Yeah, Syn is IC and vote leader we should vote someone on his wagon.
I don't get the jargon of this post mainly IC?
I do agree being the vote leader, means if they're mafia we could blow the game open.
Syn's post don't have alot going on, but I really can't recall ever playing with a mafia Syn. Is anyone aware if this is within his normal meta as mafia vs civ?
Anyone using that as a reason is either lazy or mafia.
Being confirmed civ means literally nothing except that you aren't actively trying to fool people. Its the same sort of shit like forming a town core then ignroing players outside of it.
Confirmed civs just means they aren't bad not that they're right.
Yeah, Syn is IC and vote leader we should vote someone on his wagon.
I don't get the jargon of this post mainly IC?
I do agree being the vote leader, means if they're mafia we could blow the game open.
Syn's post don't have alot going on, but I really can't recall ever playing with a mafia Syn. Is anyone aware if this is within his normal meta as mafia vs civ?
DkKoba wrote: ↑Sat Aug 28, 2021 12:58 pm
this is town tutuu they've displayed a depth deeper than surface level already and i barely had to read her posts so take that doubters
Absence of syn and Scotty why? And if your answer is because you townread them also why?
just sheeping Past Urist, i'm assuming he had decent reasons for townreading syn / scotty.
as for your townreads, I'm somewhat trusting your read on ted which is why he isn't higher on the list. rondo i think you're volumeclearing for ?? reasons when his play has been otherwise scummy, i don't see why i'd trust your read there. i have no opinion of wilgy personally so he got added to the bottom of the list, i forgot you had a strong townread there or i'd have probably taken him off.
You're playing this game without reading hardly anything right?
I am not volume clearing Rondo. That was Tutuu. I worked him over hard to try to extract a townread on him.
I didn't really ask you about him though. I don't have an issue with you scumreading him. I am just curious how you came up with a 37 player POE and left out the two bottom of my POE.
and I flipping dumbtelled myself after trying to hold out
Ruri wrote: ↑Fri Aug 27, 2021 9:51 am
Skimmed here and there. Didn't know Mac was a fellow Scorpio.
Tutuu has good posts. Upon checking Mac's posts, I'm not sure about him yet. Syn seems to be...underwhelming. Made had some sus posts, so I'll ISO that.
what about now?
*strikes a pose*
What are Tutuu's good posts @Ruri?
Oh yeah. It was this. I'm not sure why but the this one had me pinged.
This is obvious mafia.
Cool. Why?
nutella wrote: ↑Wed Feb 21, 2018 2:56 pm
@DrWilgy don't post any more k
JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Wilgy's vote is an enigma of science. Philosophers are known to throw their tomes across the auditorium in a fit of frustration after failing to solve its mystery.
insertnamehere wrote: ↑Wed Jun 28, 2017 11:50 pm
WTF was up with Wilgy's entire deal?
JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Wilgy's vote is an enigma of science. Philosophers are known to throw their tomes across the auditorium in a fit of frustration after failing to solve its mystery.
insertnamehere wrote: ↑Wed Jun 28, 2017 11:50 pm
WTF was up with Wilgy's entire deal?
Michelle: Had good paranoia about Mac before the IC. Seems to be actively sorting players. Her wolf game is more distant from the thread, IIRC.
Ted: Quite comfortable with having them higher than null for now.
Rondo: The way they're contradicting IC!Mac stands out in a way I'd say is villagery.
Scotty: Saying they won't vote me while insisting I answer their question of telling a story seems too surface-level that I don't see a wolf doing.
Poison: Asked me an irrelevant question, no sorting me out from there. Though, the ISO looks like a lot of that.
Ender: I haven't noticed anything sus from them so far, but haven't really read their posts. But the votes on him could mean there's something I'm not seeing?
Radishes: Wagon "something something" means? The readslist posted also didn't look serious. Lots of fluff IMO.
Tutuu: While I want to say villagery, seems like those who know her better say it's not reliable. Mostly null, but in lower tier to help myself remember.
Syn: Their posts seem lacking in content entirely. No idea TBH. But kinda a policy for me, since I never could read him in that one game we were in before.
These helps.
I dont think i have asked you irrelevant thing tho, mentioned popcorn because that's where I know you from. And the question was made so that you provide some quick rvs like kill target. I don't think it's irrelevant. No response rather answers from you though felt good because I feel like scum would have pointed it out and then chosen targets to answer me as well. I didn't resolve you after that because for a lot of the game I haven't seen you around at the same time as me and forgot about your presence maybe.
tedxtr wrote: ↑Sat Aug 28, 2021 10:22 am
what post did you vote her for? why did she seem suspicious?
and while you’re at it, if you can quote where you’ve already answered me why you voted for her, that’d be great, since i don’t remember you ever saying why beyond “i just felt like it”
You’re pissing me off
“I just felt like it” WAS THE ANSWER AND THE POINT I WAS MAKING BECAUSE IT LACKS ANY MORE THAN THAT
To be fair to scotty, half of the time I vote people its literally just this
JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Wilgy's vote is an enigma of science. Philosophers are known to throw their tomes across the auditorium in a fit of frustration after failing to solve its mystery.
insertnamehere wrote: ↑Wed Jun 28, 2017 11:50 pm
WTF was up with Wilgy's entire deal?
MacDougall wrote: ↑Sat Aug 28, 2021 10:29 am
Also on the subject of winrates... Alison and Jay use pure logic and ignore emotion and both have higher winrates than me and I tend to read emotion and ignore logic on occasion probably to the detriment of my results honestly. Case in point Alison would just go on burying Rondo today whereas I'm re-evaluating. Maybe I'm right this time but I think in most cases she would be.
I feel validation in my desire to slam Rondo now. Ty papi.
And here I thought we were friends +scummy DrWigly because I feel like OMGUSing
DkKoba wrote: ↑Sat Aug 28, 2021 12:58 pm
this is town tutuu they've displayed a depth deeper than surface level already and i barely had to read her posts so take that doubters
Ah just lazy then.
Since sheeping someone for being cleared isn't ground breaking performance or really sheepy. It's a convenient way to avoid getting blamed for lynching a civ.
dyachei wrote: ↑Sat Aug 28, 2021 1:13 pm
Does anyone that knows creature really think he would rwstfo? That kid top posts as a wolf. I dont really get the suspicion on the slot
JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Wilgy's vote is an enigma of science. Philosophers are known to throw their tomes across the auditorium in a fit of frustration after failing to solve its mystery.
insertnamehere wrote: ↑Wed Jun 28, 2017 11:50 pm
WTF was up with Wilgy's entire deal?
dyachei wrote: ↑Sat Aug 28, 2021 1:13 pm
Does anyone that knows creature really think he would rwstfo? That kid top posts as a wolf. I dont really get the suspicion on the slot
dyachei wrote: ↑Sat Aug 28, 2021 1:13 pm
Does anyone that knows creature really think he would rwstfo? That kid top posts as a wolf. I dont really get the suspicion on the slot
nobody should be making reads like this imo
KZA
Hally wrote: ↑Sun Apr 11, 2021 1:51 am
eating an entire sandwich is not that hard
JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Wilgy's vote is an enigma of science. Philosophers are known to throw their tomes across the auditorium in a fit of frustration after failing to solve its mystery.
insertnamehere wrote: ↑Wed Jun 28, 2017 11:50 pm
WTF was up with Wilgy's entire deal?