MovingPictures07 wrote:I've seen game after game when no player ever gets called out for a random vote on D1. I however have seen multiple games on this site ALONE where someone who dares speak of low poster voting on D1 gets bandwagoned. I therefore hold a belief that intent to vote a randomizer is more suspicious than intent to vote a low poster.
Splints disagrees with me.
She thinks I'm bad.
Makes sense, right?
Quite often that bandwagon follows on Day Two when a quiet civ was lynched on Day One, though, is that not true? I think voting low posters is lazy, and doing the baddies job for them. So I always think it is bad. Although i try to grit my teeth when Llama does it becasue he always does it.
He continues to push that his belief is better then mine because its off this site alone that hasn't been around that long. I'm basing my beliefs off of what I know, not what he thinks is true.
I believe that MP is good, so I'm voting you.
I hope this isn't civ on civ, but I have a bad feeling about you this game.
Cool. Well while you won't get looked at for lynching a low poster, you might get looked at for lynching a civvie. so enjoy that
thellama73 wrote:Nine minutes to vote. Observations.
Alex is being Alex.
Rob is being quiet.
Juliets is being blendy (which is typical of her.)
Fingerslints is being confrontational (could be civ on civ, but makes me wonder.)
SVS is being slightly subdued.
I'm being confrontational because I'm just being told point blank that I am wrong and its rubbing me seriously the wrong way
Part of it is because that is the way Alex is. Part of it is because you are wrong.
I'm being aggressive because I believe it finds baddies.
I'm not trying to rub anyone the wrong way personally. It's just a game.
He continues to push that his belief is better then mine because its off this site alone that hasn't been around that long. I'm basing my beliefs off of what I know, not what he thinks is true.
I'm voting splints.
Of course my belief is better than yours, IMO, that's why I believe it. You trying to push me as bad because I disagree with you on randomizing is absolutely ridiculous.
"I'm basing my beliefs off of what I know, not what he thinks is true"?
Am I not doing the same thing?
Hypocritical. I think she had to find someone to vote for and knows how easy I am to get lynched.
He continues to push that his belief is better then mine because its off this site alone that hasn't been around that long. I'm basing my beliefs off of what I know, not what he thinks is true.
I'm voting splints.
Of course my belief is better than yours, IMO, that's why I believe it. You trying to push me as bad because I disagree with you on randomizing is absolutely ridiculous.
"I'm basing my beliefs off of what I know, not what he thinks is true"?
Am I not doing the same thing?
Hypocritical. I think she had to find someone to vote for and knows how easy I am to get lynched.
You're belief is better than mine? seriously?
Of course everything thinks their belief is better than others, or they wouldn't believe it.
Epignosis wrote:If llama is good, it means we exist in a universe in which multitasking llama can call out the first of two mafia while simultaneously calling out two civilians.
He continues to push that his belief is better then mine because its off this site alone that hasn't been around that long. I'm basing my beliefs off of what I know, not what he thinks is true.
I believe that MP is good, so I'm voting you.
I hope this isn't civ on civ, but I have a bad feeling about you this game.
I am not perfect at reading splints but tbh I think she is sounding genuine in her posts and so does MP - I believe it is in fact civ vs civ
I will not vote either even though MPs tone is a bit snarky
He continues to push that his belief is better then mine because its off this site alone that hasn't been around that long. I'm basing my beliefs off of what I know, not what he thinks is true.
I'm voting splints.
Of course my belief is better than yours, IMO, that's why I believe it. You trying to push me as bad because I disagree with you on randomizing is absolutely ridiculous.
"I'm basing my beliefs off of what I know, not what he thinks is true"?
Am I not doing the same thing?
Hypocritical. I think she had to find someone to vote for and knows how easy I am to get lynched.
You're belief is better than mine? seriously?
LOL, isn't that the very definition of why someone believes one set of explanations for a phenomenon over another? Because they believe it to be a more accurate description of reality, and therefore better?
For example, one chooses a certain religion over all of the others because one believes it is the best explanation that one is seeking.
I don't know why people are saying I seem snarky. I'm not intending it, so sorry. I'm just trying to play the game. I can't fathom why splints thinks I'm worthy of a vote just because we disagree over something. Obviously we've had different experiences. And obviously I believe I'm right or else I wouldn't feel the way I do about low posters and randomizers, and obviously she feels the same.
I would have never voted for her for believing that, but I voted for her for thinking that somehow it makes me bad in this game right here.
Epignosis wrote:If llama is good, it means we exist in a universe in which multitasking llama can call out the first of two mafia while simultaneously calling out two civilians.
If fingers turns out to be civ, then the votes tell us nothing...
If, on the other hand...
Epignosis wrote:If llama is good, it means we exist in a universe in which multitasking llama can call out the first of two mafia while simultaneously calling out two civilians.
MovingPictures07 wrote:I don't know why people are saying I seem snarky. I'm not intending it, so sorry. I'm just trying to play the game. I can't fathom why splints thinks I'm worthy of a vote just because we disagree over something. Obviously we've had different experiences. And obviously I believe I'm right or else I wouldn't feel the way I do about low posters and randomizers, and obviously she feels the same.
I would have never voted for her for believing that, but I voted for her for thinking that somehow it makes me bad in this game right here.
You could have just said "no u" and saved yourself a lot of time. Right? Essentially you suspected me for suspecting you.
MovingPictures07 wrote:I don't know why people are saying I seem snarky. I'm not intending it, so sorry. I'm just trying to play the game. I can't fathom why splints thinks I'm worthy of a vote just because we disagree over something. Obviously we've had different experiences. And obviously I believe I'm right or else I wouldn't feel the way I do about low posters and randomizers, and obviously she feels the same.
I would have never voted for her for believing that, but I voted for her for thinking that somehow it makes me bad in this game right here.
You could have just said "no u" and saved yourself a lot of time. Right? Essentially you suspected me for suspecting you.
RIP Made.
No, I did not just suspect you for suspecting me.
I suspect you for having NO game-related reason to suspect me.
I'm more fine with people suspecting me, even if it is incorrect, so long as seems genuine and misguided and is actually based on my behavior. Not on whether someone disagrees with me on a fundamental issue about mafia in general.
It suddenly got quieter in here. Gone to retreat into your BTSC cave, baddies? Hmmmm?
Epignosis wrote:If llama is good, it means we exist in a universe in which multitasking llama can call out the first of two mafia while simultaneously calling out two civilians.
I'm going back to my show. I'll still be around some but not like the first hour. I've had a really bad day and this is really a whole lot of drama I don't feel like dealing with. see you in a little while
fingersplints wrote:I'm going back to my show. I'll still be around some but not like the first hour. I've had a really bad day and this is really a whole lot of drama I don't feel like dealing with. see you in a little while
How is this drama? I don't understand.
Anyway, sorry you had a bad day, and I already apologized since apparently at least one person thinks I seem snarky, but you're reading something into my tone that isn't there.
MovingPictures07 wrote:I don't know why people are saying I seem snarky. I'm not intending it, so sorry. I'm just trying to play the game. I can't fathom why splints thinks I'm worthy of a vote just because we disagree over something. Obviously we've had different experiences. And obviously I believe I'm right or else I wouldn't feel the way I do about low posters and randomizers, and obviously she feels the same.
I would have never voted for her for believing that, but I voted for her for thinking that somehow it makes me bad in this game right here.
You could have just said "no u" and saved yourself a lot of time. Right? Essentially you suspected me for suspecting you.
RIP Made.
No, I did not just suspect you for suspecting me.
I suspect you for having NO game-related reason to suspect me.
I'm more fine with people suspecting me, even if it is incorrect, so long as seems genuine and misguided and is actually based on my behavior. Not on whether someone disagrees with me on a fundamental issue about mafia in general.
I did have a game related reason to suspect you. Just because you are refusing to acknowledge it doesn't mean it isnt there
fingersplints wrote:I'm going back to my show. I'll still be around some but not like the first hour. I've had a really bad day and this is really a whole lot of drama I don't feel like dealing with. see you in a little while
I really hate when people try to guilt us into not voting for them.
Epignosis wrote:If llama is good, it means we exist in a universe in which multitasking llama can call out the first of two mafia while simultaneously calling out two civilians.
thellama73 wrote:It suddenly got quieter in here. Gone to retreat into your BTSC cave, baddies? Hmmmm?
No. Chatzy's down.
Why do you know that?
Epignosis wrote:If llama is good, it means we exist in a universe in which multitasking llama can call out the first of two mafia while simultaneously calling out two civilians.
