Good one.Hedgeowl wrote:Welcome back Snowy! What are your thoughts on the last lynch?
I think I was surprised. But more thoughts later on how it went down and the reasons for my voting pattern.
Moderator: Community Team
Good one.Hedgeowl wrote:Welcome back Snowy! What are your thoughts on the last lynch?
Dana swooping in at the eleventh hour to tie the vote (according to the final poll) looks a little sketchy. She set up her suspicion of Snowy earlier sure, but she's referring to a post she made just over an hour earlier than her hasty vote. (She also defends MP in that same post, I feel like a pattern is developing here). A quick search of Dana's posts reveals just one other post where Dana mentions Snow Dog, fully quoted here:Dana wrote:Voting for Snow Dog so I don't miss the time cut off, explanation coming next post.
Dana starts to doubt Snow Dog because he says he trusts MP... but doesn't Dana trust MP, hasn't she defended him more than once? Does she not follow MP's vote when she votes for Snowy here? This seems hypocritical and feels manipulative, the way she twists Snow's actions here.Dana wrote:Okay maybe bandwagoning was a bad word choice but it did feel like people jumped on the vote a bit. I'm also not sure how I feel about Snow Dog saying he trusts MP, if MP changes his vote, would you follow him, Snow Dog?
Is Snow Dog 2.0 allowed to talk as or give explanations for Snow Dog 1.0? I'm kind of actually really confused about the people replacing that were already previously in the game. Of course they get new roles and such, but they're still the same person with the same play style and all of that. What are the rules for this? As in, what are they allowed to do or say or talk about?Snow Dog wrote:Good one.Hedgeowl wrote:Welcome back Snowy! What are your thoughts on the last lynch?
I think I was surprised. But more thoughts later on how it went down and the reasons for my voting pattern.
Excuse me, antifebrile you Illyria need fossils Ender I've been made insane. Olhado thinks obligor funny witworm make amour lied like a faker.zeek wrote:Chris wrote:This is the insanifier.zeek wrote:Jackie's ability is something I'm not familair with. What exactly constitutes making someone insane? What do they have to do?
It is LC's creation, so when you become afflicted with it, you can rage on him.
http://mikesteffler.com/InsanityGenerator.html
This goodmannered whap. Totally set up.
I'll wait for a reply to this before I post about SD1 or I'll ask our glorious hosts.Dana wrote:Is Snow Dog 2.0 allowed to talk as or give explanations for Snow Dog 1.0? I'm kind of actually really confused about the people replacing that were already previously in the game. Of course they get new roles and such, but they're still the same person with the same play style and all of that. What are the rules for this? As in, what are they allowed to do or say or talk about?Snow Dog wrote:Good one.Hedgeowl wrote:Welcome back Snowy! What are your thoughts on the last lynch?
I think I was surprised. But more thoughts later on how it went down and the reasons for my voting pattern.
Why should he be restricted?Dana wrote:Is Snow Dog 2.0 allowed to talk as or give explanations for Snow Dog 1.0? I'm kind of actually really confused about the people replacing that were already previously in the game. Of course they get new roles and such, but they're still the same person with the same play style and all of that. What are the rules for this? As in, what are they allowed to do or say or talk about?Snow Dog wrote:Good one.Hedgeowl wrote:Welcome back Snowy! What are your thoughts on the last lynch?
I think I was surprised. But more thoughts later on how it went down and the reasons for my voting pattern.
I epacme that the same way.S~V~S wrote:Why should he be restricted?Dana wrote:Is Snow Dog 2.0 allowed to talk as or give explanations for Snow Dog 1.0? I'm kind of actually really confused about the people replacing that were already previously in the game. Of course they get new roles and such, but they're still the same person with the same play style and all of that. What are the rules for this? As in, what are they allowed to do or say or talk about?
This post has a "sour grapes" feel to it, IMO. Like you are annoyed that Snowy did not stay dead.
Not at all! I just wanted to make sure everything was alright since this was a new situation I'd never seen before and I was probably overthinking at 5:30 in the morning.S~V~S wrote:Why should he be restricted?Dana wrote:Is Snow Dog 2.0 allowed to talk as or give explanations for Snow Dog 1.0? I'm kind of actually really confused about the people replacing that were already previously in the game. Of course they get new roles and such, but they're still the same person with the same play style and all of that. What are the rules for this? As in, what are they allowed to do or say or talk about?Snow Dog wrote:Good one.Hedgeowl wrote:Welcome back Snowy! What are your thoughts on the last lynch?
I think I was surprised. But more thoughts later on how it went down and the reasons for my voting pattern.
This post has a "sour grapes" feel to it, IMO. Like you are annoyed that Snowy did not stay dead.
Chris wrote:Also, is zeek for real going to play like he's been insanified?
Posted before night three was over. How does this suddenly come up, out of the blue? Especially after I had already addressed it, and then Rico also brought it up...zeek wrote:Jackie's ability is something I'm not familair with. What exactly constitutes making someone insane? What do they have to do?
Also posted before night three was over. This post just seems so out of place when looked at in the grouping of Zeek's posts.zeek wrote:Thanks guys, so theres definitely been none of that. MR or someone neglecting their night powers.
Suddenly, Zeek is insanified after asking about it twice? Why Zeek? Why the two night lull?zeek wrote:Chris wrote:This is the insanifier.zeek wrote:Jackie's ability is something I'm not familair with. What exactly constitutes making someone insane? What do they have to do?
It is LC's creation, so when you become afflicted with it, you can rage on him.
http://mikesteffler.com/InsanityGenerator.html
This goodmannered whap. Totally set up.
Chris wrote:What gives? Is Zeek new at mafia?
Answered regulars own question.zeek wrote:Jackie's ability is something I'm not familair with. What exactly constitutes making someone insane? What do they have to do?
toga a fucking setup.S~V~S wrote:Well, I find it unlikely he is faking it, tbh. My guess would be that Jackie, for whatever reason, became more active, and thought it would be funny to insanify zeek since he asked about it.
He came from STV before our time, Chris. He has played, but only the gentler STV version
Good questions. palliative await Devious Goodie answer.Chris wrote:There's no way to decipher the insanifier, is there? Would it be cheating if we tried to beat the insanifier? Like, what if Zeek posted in pictures?
如果我們試圖通過把不同的語言,通過它來打敗它呢?
^ that could work, if the hosts don't modkill me for trying to beat the insanity generator.
I believe I have spoken a great deal on my thoughts on MP, but I'll specifically respond to a few of your posts.Turnip Head wrote:Dom, how are you feeling about MP? Have you read my thoughts on him?
I thought this was quite a rational post.Turnip Head wrote:If you are a civvie this game, MP, and I certainly have my doubts about that, I don't think you have been a rational one so far, no I noticed there was a portion of the thread that you missed, the part where Hedgeowl really started to get some heat. She had 4 votes at one point and was in the lead. Then you pop back in, start asking if anyone is considering changing their votes. Move your vote to Snowy "just to get it off LC", which you now explain is because your vote for LC wasn't doing anything where it was. Hedgie had 4 votes, and then shortly after that only had 3 I think once Snow Dog changed his vote. So why then did you not just campaign harder for an LC lynchtrain? Why did you feel the need to hop on the Snowmobile instead? From the thread it seems you felt stronger about LC, and that you were not sure about Snow's alignment at all, yet you went with the weaker suspicion in the end. Why?
This quote says a lot though, I think.Turnip Head wrote:MovingPictures07 wrote:I guess I'm switching to Snow Dog for now, just to get it off LC.
I dont think STV was a gentler version its just that we respected each other and tended not to be rude or insulting to each other during games. whats with the polite giggle smiley?S~V~S wrote:Well, I find it unlikely he is faking it, tbh. My guess would be that Jackie, for whatever reason, became more active, and thought it would be funny to insanify zeek since he asked about it.
He came from STV before our time, Chris. He has played, but only the gentler STV version
Not sure about BWT, but I know Bea dislikes trying to play curses, etc.
I have not just asked you, I have asked others too, who posted that remark with no qualifiers. And tbh, even if I did get role hints, I don't believe them in any case. Too many new players, too many people unfamiliar with Dr Who, it would be amazingly easy to make a false claim. I guess my thing was, WHAT other things? I would like to see things that make her not bad, if I am wrong I want to know it, but you have to know I can't just "trust" you, I need a *why*. My opinion is based on MY gut, and I have seen nothing to contradict it. If she has dropped role hints, then she wants to stay alive. I would like to see more posts from her other than the defense variety.Turnip Head wrote:Welcome back Snowy!! RIP splintsy
I'm looking at MP, Made and Hedgeowl for my vote today, and I've got my eye on all the Snow Dog voters in general. I also want to see what happens with the suspicion on Enrique, and I plan on rereading MetalMarsh at some point.
SVS, you keep asking me for specifics with Daisy, I know you don't get role hints, I'm not really pointing toward a role hint, just other things I've picked up on that make it seem unlikely to me that Daisy is bad. In addition, like I said earlier, my opinion on her is based on my gut, which tells me that Daisy is genuine. I've seen no good reason to suspect her over any other player in the game. Since you keep prying about it, do you think I should have reason to be concerned about her?
I dunno... why kill Splints? She wasn't posting very much. She was eyeballing Daisy for a bit, and even threw a vote or two her way. She was poking at me as well, although I wouldn't say that she was getting anywhere. She's not wrong, she does always think I'm bad. Myself? I was getting some civvie vibes from her, but I could have been wrong. Perhaps a baddie team killed her thinking it would implicate Daisy or myself, since I don't really get any other reason to kill her.What are you saying Chris? Do you think zeek is bad bc now someone (specifically zeek) is insanified? Do you think he insanified himself after asking about it in the thread? [/quoate]
No, I'm just tryig to figure out if he's faking it. I mean, wouldn't that be significant, if he was faking being insanified? He could have insanified himself, sure? Why not? But I necessarily think he did.
This is not zeeks first rodeo, I doubt very srsly he would have insanified himself or that he would not have missed using his ability previously then suddenly decide to use it on himself.
What do you make of the splints kill? Actually what do you think of all the NK choices?
SetupChris wrote:But I also maintain that the timing is certainly odd...
To what extent though? What are you being set up for? My suspicion? I don't believe it would come close to getting you lynched...zeek wrote:SetupChris wrote:But I also maintain that the timing is certainly odd...
You expect me to try to lynch someone over a suspected faking? LOL! I think I can be a touch convincing, but GOD DAMN! I'm not THAT good. There's no way anyone would lynch him over that. And I'm the only one pushing it because it's only been a few hours since it happened. And again, I'm not pushing anything. I'm exploring. I could have done all of this on my own, out of the thread, but then that's not how mafia is played, is it?S~V~S wrote:Because it is what I expect of you, lol. You are the one pushing the faux insanification theory. And the insanity busting. I can get the gist of what he is saying. Not implying anything about our affiliation, just about your love of boundary pushing
And I am willing to look into MP if Made turns up bad. Is Mades save part of the reason you think MP is bad?
Chris wrote:If you say you can get the gist of what he's saying, how about you translate for us all then?
Just saw this in Doms comment and wanted to reply. Was the 4 votes earlier in the day? I had 3 votes and then juliets moved hers, so I had two votes. Then in the final minutes of the vote i received another vote from daisy, so 3 votes. I was at the end of the lynch and would have moved my own vote to save myself if needed. There was no need though. Made was leading me, daisy, and mp by 2-3 votes and then suddenly snow dog went from 1 vote to 6.Turnip Head wrote:If you are a civvie this game, MP, and I certainly have my doubts about that, I don't think you have been a rational one so far, no I noticed there was a portion of the thread that you missed, the part where Hedgeowl really started to get some heat. She had 4 votes at one point and was in the lead. Then you pop back in, start asking if anyone is considering changing their votes. Move your vote to Snowy "just to get it off LC", which you now explain is because your vote for LC wasn't doing anything where it was. Hedgie had 4 votes, and then shortly after that only had 3 I think once Snow Dog changed his vote. So why then did you not just campaign harder for an LC lynchtrain? Why did you feel the need to hop on the Snowmobile instead? From the thread it seems you felt stronger about LC, and that you were not sure about Snow's alignment at all, yet you went with the weaker suspicion in the end. Why?
Turnip Head wrote: We need to lynch Pennsylvania Bitch.
I'd like to say, this is a very good point.Hedgeowl wrote:<snip>What doesnt make sense to me is if it was a save attempt for made why not throw more votes on me, daisy, or mp? We had at least a few more than snow, but for whatever reason Snow seemed to get the attention of the thread. <snip>
What?zeek wrote:Jackie picked assemblyman crundles I asked. Makes me look bad. Makes me look like faking.
Jackie picked me cause I asked.zeek wrote:Jackie's ability is something I'm not familair with. What exactly constitutes making someone insane? What do they have to do?
Ok, so page 52 was apparently where i should been reading. What I actually find interesting reading through their posts is that both Snow and TH have been baddies with me before. They both have seen my more active baddie game. If i had teammates, i would have honestly prioritized this game more. Thats what i did with Clue. Go read it if you want to see my baddie game. I see phrases like this isnt like her or normal. But for what? My baddie game? My civvie game? Or for what it really is, that i was in 3 games early on, had internet going out, and a sick child and was fried and didnt really want to read pages on pages in a game i was so far behind in.Snow Dog wrote:omethingMetalmarsh89 wrote:Never mind Snow Dog, I reread your posts and you've been onto Hedge for awhile. I feel like I had suspected you for something but can't remember why.
Also thanks for getting my reference earlier.
I haven't been onto Hedge for a while in all honesty. But i reread her and something seems off. She isn't posting as much as usual and she isn't saying much either. Could be real life issues I guesss.
Turnip Head wrote: We need to lynch Pennsylvania Bitch.
Rico and I both brought it up recently as well...zeek wrote:Jackie picked me cause I asked.zeek wrote:Jackie's ability is something I'm not familair with. What exactly constitutes making someone insane? What do they have to do?
Read my posts. MM livret Dom before imprecation.
digenesis conglutination right, the timing is too convenient.Chris wrote:Why are you insistent that is the reason you were insanified?