The Syndicate

Spacedaisy wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 12:56 pm Not sure really, I would say tone and I don't see why a mafia would respond to you that way. This early in the game it would be a more understandable response to be cool about getting some suspicion.

I like this post from Daisy. I'd bump her up to Kyle's tier on my list for it.

All of them.

Why do you have so many folks colored at such an early juncture in the game?

Marmot wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 1:18 pm All of them.

Why do you have so many folks colored at such an early juncture in the game?

Because that's how a rainbow list works. Everyone gets a color.

Do you have any reads on any players?

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 1:03 pm [VOTE: sig] aubergine

No bad sloonie bad boy no treats for you.

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 12:36 pm Sig has 6 posts, but outside of an empty mudfling in my direction none of them have really contributed much.

It's day one, I don't have much to say.

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sat Feb 24, 2018 10:40 pm [VOTE: insertnamehere] aubergine

@sig what do you think of my vote?

I think it was odd, I don't see your case on INH and I'd rather not lynch him day 1. I also kind off agree most of the time day 1 is a shot in the dark.

I do like that Sloonie is posting and trying to get people talking, but as of right now I just don't think there's much to talk about. However, I'd put him down as a light civ read.

sig wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 1:52 pm I do like that Sloonie is posting and trying to get people talking, but as of right now I just don't think there's much to talk about. However, I'd put him down as a light civ read.

Got any non-civ reads?

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 1:54 pm

sig wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 1:52 pm I do like that Sloonie is posting and trying to get people talking, but as of right now I just don't think there's much to talk about. However, I'd put him down as a light civ read.

Got any non-civ reads?

Nope not yet.

Talk more about my case on INH.

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 2:08 pm Talk more about my case on INH.

Didn't you already basically admit that your case against me is an inherently-hollow trojan horse designed to stir up shit and get people talking?

Days 1 are kinda
hard to figure out. Now I'm
out of syllables.

Bloop bloop blooper
Blooper bloop bloop blooper blooper
Bloop bloop ninja bloop.

Ah crap, I already screwed up.

In terms of voting, I wouldn't be against going the Scotty route and voting for JoH. This is the Game of friggin' Champions. Champions, at the very least, show up.

insertnamehere wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 2:12 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 2:08 pm Talk more about my case on INH.

Didn't you already basically admit that your case against me is an inherently-hollow trojan horse designed to stir up shit and get people talking?

That question was specifically for sig.

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 2:20 pm

insertnamehere wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 2:12 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 2:08 pm Talk more about my case on INH.

Didn't you already basically admit that your case against me is an inherently-hollow trojan horse designed to stir up shit and get people talking?

That question was specifically for sig.

insertnamehere wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 2:22 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 2:20 pm

insertnamehere wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 2:12 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 2:08 pm Talk more about my case on INH.

Didn't you already basically admit that your case against me is an inherently-hollow trojan horse designed to stir up shit and get people talking?

That question was specifically for sig.

In light of your interpretation of my case on you, how do you feel about sig calling it "odd"?

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 2:31 pm

insertnamehere wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 2:22 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 2:20 pm

insertnamehere wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 2:12 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 2:08 pm Talk more about my case on INH.

Didn't you already basically admit that your case against me is an inherently-hollow trojan horse designed to stir up shit and get people talking?

That question was specifically for sig.

In light of your interpretation of my case on you, how do you feel about sig calling it "odd"?

I agree with sig's assessment, mainly due to my own interpretation of your case.

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 12:39 pm

Scotty wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 1:06 am In other news, I think jackofhearts is the only one not to check in yet. I know he’s hosting a game right now- I now know just how time consuming that is.

But I’m gonna vote for him right now to have a placeholder vote.

If he comes in, I’ll look to change it depending.

[VOTE: jackofhearts] aubergine

This is in line with what I remember of Scotty's meta. He votes for the closest thing he can find to an absentee on Day 1. Scum scotty could easily get by by replicating his ancient meta on his return to game action. It's an easy thing to do.

Meta aside, I have no idea what you actually think about me, as witnessed by your “yellow” on the rainbow list. -5 points to Hufflepuff.

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 12:46 pm A strong, definitive rainbow list:

Sloonei
Kylemii
DrWilgy
LoRab
Spacedaisy
Jackofhearts2005
Scotty
Boomslang
nijuukyugou
Marmot
sig
insertnamehere

Why is Kyle a definitive green for you? I don’t remember you talking about him before.

I’m sorry, I’m not really a yellow, just a sort of bilish leaf color.

Scotty wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 2:39 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 12:39 pm

Scotty wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 1:06 am In other news, I think jackofhearts is the only one not to check in yet. I know he’s hosting a game right now- I now know just how time consuming that is.

But I’m gonna vote for him right now to have a placeholder vote.

If he comes in, I’ll look to change it depending.

[VOTE: jackofhearts] aubergine

This is in line with what I remember of Scotty's meta. He votes for the closest thing he can find to an absentee on Day 1. Scum scotty could easily get by by replicating his ancient meta on his return to game action. It's an easy thing to do.

Meta aside, I have no idea what you actually think about me, as witnessed by your “yellow” on the rainbow list. -5 points to Hufflepuff.

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 12:46 pm A strong, definitive rainbow list:

Sloonei
Kylemii
DrWilgy
LoRab
Spacedaisy
Jackofhearts2005
Scotty
Boomslang
nijuukyugou
Marmot
sig
insertnamehere

Why is Kyle a definitive green for you? I don’t remember you talking about him before.

You are light green. Not yellow. Slight town read.

Kyle is my strongest town read because his handful of posts reflect kyle's trademark contemplative attitude.

sig wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 2:02 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 1:54 pm

sig wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 1:52 pm I do like that Sloonie is posting and trying to get people talking, but as of right now I just don't think there's much to talk about. However, I'd put him down as a light civ read.

Got any non-civ reads?

Nope not yet.

I would fathom to say that I feel like @sig now looks more blendy and shruggy than INH.

insertnamehere wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 2:35 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 2:31 pm

insertnamehere wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 2:22 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 2:20 pm

insertnamehere wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 2:12 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 2:08 pm Talk more about my case on INH.

Didn't you already basically admit that your case against me is an inherently-hollow trojan horse designed to stir up shit and get people talking?

That question was specifically for sig.

In light of your interpretation of my case on you, how do you feel about sig calling it "odd"?

I agree with sig's assessment, mainly due to my own interpretation of your case.

I think it is erroneous to label it as "odd". For both of you.

Scotty wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 2:44 pm

sig wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 2:02 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 1:54 pm

sig wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 1:52 pm I do like that Sloonie is posting and trying to get people talking, but as of right now I just don't think there's much to talk about. However, I'd put him down as a light civ read.

Got any non-civ reads?

Nope not yet.

I would fathom to say that I feel like @sig now looks more blendy and shruggy than INH.

Me too.

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 2:42 pm

Scotty wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 2:39 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 12:39 pm

Scotty wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 1:06 am In other news, I think jackofhearts is the only one not to check in yet. I know he’s hosting a game right now- I now know just how time consuming that is.

But I’m gonna vote for him right now to have a placeholder vote.

If he comes in, I’ll look to change it depending.

[VOTE: jackofhearts] aubergine

This is in line with what I remember of Scotty's meta. He votes for the closest thing he can find to an absentee on Day 1. Scum scotty could easily get by by replicating his ancient meta on his return to game action. It's an easy thing to do.

Meta aside, I have no idea what you actually think about me, as witnessed by your “yellow” on the rainbow list. -5 points to Hufflepuff.

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 12:46 pm A strong, definitive rainbow list:

Sloonei
Kylemii
DrWilgy
LoRab
Spacedaisy
Jackofhearts2005
Scotty
Boomslang
nijuukyugou
Marmot
sig
insertnamehere

Why is Kyle a definitive green for you? I don’t remember you talking about him before.

You are light green. Not yellow. Slight town read.

Kyle is my strongest town read because his handful of posts reflect kyle's trademark contemplative attitude.

So you’re saying he is exhibiting his meta and that’s trustworthy. But so am I? Why am I not forest green? I like the forest.

Sorry, not forest green, more like eco-friendly bioflourescent green

Because your meta reflection is only constituted in a vote that you cast, whereas Kyle's is manifested in the tone of his posts. So far.

Marmot wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 12:59 pm

Boomslang wrote: ↑Sat Feb 24, 2018 8:09 pm Checking in. Visiting with Blooper's parents, so will give this the attention it deserves tomorrow.

What sort of attention does a game of this magnitude with themes and roles and intricacies from the entire year leading up to this point deserve?

The sort of attention that begins with a read of the thread and a consideration of the mechanics. That leads me to like INH and dislike Sloonei right off the bat: INH is willing to entertain that we should reconsider Day 1 play because of the haiku, while Sloonei just wants to charge ahead with business as usual.

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sat Feb 24, 2018 12:49 am ]I don't care about who we may or may not be able to lynch. Today should be pursued just the same as any other Day 1. This is not something I will worry about today.

I also find Sloonei's attitude toward the button rather cavalier. If the button behaves the same way as in the original game and redistributes all roles, I would think the towniest approach would be to press it immediately, rather than at some random time later in the game. That way we remove the possibility of role shuffling early; if roles shuffle after we do a bunch of reading work, then all that progress gets cast aside.

Sloonei wrote: ↑Fri Feb 23, 2018 10:50 pm I was the original Button Pusher in CC-123. It redistributed all the roles in the game. Pushing the button is a good idea any time, anywhere. Push it real good.

Other than that, Scotty reads good to me based on general helpfulness and inquisitiveness. I gut like sig because his thoughts on the button and haiku posting agree with my own. Mildly concerned about G-man given his one post with no effort to either contribute or explain an absence.

I'm going to go ahead and say for the record — I sent in a haiku. Anyone else willing to make that claim?

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 2:53 pm Because your meta reflection is only constituted in a vote that you cast, whereas Kyle's is manifested in the tone of his posts. So far.

I’ll show you a tone.

Get off my lawn!!

How’s that?

[mention]Boomslang[/mention] G-man is not playing.

I'm also not sure what your comment about my attitude toward the button means. You express agreement with me that whoever has it should not hesitate to push it, but then you seem to criticize me for it. What gives?

And this game is business as usual for me, yeah. Some players may have built in immunity today. That shouldn't stand in the way of Day 1 scumhunting. I care about it very little as far as my approach to the game is concerned. I don't discourage conversation about it.

Scotty wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 2:56 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 2:53 pm Because your meta reflection is only constituted in a vote that you cast, whereas Kyle's is manifested in the tone of his posts. So far.

I’ll show you a tone.

Get off my lawn!!

How’s that?

This lawn is my lawn.

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 3:00 pm @Boomslang G-man is not playing.

I'm also not sure what your comment about my attitude toward the button means. You express agreement with me that whoever has it should not hesitate to push it, but then you seem to criticize me for it. What gives?

And this game is business as usual for me, yeah. Some players may have built in immunity today. That shouldn't stand in the way of Day 1 scumhunting. I care about it very little as far as my approach to the game is concerned. I don't discourage conversation about it.

Derp re: G-Man. Reading too much in the thread, didn't even register that he wasn't on the player list!

What I mean about the button is this: if we're going to press it, we should press it NOW to mitigate its impact on our reads. I interpreted you as saying that we could press it whenever and it wouldn't matter.

Nah, I was encouraging the button pusher to push it real good right now.

If I were the button, I would have pressed it when I logged in.


Maybe jack is the button?

G-Man wrote: ↑Sat Feb 24, 2018 8:11 pm GREETINGS EARTH PRIMATES
THIS SETUP AMUSES ME
HA-HA! HA! HA! HA!

Hello G-Man hi!
So happy to see you here,
Hope you will play soon.

nijuukyugou wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 2:13 pm Days 1 are kinda
hard to figure out. Now I'm
out of syllables.

Why are you posting
in haiku? Wasn't that for
before the game start?

Or are you just getting it in for good measure?

Day ends in like 2 hours.

I like my vote for jack.

Scotty wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 4:28 pm Day ends in like 2 hours.

I like my vote for jack.

But we have like 2 hours left. I'm not satisfied with any resolution we've come up with today.

Talk about sig some more. You thought he looked "blendy" earlier. What does that mean, and why is Jack a better vote than him?

sig wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 1:52 pm I do like that Sloonie is posting and trying to get people talking, but as of right now I just don't think there's much to talk about. However, I'd put him down as a light civ read.

What do you think will get people talking?

How about a real, sort of substantiated case?

sig wrote: ↑Fri Feb 23, 2018 11:51 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Fri Feb 23, 2018 11:15 pm

sig wrote: ↑Fri Feb 23, 2018 10:50 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Fri Feb 23, 2018 10:45 pm This tribe cannot win. We do not have JaggedJimmyJay, there's no use trying.

hmmmm a defeatist attitude you must be mafia.

Opportunistic reaching. Must be town.

sig appeared to be trying to initiate some gameplay, but this was where his prod of me led. Nothing really came out of this, so it feels like a hollow post.

sig wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 1:49 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 1:03 pm [VOTE: sig] aubergine

No bad sloonie bad boy no treats for you.

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 12:36 pm Sig has 6 posts, but outside of an empty mudfling in my direction none of them have really contributed much.

It's day one, I don't have much to say.

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sat Feb 24, 2018 10:40 pm [VOTE: insertnamehere] aubergine

@sig what do you think of my vote?

I think it was odd, I don't see your case on INH and I'd rather not lynch him day 1. I also kind off agree most of the time day 1 is a shot in the dark.

Slaps me on the wrist for voting him. Okay. Shrugs about the lack of content on Day 1. Okay. Calls my attempts to generate content "odd". This is where I raise my eyebrows at sig. we're in a game that is moving painfully slow. I'm trying to breathe some life into it, and when I tried to get sig involved he threw a tiny bit of shade for doing so. The rest of his answer amounts to another shrug. I don't love this post on its own, but it looks even worse in conjunction with this post:

sig wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 1:52 pm I do like that Sloonie is posting and trying to get people talking, but as of right now I just don't think there's much to talk about. However, I'd put him down as a light civ read.

Sig observes that I'm "trying to get people talking", despite having just critiqued my "case" as "odd" a minute earlier. what is odd about it? I'm clearly just trying to get you to talk, sig. If this is a good thing, and a thing you can recognize that I am doing, and which I have a reputation for doing, why did you also dismiss my first efforts as "odd"?

Day ends in an hour and a half and only 25% of the roster has voted.

INH snuck a vote in as I was making that post. 33%.

LoRab wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 4:07 pm

G-Man wrote: ↑Sat Feb 24, 2018 8:11 pm GREETINGS EARTH PRIMATES
THIS SETUP AMUSES ME
HA-HA! HA! HA! HA!

Hello G-Man hi!
So happy to see you here,
Hope you will play soon.

nijuukyugou wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 2:13 pm Days 1 are kinda
hard to figure out. Now I'm
out of syllables.

Why are you posting
in haiku? Wasn't that for
before the game start?

Or are you just getting it in for good measure?

Because haikus are fun (seriously, I do like them a lot)

Eh. Sloonei’s case against Sig seems to be based on him not eagerly complying with his tactics of instigation.

Went with Jack. C’mon dude, you gotta show up.

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 5:06 pm How about a real, sort of substantiated case?

sig wrote: ↑Fri Feb 23, 2018 11:51 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Fri Feb 23, 2018 11:15 pm

sig wrote: ↑Fri Feb 23, 2018 10:50 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Fri Feb 23, 2018 10:45 pm This tribe cannot win. We do not have JaggedJimmyJay, there's no use trying.

hmmmm a defeatist attitude you must be mafia.

Opportunistic reaching. Must be town.

sig appeared to be trying to initiate some gameplay, but this was where his prod of me led. Nothing really came out of this, so it feels like a hollow post.

sig wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 1:49 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 1:03 pm [VOTE: sig] aubergine

No bad sloonie bad boy no treats for you.

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 12:36 pm Sig has 6 posts, but outside of an empty mudfling in my direction none of them have really contributed much.

It's day one, I don't have much to say.

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sat Feb 24, 2018 10:40 pm [VOTE: insertnamehere] aubergine

@sig what do you think of my vote?

I think it was odd, I don't see your case on INH and I'd rather not lynch him day 1. I also kind off agree most of the time day 1 is a shot in the dark.

Slaps me on the wrist for voting him. Okay. Shrugs about the lack of content on Day 1. Okay. Calls my attempts to generate content "odd". This is where I raise my eyebrows at sig. we're in a game that is moving painfully slow. I'm trying to breathe some life into it, and when I tried to get sig involved he threw a tiny bit of shade for doing so. The rest of his answer amounts to another shrug. I don't love this post on its own, but it looks even worse in conjunction with this post:

sig wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 1:52 pm I do like that Sloonie is posting and trying to get people talking, but as of right now I just don't think there's much to talk about. However, I'd put him down as a light civ read.

Sig observes that I'm "trying to get people talking", despite having just critiqued my "case" as "odd" a minute earlier. what is odd about it? I'm clearly just trying to get you to talk, sig. If this is a good thing, and a thing you can recognize that I am doing, and which I have a reputation for doing, why did you also dismiss my first efforts as "odd"?

This is so full of switcheroo that it almost becomes a WIFOM post.

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 2:20 pm

insertnamehere wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 2:12 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 2:08 pm Talk more about my case on INH.

Didn't you already basically admit that your case against me is an inherently-hollow trojan horse designed to stir up shit and get people talking?

That question was specifically for sig.

I feel like it was a hollow trojan horse case designed to stir up shit and get people talking.

sig wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 5:27 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 2:20 pm

insertnamehere wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 2:12 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 2:08 pm Talk more about my case on INH.

Didn't you already basically admit that your case against me is an inherently-hollow trojan horse designed to stir up shit and get people talking?

That question was specifically for sig.

I feel like it was a hollow trojan horse case designed to stir up shit and get people talking.

why is that odd?

LoRab wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 5:25 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 5:06 pm How about a real, sort of substantiated case?

sig wrote: ↑Fri Feb 23, 2018 11:51 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Fri Feb 23, 2018 11:15 pm

sig wrote: ↑Fri Feb 23, 2018 10:50 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Fri Feb 23, 2018 10:45 pm This tribe cannot win. We do not have JaggedJimmyJay, there's no use trying.

hmmmm a defeatist attitude you must be mafia.

Opportunistic reaching. Must be town.

sig appeared to be trying to initiate some gameplay, but this was where his prod of me led. Nothing really came out of this, so it feels like a hollow post.

sig wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 1:49 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 1:03 pm [VOTE: sig] aubergine

No bad sloonie bad boy no treats for you.

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 12:36 pm Sig has 6 posts, but outside of an empty mudfling in my direction none of them have really contributed much.

It's day one, I don't have much to say.

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sat Feb 24, 2018 10:40 pm [VOTE: insertnamehere] aubergine

@sig what do you think of my vote?

I think it was odd, I don't see your case on INH and I'd rather not lynch him day 1. I also kind off agree most of the time day 1 is a shot in the dark.

Slaps me on the wrist for voting him. Okay. Shrugs about the lack of content on Day 1. Okay. Calls my attempts to generate content "odd". This is where I raise my eyebrows at sig. we're in a game that is moving painfully slow. I'm trying to breathe some life into it, and when I tried to get sig involved he threw a tiny bit of shade for doing so. The rest of his answer amounts to another shrug. I don't love this post on its own, but it looks even worse in conjunction with this post:

sig wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 1:52 pm I do like that Sloonie is posting and trying to get people talking, but as of right now I just don't think there's much to talk about. However, I'd put him down as a light civ read.

Sig observes that I'm "trying to get people talking", despite having just critiqued my "case" as "odd" a minute earlier. what is odd about it? I'm clearly just trying to get you to talk, sig. If this is a good thing, and a thing you can recognize that I am doing, and which I have a reputation for doing, why did you also dismiss my first efforts as "odd"?

This is so full of switcheroo that it almost becomes a WIFOM post.

I don't know what this means.

Marmot wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 4:46 pm

sig wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 1:52 pm I do like that Sloonie is posting and trying to get people talking, but as of right now I just don't think there's much to talk about. However, I'd put him down as a light civ read.

What do you think will get people talking?

Somebody could offer to like idk strip?

Scotty wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 2:44 pm

sig wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 2:02 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 1:54 pm

sig wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 1:52 pm I do like that Sloonie is posting and trying to get people talking, but as of right now I just don't think there's much to talk about. However, I'd put him down as a light civ read.

Got any non-civ reads?

Nope not yet.

I would fathom to say that I feel like @sig now looks more blendy and shruggy than INH.

Your case on me is odd.

I didn't think the INH thing has good backing it was odd, weird, strange bizarre, ect. Nothing else to really say on it. I do like that you're talking I just didn't like your case.

[VOTE: Sig] aubergine

I'm bored, lets tie it.

Plus I'm about 70% sure I submitted a haiku and it's very disappointing nobody followed up and answered when I asked if they did.