The Syndicate

DFaraday wrote: ↑Fri Jun 30, 2017 10:33 pm Oh wow. Good job, Sprit voters!

Quin wrote: ↑Thu Jul 06, 2017 9:17 pm

Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Thu Jul 06, 2017 9:15 pm

boo wrote: ↑Thu Jul 06, 2017 9:00 pm Okay, so people are still being bullheaded, so I'll just dump it. DF took his best shot and failed now anyways (suck it), so I'll make it as clear as I can:

At the time Eloh was lynched, there were two possibilities. She had a type of role (almost definitely civ, occasionally indie) that she loves, and often has in Epi games, or Tink has it and had targeted Eloh early on. I believe anyone who has played with Eloh in such a game where she had a role like that would know what was going on. I am certain DF fits the bill there. And he voted for her. He's bad. He voted for her and risked that 1) because it was a reasonable risk, lots of people wouldn't know this I imagine, 2) people who do know it don't like to bring up this style of meta-ness, 3) people who do know it are people who he wanted to NK anyways, so he got rid of them.

La was also part of that tink/Eloh group of people tink targeted. My best guess is, given the numbers, she had 1 other use and that person is already dead. Probably NKed early on. I think the reason tink has gone mia is a lack of interest given people she trusted are all dead. And maybe another possibility, but that's not important.

Anyways, la wanted to lynch DF because she knew it. I've picked it up.

As for teammates. Wilgy and quin are my top two choices. But I still want to lynch DF first, because I'm confident about him.

You honor your avatar, sir.

I feel like I've become obsolete with him around.

Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Thu Jul 06, 2017 9:18 pm

DFaraday wrote: ↑Fri Jun 30, 2017 10:33 pm Oh wow. Good job, Sprit voters!

This is the first time DF mentions spirit in the game.

DFaraday wrote: ↑Sun Jun 25, 2017 4:02 pm

G-Man wrote: ↑Sun Jun 25, 2017 3:26 pm I'm not fine with putting such a strategy together based solely on one person's preferences. If Jack wants a list, let's all submit five or six names and select the ones that appear the most. If the plan can indeed thumb the scale in our favor, then it's too important to be nonchalant about picking names.

I agree. I don't even know some of the people on Jack's list. Although I'm really not crazy about this plan, since there's every chance we could end up empowering one or more baddies, who then will immediately take out their fellow power roles. Furthermore, if Mew/Mewtwo are part of the Oceanic Six, we'll spend the game funneling points into a black hole.

I think it might be more effective to allot points this round to a group of six, as suggested, then rotate on future rounds so that other players can get powers. Granted, this strategy pretty much ensures giving Mafia powers, but it would also keep an array of civvie powers in play even if Mafia start NKing power roles.

DFaraday wrote: ↑Wed Jun 28, 2017 2:01 pm

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Jun 28, 2017 12:08 pm RIP. Chrome ate my post. Time to retype.

Right now, I have tonal pings from both DDL and Boo though I'm unsure the direct cause. I don't think Boo is on a team with Hazelnut. I want to see where the Boo suspicion goes and see thier thoughts on having the vote lead.

I'd say put both DF and Timmer on the chopping block again for their shitty votes last cycle. Timmer's vote now has high momentum. He and Boo are probably not on a team.

Anyone wanna tie Mac and Dom, and have them fight to the death as they aren't here lol? Also now that I have some hindsight, it kinda sucks that TSP died right as he entered the game. Probably should have saved him rgardless of the alignment. Oh well, wasn't here.

Sorry, you've made me one of your top suspects because I voted for a (at the time) no-show, then in the same post propose trying to get the other no-shows out?

I'm of the belief that when it comes to voting for someone I have no suspicion of and someone who is contributing nothing to the game, voting the latter is the better option. On Day 1 I didn't have any suspicions, so I would be forcing any reason I had to vote someone.

I'm not liking Boo's Timmer vote. It feels NO U-y, and doesn't make sense coming right after his campaign against LC and Nutella. I'll go ahead and vote Boo for now.

DFaraday wrote: ↑Fri Jun 30, 2017 9:50 pm I would be fine with voting Tink or Dom, as they haven't contributed as of yet. If Dys doesn't offer something again soon, I'd say get her out as well. Eloh at least has, although I think it's bizarre that she keeps insisting that Tink is good, when I don't see how she could know that so early in the game.

Quin wrote: ↑Thu Jul 06, 2017 9:35 pm

DFaraday wrote: ↑Wed Jun 28, 2017 2:01 pm

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Jun 28, 2017 12:08 pm RIP. Chrome ate my post. Time to retype.

Right now, I have tonal pings from both DDL and Boo though I'm unsure the direct cause. I don't think Boo is on a team with Hazelnut. I want to see where the Boo suspicion goes and see thier thoughts on having the vote lead.

I'd say put both DF and Timmer on the chopping block again for their shitty votes last cycle. Timmer's vote now has high momentum. He and Boo are probably not on a team.

Anyone wanna tie Mac and Dom, and have them fight to the death as they aren't here lol? Also now that I have some hindsight, it kinda sucks that TSP died right as he entered the game. Probably should have saved him rgardless of the alignment. Oh well, wasn't here.

Sorry, you've made me one of your top suspects because I voted for a (at the time) no-show, then in the same post propose trying to get the other no-shows out?

I'm of the belief that when it comes to voting for someone I have no suspicion of and someone who is contributing nothing to the game, voting the latter is the better option. On Day 1 I didn't have any suspicions, so I would be forcing any reason I had to vote someone.

I'm not liking Boo's Timmer vote. It feels NO U-y, and doesn't make sense coming right after his campaign against LC and Nutella. I'll go ahead and vote Boo for now.

DFaraday wrote: ↑Fri Jun 30, 2017 9:50 pm I would be fine with voting Tink or Dom, as they haven't contributed as of yet. If Dys doesn't offer something again soon, I'd say get her out as well. Eloh at least has, although I think it's bizarre that she keeps insisting that Tink is good, when I don't see how she could know that so early in the game.

DFaraday would rather vote a no-show over someone he doesn't suspect. That's fine, but it should also mean that he'd rather vote someone he suspects over a no show. Yet here he is on Day 3 supporting lynches for no-shows when he's got a suspect in boo. He voted him yesterday. Now he's not a consideration. Why?

Quin wrote: ↑Thu Jul 06, 2017 9:35 pm

DFaraday wrote: ↑Wed Jun 28, 2017 2:01 pm

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Jun 28, 2017 12:08 pm RIP. Chrome ate my post. Time to retype.

Right now, I have tonal pings from both DDL and Boo though I'm unsure the direct cause. I don't think Boo is on a team with Hazelnut. I want to see where the Boo suspicion goes and see thier thoughts on having the vote lead.

I'd say put both DF and Timmer on the chopping block again for their shitty votes last cycle. Timmer's vote now has high momentum. He and Boo are probably not on a team.

Anyone wanna tie Mac and Dom, and have them fight to the death as they aren't here lol? Also now that I have some hindsight, it kinda sucks that TSP died right as he entered the game. Probably should have saved him rgardless of the alignment. Oh well, wasn't here.

Sorry, you've made me one of your top suspects because I voted for a (at the time) no-show, then in the same post propose trying to get the other no-shows out?

I'm of the belief that when it comes to voting for someone I have no suspicion of and someone who is contributing nothing to the game, voting the latter is the better option. On Day 1 I didn't have any suspicions, so I would be forcing any reason I had to vote someone.

I'm not liking Boo's Timmer vote. It feels NO U-y, and doesn't make sense coming right after his campaign against LC and Nutella. I'll go ahead and vote Boo for now.

DFaraday wrote: ↑Fri Jun 30, 2017 9:50 pm I would be fine with voting Tink or Dom, as they haven't contributed as of yet. If Dys doesn't offer something again soon, I'd say get her out as well. Eloh at least has, although I think it's bizarre that she keeps insisting that Tink is good, when I don't see how she could know that so early in the game.

DFaraday would rather vote a no-show over someone he doesn't suspect. That's fine, but it should also mean that he'd rather vote someone he suspects over a no show. Yet here he is on Day 3 supporting lynches for no-shows when he's got a suspect in boo. He voted him yesterday. Now he's not a consideration. Why?

DFaraday wrote: ↑Thu Jul 06, 2017 9:55 pm

Quin wrote: ↑Thu Jul 06, 2017 9:35 pm

DFaraday wrote: ↑Wed Jun 28, 2017 2:01 pm

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Jun 28, 2017 12:08 pm RIP. Chrome ate my post. Time to retype.

Right now, I have tonal pings from both DDL and Boo though I'm unsure the direct cause. I don't think Boo is on a team with Hazelnut. I want to see where the Boo suspicion goes and see thier thoughts on having the vote lead.

I'd say put both DF and Timmer on the chopping block again for their shitty votes last cycle. Timmer's vote now has high momentum. He and Boo are probably not on a team.

Anyone wanna tie Mac and Dom, and have them fight to the death as they aren't here lol? Also now that I have some hindsight, it kinda sucks that TSP died right as he entered the game. Probably should have saved him rgardless of the alignment. Oh well, wasn't here.

Sorry, you've made me one of your top suspects because I voted for a (at the time) no-show, then in the same post propose trying to get the other no-shows out?

I'm of the belief that when it comes to voting for someone I have no suspicion of and someone who is contributing nothing to the game, voting the latter is the better option. On Day 1 I didn't have any suspicions, so I would be forcing any reason I had to vote someone.

I'm not liking Boo's Timmer vote. It feels NO U-y, and doesn't make sense coming right after his campaign against LC and Nutella. I'll go ahead and vote Boo for now.

DFaraday wrote: ↑Fri Jun 30, 2017 9:50 pm I would be fine with voting Tink or Dom, as they haven't contributed as of yet. If Dys doesn't offer something again soon, I'd say get her out as well. Eloh at least has, although I think it's bizarre that she keeps insisting that Tink is good, when I don't see how she could know that so early in the game.

DFaraday would rather vote a no-show over someone he doesn't suspect. That's fine, but it should also mean that he'd rather vote someone he suspects over a no show. Yet here he is on Day 3 supporting lynches for no-shows when he's got a suspect in boo. He voted him yesterday. Now he's not a consideration. Why?

Because I'm not consistent? Most people aren't.

I know Boo can't go into do much detail for fear of role outing and such, but I really don't know what exactly it is he thinks I know. Since Eloh was confident of Tink from Day 1, I figured her being bad was the most likely way she'd know a civ alignment.

I was going to vote Boo for leading a lynch on me, then realized I still have a potential chance, so I'm sticking with Wilgy.

Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Thu Jul 06, 2017 9:23 pm I think I'm gonna vote DF for that, for the fact I'm having a hard time reading his intentons (which scares me), and because I'm curious. Also because I want Boo to shut up about him.

votes DF

DFaraday wrote: ↑Thu Jul 06, 2017 9:58 pm

Quin wrote: ↑Thu Jul 06, 2017 9:35 pm

DFaraday wrote: ↑Wed Jun 28, 2017 2:01 pm

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Jun 28, 2017 12:08 pm RIP. Chrome ate my post. Time to retype.

Right now, I have tonal pings from both DDL and Boo though I'm unsure the direct cause. I don't think Boo is on a team with Hazelnut. I want to see where the Boo suspicion goes and see thier thoughts on having the vote lead.

I'd say put both DF and Timmer on the chopping block again for their shitty votes last cycle. Timmer's vote now has high momentum. He and Boo are probably not on a team.

Anyone wanna tie Mac and Dom, and have them fight to the death as they aren't here lol? Also now that I have some hindsight, it kinda sucks that TSP died right as he entered the game. Probably should have saved him rgardless of the alignment. Oh well, wasn't here.

Sorry, you've made me one of your top suspects because I voted for a (at the time) no-show, then in the same post propose trying to get the other no-shows out?

I'm of the belief that when it comes to voting for someone I have no suspicion of and someone who is contributing nothing to the game, voting the latter is the better option. On Day 1 I didn't have any suspicions, so I would be forcing any reason I had to vote someone.

I'm not liking Boo's Timmer vote. It feels NO U-y, and doesn't make sense coming right after his campaign against LC and Nutella. I'll go ahead and vote Boo for now.

DFaraday wrote: ↑Fri Jun 30, 2017 9:50 pm I would be fine with voting Tink or Dom, as they haven't contributed as of yet. If Dys doesn't offer something again soon, I'd say get her out as well. Eloh at least has, although I think it's bizarre that she keeps insisting that Tink is good, when I don't see how she could know that so early in the game.

DFaraday would rather vote a no-show over someone he doesn't suspect. That's fine, but it should also mean that he'd rather vote someone he suspects over a no show. Yet here he is on Day 3 supporting lynches for no-shows when he's got a suspect in boo. He voted him yesterday. Now he's not a consideration. Why?

Also, your logic doesn't quite track. I might be okay with lynching no-shows over people I do suspect, especially when my suspects aren't likely to be up for lynching again.

Quin wrote: ↑Thu Jul 06, 2017 9:59 pm

DFaraday wrote: ↑Thu Jul 06, 2017 9:55 pm

Quin wrote: ↑Thu Jul 06, 2017 9:35 pm

DFaraday wrote: ↑Wed Jun 28, 2017 2:01 pm

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Jun 28, 2017 12:08 pm RIP. Chrome ate my post. Time to retype.

Right now, I have tonal pings from both DDL and Boo though I'm unsure the direct cause. I don't think Boo is on a team with Hazelnut. I want to see where the Boo suspicion goes and see thier thoughts on having the vote lead.

I'd say put both DF and Timmer on the chopping block again for their shitty votes last cycle. Timmer's vote now has high momentum. He and Boo are probably not on a team.

Anyone wanna tie Mac and Dom, and have them fight to the death as they aren't here lol? Also now that I have some hindsight, it kinda sucks that TSP died right as he entered the game. Probably should have saved him rgardless of the alignment. Oh well, wasn't here.

Sorry, you've made me one of your top suspects because I voted for a (at the time) no-show, then in the same post propose trying to get the other no-shows out?

I'm of the belief that when it comes to voting for someone I have no suspicion of and someone who is contributing nothing to the game, voting the latter is the better option. On Day 1 I didn't have any suspicions, so I would be forcing any reason I had to vote someone.

I'm not liking Boo's Timmer vote. It feels NO U-y, and doesn't make sense coming right after his campaign against LC and Nutella. I'll go ahead and vote Boo for now.

DFaraday wrote: ↑Fri Jun 30, 2017 9:50 pm I would be fine with voting Tink or Dom, as they haven't contributed as of yet. If Dys doesn't offer something again soon, I'd say get her out as well. Eloh at least has, although I think it's bizarre that she keeps insisting that Tink is good, when I don't see how she could know that so early in the game.

DFaraday would rather vote a no-show over someone he doesn't suspect. That's fine, but it should also mean that he'd rather vote someone he suspects over a no show. Yet here he is on Day 3 supporting lynches for no-shows when he's got a suspect in boo. He voted him yesterday. Now he's not a consideration. Why?

Because I'm not consistent? Most people aren't.

I know Boo can't go into do much detail for fear of role outing and such, but I really don't know what exactly it is he thinks I know. Since Eloh was confident of Tink from Day 1, I figured her being bad was the most likely way she'd know a civ alignment.

I was going to vote Boo for leading a lynch on me, then realized I still have a potential chance, so I'm sticking with Wilgy.

But what happened that moved boo from earning your vote to entertaining no-posters as an option again?

DFaraday wrote: ↑Thu Jul 06, 2017 10:07 pm

Quin wrote: ↑Thu Jul 06, 2017 9:59 pm

DFaraday wrote: ↑Thu Jul 06, 2017 9:55 pm

Quin wrote: ↑Thu Jul 06, 2017 9:35 pm

DFaraday wrote: ↑Wed Jun 28, 2017 2:01 pm

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Jun 28, 2017 12:08 pm RIP. Chrome ate my post. Time to retype.

Right now, I have tonal pings from both DDL and Boo though I'm unsure the direct cause. I don't think Boo is on a team with Hazelnut. I want to see where the Boo suspicion goes and see thier thoughts on having the vote lead.

I'd say put both DF and Timmer on the chopping block again for their shitty votes last cycle. Timmer's vote now has high momentum. He and Boo are probably not on a team.

Anyone wanna tie Mac and Dom, and have them fight to the death as they aren't here lol? Also now that I have some hindsight, it kinda sucks that TSP died right as he entered the game. Probably should have saved him rgardless of the alignment. Oh well, wasn't here.

Sorry, you've made me one of your top suspects because I voted for a (at the time) no-show, then in the same post propose trying to get the other no-shows out?

I'm of the belief that when it comes to voting for someone I have no suspicion of and someone who is contributing nothing to the game, voting the latter is the better option. On Day 1 I didn't have any suspicions, so I would be forcing any reason I had to vote someone.

I'm not liking Boo's Timmer vote. It feels NO U-y, and doesn't make sense coming right after his campaign against LC and Nutella. I'll go ahead and vote Boo for now.

DFaraday wrote: ↑Fri Jun 30, 2017 9:50 pm I would be fine with voting Tink or Dom, as they haven't contributed as of yet. If Dys doesn't offer something again soon, I'd say get her out as well. Eloh at least has, although I think it's bizarre that she keeps insisting that Tink is good, when I don't see how she could know that so early in the game.

DFaraday would rather vote a no-show over someone he doesn't suspect. That's fine, but it should also mean that he'd rather vote someone he suspects over a no show. Yet here he is on Day 3 supporting lynches for no-shows when he's got a suspect in boo. He voted him yesterday. Now he's not a consideration. Why?

Because I'm not consistent? Most people aren't.

I know Boo can't go into do much detail for fear of role outing and such, but I really don't know what exactly it is he thinks I know. Since Eloh was confident of Tink from Day 1, I figured her being bad was the most likely way she'd know a civ alignment.

I was going to vote Boo for leading a lynch on me, then realized I still have a potential chance, so I'm sticking with Wilgy.

But what happened that moved boo from earning your vote to entertaining no-posters as an option again?

His Day 3 posts felt pretty sincere and tracked with what he'd said previously. I thought he jumped from his LC suspicion onto Timmer too easily, which made me suspect him, but he explained where he was at after that lynch and it made me feel a bit better about him. Lately he's really got me convinced he's civ, even though he's going after me.

Quin wrote: ↑Thu Jul 06, 2017 10:10 pm

DFaraday wrote: ↑Thu Jul 06, 2017 10:07 pm

Quin wrote: ↑Thu Jul 06, 2017 9:59 pm

DFaraday wrote: ↑Thu Jul 06, 2017 9:55 pm

Quin wrote: ↑Thu Jul 06, 2017 9:35 pm

DFaraday wrote: ↑Wed Jun 28, 2017 2:01 pm

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Jun 28, 2017 12:08 pm RIP. Chrome ate my post. Time to retype.

Right now, I have tonal pings from both DDL and Boo though I'm unsure the direct cause. I don't think Boo is on a team with Hazelnut. I want to see where the Boo suspicion goes and see thier thoughts on having the vote lead.

I'd say put both DF and Timmer on the chopping block again for their shitty votes last cycle. Timmer's vote now has high momentum. He and Boo are probably not on a team.

Anyone wanna tie Mac and Dom, and have them fight to the death as they aren't here lol? Also now that I have some hindsight, it kinda sucks that TSP died right as he entered the game. Probably should have saved him rgardless of the alignment. Oh well, wasn't here.

Sorry, you've made me one of your top suspects because I voted for a (at the time) no-show, then in the same post propose trying to get the other no-shows out?

I'm of the belief that when it comes to voting for someone I have no suspicion of and someone who is contributing nothing to the game, voting the latter is the better option. On Day 1 I didn't have any suspicions, so I would be forcing any reason I had to vote someone.

I'm not liking Boo's Timmer vote. It feels NO U-y, and doesn't make sense coming right after his campaign against LC and Nutella. I'll go ahead and vote Boo for now.

DFaraday wrote: ↑Fri Jun 30, 2017 9:50 pm I would be fine with voting Tink or Dom, as they haven't contributed as of yet. If Dys doesn't offer something again soon, I'd say get her out as well. Eloh at least has, although I think it's bizarre that she keeps insisting that Tink is good, when I don't see how she could know that so early in the game.

DFaraday would rather vote a no-show over someone he doesn't suspect. That's fine, but it should also mean that he'd rather vote someone he suspects over a no show. Yet here he is on Day 3 supporting lynches for no-shows when he's got a suspect in boo. He voted him yesterday. Now he's not a consideration. Why?

Because I'm not consistent? Most people aren't.

I know Boo can't go into do much detail for fear of role outing and such, but I really don't know what exactly it is he thinks I know. Since Eloh was confident of Tink from Day 1, I figured her being bad was the most likely way she'd know a civ alignment.

I was going to vote Boo for leading a lynch on me, then realized I still have a potential chance, so I'm sticking with Wilgy.

But what happened that moved boo from earning your vote to entertaining no-posters as an option again?

His Day 3 posts felt pretty sincere and tracked with what he'd said previously. I thought he jumped from his LC suspicion onto Timmer too easily, which made me suspect him, but he explained where he was at after that lynch and it made me feel a bit better about him. Lately he's really got me convinced he's civ, even though he's going after me.

But you just said you were thinking of voting boo for leading a lynch on you

DFaraday wrote: ↑Thu Jul 06, 2017 10:11 pm

Quin wrote: ↑Thu Jul 06, 2017 10:10 pm

DFaraday wrote: ↑Thu Jul 06, 2017 10:07 pm

Quin wrote: ↑Thu Jul 06, 2017 9:59 pm

DFaraday wrote: ↑Thu Jul 06, 2017 9:55 pm

Quin wrote: ↑Thu Jul 06, 2017 9:35 pm

DFaraday wrote: ↑Wed Jun 28, 2017 2:01 pm

Sorry, you've made me one of your top suspects because I voted for a (at the time) no-show, then in the same post propose trying to get the other no-shows out?

I'm of the belief that when it comes to voting for someone I have no suspicion of and someone who is contributing nothing to the game, voting the latter is the better option. On Day 1 I didn't have any suspicions, so I would be forcing any reason I had to vote someone.

I'm not liking Boo's Timmer vote. It feels NO U-y, and doesn't make sense coming right after his campaign against LC and Nutella. I'll go ahead and vote Boo for now.

DFaraday wrote: ↑Fri Jun 30, 2017 9:50 pm I would be fine with voting Tink or Dom, as they haven't contributed as of yet. If Dys doesn't offer something again soon, I'd say get her out as well. Eloh at least has, although I think it's bizarre that she keeps insisting that Tink is good, when I don't see how she could know that so early in the game.

DFaraday would rather vote a no-show over someone he doesn't suspect. That's fine, but it should also mean that he'd rather vote someone he suspects over a no show. Yet here he is on Day 3 supporting lynches for no-shows when he's got a suspect in boo. He voted him yesterday. Now he's not a consideration. Why?

Because I'm not consistent? Most people aren't.

I know Boo can't go into do much detail for fear of role outing and such, but I really don't know what exactly it is he thinks I know. Since Eloh was confident of Tink from Day 1, I figured her being bad was the most likely way she'd know a civ alignment.

I was going to vote Boo for leading a lynch on me, then realized I still have a potential chance, so I'm sticking with Wilgy.

But what happened that moved boo from earning your vote to entertaining no-posters as an option again?

His Day 3 posts felt pretty sincere and tracked with what he'd said previously. I thought he jumped from his LC suspicion onto Timmer too easily, which made me suspect him, but he explained where he was at after that lynch and it made me feel a bit better about him. Lately he's really got me convinced he's civ, even though he's going after me.

But you just said you were thinking of voting boo for leading a lynch on you

I don't suspect him, I just thought my lynch was a done deal and would give a throwaway vote. Then I realized that the numbers could still swing my way, and voted someone I actually suspect.

G-Man wrote: ↑Thu Jul 06, 2017 8:25 pmLinki: I'm beginning to get weirded out by Wilgy's game-long desire to eliminate inactives. It's almost nakedly opportunistic, which provides WIFOM.

boo wrote: ↑Thu Jul 06, 2017 9:00 pm Okay, so people are still being bullheaded, so I'll just dump it. DF took his best shot and failed now anyways (suck it), so I'll make it as clear as I can:

At the time Eloh was lynched, there were two possibilities. She had a type of role (almost definitely civ, occasionally indie) that she loves, and often has in Epi games, or Tink has it and had targeted Eloh early on. I believe anyone who has played with Eloh in such a game where she had a role like that would know what was going on. I am certain DF fits the bill there. And he voted for her. He's bad. He voted for her and risked that 1) because it was a reasonable risk, lots of people wouldn't know this I imagine, 2) people who do know it don't like to bring up this style of meta-ness, 3) people who do know it are people who he wanted to NK anyways, so he got rid of them.

La was also part of that tink/Eloh group of people tink targeted. My best guess is, given the numbers, she had 1 other use and that person is already dead. Probably NKed early on. I think the reason tink has gone mia is a lack of interest given people she trusted are all dead. And maybe another possibility, but that's not important.

Anyways, la wanted to lynch DF because she knew it. I've picked it up.

As for teammates. Wilgy and quin are my top two choices. But I still want to lynch DF first, because I'm confident about him.

Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Thu Jul 06, 2017 9:18 pm

DFaraday wrote: ↑Fri Jun 30, 2017 10:33 pm Oh wow. Good job, Sprit voters!

This is the first time DF mentions spirit in the game.

Quin wrote: ↑Thu Jul 06, 2017 10:17 pm

DFaraday wrote: ↑Thu Jul 06, 2017 10:11 pm

Quin wrote: ↑Thu Jul 06, 2017 10:10 pm

DFaraday wrote: ↑Thu Jul 06, 2017 10:07 pm

Quin wrote: ↑Thu Jul 06, 2017 9:59 pm

DFaraday wrote: ↑Thu Jul 06, 2017 9:55 pm

Quin wrote: ↑Thu Jul 06, 2017 9:35 pm



DFaraday would rather vote a no-show over someone he doesn't suspect. That's fine, but it should also mean that he'd rather vote someone he suspects over a no show. Yet here he is on Day 3 supporting lynches for no-shows when he's got a suspect in boo. He voted him yesterday. Now he's not a consideration. Why?

Because I'm not consistent? Most people aren't.

I know Boo can't go into do much detail for fear of role outing and such, but I really don't know what exactly it is he thinks I know. Since Eloh was confident of Tink from Day 1, I figured her being bad was the most likely way she'd know a civ alignment.

I was going to vote Boo for leading a lynch on me, then realized I still have a potential chance, so I'm sticking with Wilgy.

But what happened that moved boo from earning your vote to entertaining no-posters as an option again?

His Day 3 posts felt pretty sincere and tracked with what he'd said previously. I thought he jumped from his LC suspicion onto Timmer too easily, which made me suspect him, but he explained where he was at after that lynch and it made me feel a bit better about him. Lately he's really got me convinced he's civ, even though he's going after me.

But you just said you were thinking of voting boo for leading a lynch on you

I don't suspect him, I just thought my lynch was a done deal and would give a throwaway vote. Then I realized that the numbers could still swing my way, and voted someone I actually suspect.

Why would you not at least put a throwaway on someone you suspect? I am aware you did that in the end with Wilgy, but that vote wasn't a throwaway. The purpose of it being a throwaway specifically is important to me.

DFaraday wrote: ↑Wed Jul 05, 2017 10:53 pm We've been getting kills every night up until now though. I guess Tink could have been sending kills up to this point, but it doesn't seem likely to me.

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Thu Jul 06, 2017 10:38 pm Just skimmed through DF, and DDL is right regarding him never interacting with Sprityo.

Is this a slip?

DFaraday wrote: ↑Wed Jul 05, 2017 10:53 pm We've been getting kills every night up until now though. I guess Tink could have been sending kills up to this point, but it doesn't seem likely to me.

Quin wrote: ↑Thu Jul 06, 2017 8:07 pm

MacDougall wrote: ↑Thu Jul 06, 2017 3:29 am I think most likely scenario is a miss. Possibly whoever is Mew has a protection ability of some kind.

It could be a miss, but everyone but Tink and Dizzy were around Night 6, so it's unlikely. Correct me if I'm wrong, but Tink and Dizzy can't both be bad if this is the case, because they've both been gone for ages and night kills kept coming in after sprityo died. If it's a miss then someone posted but forgot to send in their night action.

It's very likely not an intentional miss to make us look at absentees, because again, everyone (bar the two) were here.

G-Man wrote: ↑Thu Jul 06, 2017 8:39 pm I think it was Nutella's overreaction to Boo's misinterpretation that conflated their spat and made Boo an easy target. Neither one wanted to back down, so it just got worse for both of them. Boo was taking it too far, which is why he drew the vote fire.

Quin wrote: ↑Thu Jul 06, 2017 9:25 pm It reads way OTT. I strongly believe exclamation marks are among the most disingenuous of punctuations.

It's also a pretty classic example of feeling the need to say something.

DFaraday wrote: ↑Thu Jul 06, 2017 10:40 pm

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Thu Jul 06, 2017 10:38 pm Just skimmed through DF, and DDL is right regarding him never interacting with Sprityo.

Is this a slip?

DFaraday wrote: ↑Wed Jul 05, 2017 10:53 pm We've been getting kills every night up until now though. I guess Tink could have been sending kills up to this point, but it doesn't seem likely to me.

If I were bad, wouldn't I say "we've been sending kills"?

Seriously, don't lynch me.

boo wrote: ↑Fri Jul 07, 2017 9:44 am It's based on stuff. And some things. If I was gunning for you yet, you'd know why. Till then, I'll hold onto it.

I've said my piece on what I have to say about Eloh and tink and la and why it all comes together for why DF needs to go.

His survival hasn't changed my mind, I would like to try again. A fully evolved baddie surviving a lynch wouldn't surprise me at all.

Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Fri Jul 07, 2017 9:40 am Guys

Vote me plz

Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Fri Jul 07, 2017 9:49 amOr we have a civ governor who made a terrible decision.

boo wrote: ↑Fri Jul 07, 2017 11:29 am He knew he was going to survive, it wasn't a pardon.

DFaraday wrote: ↑Thu Jul 06, 2017 10:14 pm Also, I hate to say it, but if people are insistent on trying to lynch me, I really need to let you know that you're wasting your time. It won't be a good civ outcome if I'm up for lynching.

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Fri Jul 07, 2017 11:26 am

Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Fri Jul 07, 2017 9:40 am Guys

Vote me plz

Y tho?

Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Fri Jul 07, 2017 9:49 amOr we have a civ governor who made a terrible decision.

Explain.

Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Fri Jul 07, 2017 11:41 am

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Fri Jul 07, 2017 11:26 am

Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Fri Jul 07, 2017 9:40 am Guys

Vote me plz

Y tho?

Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Fri Jul 07, 2017 9:49 amOr we have a civ governor who made a terrible decision.

Explain.

Because I want to evolve.

Because we learned nothing and gave mafia an extra night kill.

Neverwhere wrote: ↑Wed Jul 05, 2017 6:07 pm Reading back over my own posts, I'm inclined to side with boo and say I'd be interested in a DFaraday lynch. I remember reading back through Sprityos posts Mac and DFaraday stood out as people sprit was possibly defensive of.

Quin wrote: ↑Fri Jul 07, 2017 4:26 pm It is also possible that DFaraday is either town or Mewtwo and also absorbed the night kill last night.

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Fri Jul 07, 2017 5:19 pm

Quin wrote: ↑Fri Jul 07, 2017 4:26 pm It is also possible that DFaraday is either town or Mewtwo and also absorbed the night kill last night.

Is he immortal in your head Quin?