever needed to backpedal. No, making it seem like he's straight up lying from the very beginning only makes him a likelier lynch candidate. You've got your mind set on lynching Made for hardly any reason, and nobody can do anything to change that.

Now, now boys.

I think Llama has been very consistent. I also believe Mades defense. Therefore I am moving on from this.

Reading other things now.

Thank you! I am sick of talking about this. I have said everything I have to say on the issue, and I have no new information, so I welcome the chance to move on and discuss other things.

OK, if you want that, you know what's a good idea? Bringing other names to the table, instead of simply saying "let's not discuss this anymore because he's bad and that's final," as if that was good enough for everyone.

[Canucklehead]

Ok. I just read this whole fucking thread, which is 99.9% centered on Made/llama/MP/Enrique with a dash of MP/SVS thrown in for good measure.

I really, really don't think Made is bad. But I also don't get the sense that his accusers are bad. If ANYONE from the group of SuperPosters is bad, my guess would be MP, simply because he seems like he's trying extra hard to not seem over the top and look reasonable and "fair" in his statements, particularly in his interactions with SVS (I think he began about 4billion response posts with the words "fair enough"). I also thought his super quick response to llama's (seemingly jokey?) mention of his disconcerting agreeability was a little ping worthy. So yes, I am moderately suspicious of MP.

However, given the single mindedness of the thread so far, I'm much more inclined to believe that the baddies are using this insane Made-centric firestorm to stay out of the way and out of memory. This is like a Day 1 from heaven for them. For that reason, I think I will probably be spending some time looking at (and waiting to hear from) people who are conspicuously staying out of the Made debate, or (even more suspiciously) subtly egging it on while being sure to stay on the fringes. Before anyone gets their panties in a knot, no, I'm not advocating voting for low posters, and yes I recognize that this was a HUGE amount to catch up on and that is a likely reason why some people haven't been too involved (that is in fact my own rationale). BUT I'm hoping that when I do a re-read of the last few pages I will be able to spot some people that are doing some quiet fire feeding while staying out of the limelight, thus keeping the heat of them while providing excellent distractionary fodder for pages and pages and pages......


......of course, that would require me to do some actual work, which I am rather disinclined towards, so maybe I'll just vote MP instead.


linki linki linki fuck off linki

[thellama73]

I have no idea whether Made has BTSC.

Wait, do you "have no idea whether Made has BTSC" or do you "not think Made has BTSC"? Because those are very different things.

Maybe, just maybe, llama, you should try to be a bit less vague.

I wasn't vague at all. I do not have to tell you about every little irrelevant post I made in chat.

OK, if you want that, you know what's a good idea? Bringing other names to the table, instead of simply saying "let's not discuss this anymore because he's bad and that's final," as if that was good enough for everyone.

I don't have any other names to bring up right now. I have made my case. I want to hear other people's cases.

[Roxy]

Metalmarsh!! You sir are a spammy spammer!
Hope nothing goes wrong N1 for you
jk!
And also you will remain in newt form -FOREVER!!

[Marmot]

Ok. I just read this whole fucking thread, which is 99.9% centered on Made/llama/MP/Enrique with a dash of MP/SVS thrown in for good measure.

It's posts like these that make me think people don't read what I have to say.

However, given the single mindedness of the thread so far, I'm much more inclined to believe that the baddies are using this insane Made-centric firestorm to stay out of the way and out of memory. This is like a Day 1 from heaven for them. For that reason, I think I will probably be spending some time looking at (and waiting to hear from) people who are conspicuously staying out of the Made debate, or (even more suspiciously) subtly egging it on while being sure to stay on the fringes. Before anyone gets their panties in a knot, no, I'm not advocating voting for low posters, and yes I recognize that this was a HUGE amount to catch up on and that is a likely reason why some people haven't been too involved (that is in fact my own rationale). BUT I'm hoping that when I do a re-read of the last few pages I will be able to spot some people that are doing some quiet fire feeding while staying out of the limelight, thus keeping the heat of them while providing excellent distractionary fodder for pages and pages and pages......

Okay, so you're not going to touch the Made debate, but rather you'll look around at the others who are doing the same thing you are to find a baddie?

Linki: lol, what???

[Enrique]

I have no reason to believe Made has BTSC. But thank you for making me repeat myself again. I may explode if I go longer than 108 minutes without mentioning that.

Omitting the fact that you did ask Made about his "teammates" does kinda paint him as a liar, though? You do understand how those details matter?

(I think he began about 4billion response posts with the words "fair enough")

That doesn't sound too far off. I agree MP has been trying very hard to keep himself involved, while not really taking a position. Most of the time he'll just agree with whoever posted last and seems incredibly easy to sway at least for a few posts. I don't know what to make of his whole dynamics with SVS and Epi, but I'm not getting the best vibes from them either. SVS was definitely quick to jump on Made, and Epi... I don't think I've played with him before, so I don't really know what's going on there.

There's still lots of people I'm waiting to hear from. BWT would be nice, for starters. Dana was reading the thread earlier but never responded.

[Marmot]

Oh I see. Spamalot.

[Made]

Good morning all!

If llama found my "I doubt the other team has this" commentweird, why wouldn't he mention it during chat.

As a matter of fact, I did mention it in the chat. I said something along the lines of "Do you know that because your teammates told you?" after you had finished all the posts we previously talked about. I saw no point in dwelling on it there, though, since I was trying to win a contest.

Gusbfjebfuwhfuvuwjfisbwhcjebg BUT YOU DENIED THAT EARLIER WHAT?????? YOU SPECIFICALLY SAID YOU DIDNT REMEMBER SOMEONE SAYING THAT I WAS PUT ON THE DEFENSIVE/ ANYONE QUESTIONED ME ABOUT IT BEFORE I DENIED BTSC.
WHAT???
*Flounders*

That's not at all true. I never denied that I said something to you. What I denied was your claim that you only made excuses AFTER someone said "you would know."

This is the order of events:
1. You made an assumption about the other team.
2. You hastily retracted your statement with a bunch of hemming and hawing about how you didn't know.
3. I asked you if you got your information from your teammates.

Your claim transposes events 2 and 3. That's what I was arguing against.

The fact that you are just now acknowledging the fact that you even said "you would know" is pretty bad on your part. It seems like something that should be addressed immedately. Not saying you did say this afterwards, implies that you didn't. This is especially true considering the fact eariler in the thread i said i recalled someone saying something.

Not to mention, my current arguement would have no basis, and we wouldn't be having this conversation. I would of basically agreed with your order of events as they would of acknowledged the validity of my recollection of events, but now i'm suspect of why you chose to not correct me eariler.

I happy, that we agree on what the basises of this arguement is (beside the whole" nemming and nawing" part. Like really tho, exageration of the severity of my (alleged) slip can make you look pretty sus)
TLDR
you lied by omission.
(also I swear if you're not a baddie, we're wasting a lot of time/focus....)

[Canucklehead]

Ok. I just read this whole fucking thread, which is 99.9% centered on Made/llama/MP/Enrique with a dash of MP/SVS thrown in for good measure.

It's posts like these that make me think people don't read what I have to say.

However, given the single mindedness of the thread so far, I'm much more inclined to believe that the baddies are using this insane Made-centric firestorm to stay out of the way and out of memory. This is like a Day 1 from heaven for them. For that reason, I think I will probably be spending some time looking at (and waiting to hear from) people who are conspicuously staying out of the Made debate, or (even more suspiciously) subtly egging it on while being sure to stay on the fringes. Before anyone gets their panties in a knot, no, I'm not advocating voting for low posters, and yes I recognize that this was a HUGE amount to catch up on and that is a likely reason why some people haven't been too involved (that is in fact my own rationale). BUT I'm hoping that when I do a re-read of the last few pages I will be able to spot some people that are doing some quiet fire feeding while staying out of the limelight, thus keeping the heat of them while providing excellent distractionary fodder for pages and pages and pages......

Okay, so you're not going to touch the Made debate, but rather you'll look around at the others who are doing the same thing you are to find a baddie?

Linki: lol, what???

I get accused of this or something like this EVERY. SINGLE. GAME.


But no. If you had read a little further into my post, you would see that what I said was that I was much more interested in finding people "that are doing some quiet fire feeding while staying out of the limelight" or "subtly egging it on while being sure to stay on the fringes" (if those sound familiar its because they are direct quotes from the post you are responding to but evidently did not read), not people who are doing the same thing I am (whatever you mean by that). People who are doing the same thing I am (i.e. moving on from the Made debate and looking elsewhere for suspicions) are on my list of A1 civvies.

[Made]

To clarify: "Afterwards" being any point after I said "i remember someone from questioning if i had a teammate", but before I brought up the fact you didn't mention your suspicion in chat.

Also note, Quotation are just use to make reading easier, and are not infact quotes.

[thellama73]

The fact that you are just now acknowledging the fact that you even said "you would know" is pretty bad on your part.

I didn't say "you would know." I never said "you would know." I have no idea what that even means. It sounds like garbled gibberish to me. I said "do you know that because one of your teammates told you?" which is English. Maybe it's a language barrier that's getting me, but honestly, I had no idea what you were talking about when you kept repeating the phrase "you would know" in your earlier posts, because it has no meaning.

[thellama73]

you lied by omission.

Alright, then you also lied by omission by not reproducing every single thing you said in our chatroom here. My challenge to you in the chatroom was not relevant, and remains not relevant, since you never answered it in the chatroom. It has no bearing on whether you are bad or not, so I saw no reason to bring it up until specifically asked.

Now reproduce everything you said in the chatroom for me or else stop calling me a liar by omission. If you don't, you're a hypocrite.

[Made]

The fact that you are just now acknowledging the fact that you even said "you would know" is pretty bad on your part.

I didn't say "you would know." I never said "you would know." I have no idea what that even means. It sounds like garbled gibberish to me. I said "do you know that because one of your teammates told you?" which is English. Maybe it's a language barrier that's getting me, but honestly, I had no idea what you were talking about when you kept repeating the phrase "you would know" in your earlier posts, because it has no meaning.

wait, i'm sorry is English your first language?

[Enrique]

The fact that you are just now acknowledging the fact that you even said "you would know" is pretty bad on your part.

I didn't say "you would know." I never said "you would know." I have no idea what that even means. It sounds like garbled gibberish to me. I said "do you know that because one of your teammates told you?" which is English. Maybe it's a language barrier that's getting me, but honestly, I had no idea what you were talking about when you kept repeating the phrase "you would know" in your earlier posts, because it has no meaning.

Don't lose it, llama.

[thellama73]

The fact that you are just now acknowledging the fact that you even said "you would know" is pretty bad on your part.

I didn't say "you would know." I never said "you would know." I have no idea what that even means. It sounds like garbled gibberish to me. I said "do you know that because one of your teammates told you?" which is English. Maybe it's a language barrier that's getting me, but honestly, I had no idea what you were talking about when you kept repeating the phrase "you would know" in your earlier posts, because it has no meaning.

wait, i'm sorry is English your first language?

Yes, I am a professional writer. Is it yours?

[DharmaHelper]

The fact that you are just now acknowledging the fact that you even said "you would know" is pretty bad on your part.

I didn't say "you would know." I never said "you would know." I have no idea what that even means. It sounds like garbled gibberish to me. I said "do you know that because one of your teammates told you?" which is English. Maybe it's a language barrier that's getting me, but honestly, I had no idea what you were talking about when you kept repeating the phrase "you would know" in your earlier posts, because it has no meaning.

You would know.

[Enrique]

Come on, boys. We're all adults here.

[Canucklehead]

...aaaaaaaaaaannnnd this is exactly the kind of mafia-ing I find hugely un-fun.

You all have at it and get it out of your system, and I'll come back in a few hours and see if we've all cheered up a little.

[Made]

you lied by omission.

Alright, then you also lied by omission by not reproducing every single thing you said in our chatroom here. My challenge to you in the chatroom was not relevant, and remains not relevant, since you never answered it in the chatroom. It has no bearing on whether you are bad or not, so I saw no reason to bring it up until specifically asked.

Now reproduce everything you said in the chatroom for me or else stop calling me a liar by omission. If you don't, you're a hypocrite.

Depending on the arguement it's very relevant.
You either think chat went something like

M: damn, we're doing really well organizationaly, the other team doesn't stand a chance!
M: I wouldn't know or anything, Because i wouldn't because i'm civvie!
L: do you know that because one of your teammates told you?


OR


M: damn, we're doing really well organizationaly, the other team doesn't stand a chance!
L: do you know that because one of your teammates told you?
M: I wouldn't know or anything, Because i wouldn't because i'm civvie!


The fact that you said I doubled talked hard in one scenerio would be a simple defense, the other would be a cover up of a slip.

No matter how many lines or "nawws" I had inbetween, one is provoaked the other isn't.

insert snarky insult of other's intelligence here

[Made]

The fact that you are just now acknowledging the fact that you even said "you would know" is pretty bad on your part.

I didn't say "you would know." I never said "you would know." I have no idea what that even means. It sounds like garbled gibberish to me. I said "do you know that because one of your teammates told you?" which is English. Maybe it's a language barrier that's getting me, but honestly, I had no idea what you were talking about when you kept repeating the phrase "you would know" in your earlier posts, because it has no meaning.

wait, i'm sorry is English your first language?

Yes, I am a professional writer. Is it yours?

Incase you weren't kidding, like i wasn't, yes. My first language is English.

[Dana]

Also, can we pause for a moment and laugh at the porr saps who were not around today, and who now have zero chance of ever catching up in this game?

Yes hello I am here. Took hours and hours but look I am all caught up! Though I also took a few breaks to go to class in-between.

But anyway,

I see Dana is reading the thread, probably catching up, we did talk a lot yesterday

Dana, if you're reading this, give us a bit of what you're thinking. Where do you stand on any of the stuff going on? If you had to vote right now, who would it be for? Do you have anything else to add?

So I'm not entirely sure what to think exactly, there were kind of like 15 pages to catch up on and my mind is a mess. I have 10 minutes before I have another class so I'll probably only make this post and come back later.

As for the stuff that's going on, I think the Made/Llama/Enri fight is just absolutely insane. So Made apparently made some comment in the challenge chat? I wasn't there, but honestly, so what? Made is like that, he's jokey, I very strongly doubt it means anything at all. I think this whole thread and accusations and suspicions have all been blown way out of proportion. I agree with the people saying we should move on from this. I do not understand why Llama was so set on painting Made in a bad light? I can assure you, Llama, that some small comment like that from Made most likely means nothing.
Llama you seem like a cool dude but you also seem so angry Can't we all just be friends?!
I would say Enrique's defense of made was a very tiny little bit suspicious, but definitely not enough to warrant calling him a lying liar and say his making stuff up.

I agree very much with Canuck saying that the people staying on the sidelines are the most likely to be bad. I doubt Made, Enrique, or Llama would be bad and continue this long fight/argument/whatever you want to call it.

Also I know we can't speculate about roles and I'm not sure this is one but I'm going to say it anyway so sorry hosts if it is... Is it at all possible that there are no baddies?

[Made]

I honestly I found the fact that you didn't comprehend what i meant when i said "You would know" baffling/rage inducing and I appologize for the insult.

When I said you said "you would know" it was in the context of something like
A:there can't be 5 civvies here
B: you would know

[Made]

That statement would imply, incase it's still not clear, that person A has extra knowledge for any variety of reason.

[thellama73]

I've made my point. As I say, I have no new information and nothing else to say, and my being here only encourages Enrique and Made to tell lies about me over and over which I then have to address. My record speaks for itself. Anyone reading my posts can see that I have never changed my story and that I didn't lie by omission. Everyone have a nice discussion about other things, and I will log back on after the poll has ended.

One final thing: notice how many times Enrique has said "I have no idea" or "I don't know" about people. If that were true, why would he offer such a passionate defense of Made? Why would you defend passionately someone you have "no idea" about? (Check the post record, he has said it more than once.)

*Voting Made.*

linki Made: That sentence still makes no sense. WHat does "you would know" mean in that context? Why would I say that you would know something? How would I know whether you would know?

[Enrique]

I do not understand why Llama was so set on painting Made in a bad light?

Can you think of any reasons?

One final thing: notice how many times Enrique has said "I have no idea" or "I don't know" about people. If that were true, why would he offer such a passionate defense of Made? Why would you defend passionately someone you have "no idea" about? (Check the post record, he has said it more than once.)

You would know.

jk jk

Well, I don't? I don't believe your case and you're not letting go of it. That's all I have. I don't like lynching people for stupid reasons. and jfc of course I've said it more than once, maybe because it's true??

[Dana]

Also about the who would I vote for question I would have to say no one right now.

Linki- Nevermind probably llama now, that vote for made was kind of uncalled for. Especially when we still have so much time left to vote...

[Made]

I've made my point. As I say, I have no new information and nothing else to say, and my being here only encourages Enrique and Made to tell lies about me over and over which I then have to address. My record speaks for itself. Anyone reading my posts can see that I have never changed my story and that I didn't lie by omission. Everyone have a nice discussion about other things, and I will log back on after the poll has ended.

One final thing: notice how many times Enrique has said "I have no idea" or "I don't know" about people. If that were true, why would he offer such a passionate defense of Made? Why would you defend passionately someone you have "no idea" about? (Check the post record, he has said it more than once.)

*Voting Made.*

linki Made: That sentence still makes no sense. WHat does "you would know" mean in that context? Why would I say that you would know something? How would I know whether you would know?

how about this, i guess is a lot is ommitted and assumed when you say "You would know"

Cop: A lot of people are going to jail these days
B: You would know( that, because you are an officer.)

In a less litterally, more speculative scenerio

Actual mafia member: wow, crime's getting bad here!
B: You would know ( because i think you are the cause of the crime)

Make any more sense yet? I feel like i'm going crazy. Does "you would know" seriously not make any sense to anyone else?

[Enrique]

and I will log back on after the poll has ended.

^Dana. It's not the timing of his vote that bothers me, just the reasoning. Did you really just go from doubting he could be bad to voting for him just because of an early vote?

Also Made I think you can stop

[Made]

Also it's kinda of rude to not even acknowledge the valid points of arguement.

I'm "late to work" Back around 5:30 6.

saving my vote so people don't give me unearned shit for using it even though votes can be changed....

Linki- ok, so i'm not crazy.

[Enrique]

insert snarky insult of other's intelligence here

One second... who taught you sarcastic orange???

[Made]

insert snarky insult of other's intelligence here

One second... who taught you sarcastic orange???

Saw SVS use it once

[Made]

[col]Don't know what this is tho...[/col]

[S~V~S]

insert snarky insult of other's intelligence here

One second... who taught you sarcastic orange???

Saw SVS use it once

Did I explain my use of it? Because that is possible.

Thread blew up again yay. Will catch up when I get home about 90 mins or so.

[Made]

insert snarky insult of other's intelligence here

One second... who taught you sarcastic orange???

Saw SVS use it once

Did I explain my use of it? Because that is possible.

Thread blew up again yay. Will catch up when I get home about 90 mins or so.

Nah, you said something sarcastic sounding and it was in orange, then I noticed the "sarc" button

[bea]

Holy catsup Batman!

First of all, I'm sorry I wasn't here for the challenge. I knew soooo many of those answers. Stoopid work always gets in the way of my Mafia.

Ok - on to business.

Made - I think the comparison to Mr. F is appropriate. I don't think it gives him a pass to be as zany as he likes though. Mr. F was quite skilled at using his odder play style to his advantage. I'm on the fence here. I think it's a small ping that's been blown up astronomically based on something that happened in a chat room nobody can verify. His in thread behavior has been odd to say the least and this new thing that I'm currently in linki over (the sarcastic orange) gives me some pause. I saw SVS use it but I don't know what it means even though I used it perfectly is eye raising. If you figured it out re:context - own up to your smart self sir! I know in at least one of MP's posts he made a comment (specificly to epi in regards to epi's suspicion of him that maybe mp's original statement should have been in orange) so yea. There's definitely thread ways you could have put two and two together yet you chose not to use that. TBH - this gives me a ping more than any of the stuff you've said the past eleventy billion pages.

llama - Feels like llama to me. I may not always agree with him but I don't find his holding on to this out of character for him.

Enrique (aka Rico Suave) - Reads genuine to me as well. I can't see for the life of me why he would go out on a limb like this to defend Made if they were baddie teammates. He's not played in a long time, but I don't remember him being that risky of a player.

MP - oh MP you always do find yourself in the spotlight don't you? I understand what you are saying about SVS, but I disagree with you. SVS hunts baddies regardless of alignment. When she is bad she just doesn't hunt her teammates. I am hard pressed to think of a time where she fabricated a suspicion against someone. Maybe I would have seen it against me in Fight Club had I not been conveniently NKed, but you know, that would have been a first for me in recent memory. It feels like you jumped the gun a bit in thinking that SVS is glomming onto llama because Made is an easy target, but it reads like yesterday was pretty intense so yea, I guess I can see how you could jump the gun.

SVS - I don't see anything odd here at all. I can't say if she's civ or bad, but she's not doing anything that ruffles my feathers yet.

LC - I'm curious as to why he suspects SVS.

Epi - I find myself agreeing with what little he's posted. I'm not ready to call MP as being a baddie yet, but I can see what epi sees as suspicious and I get where his brain is going with it. (Now THAT'S frightening for both of us sir. )

MM: I was trying to be jokey with the I hope you get better referencing this:



but apparently THE WITCH!!!!*coff* Our Lovely and Awesome Hostess chooses otherwise.

tl:dr

Day 1 drama is drama filled. Not sure about my vote. I have to work tonight and I'm debating voting before bed as tomorrow is my birthday and I have the Willy Wonka chocolate tour to go on about 2 hours before the vote ends. If I hold it - it'll happen from the phone and sugar filled and flyby like.

link part 2 - ok - so you did use your smarts Made. Still, for what you were just on llama for (not full disclosure) why not just say that up front?

[S~V~S]

K Made, I could see it. And since all the cool lids are doing it, my native language is Brooklyn BadaBing, which is not unlike Jersey BadaBing (which was an expression before it was a strip club) but a bit more guttural and a bit less gum snappy.

Linki Hi Bea!

[S~V~S]

Cool kids Lol

[Marmot]

MM: I was trying to be jokey with the I hope you get better referencing this:



but apparently THE WITCH!!!!*coff* Our Lovely and Awesome Hostess chooses otherwise.

Ooooh, I see. That was one of my favorite quotes as a kid, but it completely slipped my mind when you read the reference.

[bea]

Hi SVS - on the phone again? I hate auto correct. I'm currently stuck in the I get periods after every word stage in my phone posting activities.

New notebook is still new too. You should see some of the grand typos I make and backspace on this small ass keyboard. LOL.

it's ok MM - I'm hard pressed to pick a favorite scene as I love that movie so very much but I didn't do a good job of presenting the reference. It was quick and ugly from the phone at work.

[Made]

link part 2 - ok - so you did use your smarts Made. Still, for what you were just on llama for (not full disclosure) why not just say that up front?

The "you would know" comment? I figured it was understood. I'd of clarified if i'd thought otherwise.

[col]Also, what this is suppose to do?[/col]

[bea]

green is off topic. red is dead. blue is nonplayer. all those links are right beside the sarc one you used so well.

[Marmot]

OT = off topic
col = This ---vvv

Column 1 Made

Column 2 llama

Insert one of these ---> | (above backslash) to separate columns.

[Enrique]

Bea I'm gonna be fair here... I've had games before where I came strongly in defense of somebody from the beginning, but then turned out wrong. Can't remember the specific players but this happened at least twice >_> Now, Made hasn't given me billions of reasons to trust him yet, but I think the case against him is BS and I'm sticking to that. The sarcastic orange did give me a little pause, and jeez how I'd hate to be wrong, but I'd sooner vote for some other people than him.

[Marmot]

[col]I
think
this
is
a
new
feature.|I
don't
recall
ever
seeing
this
before.[/col]

[bea]

I get that Rico suave - my point was more that I didn't think you'd defend him this hard if you were.baddie.teammates. yea. Phone.

[Epignosis]

insert snarky insult of other's intelligence here

One second... who taught you sarcastic orange???

Saw SVS use it once

His in thread behavior has been odd to say the least and this new thing that I'm currently in linki over (the sarcastic orange) gives me some pause. I saw SVS use it but I don't know what it means even though I used it perfectly is eye raising. If you figured it out re:context - own up to your smart self sir! I know in at least one of MP's posts he made a comment (specificly to epi in regards to epi's suspicion of him that maybe mp's original statement should have been in orange) so yea. There's definitely thread ways you could have put two and two together yet you chose not to use that. TBH - this gives me a ping more than any of the stuff you've said the past eleventy billion pages.

Where did S~V~S use sarcastic orange?

[bea]

Epi - dunno did she play misfits?