The Syndicate

Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 7:57 pm You voting Krusty and after asking Gramps the next question looks hypocritical.

Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 7:57 pm Because you let some sentences unfinished and i want to see your take not to let it implied.

Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 7:57 pm My brain.

Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:04 pm 2 hours before Eod and activity still is low

Hugh Jass wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:01 pm

Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 7:35 pm

Hugh Jass wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 5:38 pm I looked over Bart's response to you and it doesn't look great. The take on you is meh especially since they use your earlier TR on them and qualify it as being undeserved and like you trying to pocket them. They didn't voice these thoughts before you actually flipped on them, so they don't feel real here. Reaction to you looking for common ground and then voting me your top TR was meh, it doesn't feel like genuine confusion which would lead someone to look for answers. More like theatrics

Took you some time to make a plan to push me, you are not genuine at all, what you say here is a scum claim.
I reacted instantly, you were itt and react so much time after.
Feels like i am right about you, you remain in my Poe.

Lol. I can assure you this is very much so genuine.

This isn't an argument. I've always got thoughts ruminating, and I keep re-reading stuff. Fwiw I actually did react instantly when your handling of me continued this phase and I told you that I didn't feel like you were genuinely trying to figure me out since there is no substance. And you never follow up.

If you're town, you're dead wrong.

Hugh Jass wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:05 pm

Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 7:57 pm You voting Krusty and after asking Gramps the next question looks hypocritical.

I'm not sure if you've read the thread or not, but there is nothing secret about my take on Krusty. There is also nothing hypocritical to that queston, since it's about fucking Marge lol.

Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 7:57 pm Because you let some sentences unfinished and i want to see your take not to let it implied.

What's yours?

Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 7:57 pm My brain.

Lol thank you.

Hugh Jass wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:06 pm

Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:04 pm 2 hours before Eod and activity still is low

Be the change you want to see in the world.

Hugh Jass wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:02 pm

Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 7:39 pmOtto

Why him?

The Grumple wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 5:44 pm

Otto Mann wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 5:23 pm The silence from Lisa is a bad look. She's had a wagon on her both nights and considering both yeets flipped town, you'd think that if she were town we'd be seeing some sense urgency to solve and take herself off the block with good play.

I get the feeling Grandpa has no desire to solve or take stand, yet will write a bunch of fluff and filler to look busy.

My vote will land on one of them tonight, not sure if I care which one.

that's where i'm at rn as well. of the cluster of people that have votes right now, the only person i think I wouldn't be comfortable voting for is Allison.

Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:07 pm

Hugh Jass wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:01 pm

Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 7:35 pm

Hugh Jass wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 5:38 pm I looked over Bart's response to you and it doesn't look great. The take on you is meh especially since they use your earlier TR on them and qualify it as being undeserved and like you trying to pocket them. They didn't voice these thoughts before you actually flipped on them, so they don't feel real here. Reaction to you looking for common ground and then voting me your top TR was meh, it doesn't feel like genuine confusion which would lead someone to look for answers. More like theatrics

Took you some time to make a plan to push me, you are not genuine at all, what you say here is a scum claim.
I reacted instantly, you were itt and react so much time after.
Feels like i am right about you, you remain in my Poe.

Lol. I can assure you this is very much so genuine.

This isn't an argument. I've always got thoughts ruminating, and I keep re-reading stuff. Fwiw I actually did react instantly when your handling of me continued this phase and I told you that I didn't feel like you were genuinely trying to figure me out since there is no substance. And you never follow up.

If you're town, you're dead wrong.

Why is no substance? Because you don't like it and is addressed at you?
I don't follow up what? I don't answer at your questions? If i have a wolf read i don't really make that player my no 1 in interactions.

Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:09 pm

Hugh Jass wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:05 pm

Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 7:57 pm You voting Krusty and after asking Gramps the next question looks hypocritical.

I'm not sure if you've read the thread or not, but there is nothing secret about my take on Krusty. There is also nothing hypocritical to that queston, since it's about fucking Marge lol.

Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 7:57 pm Because you let some sentences unfinished and i want to see your take not to let it implied.

What's yours?

Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 7:57 pm My brain.

Lol thank you.

What's my take about what?

Hugh Jass wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:02 pm Still waiting on those Lisa thoughts lol

Hugh Jass wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:13 pm

Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:07 pm

Hugh Jass wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:01 pm

Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 7:35 pm

Hugh Jass wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 5:38 pm I looked over Bart's response to you and it doesn't look great. The take on you is meh especially since they use your earlier TR on them and qualify it as being undeserved and like you trying to pocket them. They didn't voice these thoughts before you actually flipped on them, so they don't feel real here. Reaction to you looking for common ground and then voting me your top TR was meh, it doesn't feel like genuine confusion which would lead someone to look for answers. More like theatrics

Took you some time to make a plan to push me, you are not genuine at all, what you say here is a scum claim.
I reacted instantly, you were itt and react so much time after.
Feels like i am right about you, you remain in my Poe.

Lol. I can assure you this is very much so genuine.

This isn't an argument. I've always got thoughts ruminating, and I keep re-reading stuff. Fwiw I actually did react instantly when your handling of me continued this phase and I told you that I didn't feel like you were genuinely trying to figure me out since there is no substance. And you never follow up.

If you're town, you're dead wrong.

Why is no substance? Because you don't like it and is addressed at you?
I don't follow up what? I don't answer at your questions? If i have a wolf read i don't really make that player my no 1 in interactions.

No, because there is literally no substance to it. "Too townie, not solvy" isn't a thing if you aren't actually defining criteria. You're not interacting with the meat of my posts which is what I'd expect someone trying to figure me out to do. The same goes for you having grippes with me being wordy when it's not the case when you agree with the take.

You don't follow up when you're questioning to reach conclusions. You've failed to answer several of mine, and when raising points that I rebutt, same.

I'm not asking you to make me your no 1 in interactions. And this isn't simply in your handling of me, it's a trend of your contribution so far. There is little of it in most of the questions you ask.

Hugh Jass wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:14 pm

Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:09 pm

Hugh Jass wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:05 pm

Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 7:57 pm You voting Krusty and after asking Gramps the next question looks hypocritical.

I'm not sure if you've read the thread or not, but there is nothing secret about my take on Krusty. There is also nothing hypocritical to that queston, since it's about fucking Marge lol.

Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 7:57 pm Because you let some sentences unfinished and i want to see your take not to let it implied.

What's yours?

Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 7:57 pm My brain.

Lol thank you.

What's my take about what?

The interaction you asked me about.

Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:15 pm [vimeo][/vimeo]

Hugh Jass wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:02 pm Still waiting on those Lisa thoughts lol

Not much to add, Lisa is family, and a she abandoned the game, she was early wagoned and if she is scum she maybe didn't post to not expose parteners.
I am not sure of course, what do you think?

Hugh Jass wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:24 pm

Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:15 pm [vimeo][/vimeo]

Hugh Jass wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:02 pm Still waiting on those Lisa thoughts lol

Not much to add, Lisa is family, and a she abandoned the game, she was early wagoned and if she is scum she maybe didn't post to not expose parteners.
I am not sure of course, what do you think?

The gist of it is still what I had in my wall and then expended on in our interactions D2. The arbitrary contribution doesn't really feel genuine, there doesn't seem to be any progression at all. And the remarks themselves are pretty bland or with no reasoning. It's a hand in every jar vibe that feel like she's just trying to appear engaged in different topics. Fluff visibility. She hasn't really been around since and yeah it does feel like it might be because this is a dunk that she think there ain't no way to fight. Potentially two fold with not exposing partners or giving info and the other maybe sell the vibe that this is another inactive lynch.

Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:20 pm

Hugh Jass wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:13 pm

Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:07 pm

Hugh Jass wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:01 pm

Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 7:35 pm

Hugh Jass wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 5:38 pm I looked over Bart's response to you and it doesn't look great. The take on you is meh especially since they use your earlier TR on them and qualify it as being undeserved and like you trying to pocket them. They didn't voice these thoughts before you actually flipped on them, so they don't feel real here. Reaction to you looking for common ground and then voting me your top TR was meh, it doesn't feel like genuine confusion which would lead someone to look for answers. More like theatrics

Took you some time to make a plan to push me, you are not genuine at all, what you say here is a scum claim.
I reacted instantly, you were itt and react so much time after.
Feels like i am right about you, you remain in my Poe.

Lol. I can assure you this is very much so genuine.

This isn't an argument. I've always got thoughts ruminating, and I keep re-reading stuff. Fwiw I actually did react instantly when your handling of me continued this phase and I told you that I didn't feel like you were genuinely trying to figure me out since there is no substance. And you never follow up.

If you're town, you're dead wrong.

Why is no substance? Because you don't like it and is addressed at you?
I don't follow up what? I don't answer at your questions? If i have a wolf read i don't really make that player my no 1 in interactions.

No, because there is literally no substance to it. "Too townie, not solvy" isn't a thing if you aren't actually defining criteria. You're not interacting with the meat of my posts which is what I'd expect someone trying to figure me out to do. The same goes for you having grippes with me being wordy when it's not the case when you agree with the take.

You don't follow up when you're questioning to reach conclusions. You've failed to answer several of mine, and when raising points that I rebutt, same.

I'm not asking you to make me your no 1 in interactions. And this isn't simply in your handling of me, it's a trend of your contribution so far. There is little of it in most of the questions you ask.

Thanks for minimising my contribution, i engage you in what i see worrisome, a decent wolf can make your posts with ease, i already said i will not make text analysis on your posts.
Not before a scum flip anyway.

Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:26 pm

Hugh Jass wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:24 pm

Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:15 pm [vimeo][/vimeo]

Hugh Jass wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:02 pm Still waiting on those Lisa thoughts lol

Not much to add, Lisa is family, and a she abandoned the game, she was early wagoned and if she is scum she maybe didn't post to not expose parteners.
I am not sure of course, what do you think?

The gist of it is still what I had in my wall and then expended on in our interactions D2. The arbitrary contribution doesn't really feel genuine, there doesn't seem to be any progression at all. And the remarks themselves are pretty bland or with no reasoning. It's a hand in every jar vibe that feel like she's just trying to appear engaged in different topics. Fluff visibility. She hasn't really been around since and yeah it does feel like it might be because this is a dunk that she think there ain't no way to fight. Potentially two fold with not exposing partners or giving info and the other maybe sell the vibe that this is another inactive lynch.

Wanna put equal between inactive lynch and mislynch here?

Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:29 pm [mention]The Grumple[/mention] what's your take at this moment?
Who is in your Poe?

Hugh Jass wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:31 pm

Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:26 pm

Hugh Jass wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:24 pm

Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:15 pm [vimeo][/vimeo]

Hugh Jass wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:02 pm Still waiting on those Lisa thoughts lol

Not much to add, Lisa is family, and a she abandoned the game, she was early wagoned and if she is scum she maybe didn't post to not expose parteners.
I am not sure of course, what do you think?

The gist of it is still what I had in my wall and then expended on in our interactions D2. The arbitrary contribution doesn't really feel genuine, there doesn't seem to be any progression at all. And the remarks themselves are pretty bland or with no reasoning. It's a hand in every jar vibe that feel like she's just trying to appear engaged in different topics. Fluff visibility. She hasn't really been around since and yeah it does feel like it might be because this is a dunk that she think there ain't no way to fight. Potentially two fold with not exposing partners or giving info and the other maybe sell the vibe that this is another inactive lynch.

Wanna put equal between inactive lynch and mislynch here?

I don't follow

Hugh Jass wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:30 pm

Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:20 pm

Hugh Jass wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:13 pm

Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:07 pm

Hugh Jass wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:01 pm

Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 7:35 pm

Hugh Jass wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 5:38 pm I looked over Bart's response to you and it doesn't look great. The take on you is meh especially since they use your earlier TR on them and qualify it as being undeserved and like you trying to pocket them. They didn't voice these thoughts before you actually flipped on them, so they don't feel real here. Reaction to you looking for common ground and then voting me your top TR was meh, it doesn't feel like genuine confusion which would lead someone to look for answers. More like theatrics

Took you some time to make a plan to push me, you are not genuine at all, what you say here is a scum claim.
I reacted instantly, you were itt and react so much time after.
Feels like i am right about you, you remain in my Poe.

Lol. I can assure you this is very much so genuine.

This isn't an argument. I've always got thoughts ruminating, and I keep re-reading stuff. Fwiw I actually did react instantly when your handling of me continued this phase and I told you that I didn't feel like you were genuinely trying to figure me out since there is no substance. And you never follow up.

If you're town, you're dead wrong.

Why is no substance? Because you don't like it and is addressed at you?
I don't follow up what? I don't answer at your questions? If i have a wolf read i don't really make that player my no 1 in interactions.

No, because there is literally no substance to it. "Too townie, not solvy" isn't a thing if you aren't actually defining criteria. You're not interacting with the meat of my posts which is what I'd expect someone trying to figure me out to do. The same goes for you having grippes with me being wordy when it's not the case when you agree with the take.

You don't follow up when you're questioning to reach conclusions. You've failed to answer several of mine, and when raising points that I rebutt, same.

I'm not asking you to make me your no 1 in interactions. And this isn't simply in your handling of me, it's a trend of your contribution so far. There is little of it in most of the questions you ask.

Thanks for minimising my contribution, i engage you in what i see worrisome, a decent wolf can make your posts with ease, i already said i will not make text analysis on your posts.
Not before a scum flip anyway.

I didn't mean to do that, I apologize. I understand that and that's why I had you at top town last phase when you were going after me 'cause it felt like paranoia. But what I perceive as a lack of progression and engaging me is irking me. Feel like you're viewing everything I do in the light of "a wolf can fake that" rather than is this dude faking that. If that make any sense.

You've played against me as a wolf before I think

Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:33 pm

Hugh Jass wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:31 pm

Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:26 pm

Hugh Jass wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:24 pm

Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:15 pm [vimeo][/vimeo]

Hugh Jass wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:02 pm Still waiting on those Lisa thoughts lol

Not much to add, Lisa is family, and a she abandoned the game, she was early wagoned and if she is scum she maybe didn't post to not expose parteners.
I am not sure of course, what do you think?

The gist of it is still what I had in my wall and then expended on in our interactions D2. The arbitrary contribution doesn't really feel genuine, there doesn't seem to be any progression at all. And the remarks themselves are pretty bland or with no reasoning. It's a hand in every jar vibe that feel like she's just trying to appear engaged in different topics. Fluff visibility. She hasn't really been around since and yeah it does feel like it might be because this is a dunk that she think there ain't no way to fight. Potentially two fold with not exposing partners or giving info and the other maybe sell the vibe that this is another inactive lynch.

Wanna put equal between inactive lynch and mislynch here?

I don't follow

All inactives until now flipped town and were either MLed or NKed. Is obvious Lisa lynch is an inactive lynch, but you consider her a mislynch?

Are we talking past each other?

Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:36 pm

Hugh Jass wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:30 pm

Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:20 pm

Hugh Jass wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:13 pm

Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:07 pm

Hugh Jass wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:01 pm

Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 7:35 pm
Took you some time to make a plan to push me, you are not genuine at all, what you say here is a scum claim.
I reacted instantly, you were itt and react so much time after.
Feels like i am right about you, you remain in my Poe.

Lol. I can assure you this is very much so genuine.

This isn't an argument. I've always got thoughts ruminating, and I keep re-reading stuff. Fwiw I actually did react instantly when your handling of me continued this phase and I told you that I didn't feel like you were genuinely trying to figure me out since there is no substance. And you never follow up.

If you're town, you're dead wrong.

Why is no substance? Because you don't like it and is addressed at you?
I don't follow up what? I don't answer at your questions? If i have a wolf read i don't really make that player my no 1 in interactions.

No, because there is literally no substance to it. "Too townie, not solvy" isn't a thing if you aren't actually defining criteria. You're not interacting with the meat of my posts which is what I'd expect someone trying to figure me out to do. The same goes for you having grippes with me being wordy when it's not the case when you agree with the take.

You don't follow up when you're questioning to reach conclusions. You've failed to answer several of mine, and when raising points that I rebutt, same.

I'm not asking you to make me your no 1 in interactions. And this isn't simply in your handling of me, it's a trend of your contribution so far. There is little of it in most of the questions you ask.

Thanks for minimising my contribution, i engage you in what i see worrisome, a decent wolf can make your posts with ease, i already said i will not make text analysis on your posts.
Not before a scum flip anyway.

I didn't mean to do that, I apologize. I understand that and that's why I had you at top town last phase when you were going after me 'cause it felt like paranoia. But what I perceive as a lack of progression and engaging me is irking me. Feel like you're viewing everything I do in the light of "a wolf can fake that" rather than is this dude faking that. If that make any sense.

You've played against me as a wolf before I think

You say i don't have progression, i would say i kept the tunnel.
Are you affraid of pressure?

Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:37 pm Spoiler that a little please if you quote it again

Hugh Jass wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:40 pm I'll be back in a few, dinner time.

Otto Mann wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:13 pmYou and gramps were wonder twins yesterday! What killed the spark?

In your most recent colour coded list I'd like to point out two things which I always find scummy -

1) You included yourself, in green, on the list. I hate it when players include themselves in their own town reads.

2) That it's colour coded. I hate colour coded lists, just ask Kza.

Further to point two, I gave you a hard time for not being succinct and you replied with "sorry I dont curate my posts", but then you take the time to curate a fucking colour coded list.
Puked in my mouth.

[VOTE: Grumple] aubergine

Hugh Jass wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 7:56 pm

Principal Skinner wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 7:25 pm

Krusty the Clown wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 7:23 pm

Principal Skinner wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 7:22 pm What is the concern with Lisa? She's always been a top notch student.

Read her posts. She's made a remarkable contribution this RD, 1 post! Top marks, fo sho

I read them. The concern is that Lisa has one post this phase and that means she's a bad student? I find that less than compelling evidence.

She was the second wagon and has been suspected before her absence this phase. Being inactive isn't really one of the reasons.

Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:31 pm

Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:29 pm [mention]The Grumple[/mention] what's your take at this moment?
Who is in your Poe?

The Grumple wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 6:24 pm Allison Taylor
The Grumple
Hugh Jass
Marge Simpson
Otto Mann
Principal Skinner

Bart Simpson
Grampa Simpson
Krusty the Clown
Lisa Simpson
Mr. Burns

The Grumple wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:03 pm

Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:31 pm

Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:29 pm @The Grumple what's your take at this moment?
Who is in your Poe?

I posted this a little earlier.

The Grumple wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 6:24 pm Allison Taylor
The Grumple
Hugh Jass
Marge Simpson
Otto Mann
Principal Skinner

Bart Simpson
Grampa Simpson
Krusty the Clown
Lisa Simpson
Mr. Burns

some of this is flexible. Otto flashes downward whenever he goes after me or anyone else over things that aren't actually related to the game. It's so frequent and consistent and no one else seems bothered by it, so I have to assume that's just a personality trait.

You and Mr. Burns are basically in the bottom part because I haven't seen any particular reason to read you as town yet.

The Grumple wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:51 pm

Otto Mann wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:13 pmYou and gramps were wonder twins yesterday! What killed the spark?

that was something that you decided on your own. we joked about having a similar name that's the only thing we have in common.

In your most recent colour coded list I'd like to point out two things which I always find scummy -

1) You included yourself, in green, on the list. I hate it when players include themselves in their own town reads.

that sounds like a "you" problem. I copy pasted the list from the front page.

2) That it's colour coded. I hate colour coded lists, just ask Kza.

this is also a you problem. Color coded lists are standard, or at least they have been in the past.

Further to point two, I gave you a hard time for not being succinct and you replied with "sorry I dont curate my posts", but then you take the time to curate a fucking colour coded list.
Puked in my mouth.

[VOTE: Grumple] aubergine

It takes 5 seconds to choose color tags you dork. I put the colors because I wanted to, and again because they're the universally understood standard for read lists.

If you want all your posts to be plain text, size 14 calibri font double spaced, with 1 sentence paragraphs and MLA formatting that is your prerogative, have fun with it.

if you say anything else on thie topic I promise to respond to you in bright yellow text forever
(or until I get bored of it)

Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:06 pm

The Grumple wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:03 pm

Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:31 pm

Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:29 pm @The Grumple what's your take at this moment?
Who is in your Poe?

I posted this a little earlier.

The Grumple wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 6:24 pm Allison Taylor
The Grumple
Hugh Jass
Marge Simpson
Otto Mann
Principal Skinner

Bart Simpson
Grampa Simpson
Krusty the Clown
Lisa Simpson
Mr. Burns

some of this is flexible. Otto flashes downward whenever he goes after me or anyone else over things that aren't actually related to the game. It's so frequent and consistent and no one else seems bothered by it, so I have to assume that's just a personality trait.

You and Mr. Burns are basically in the bottom part because I haven't seen any particular reason to read you as town yet.

If you put me and Burns in the same tier that means the bottom is not ordered?

Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:06 pm

The Grumple wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:03 pm

Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:31 pm

Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:29 pm @The Grumple what's your take at this moment?
Who is in your Poe?

I posted this a little earlier.

The Grumple wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 6:24 pm Allison Taylor
The Grumple
Hugh Jass
Marge Simpson
Otto Mann
Principal Skinner

Bart Simpson
Grampa Simpson
Krusty the Clown
Lisa Simpson
Mr. Burns

some of this is flexible. Otto flashes downward whenever he goes after me or anyone else over things that aren't actually related to the game. It's so frequent and consistent and no one else seems bothered by it, so I have to assume that's just a personality trait.

You and Mr. Burns are basically in the bottom part because I haven't seen any particular reason to read you as town yet.

If you put me and Burns in the same tier that means the bottom is not ordered?

Otto Mann wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:08 pm What? So a guy who won't curate his posts worries about his font size looking boring like a stuffy MLA? I don't get it.

Bright yellow me baby. Just pee everywhere, Grumple, at least Grampa wears a diaper.

The Grumple wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:27 pm seriously though is this normal for him