[FELT Mafia]: ENDGAME

#301

Außerdem würde ich etwas Koffer nichts dagegen, gerade jetzt, wenn Sie wissen, was ich meine.

#302

There is no pattern, it just blends all my sentences. I can post words, but i'd rather have to (???). I rather vote Mr or Sabie right now.

( I can't figure out where the other the second "there", "have", "more", "full" or "one" go.)

linki- holy poop, this curse sucks.... just gonna stop.

#303

Made wrote:There is no pattern, it just blends all my sentences.

Made wrote:I can post words, but i'd rather have to (???). I rather vote Mr or Sabie right now.

( I can't figure out where the other the second "there", "have", "more", "full" or "one" go.)

linki- holy poop, this curse sucks.... just gonna stop.

You have no idea how must is sucks! The rest be mistaken. You have no idea head shaking (no) smiley but must is wrong. I swear this wrong. I swear this sucks! The rest be mistaken. You have no idea how must is wrong. I swear this sucks! The rest be mistaken. You have no idea head shaking (no) smiley but must is wrong. I swear this sucks! The rest is wrong. I swear this wrong. I swear there was a how must is sucks! The rest be mistaken. You have no idea head shaking (no) smiley but must is wrong. I s

#304

Doing a Zelda - giving thoughts as I read.

RIP Keterman
RIP Bea IYWGANAI

Elo, llama, Epi - You are painting targets - spin how you wish to make yourselves look better but it is what it is. Ganging up on little Hedgy to hammer home your points only proved to make it all so silly tbh. You all kept saying the Mafia know who the civs are but hey remember there is a SK too. Do they know who the SK is?
The arguement of whether to trust a defender was a funny read. llama saying you can't trust the defenders of civs bc he does it all the time as a baddie - Epi saying why would you look at defenders of a non bts role for someone to get civ cred but one who had bts is worth looking at.

round in circles you all went . Much to my amusement.

llama - the difference betwixt killing a known civ vs a not known civ is that maybe they aren't civ.

Epi - you said its a one mafia game so you can't paint targets - can't happen as you put it. I say hello SK role.

Elo - your vote and now saying you are thinking that if someone defended Keterman then they are more trusty only proves to twitch my nose more. Its Day 2. How do you trust anyone in a game with a mafia and SK so quickly? Why did you vote llama in the poll? You don't think he is bad yet you voted for him. I don't expect for you to respond as you ignored my point last night and only addressed it when Hedge brought it up to you - that and you said you are done defending yourself, that is not very civ imo.

llama - Sabie really? On day 2 bc she did not respond to your ridiculous question? Bc she is voting without posting? Well if I was new here and didn't know you and Epi I might feel a bit overwhelmed. Maybe this is her first game? Maybe she is shy like AP or Vomps at first.

Bullz - why MR? I think you saying you wouldn't vote for Sabie but would vote for MR.

Vomps - do you have to make a certain number of posts in German?

#305

Roxy wrote:
Bullz - why MR? I think you saying you wouldn't vote for Sabie but would vote for MR.

Process of elimination = MR. Rather. At to voters. But necessarily waiting to see. I trust Llama. So I'd vote MR. Rather. At the necessarily want I trust Llama. So I'd vote one one. Processarily waiting to vote on. But I trust Llama. So I'd vote one. Processarily waiting to go one. Processarily want I don't have moment ther reason ther reason ther. At the moment the necessarily waiting to go one. Process of his voter have moment the moment ther have a betters. But I trust Llama. So I'd vote one. Pro

#306

Bullz -I don't trust llama but tbh I don't trust any of you. So process of elimination led you to MR? I guess I will read MR and see how I feel.

#307

Roxy wrote:Vomps - do you have to make a certain number of posts in German?

Nein, aber eine beliebige Anzahl von Stellen ich ich muss in Deutsch zu machen. Ich fühle mich wie machen mehr Beiträge in deutscher als ich in der Regel in Englisch, weil Deutsch ist eine schöne Sprache.

#308

Vompatti wrote:
Roxy wrote:Vomps - do you have to make a certain number of posts in German?
Nein, aber eine beliebige Anzahl von Stellen ich ich muss in Deutsch zu machen. Ich fühle mich wie machen mehr Beiträge in deutscher als ich in der Regel in Englisch, weil Deutsch ist eine schöne Sprache.

Ich sehe und ich danke Ihnen. Wenn Entsendung in Deutsch macht Lust auf mehr, als ich bin für Sie immer Entsendung in Deutsch schreiben zu können! Sie könnten also Sabie stimmen? Ist das richtig?

#309

Roxy wrote: llama - Sabie really? On day 2 bc she did not respond to your ridiculous question? Bc she is voting without posting? Well if I was new here and didn't know you and Epi I might feel a bit overwhelmed. Maybe this is her first game? Maybe she is shy like AP or Vomps at first.

It's not a ridiculous question. It's the only question that matters. Maybe it is her first game? It is. Does that make her less likely to be bad? Maybe she is shy? Maybe. Does that make her less likely to be bad? I didn't realize we could only lynch aggressive, experienced baddies. I thought all baddies were fair game.

#310

Roxy wrote:
Vompatti wrote:
Roxy wrote:Vomps - do you have to make a certain number of posts in German?
Nein, aber eine beliebige Anzahl von Stellen ich ich muss in Deutsch zu machen. Ich fühle mich wie machen mehr Beiträge in deutscher als ich in der Regel in Englisch, weil Deutsch ist eine schöne Sprache.
Ich sehe und ich danke Ihnen. Wenn Entsendung in Deutsch macht Lust auf mehr, als ich bin für Sie immer Entsendung in Deutsch schreiben zu können! Sie könnten also Sabie stimmen? Ist das richtig?

Basierend auf Intuition bin ich mehr um Mr. Rearranger, aber es ist zwischen diesen beiden für mich.

#311

thellama73 wrote:
Roxy wrote: llama - Sabie really? On day 2 bc she did not respond to your ridiculous question? Bc she is voting without posting? Well if I was new here and didn't know you and Epi I might feel a bit overwhelmed. Maybe this is her first game? Maybe she is shy like AP or Vomps at first.
It's not a ridiculous question. It's the only question that matters. Maybe it is her first game? It is. Does that make her less likely to be bad? Maybe she is shy? Maybe. Does that make her less likely to be bad? I didn't realize we could only lynch aggressive, experienced baddies. I thought all baddies were fair game.

You and Epi can be quite intimidating! Can you not understand after reading your back and forth over everything that she might feel like a fish out of water?
She is new! Can we wait to kill brand new shiny people to the site until Day 3? Please!

#312

Roxy wrote:
thellama73 wrote:
Roxy wrote: llama - Sabie really? On day 2 bc she did not respond to your ridiculous question? Bc she is voting without posting? Well if I was new here and didn't know you and Epi I might feel a bit overwhelmed. Maybe this is her first game? Maybe she is shy like AP or Vomps at first.
It's not a ridiculous question. It's the only question that matters. Maybe it is her first game? It is. Does that make her less likely to be bad? Maybe she is shy? Maybe. Does that make her less likely to be bad? I didn't realize we could only lynch aggressive, experienced baddies. I thought all baddies were fair game.
You and Epi can be quite intimidating! Can you not understand after reading your back and forth over everything that she might feel like a fish out of water?
She is new! Can we wait to kill brand new shiny people to the site until Day 3? Please!

Give new people a chance. It's only fair, we don't want to scare people off. It's only fair, we don't want to scare people off. I agree with this. Give new people off. It's only fair, we don't want to scare people off. I agree with this. Give new people off. It's only fair, we don't want to scare people a chance. I agree with this. Give new people off. I agree with this. Give new people a chance. It's only fair, we don't want to scare people off. It's only fair, we don't want to scare people a chanc

#313

Roxy wrote:
thellama73 wrote:
Roxy wrote: llama - Sabie really? On day 2 bc she did not respond to your ridiculous question? Bc she is voting without posting? Well if I was new here and didn't know you and Epi I might feel a bit overwhelmed. Maybe this is her first game? Maybe she is shy like AP or Vomps at first.
It's not a ridiculous question. It's the only question that matters. Maybe it is her first game? It is. Does that make her less likely to be bad? Maybe she is shy? Maybe. Does that make her less likely to be bad? I didn't realize we could only lynch aggressive, experienced baddies. I thought all baddies were fair game.
You and Epi can be quite intimidating! Can you not understand after reading your back and forth over everything that she might feel like a fish out of water?
She is new! Can we wait to kill brand new shiny people to the site until Day 3? Please!

I understand all that. It is possible to be bad and also intimidated. I don''t understand why we should let baddies continue to live and kill us because they are new and scared and we don't want to hurt their feelings.

#314

Vompatti wrote:
Roxy wrote:
Vompatti wrote:
Roxy wrote:Vomps - do you have to make a certain number of posts in German?
Nein, aber eine beliebige Anzahl von Stellen ich ich muss in Deutsch zu machen. Ich fühle mich wie machen mehr Beiträge in deutscher als ich in der Regel in Englisch, weil Deutsch ist eine schöne Sprache.
Ich sehe und ich danke Ihnen. Wenn Entsendung in Deutsch macht Lust auf mehr, als ich bin für Sie immer Entsendung in Deutsch schreiben zu können! Sie könnten also Sabie stimmen? Ist das richtig?
Basierend auf Intuition bin ich mehr um Mr. Rearranger, aber es ist zwischen diesen beiden für mich.

Ah ich sehe - so wie seine ein Geräusch zucken Againt MR für Sie. Darf ich fragen , dass Sie nicht für einen neuen Spieler zu stimmen , bis Tag 3, hübsch mit Twinkies auf gefallen.

#315

I'll tell you what, to show I'm a good sport. If Sabie posts even once before noon tomorrow, I will not vote for her. Happy?

#316

thellama73 wrote:
Roxy wrote:
thellama73 wrote:
Roxy wrote: llama - Sabie really? On day 2 bc she did not respond to your ridiculous question? Bc she is voting without posting? Well if I was new here and didn't know you and Epi I might feel a bit overwhelmed. Maybe this is her first game? Maybe she is shy like AP or Vomps at first.
It's not a ridiculous question. It's the only question that matters. Maybe it is her first game? It is. Does that make her less likely to be bad? Maybe she is shy? Maybe. Does that make her less likely to be bad? I didn't realize we could only lynch aggressive, experienced baddies. I thought all baddies were fair game.
You and Epi can be quite intimidating! Can you not understand after reading your back and forth over everything that she might feel like a fish out of water?
She is new! Can we wait to kill brand new shiny people to the site until Day 3? Please!
I understand all that. It is possible to be bad and also intimidated. I don''t understand why we should let baddies continue to live and kill us because they are new and scared and we don't want to hurt their feelings.

This sounds really ridiculous. So instead of meta gaming people you have played with before you would just vote the noob. Won't even consider giving her until Day 3 to try. Don't you want to encourage new people here instead of killing them for not conforming to your playstyle?
And no I do not think she would as intimidated if she had BTS partners. If she did they would be helping her learn and post.

Sabie - Please for the love that is all holy in mafia - post who you vote for and why - otherwise TS rules dictate you be lynched post haste!

Linky - Yes that seems nicer <3 - still posting this though!

#317

Lovely now I just have to revise my strategy. I was going to vote for people I find suspicious, but apparently that is "ridiculous" so instead I will vote for people who are thick skinned and can handle taking votes without quitting the site, whether I find them suspicious or not. I'm sure that strategy will all but guarantee a civvie win!

#318

thellama73 wrote:Lovely now I just have to revise my strategy. I was going to vote for people I find suspicious, but apparently that is "ridiculous" so instead I will vote for people who are thick skinned and can handle taking votes without quitting the site, whether I find them suspicious or not. I'm sure that strategy will all but guarantee a civvie win!

<3

#319

Made wrote:Let's do it this way, Bullzeye. If permitted, in your next message only refer to who you're suspicious of (unless someone has cracked the code of this curse, i'm not seeing the pattern yet.

I found Bullz's response to this rather dumbfounding to be honest. Rather than do what was instructed, he constructed a response that made it more confusing to read.

I think we've all seen this randomizer (the veterans, that is). If you one word, it become abundantly clear what you're saying. The fewer words-- the better. However, when tasked with communicating feelings, Bullzeye responds in very confounding ways. I am not sure it makes him bad, but it does make me question his motives.

#320

Dom wrote:
Made wrote:Let's do it this way, Bullzeye. If permitted, in your next message only refer to who you're suspicious of (unless someone has cracked the code of this curse, i'm not seeing the pattern yet.
I found Bullz's response to this rather dumbfounding to be honest. Rather than do what was instructed, he constructed a response that made it more confusing to read.

I think we've all seen this randomizer (the veterans, that is). If you one word, it become abundantly clear what you're saying. The fewer words-- the better. However, when tasked with communicating feelings, Bullzeye responds in very confounding ways. I am not sure it makes him bad, but it does make me question his motives.

It is possible that the condition of his insanification requires him to post more than a certain number of distinct words?

#321

thellama73 wrote:
Dom wrote:
Made wrote:Let's do it this way, Bullzeye. If permitted, in your next message only refer to who you're suspicious of (unless someone has cracked the code of this curse, i'm not seeing the pattern yet.
I found Bullz's response to this rather dumbfounding to be honest. Rather than do what was instructed, he constructed a response that made it more confusing to read.

I think we've all seen this randomizer (the veterans, that is). If you one word, it become abundantly clear what you're saying. The fewer words-- the better. However, when tasked with communicating feelings, Bullzeye responds in very confounding ways. I am not sure it makes him bad, but it does make me question his motives.
It is possible that the condition of his insanification requires him to post more than a certain number of distinct words?

That would fit as a possible interpretation of this post?

Bullz said: I disagree with. There to go one vote I that. MR or Sabie right now. But I have more is no post full my words. I disagree with. There is no post full sentences. But I'd rather have more is no pattern it just blends all sentences. I disagree with. Ther have to go one vote I have to post full sentences. But I have to pattern it just blends all my words. I can do think I can just blends all my words. But I disagree with. Ther have more to go one vote I have more to post full sentences. But I'd rather h

The sentence "no one word post" can be made from the above.

#322

Hey guys it's only day two and this is my first game. Had no idea I was supposed to post and didn't see anyone asked me anything til way later. I'm trying my best here to understand this game. I voted for llama the first time because he she it seemed to be talking a lot. I'll get there eventually just bear with me!

#323

sabie12 wrote:Hey guys it's only day two and this is my first game. Had no idea I was supposed to post and didn't see anyone asked me anything til way later. I'm trying my best here to understand this game. I voted for llama the first time because he she it seemed to be talking a lot. I'll get there eventually just bear with me!

Hooray! I was hoping you'd stop in. Don't worry about it. I just wanted your presence in the thread, and now that I have it, I am happy.

I'll repeat my question, since you missed it. Are you bad?

Also, did your teammates tell you that you were being talked about and needed to post a response?

#324

I saw that my name was coming up and I was like oh no I guess I have to try and talk more. Didn't realize I was offending anyone. I am attempting to converse as much as I can. I'd like to think I'm a good person. I will from now on try to remember to post more. I'm just trying to get the hang of this forum and how the game works and such.

#325

sabie12 wrote:I saw that my name was coming up and I was like oh no I guess I have to try and talk more. Didn't realize I was offending anyone. I am attempting to converse as much as I can. I'd like to think I'm a good person. I will from now on try to remember to post more. I'm just trying to get the hang of this forum and how the game works and such.

You're not offending anyone at all. You didn't answer my questions though.

#326

Well of course I'm good and I am slowly figuring things out on my own. Not sure what you mean by teammates? Didn't know that was a thing. Do you have teammates helping you?

#327

sabie12 wrote:Well of course I'm good and I am slowly figuring things out on my own. Not sure what you mean by teammates? Didn't know that was a thing. Do you have teammates helping you?

I don't, sadly.

And I believe you.

#328

(although if it turns out you're faking, that's dashed clever.)

#329

Epi must be silenced he keeps hanging out and not posting. idk. Lots of quiet players that haven't posted so I guess we'll have to wait to be sure.

MR - after reading your posts a few questions if you please.
Do you see yourself voting llama again today?
Do you still think he was being saved Day 1?
If yes, who do you think most likely to be trying to save him?

#330

Roxy wrote:Doing a Zelda - giving thoughts as I read.

RIP Keterman
RIP Bea IYWGANAI

Elo, llama, Epi - You are painting targets - spin how you wish to make yourselves look better but it is what it is. Ganging up on little Hedgy to hammer home your points only proved to make it all so silly tbh. You all kept saying the Mafia know who the civs are but hey remember there is a SK too. Do they know who the SK is?
The arguement of whether to trust a defender was a funny read. llama saying you can't trust the defenders of civs bc he does it all the time as a baddie - Epi saying why would you look at defenders of a non bts role for someone to get civ cred but one who had bts is worth looking at. round in circles you all went . Much to my amusement.

llama - the difference betwixt killing a known civ vs a not known civ is that maybe they aren't civ.

Epi - you said its a one mafia game so you can't paint targets - can't happen as you put it. I say hello SK role.

Elo - your vote and now saying you are thinking that if someone defended Keterman then they are more trusty only proves to twitch my nose more. Its Day 2. How do you trust anyone in a game with a mafia and SK so quickly? Why did you vote llama in the poll? You don't think he is bad yet you voted for him. I don't expect for you to respond as you ignored my point last night and only addressed it when Hedge brought it up to you - that and you said you are done defending yourself, that is not very civ imo.

llama - Sabie really? On day 2 bc she did not respond to your ridiculous question? Bc she is voting without posting? Well if I was new here and didn't know you and Epi I might feel a bit overwhelmed. Maybe this is her first game? Maybe she is shy like AP or Vomps at first.

Bullz - why MR? I think you saying you wouldn't vote for Sabie but would vote for MR.

Vomps - do you have to make a certain number of posts in German?

#331

Vompatti wrote:
Roxy wrote:
Vompatti wrote:
Roxy wrote:Vomps - do you have to make a certain number of posts in German?
Nein, aber eine beliebige Anzahl von Stellen ich ich muss in Deutsch zu machen. Ich fühle mich wie machen mehr Beiträge in deutscher als ich in der Regel in Englisch, weil Deutsch ist eine schöne Sprache.
Ich sehe und ich danke Ihnen. Wenn Entsendung in Deutsch macht Lust auf mehr, als ich bin für Sie immer Entsendung in Deutsch schreiben zu können! Sie könnten also Sabie stimmen? Ist das richtig?
Basierend auf Intuition bin ich mehr um Mr. Rearranger, aber es ist zwischen diesen beiden für mich.

Intuition, wirklich, dass glaube ich nicht.

Verdammt autokorrekt!

#332

thellama73 wrote:
Dom wrote:
Made wrote:Let's do it this way, Bullzeye. If permitted, in your next message only refer to who you're suspicious of (unless someone has cracked the code of this curse, i'm not seeing the pattern yet.
I found Bullz's response to this rather dumbfounding to be honest. Rather than do what was instructed, he constructed a response that made it more confusing to read.

I think we've all seen this randomizer (the veterans, that is). If you one word, it become abundantly clear what you're saying. The fewer words-- the better. However, when tasked with communicating feelings, Bullzeye responds in very confounding ways. I am not sure it makes him bad, but it does make me question his motives.
It is possible that the condition of his insanification requires him to post more than a certain number of distinct words?

It's possible. But it's the second thing that has caught my eye.

Though, I am always wrong about Bullzeye.

I won't be voting him today, methinks.

#333

What's everyone's thought on boogs' vote yesterday? I found it suspicious enough to vote for him, and nothing i've seen has garnered enough suspicion to warrant voting differently tomorrow.

#334

Roxy wrote: MR - after reading your posts a few questions if you please.
Do you see yourself voting llama again today?
Do you still think he was being saved Day 1?
If yes, who do you think most likely to be trying to save him?

*votes Llama again in case I'm not home in time*

1. Yes

B. No

3. N/A but also I'm rushing.

Sorry guys, I'm visiting my sis so I'm very brief atm.

#335

All these curses are making the thread nearly incomprehensible.

I agree with Dom that it's weird that Bullz doesn't seem to be trying very hard to get his point across clearly. He may have a tricky curse to deal with, but generally fewer words will make the gist of the post pretty clear.

I'm still not convinced about Llama. I'm just reading go-getter civvie on his part.

I do think Sabie came across as genuine in her few posts, and she'd probably be a bit more active if she did have teammates.

#336

Mister Rearranger wrote:
Roxy wrote: MR - after reading your posts a few questions if you please.
Do you see yourself voting llama again today?
Do you still think he was being saved Day 1?
If yes, who do you think most likely to be trying to save him?
*votes Llama again in case I'm not home in time*

1. Yes

B. No

3. N/A but also I'm rushing.

Sorry guys, I'm visiting my sis so I'm very brief atm.

F*ck, don't drink and Mafia, friends...

Yes to the 2nd question as well. I got this mixed up with another game lol

#337

Ebwop: I noticed a lot of curses. I'm thoroughly entertained by it. :

#338

I hate posting on a Nook. Also very interested in what Bullz means; but to say the least, page 7/9 was a f*cking riot for me to read.

#339

Since Sabie just proved that she's good I'm voting Rearranger.

#340

Made wrote:What's everyone's thought on boogs' vote yesterday? I found it suspicious enough to vote for him, and nothing i've seen has garnered enough suspicion to warrant voting differently tomorrow.

Why do you find my vote for Llama suspicious when I've been saying since we started I feel he's bad? You care to elaborate ?

#341

Did I miss the case on MR? Why are people voting for him? Personally, I'm inclined to vote Boogs, but seeing as how I am once again in the spotlight, I will probably have to hold my vote to save myself.

#342

Dom wrote:
Made wrote:Let's do it this way, Bullzeye. If permitted, in your next message only refer to who you're suspicious of (unless someone has cracked the code of this curse, i'm not seeing the pattern yet.
I found Bullz's response to this rather dumbfounding to be honest. Rather than do what was instructed, he constructed a response that made it more confusing to read.

I think we've all seen this randomizer (the veterans, that is). If you one word, it become abundantly clear what you're saying. The fewer words-- the better. However, when tasked with communicating feelings, Bullzeye responds in very confounding ways. I am not sure it makes him bad, but it does make me question his motives.

I did only mention suspicious people in my response. I did only mention suspicious people word answers etc as I have to make at least 3 COMPLETE SENTENCES people in my response. I understand it. No single in my response. I unders etc as I have to make at least 3 COMPLETE SENTENCES people word answers etc as I understand it. No single in my response. I did only mention suspicious people in my response. I have to make at least 3 COMPLETE SENTENCES per post. No single in my response. I have to make at

thellama73 wrote:Did I miss the case on MR? Why are people voting for him? Personally, I'm inclined to vote Boogs, but seeing as how I am once again in the spotlight, I will probably have to hold my vote to save myself.

I find MR more was more was more to go on his likely civ. I there to go on though. I think Boogs is votes. Wish think Boogs is votes. Wish though. I find MR more to go on though. I there was more was more was more was more suspicious based on think Boogs is votes. Wish think Boogs is likely civ. I think Boogs is likely civ. I find MR more suspicious based on his likely civ. I though. I though. I though. I find MR more to go on his likely civ. I find MR more was more to go on his likely civ. I find M

#343

Well I am off to work so I need to do my vote now because my supervisor will be there. Is that a green font thing? Not sure. Anyways, my vote is going to llama purely because he has been very hard on me to I can assume distract others from whatever he is planning and take the spotlight off of himself. I believe that is how the game is played. Hopefully I'll be able to sneak on later and see how this all turns out.

#344

Made wrote:
Boogs wrote:
DFaraday wrote:I hope supatown stays a thing, I like it.

Also, I'm feeling like Llama is probably a proactive civ, so I need to look over the rest to see where I stand on the board. Most players haven't made much impression so far.
A proactive Civ? All I have seen is him act unusual and try to "stir the pot" to get certain people to cause conflict. Doesn't seem Civ like behavior in the least to me. Voting for a non participant always is a bad idea if you are Civ, and considering the game started a few hours on a holiday weekend before I can check in that he says he wanted to "get us to react" etc. doesn't feel any good to me. I'm most likely giving him my vote tomorrow. I don't what proactive Civ you see in him by most of the talk here about apples and off topic being helpful. Which makes me worried about you as well to say that about Llama.
This post makes me suspect boogs. Voting him. Llama doesn't seem off enough, and ketterman's suspicion seems kinda silly.

Boogs talk of what and what wouldn't a civvie do seems to be attempting to box llama into a very small definition (of what) is allowed to be civvie, and it doesn't seem right to me.

That's why i found your vote sus Boogs

#345

sabie12 wrote:Well I am off to work so I need to do my vote now because my supervisor will be there. Is that a green font thing? Not sure.

That could go either way since you are explaining your reason for voting early; I'm not particularly fussed and let players be self-governing in that arena.

#346

sabie12 wrote:Well I am off to work so I need to do my vote now because my supervisor will be there. Is that a green font thing? Not sure. Anyways, my vote is going to llama purely because he has been very hard on me to I can assume distract others from whatever he is planning and take the spotlight off of himself. I believe that is how the game is played. Hopefully I'll be able to sneak on later and see how this all turns out.

That is how the game is played!

Anyway, I don't think I'll be on again before it closes, so I'll just vote Bullz. And I still don't get why there's so much talk about MR.

#347

DFaraday wrote:
sabie12 wrote:Well I am off to work so I need to do my vote now because my supervisor will be there. Is that a green font thing? Not sure. Anyways, my vote is going to llama purely because he has been very hard on me to I can assume distract others from whatever he is planning and take the spotlight off of himself. I believe that is how the game is played. Hopefully I'll be able to sneak on later and see how this all turns out.
That is how the game is played!

Anyway, I don't think I'll be on again before it closes, so I'll just vote Bullz. And I still don't get why there's so much talk about MR.

Hardly seems fair when dealing with a curse you don't like how the rules of? Hardly seems fair when dealing with a curse you don't even I can't know the rules of? Hardly seems fair when dealing with a curse you don't like how I'm defend properly. Why me? Because you don't like how I'm dealing with a curse you don't even I can't even I can't like how I'm defend properly. Why me? Because you don't know the rules of? Hardly seems fair when dealing with a curse you don't like how the rules of? Hardly se

#348

sabie12 wrote:Well I am off to work so I need to do my vote now because my supervisor will be there. Is that a green font thing? Not sure. Anyways, my vote is going to llama purely because he has been very hard on me to I can assume distract others from whatever he is planning and take the spotlight off of himself. I believe that is how the game is played. Hopefully I'll be able to sneak on later and see how this all turns out.

If I am trying to take the spotlight off of myself, I am really bad at it!

#349

Voting ends in less than 2 hours, so get your votes in! If I get all votes in before the deadline, I'll end the Day early.

#350

I don't trust his Llama vote. Also nothing to vote for *MR*. Because I am going to vote. Also nothing else really cause I don't trust his Llama vote. Also nothing else I don't trust his Llama vote. Also nothing else I don't trust his Llama vote. Also nothing else I don't trust his Llama vote. Also nothing to vote. Also nothing to vote for *MR*. Becaught my eye yet. I am going else I am going else really caught my eye yet. I don't trust his Llama vote for *MR*. Becaught my eye yet. I am going else I

See you in Film Director Mafia!