The Syndicate

Posted: **Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:38 pm**

Rej wrote: ↑Tue Oct 15, 2019 3:29 pm wait, Epignosis is also playing?

just looked at Long Con. He went like -> interaction with JJJ/push against Dragomir -> distancing(?)
Long Con did you distance yourself there?

This post.

Rej is bad, and ultimately voted for LC based on this "just looked at" post. He asked if LC was distancing from Dragomir. That accusation only has fuel if Dragomir is bad.

Posted: **Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:38 pm**

Dom wrote: ↑Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:36 pm
Dragomir wrote: ↑Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:27 pm
Dom wrote: ↑Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:08 pm
Dragomir wrote: ↑Sat Oct 19, 2019 12:58 pm You know what, I'ma vote Jay. I really want to see what he flips. Nothing against you Jay.
what changed from you wanting fayt to be lynched and jay to be vig'd?
I want to see what he flips, right now.
lol this is why i voted for you for two days straight

But I didn't something like this the last 2 days. So how could this have been it?

Posted: **Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:38 pm**

Dragomir wrote: ↑Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:36 pm
Michelle wrote: ↑Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:33 pm
Dragomir wrote: ↑Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:28 pm @Michelle yes, I read him.as town and want to lynch him.
Let's lynch a cat please. At least we should try.
This depends on who you're asking. Some ppl think Jay is scum, others like me and Jay think someone else. You sound sure that Jay is not cat. Why is that?

I am not sure about anything. You said you read him towm but you want him lynched. I said i prefere to lynch a cat. Is related to your read.
Is nonsense for a villager to want to lynch a villager.

Posted: **Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:39 pm**

Rej wrote: ↑Tue Oct 15, 2019 3:58 pm
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Tue Oct 15, 2019 3:46 pm Rej, as far as I am concerned your vote is on Dragomir right now. You're exploring ideas and asking questions, but the day is over in less than 40 minutes. Who do you want to lynch?

I have my vote nowhere for exactly such a moment. We can agree on doing the Long Con gamble lynch. Else my lynch would be wasted on others I feel, in a sense that we can't get enough votes maybe.
So my vote on Long Con should be bringing us forward.
[VOTE: Long Con] aubergine

Gonna take a smoke, gonna check all 5 minute instances.

Rej would rather "gamble" on the secondary suspect (LC) than lynch the primary one (Dragomir).

Posted: **Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:40 pm**

I’ll put Dragomir back in my bin.

Fayt, Dragomir, Michelle, Mac

Posted: **Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:40 pm**

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:38 pm @Michelle you’ve been shoving my nose in doggy poo all day but I see nary a vote. What are you waiting for?

I want to be sure about a scum read. I don't like to mislynch and so i try to figure who's lying.

Posted: **Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:41 pm**

Michelle wrote: ↑Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:38 pm
Dragomir wrote: ↑Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:36 pm
Michelle wrote: ↑Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:33 pm
Dragomir wrote: ↑Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:28 pm @Michelle yes, I read him.as town and want to lynch him.
Let's lynch a cat please. At least we should try.
This depends on who you're asking. Some ppl think Jay is scum, others like me and Jay think someone else. You sound sure that Jay is not cat. Why is that?
I am not sure about anything. You said you read him towm but you want him lynched. I said i prefere to lynch a cat. Is related to your read.
Is nonsense for a villager to want to lynch a villager.

No, it's not. Look at this Jay situation. He has to die at some or game ain't progress away from him. Besides I'm not married to the town read.

Posted: **Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:41 pm**

Long Con wrote: ↑Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:22 pm Looking at the roles we have left... there's a pretty good reason to try to end the vote in a tie. I think we should try to do that.

That'd be inconclusive. Can't conclude if softvoter was on the losing wagon, or if it's coin toss loss.

Posted: **Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:42 pm**

Epignosis wrote: ↑Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:38 pm
Rej wrote: ↑Tue Oct 15, 2019 3:29 pm wait, Epignosis is also playing?

just looked at Long Con. He went like -> interaction with JJJ/push against Dragomir -> distancing(?)
Long Con did you distance yourself there?
This post.

Rej is bad, and ultimately voted for LC based on this "just looked at" post. He asked if LC was distancing from Dragomir. That accusation only has fuel if Dragomir is bad.

Or if I'm bad?

Posted: **Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:42 pm**

Reminds me of the It's always sunny game lolol.

Posted: **Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:42 pm**

novaselinenever wrote: ↑Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:41 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:22 pm Looking at the roles we have left... there's a pretty good reason to try to end the vote in a tie. I think we should try to do that.
That'd be inconclusive. Can't conclude if softvoter was on the losing wagon, or if it's coin toss loss.

It guarantees a cat lynch if either tied player is a cat.

Posted: **Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:42 pm**

Starting to feel like early day 1 all over again with the attention being on me.

Posted: **Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:43 pm**

novaselinenever wrote: ↑Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:41 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:22 pm Looking at the roles we have left... there's a pretty good reason to try to end the vote in a tie. I think we should try to do that.
That'd be inconclusive. Can't conclude if softvoter was on the losing wagon, or if it's coin toss loss.

That is correct, we can't use that role for better than a 50/50 coin toss shot. However, if the soft-vote is on a dog, then it 100% protects THAT dog from lynch. I think that's a worthy goal.

Posted: **Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:43 pm**

Putting them at 1 vote difference can potentially be good. Softvoter on the wagon with +1 vote would make it a tie, so if the wagon with one less vote wins the tie, it's conclusive.

Posted: **Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:43 pm**

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:42 pm
novaselinenever wrote: ↑Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:41 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:22 pm Looking at the roles we have left... there's a pretty good reason to try to end the vote in a tie. I think we should try to do that.
That'd be inconclusive. Can't conclude if softvoter was on the losing wagon, or if it's coin toss loss.
It guarantees a cat lynch if either tied player is a cat.

No, that would result in a coin toss.

Posted: **Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:44 pm**

Dragomir wrote: ↑Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:42 pm Starting to feel like early day 1 all over again with the attention being on me.

The spotlight is intoxicating.

Posted: **Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:44 pm**

would the top voted ping me to vote if he is a cat? Is logic even working here?

Posted: **Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:44 pm**

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:42 pm
novaselinenever wrote: ↑Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:41 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:22 pm Looking at the roles we have left... there's a pretty good reason to try to end the vote in a tie. I think we should try to do that.
That'd be inconclusive. Can't conclude if softvoter was on the losing wagon, or if it's coin toss loss.
It guarantees a cat lynch if either tied player is a cat.

Oh yeah, it's not just a general minus 1

Posted: **Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:45 pm**

novaselinenever wrote: ↑Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:43 pm Putting them at 1 vote difference can potentially be good. Softvoter on the wagon with +1 vote would make it a tie, so if the wagon with one less vote wins the tie, it's conclusive.

We can't know who the soft voter is though. And with one cat left, the "conclusiveness" will be moot when the cat dies, right?

Posted: **Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:45 pm**

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:44 pm
Dragomir wrote: ↑Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:42 pm Starting to feel like early day 1 all over again with the attention being on me.
The spotlight is intoxicating.

I don't get it.

Posted: **Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:45 pm**

What is this soft voter thing?

Posted: **Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:45 pm**

Michelle wrote: ↑Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:44 pm would the top voted ping me to vote if he is a cat? Is logic even working here?

I lost the thread here, what are you referencing?

Posted: **Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:45 pm**

Long Con wrote: ↑Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:43 pm
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:42 pm
novaselinenever wrote: ↑Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:41 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:22 pm Looking at the roles we have left... there's a pretty good reason to try to end the vote in a tie. I think we should try to do that.
That'd be inconclusive. Can't conclude if softvoter was on the losing wagon, or if it's coin toss loss.
It guarantees a cat lynch if either tied player is a cat.
No, that would result in a coin toss.

Maybe I’m confused.

Say it’s 3-3, one dog one cat

Soft voter votes dog and activates, cat auto lynched
Soft voter votes cat and activates, coin flip

So yeah that’s what I meant

Posted: **Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:46 pm**

Dragomir wrote: ↑Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:45 pm What is this soft voter thing?

The golden retriever

Posted: **Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:47 pm**

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:45 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:43 pm
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:42 pm
novaselinenever wrote: ↑Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:41 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:22 pm Looking at the roles we have left... there's a pretty good reason to try to end the vote in a tie. I think we should try to do that.
That'd be inconclusive. Can't conclude if softvoter was on the losing wagon, or if it's coin toss loss.
It guarantees a cat lynch if either tied player is a cat.
No, that would result in a coin toss.
Maybe I’m confused.

Say it’s 3-3, one dog one cat

Soft voter votes dog and activates, cat auto lynched
Soft voter votes cat and activates, coin flip

So yeah that’s what I meant

Right, okay... so it's 50/50 whether it goes to a 50/50.

75% something something then?

Posted: **Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:47 pm**

Oh, you guys are talking about the roles.

Posted: **Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:47 pm**

Long Con wrote: ↑Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:45 pm
novaselinenever wrote: ↑Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:43 pm Putting them at 1 vote difference can potentially be good. Softvoter on the wagon with +1 vote would make it a tie, so if the wagon with one less vote wins the tie, it's conclusive.
We can't know who the soft voter is though. And with one cat left, the "conclusiveness" will be moot when the cat dies, right?

I misunderstood how it'd work. You're right, it's worth it

Posted: **Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:47 pm**

Long Con wrote: ↑Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:42 pm
Epignosis wrote: ↑Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:38 pm
Rej wrote: ↑Tue Oct 15, 2019 3:29 pm wait, Epignosis is also playing?

just looked at Long Con. He went like -> interaction with JJJ/push against Dragomir -> distancing(?)
Long Con did you distance yourself there?
This post.

Rej is bad, and ultimately voted for LC based on this "just looked at" post. He asked if LC was distancing from Dragomir. That accusation only has fuel if Dragomir is bad.
Or if I'm bad?

Not possible because there's only three cats and two are accounted for.

Posted: **Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:48 pm**

Long Con wrote: ↑Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:45 pm
Michelle wrote: ↑Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:44 pm would the top voted ping me to vote if he is a cat? Is logic even working here?
I lost the thread here, what are you referencing?

JJJ @ ed me to ask when i'll vote. I said i will vote when i will be more sure of my scumread.
And had the thought i posted

Posted: **Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:48 pm**

Michelle wrote: ↑Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:23 pm
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Sat Oct 19, 2019 12:54 pm So Dragomir looks better in light of the Day 2 voting. Michelle looks authentic today, but I still lack a concrete or objective basis to clear her.

Mac never entertained anything I said for a second, so there’s room for opportunism. I don’t feel that way about nutella or Dom right now.

If it’s not Fayt, Michelle and Mac are my next suspects up. If someone I have long trusted is a deep cat, perhaps it’s Long Con. I don’t get it, but plenty of intelligent and talented players have beefed. So those four would probably be my present POE: Fayt, Michelle, Mac, LC.
I am trending up in your Poe?
I was authentic... wow.. Feels like you give a little bone for me and i should swag tail and bark happy.
Who gives a damn on authenticity nowadays? Not JJJ who inserts me in his Poe like he knows everything :/

What does this mean?

Posted: **Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:48 pm**

Dragomir wrote: ↑Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:45 pm What is this soft voter thing?

Rej wrote: ↑Tue Oct 15, 2019 4:24 pm Hope the softvoter was on me.

Hmmmm.... ARE these guys on the same baddie team?

Posted: **Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:49 pm**

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:42 pm
novaselinenever wrote: ↑Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:41 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:22 pm Looking at the roles we have left... there's a pretty good reason to try to end the vote in a tie. I think we should try to do that.
That'd be inconclusive. Can't conclude if softvoter was on the losing wagon, or if it's coin toss loss.
It guarantees a cat lynch if either tied player is a cat.

If the golden retriever is paying attention

Posted: **Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:50 pm**

Michelle wrote: ↑Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:48 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:45 pm
Michelle wrote: ↑Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:44 pm would the top voted ping me to vote if he is a cat? Is logic even working here?
I lost the thread here, what are you referencing?
JJJ @ ed me to ask when i'll vote. I said i will vote when i will be more sure of my scumread.
And had the thought i posted

If JJJ is a cat, and leading the lynch, then he would have good reason to spur someone else to vote, in the hope that you vote for someone who is not JJJ.

Posted: **Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:50 pm**

Fayt > Dragomir > Michelle > Mac

Posted: **Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:50 pm**

novaselinenever wrote: ↑Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:48 pm
Michelle wrote: ↑Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:23 pm
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Sat Oct 19, 2019 12:54 pm So Dragomir looks better in light of the Day 2 voting. Michelle looks authentic today, but I still lack a concrete or objective basis to clear her.

Mac never entertained anything I said for a second, so there’s room for opportunism. I don’t feel that way about nutella or Dom right now.

If it’s not Fayt, Michelle and Mac are my next suspects up. If someone I have long trusted is a deep cat, perhaps it’s Long Con. I don’t get it, but plenty of intelligent and talented players have beefed. So those four would probably be my present POE: Fayt, Michelle, Mac, LC.
I am trending up in your Poe?
I was authentic... wow.. Feels like you give a little bone for me and i should swag tail and bark happy.
Who gives a damn on authenticity nowadays? Not JJJ who inserts me in his Poe like he knows everything :/
What does this mean?

frustration for his stuborness.

Posted: **Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:50 pm**

Dom wrote: ↑Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:49 pm
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:42 pm
novaselinenever wrote: ↑Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:41 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:22 pm Looking at the roles we have left... there's a pretty good reason to try to end the vote in a tie. I think we should try to do that.
That'd be inconclusive. Can't conclude if softvoter was on the losing wagon, or if it's coin toss loss.
It guarantees a cat lynch if either tied player is a cat.
If the golden retriever is paying attention

Who isn't paying attention right now? I feel like we have a good participation level going on right now, but haven't verified that no one is absent.

Posted: **Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:51 pm**

Dom wrote: ↑Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:49 pm
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:42 pm
novaselinenever wrote: ↑Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:41 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:22 pm Looking at the roles we have left... there's a pretty good reason to try to end the vote in a tie. I think we should try to do that.
That'd be inconclusive. Can't conclude if softvoter was on the losing wagon, or if it's coin toss loss.
It guarantees a cat lynch if either tied player is a cat.
If the golden retriever is paying attention

Yup that’s necessary.

Posted: **Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:51 pm**

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:50 pm Fayt > Dragomir > Michelle > Mac

I shouldn't be here.

Posted: **Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:51 pm**

Epignosis wrote: ↑Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:47 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:42 pm
Epignosis wrote: ↑Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:38 pm
Rej wrote: ↑Tue Oct 15, 2019 3:29 pm wait, Epignosis is also playing?

just looked at Long Con. He went like -> interaction with JJJ/push against Dragomir -> distancing(?)
Long Con did you distance yourself there?
This post.

Rej is bad, and ultimately voted for LC based on this "just looked at" post. He asked if LC was distancing from Dragomir. That accusation only has fuel if Dragomir is bad.
Or if I'm bad?
Not possible because there's only three cats and two are accounted for.

Right, I think I confused distancing and buddying for a sec there.

Posted: **Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:53 pm**

Michelle wrote: ↑Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:50 pm frustration for his stuborness.

Okay I understand you. So here’s the deal. My POE is going to have four names. It just is. That’s where the numbers are right now.

So if you don’t think you should be one of the four, who should I replace you with?

Posted: **Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:53 pm**

Dragomir wrote: ↑Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:51 pm
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:50 pm Fayt > Dragomir > Michelle > Mac
I shouldn't be here.

If Not You, Then Who?

[insert photo of Barney]

Posted: **Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:54 pm**

Dragomir wrote: ↑Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:51 pm
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:50 pm Fayt > Dragomir > Michelle > Mac
I shouldn't be here.

I for sure shouldn't be :/
Also Fayt posted something that makes sense idk if i agree with the SR

Posted: **Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:57 pm**

I want to say that i am phone posting and i have to press twice on submit and that means i am extremely nervous because this is happening at each post and i am loosing time and i catch up too slow. I can't play like this.

Posted: **Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:59 pm**

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:53 pm
Michelle wrote: ↑Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:50 pm frustration for his stuborness.
Okay I understand you. So here’s the deal. My POE is going to have four names. It just is. That’s where the numbers are right now.

So if you don’t think you should be one of the four, who should I replace you with?

idk.

I don't make deals

Posted: **Sat Oct 19, 2019 2:00 pm**

[VOTE: JJJ] aubergine here is my head at now.

Posted: **Sat Oct 19, 2019 2:00 pm**

[VOTE: JJJ] aubergine here is my head at now.

Posted: **Sat Oct 19, 2019 2:00 pm**

Michelle wrote: ↑Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:59 pm
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:53 pm
Michelle wrote: ↑Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:50 pm frustration for his stuborness.
Okay I understand you. So here’s the deal. My POE is going to have four names. It just is. That’s where the numbers are right now.

So if you don’t think you should be one of the four, who should I replace you with?
idk.
I don't make deals

I wasn’t going for a haggle.

How about this: do you understand why I have exactly four names in my POE pool?

Posted: **Sat Oct 19, 2019 2:01 pm**

sorry for double posting -_-

Posted: **Sat Oct 19, 2019 2:01 pm**

Your 4 Poe names logic is broken and i told you why JJJ

Posted: **Sat Oct 19, 2019 2:02 pm**

The Syndicate

Dogs vs. Cats [END]

Re: Dogs vs. Cats [Day 1]

Re: Dogs vs. Cats [Day 3]

Re: Dogs vs. Cats [Day 3]

Re: Dogs vs. Cats [Day 1]

Re: Dogs vs. Cats [Day 3]

Re: Dogs vs. Cats [Day 3]

Re: Dogs vs. Cats [Day 3]

Re: Dogs vs. Cats [Day 3]

Re: Dogs vs. Cats [Day 1]

Re: Dogs vs. Cats [Day 3]

Re: Dogs vs. Cats [Day 3]

Re: Dogs vs. Cats [Day 3]

Re: Dogs vs. Cats [Day 3]

Re: Dogs vs. Cats [Day 3]

Re: Dogs vs. Cats [Day 3]

Re: Dogs vs. Cats [Day 3]

Re: Dogs vs. Cats [Day 3]

Re: Dogs vs. Cats [Day 3]

Re: Dogs vs. Cats [Day 3]

Re: Dogs vs. Cats [Day 3]

Re: Dogs vs. Cats [Day 3]

Re: Dogs vs. Cats [Day 3]

Re: Dogs vs. Cats [Day 3]

Re: Dogs vs. Cats [Day 3]

Re: Dogs vs. Cats [Day 3]

Re: Dogs vs. Cats [Day 3]

Re: Dogs vs. Cats [Day 3]

Re: Dogs vs. Cats [Day 1]

Re: Dogs vs. Cats [Day 3]

Re: Dogs vs. Cats [Day 3]

Re: Dogs vs. Cats [Day 3]

Re: Dogs vs. Cats [Day 3]

Re: Dogs vs. Cats [Day 3]

Re: Dogs vs. Cats [Day 3]

Re: Dogs vs. Cats [Day 3]

Re: Dogs vs. Cats [Day 3]

Re: Dogs vs. Cats [Day 3]

Re: Dogs vs. Cats [Day 3]

Re: Dogs vs. Cats [Day 1]

Re: Dogs vs. Cats [Day 3]

Re: Dogs vs. Cats [Day 3]

Re: Dogs vs. Cats [Day 3]

Re: Dogs vs. Cats [Day 3]

Re: Dogs vs. Cats [Day 3]

Re: Dogs vs. Cats [Day 3]

Re: Dogs vs. Cats [Day 3]

Re: Dogs vs. Cats [Day 3]

Re: Dogs vs. Cats [Day 3]

Re: Dogs vs. Cats [Day 3]

Re: Dogs vs. Cats [Day 3]