
And no insult intended.
Moderator: Community Team
for me, it was his flat out refusal that that was what was going on. Hedging could have been done. Deying it took away my reason for thinking he was a civ.S~V~S wrote:Right, becasue the incredibly enthusiastic teenager playing his first game will never change his game, will never learn, or do anything differently.
I am a tad annoyed at Made, tbh. He had to have known he had another life depending on him, even if he did not know who it was, as he claimed. Making such a spectacle of himself under those circumstances, when he had to have known another civvie would die for him, did not strike me as the civviest thing to do. That is part of the reason I thought the Lovers thing was bullshit.
Epignosis wrote:Bitch, my identity is my identity theft protection!
Turnip Head wrote: We need to lynch Pennsylvania Bitch.
You're right - I should've tried harder when I saw what was happening. I'm actually more frustrated with myself than anythingS~V~S wrote:So drama. And you tried so hard to prevent it, didn't you?nijuukyugou wrote:^ That's why.birdwithteeth11 wrote:Why ugh?
Indigo?juliets wrote:So my favorite color or favourite colour is blue, specifically a purpleish blue. My second favorite color is purple.
Epignosis wrote:If llama is good, it means we exist in a universe in which multitasking llama can call out the first of two mafia while simultaneously calling out two civilians.
I don't want to live in that universe.
goosey - I ment A Person and Made.Mongoose wrote:My favorite color is green.
This game is breaking my brain. I coulda sworn we had mislynched Lancelot earlier in the game.
Linki Bea - Did you mean "A Person and Matt" or "A Person/Matt"?
Epignosis wrote:Bitch, my identity is my identity theft protection!
I would also agree with this notion.Long Con wrote:Agreed.thellama73 wrote:Oh she is a Baddie McBadderson all right.Long Con wrote:So you're in S~V~S' camp, and believe he was some Seemed type... How do you feel about her now?thellama73 wrote:I still think he was bad and nothing will convince me otherwise.
Ok - I'm confused by llama refusing to believe that Made was civ, but agreeing svs is bad because he's not a seemer. WTF am I missing?birdwithteeth11 wrote:I would also agree with this notion.Long Con wrote:Agreed.thellama73 wrote:Oh she is a Baddie McBadderson all right.Long Con wrote:So you're in S~V~S' camp, and believe he was some Seemed type... How do you feel about her now?thellama73 wrote:I still think he was bad and nothing will convince me otherwise.
Epignosis wrote:Bitch, my identity is my identity theft protection!
Epignosis wrote:If llama is good, it means we exist in a universe in which multitasking llama can call out the first of two mafia while simultaneously calling out two civilians.
I don't want to live in that universe.
Epignosis wrote:Bitch, my identity is my identity theft protection!
Epignosis wrote:Bitch, my identity is my identity theft protection!
Is S~V~S God? Is God likely to be a Civvie role?thellama73 wrote:Bea, my next suspicion after SVS is Long Con because of this post.
After that, I had a ping on Dana, but looking back at her posts, I can't remember why. I also find Canucklehead suspicious, and I feel like I haven't seen her around in a while.
I just realized, looking at the player list, that I don't have very strong reads on almost anyone else, so I will do some vote analysis and rereading tomorrow to see if anything sticks out to me.
Would GOD offer such a strong alignment hint if he actually had info? Or is he just guessing? I can't decide which is more likely.
When did he actually deny it? I remember him answering "yes" to that question about if he knew how he was saved the first time I was supposed to get lynched. And then after when someone asked for clarification he said he's not certain but he thinks so, which I assume was him trying to keep Roxy/DP off his back. I don't remember him ever outright saying the lovers theory was false.bea wrote:for me, it was his flat out refusal that that was what was going on. Hedging could have been done. Deying it took away my reason for thinking he was a civ.
Yes. But Mel Brooks makes it funny.S~V~S wrote:Yes, they were quite evil and horrible as religious zealots usually are, imo.LoRab wrote:Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition.
Also:
Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Wed Dec 16, 2020 7:33 pm Just how many days of "let's yeet them tomorrow" can a mafioso survive?
The answer: all of them, if you are a marmot.
Agreed, and there was so much doubt surrounding the whole situation, we couldn't just let him go. Feels off that you'd say you "believed" me... I didn't know anything, it just seemed like it was still a good possibility. What are your next moves here... Suspicions?Metalmarsh89 wrote:Well Long Con, looks like you were right. I believed you, but even if we had the time, I think it would have been too late to change everyone's votes.
I'll be on tomorrow morning to chat.
his saying he knew how he survived but not understanding how we could think he was lancelot even after everything was spelt out to me felt like denial to me. And took away the biggest reason I was believing he was civ.Dana wrote:When did he actually deny it? I remember him answering "yes" to that question about if he knew how he was saved the first time I was supposed to get lynched. And then after when someone asked for clarification he said he's not certain but he thinks so, which I assume was him trying to keep Roxy/DP off his back. I don't remember him ever outright saying the lovers theory was false.bea wrote:for me, it was his flat out refusal that that was what was going on. Hedging could have been done. Deying it took away my reason for thinking he was a civ.
Epignosis wrote:Bitch, my identity is my identity theft protection!
You're my next suspicion, so...Metalmarsh89 wrote:Well Long Con, looks like you were right. I believed you, but even if we had the time, I think it would have been too late to change everyone's votes.
I'll be on tomorrow morning to chat.
Llama just wants me lynched. He even said that while it wasn't fair, regardless of Mades outcome, he thought i was bad. What confuses me is that Boogs was so sure I was bad, now I am not even on his list? He even voted for me when he was silencedbea wrote:Ok - I'm confused by llama refusing to believe that Made was civ, but agreeing svs is bad because he's not a seemer. WTF am I missing?birdwithteeth11 wrote:I would also agree with this notion.Long Con wrote:Agreed.thellama73 wrote:Oh she is a Baddie McBadderson all right.Long Con wrote:So you're in S~V~S' camp, and believe he was some Seemed type... How do you feel about her now?thellama73 wrote:I still think he was bad and nothing will convince me otherwise.
Also - are none of you concerned that GOD has said he'd rather hear about people's thoughts on other players?
I'm not at all convinced svs is baddie mc badderson. I get why LC origninally suspected her, but I've always thought that was civ on civ.
Who else besides SVS would you look at LC, llama, and teefies?
Boogs wrote:^This =100% I agree. I wanted to mention SVS changing and defending Made yesterday but I didn't want them to draw attention to me but I need to say I agree with Llama 100%. I've trusted him since the beginning when he found Made in a lie, and I trust his judgment here also.thellama73 wrote:Okay, I will.Enrique wrote:Try being a little more condescending just so you look like even more of an ass at endgame.
Listen up, people.
Made is bad.
SVS is bad.
Made is on SVS' team.
SVS is on Made's team.
SVS and Made are on the same team, a team of baddies.
Remember the first time we voted to lynch Made? SVS was all over him like white on rice. Why? Because they had a lynch switch in their back pocket ready to use. AP killed, lynch switch gone. Where did SVS' suspicions of Made go? Poof! Vanished. Now she desperately doesn't want to lynch him. Why? The reason she gives is that we won't learn anything from him if he flips civ. As opposed to who? Did we learn a lot from MR flipping civ? Two seconds thought reveals that it's a nonsensical reason not to lynch somebody.
And no one seems to remember that Made's case on MR was specifically cooked up to save his own skin. He asked what he could do to avoid being lynched, I said make a case on someone else, so he cooked one up out of thin air. He never believed in it. He just didn't want to die. Of all the suspicious people in this thread, THAT's the case you fell for? Really? Use your heads.
BTW, I would love to hear Llamas condescending commentary on that post. Why exactly am I bad now?Boogs wrote:Rip Made :/ I'm really surprised you turned up Civ. I'm not sure who I want to vote for tomorrow, since Enrique and Made were my suspects and only one turned up Baddie.
Certainly, my dear fellow.Long Con wrote: Llama, can you go over again why asking you your opinion on the lynch is suspicious?
Epignosis wrote:If llama is good, it means we exist in a universe in which multitasking llama can call out the first of two mafia while simultaneously calling out two civilians.
I don't want to live in that universe.
Epignosis wrote:If llama is good, it means we exist in a universe in which multitasking llama can call out the first of two mafia while simultaneously calling out two civilians.
I don't want to live in that universe.
llama I have not looked at your posts yet but I'm hoping you might just tell me if there is any other evidence of Long Con's baddieness than this post. If Long Con did what you say he did regarding that quote it was clumsy and I'm not used to LC being clumsy. Neither of you is on my baddie list at the moment but maybe I'm blinded.thellama73 wrote:Certainly, my dear fellow.Long Con wrote: Llama, can you go over again why asking you your opinion on the lynch is suspicious?
Asking "who do you think will be lynched" as opposed to "who do you think ought to be lynched" seems suspicious to me, because the only motive I can see behind such a question is trying to plan where to put your vote so it doesn't look suspicious. Initially, I thought it was about throwing Made under the bus. That no longer appears to be the case, but it still smells fishy to me.
IMO God is most likely a non player with no info. LC, I believe I remember that Rox asked you to be one of these non players at least once. (Jimi Hendrix in Beatles) We had 3 non player accounts of this sort in Pirates.Long Con wrote:thellama73 wrote:Bea, my next suspicion after SVS is Long Con because of this post.
After that, I had a ping on Dana, but looking back at her posts, I can't remember why. I also find Canucklehead suspicious, and I feel like I haven't seen her around in a while.
I just realized, looking at the player list, that I don't have very strong reads on almost anyone else, so I will do some vote analysis and rereading tomorrow to see if anything sticks out to me.
Would GOD offer such a strong alignment hint if he actually had info? Or is he just guessing? I can't decide which is more likely.
Is S~V~S God? Is God likely to be a Civvie role?
Am I allowed to ask questions like that? Hosts, can you clarify? Everyone is afraid to talk about roles at all, and I'm sure you don't want to stifle important game conversation and such... Right?
Llama, can you go over again why asking you your opinion on the lynch is suspicious?
I feel really bad too, and I'm worried it's clouding my judgment. If there are two teams, though, and if SVS is on one of them, she has a strong interest in hunting down the other team to help her own credibility, so I'm interested to see who she plans to vote for today.fingersplints wrote: I feel like SVS is "giving up" because she is trying to guilt trip players. It's actually working quite well because I already feel very bad ;(
Epignosis wrote:If llama is good, it means we exist in a universe in which multitasking llama can call out the first of two mafia while simultaneously calling out two civilians.
I don't want to live in that universe.
I just looked over LC's posts again. I could say it was because of his dirty signature trick or his relentless harping on "you would know" but honestly, that one question is what I am basing my suspicion on yes. I just can't see a reason why a civ would ask that question.juliets wrote:llama I have not looked at your posts yet but I'm hoping you might just tell me if there is any other evidence of Long Con's baddieness than this post. If Long Con did what you say he did regarding that quote it was clumsy and I'm not used to LC being clumsy. Neither of you is on my baddie list at the moment but maybe I'm blinded.thellama73 wrote:Certainly, my dear fellow.Long Con wrote: Llama, can you go over again why asking you your opinion on the lynch is suspicious?
Asking "who do you think will be lynched" as opposed to "who do you think ought to be lynched" seems suspicious to me, because the only motive I can see behind such a question is trying to plan where to put your vote so it doesn't look suspicious. Initially, I thought it was about throwing Made under the bus. That no longer appears to be the case, but it still smells fishy to me.
Epignosis wrote:If llama is good, it means we exist in a universe in which multitasking llama can call out the first of two mafia while simultaneously calling out two civilians.
I don't want to live in that universe.
You shouldn't have expected anything else from me, because my suspicion of you never involved Made at all.S~V~S wrote:EBWOP:
I knew that no matter how Made turned up, LC & Llama would come gunning for me.
(I knew something was wrong with that sentence, it kept chewing at me. took a while to figure out)
I think SVS has been acting strange with the Made stuff to almost build credibility for the lynch, however maybe she saw something else we didn't when we cast our votes.juliets wrote:I agree I'd like to hear more from Boogs. I'm just not getting a good vibe there for reasons I covered earlier as well as bwt's point that he's only posted about Made and Enrique. Who are you suspicious of boogs? Can you name a couple of people you are suspicious of and reasons like most of us have done?
Well, here was my post.Long Con wrote:Agreed, and there was so much doubt surrounding the whole situation, we couldn't just let him go. Feels off that you'd say you "believed" me... I didn't know anything, it just seemed like it was still a good possibility. What are your next moves here... Suspicions?Metalmarsh89 wrote:Well Long Con, looks like you were right. I believed you, but even if we had the time, I think it would have been too late to change everyone's votes.
I'll be on tomorrow morning to chat.
I don't recall anyone else offering such a hypothesis, but it made complete sense as to why AP was lynched. I never did read the details on AP's role, which clearly would have helped.Metalmarsh89 wrote:So you think that maybe the secrets to AP's role are that he would sacrifice himself for the surival of Lancelot? That fits with the movie description. I am actually very inclined to believe this.Long Con wrote:I understand that Made has to be lynched, but if there were wagers on the outcome, I would put a small bet on him being the Civvie role that A Person's lynch alludes to. A small bet, as in I'm not super confident, but I still kind of think it.
Too much reasonable doubt though.
This would mean that Made is Sir Lancelot though. Hmm...
Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Wed Dec 16, 2020 7:33 pm Just how many days of "let's yeet them tomorrow" can a mafioso survive?
The answer: all of them, if you are a marmot.
I'm not going anywhere. Suspish away...LoRab wrote:You're my next suspicion, so...Metalmarsh89 wrote:Well Long Con, looks like you were right. I believed you, but even if we had the time, I think it would have been too late to change everyone's votes.
I'll be on tomorrow morning to chat.
Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Wed Dec 16, 2020 7:33 pm Just how many days of "let's yeet them tomorrow" can a mafioso survive?
The answer: all of them, if you are a marmot.