
The Simpsons [GAME OVER]
Moderator: Community Team
- PonySparkPrime
- Sockpuppet Account
- Posts in topic: 253
- Posts: 575
- Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2015 10:16 pm
- Preferred Pronouns: he/his/him
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]
2 hours before Eod and activity still is low 

Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]
I'm not sure if you've read the thread or not, but there is nothing secret about my take on Krusty. There is also nothing hypocritical to that queston, since it's about fucking Marge lol.Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 7:57 pm You voting Krusty and after asking Gramps the next question looks hypocritical.
What's yours?Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 7:57 pm Because you let some sentences unfinished and i want to see your take not to let it implied.
Lol thank you.
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]
Be the change you want to see in the world.
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]
[VOTE:
Burns] aubergine


- PonySparkPrime
- Sockpuppet Account
- Posts in topic: 253
- Posts: 575
- Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2015 10:16 pm
- Preferred Pronouns: he/his/him
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]
Why is no substance? Because you don't like it and is addressed at you?Hugh Jass wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:01 pmLol. I can assure you this is very much so genuine.Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 7:35 pmTook you some time to make a plan to push me, you are not genuine at all, what you say here is a scum claim.Hugh Jass wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 5:38 pm I looked over Bart's response to you and it doesn't look great. The take on you is meh especially since they use your earlier TR on them and qualify it as being undeserved and like you trying to pocket them. They didn't voice these thoughts before you actually flipped on them, so they don't feel real here. Reaction to you looking for common ground and then voting me your top TR was meh, it doesn't feel like genuine confusion which would lead someone to look for answers. More like theatrics
I reacted instantly, you were itt and react so much time after.
Feels like i am right about you, you remain in my Poe.
This isn't an argument. I've always got thoughts ruminating, and I keep re-reading stuff. Fwiw I actually did react instantly when your handling of me continued this phase and I told you that I didn't feel like you were genuinely trying to figure me out since there is no substance. And you never follow up.
If you're town, you're dead wrong.
I don't follow up what? I don't answer at your questions? If i have a wolf read i don't really make that player my no 1 in interactions.
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]
Marge where ya at
Get in
Get in
- PonySparkPrime
- Sockpuppet Account
- Posts in topic: 253
- Posts: 575
- Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2015 10:16 pm
- Preferred Pronouns: he/his/him
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]
What's my take about what?Hugh Jass wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:05 pmI'm not sure if you've read the thread or not, but there is nothing secret about my take on Krusty. There is also nothing hypocritical to that queston, since it's about fucking Marge lol.Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 7:57 pm You voting Krusty and after asking Gramps the next question looks hypocritical.What's yours?Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 7:57 pm Because you let some sentences unfinished and i want to see your take not to let it implied.Lol thank you.
- PonySparkPrime
- Sockpuppet Account
- Posts in topic: 253
- Posts: 575
- Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2015 10:16 pm
- Preferred Pronouns: he/his/him
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]
- PonySparkPrime
- Sockpuppet Account
- Posts in topic: 253
- Posts: 575
- Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2015 10:16 pm
- Preferred Pronouns: he/his/him
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]
You and gramps were wonder twins yesterday! What killed the spark?The Grumple wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 5:44 pmthat's where i'm at rn as well. of the cluster of people that have votes right now, the only person i think I wouldn't be comfortable voting for is Allison.Otto Mann wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 5:23 pm The silence from Lisa is a bad look. She's had a wagon on her both nights and considering both yeets flipped town, you'd think that if she were town we'd be seeing some sense urgency to solve and take herself off the block with good play.
I get the feeling Grandpa has no desire to solve or take stand, yet will write a bunch of fluff and filler to look busy.
My vote will land on one of them tonight, not sure if I care which one.
In your most recent colour coded list I'd like to point out two things which I always find scummy -
1) You included yourself, in green, on the list. I hate it when players include themselves in their own town reads.
2) That it's colour coded. I hate colour coded lists, just ask Kza.
Further to point two, I gave you a hard time for not being succinct and you replied with "sorry I dont curate my posts", but then you take the time to curate a fucking colour coded list.
Puked in my mouth.
[VOTE: Grumple] aubergine
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]
No, because there is literally no substance to it. "Too townie, not solvy" isn't a thing if you aren't actually defining criteria. You're not interacting with the meat of my posts which is what I'd expect someone trying to figure me out to do. The same goes for you having grippes with me being wordy when it's not the case when you agree with the take.Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:07 pmWhy is no substance? Because you don't like it and is addressed at you?Hugh Jass wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:01 pmLol. I can assure you this is very much so genuine.Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 7:35 pmTook you some time to make a plan to push me, you are not genuine at all, what you say here is a scum claim.Hugh Jass wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 5:38 pm I looked over Bart's response to you and it doesn't look great. The take on you is meh especially since they use your earlier TR on them and qualify it as being undeserved and like you trying to pocket them. They didn't voice these thoughts before you actually flipped on them, so they don't feel real here. Reaction to you looking for common ground and then voting me your top TR was meh, it doesn't feel like genuine confusion which would lead someone to look for answers. More like theatrics
I reacted instantly, you were itt and react so much time after.
Feels like i am right about you, you remain in my Poe.
This isn't an argument. I've always got thoughts ruminating, and I keep re-reading stuff. Fwiw I actually did react instantly when your handling of me continued this phase and I told you that I didn't feel like you were genuinely trying to figure me out since there is no substance. And you never follow up.
If you're town, you're dead wrong.
I don't follow up what? I don't answer at your questions? If i have a wolf read i don't really make that player my no 1 in interactions.
You don't follow up when you're questioning to reach conclusions. You've failed to answer several of mine, and when raising points that I rebutt, same.
I'm not asking you to make me your no 1 in interactions. And this isn't simply in your handling of me, it's a trend of your contribution so far. There is little of it in most of the questions you ask.
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]
The interaction you asked me about.Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:09 pmWhat's my take about what?Hugh Jass wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:05 pmI'm not sure if you've read the thread or not, but there is nothing secret about my take on Krusty. There is also nothing hypocritical to that queston, since it's about fucking Marge lol.Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 7:57 pm You voting Krusty and after asking Gramps the next question looks hypocritical.What's yours?Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 7:57 pm Because you let some sentences unfinished and i want to see your take not to let it implied.Lol thank you.
- PonySparkPrime
- Sockpuppet Account
- Posts in topic: 253
- Posts: 575
- Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2015 10:16 pm
- Preferred Pronouns: he/his/him
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]
Lead one now, there are a few people
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]
And you're on the same wagon as gramps ffs.
Somebody hold my hair
Somebody hold my hair
- PonySparkPrime
- Sockpuppet Account
- Posts in topic: 253
- Posts: 575
- Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2015 10:16 pm
- Preferred Pronouns: he/his/him
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]
Thanks for minimising my contribution, i engage you in what i see worrisome, a decent wolf can make your posts with ease, i already said i will not make text analysis on your posts.Hugh Jass wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:13 pmNo, because there is literally no substance to it. "Too townie, not solvy" isn't a thing if you aren't actually defining criteria. You're not interacting with the meat of my posts which is what I'd expect someone trying to figure me out to do. The same goes for you having grippes with me being wordy when it's not the case when you agree with the take.Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:07 pmWhy is no substance? Because you don't like it and is addressed at you?Hugh Jass wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:01 pmLol. I can assure you this is very much so genuine.Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 7:35 pmTook you some time to make a plan to push me, you are not genuine at all, what you say here is a scum claim.Hugh Jass wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 5:38 pm I looked over Bart's response to you and it doesn't look great. The take on you is meh especially since they use your earlier TR on them and qualify it as being undeserved and like you trying to pocket them. They didn't voice these thoughts before you actually flipped on them, so they don't feel real here. Reaction to you looking for common ground and then voting me your top TR was meh, it doesn't feel like genuine confusion which would lead someone to look for answers. More like theatrics
I reacted instantly, you were itt and react so much time after.
Feels like i am right about you, you remain in my Poe.
This isn't an argument. I've always got thoughts ruminating, and I keep re-reading stuff. Fwiw I actually did react instantly when your handling of me continued this phase and I told you that I didn't feel like you were genuinely trying to figure me out since there is no substance. And you never follow up.
If you're town, you're dead wrong.
I don't follow up what? I don't answer at your questions? If i have a wolf read i don't really make that player my no 1 in interactions.
You don't follow up when you're questioning to reach conclusions. You've failed to answer several of mine, and when raising points that I rebutt, same.
I'm not asking you to make me your no 1 in interactions. And this isn't simply in your handling of me, it's a trend of your contribution so far. There is little of it in most of the questions you ask.
Not before a scum flip anyway.
- PonySparkPrime
- Sockpuppet Account
- Posts in topic: 253
- Posts: 575
- Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2015 10:16 pm
- Preferred Pronouns: he/his/him
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]
I am conflicted about Marge, read is under construction.Hugh Jass wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:14 pmThe interaction you asked me about.Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:09 pmWhat's my take about what?Hugh Jass wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:05 pmI'm not sure if you've read the thread or not, but there is nothing secret about my take on Krusty. There is also nothing hypocritical to that queston, since it's about fucking Marge lol.Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 7:57 pm You voting Krusty and after asking Gramps the next question looks hypocritical.What's yours?Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 7:57 pm Because you let some sentences unfinished and i want to see your take not to let it implied.Lol thank you.
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]
The gist of it is still what I had in my wall and then expended on in our interactions D2. The arbitrary contribution doesn't really feel genuine, there doesn't seem to be any progression at all. And the remarks themselves are pretty bland or with no reasoning. It's a hand in every jar vibe that feel like she's just trying to appear engaged in different topics. Fluff visibility. She hasn't really been around since and yeah it does feel like it might be because this is a dunk that she think there ain't no way to fight. Potentially two fold with not exposing partners or giving info and the other maybe sell the vibe that this is another inactive lynch.Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:15 pm [vimeo][/vimeo]Not much to add, Lisa is family, and a she abandoned the game, she was early wagoned and if she is scum she maybe didn't post to not expose parteners.
I am not sure of course, what do you think?
- PonySparkPrime
- Sockpuppet Account
- Posts in topic: 253
- Posts: 575
- Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2015 10:16 pm
- Preferred Pronouns: he/his/him
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]
Lisa Simpson
4
25%
Voters: Krusty the Clown, Allison Taylor, Mr. Burns, Bart Simpson
I like this wagon
4
25%
Voters: Krusty the Clown, Allison Taylor, Mr. Burns, Bart Simpson
I like this wagon
- PonySparkPrime
- Sockpuppet Account
- Posts in topic: 253
- Posts: 575
- Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2015 10:16 pm
- Preferred Pronouns: he/his/him
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]
Wanna put equal between inactive lynch and mislynch here?Hugh Jass wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:24 pmThe gist of it is still what I had in my wall and then expended on in our interactions D2. The arbitrary contribution doesn't really feel genuine, there doesn't seem to be any progression at all. And the remarks themselves are pretty bland or with no reasoning. It's a hand in every jar vibe that feel like she's just trying to appear engaged in different topics. Fluff visibility. She hasn't really been around since and yeah it does feel like it might be because this is a dunk that she think there ain't no way to fight. Potentially two fold with not exposing partners or giving info and the other maybe sell the vibe that this is another inactive lynch.Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:15 pm [vimeo][/vimeo]Not much to add, Lisa is family, and a she abandoned the game, she was early wagoned and if she is scum she maybe didn't post to not expose parteners.
I am not sure of course, what do you think?
- PonySparkPrime
- Sockpuppet Account
- Posts in topic: 253
- Posts: 575
- Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2015 10:16 pm
- Preferred Pronouns: he/his/him
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]
Krusty the Clown
3
19%
Voters: Principal Skinner, Grampa Simpson, The Grumple
OTOH the cw is no more Grampa but Krusty voted by Gramps
3
19%
Voters: Principal Skinner, Grampa Simpson, The Grumple
OTOH the cw is no more Grampa but Krusty voted by Gramps

- PonySparkPrime
- Sockpuppet Account
- Posts in topic: 253
- Posts: 575
- Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2015 10:16 pm
- Preferred Pronouns: he/his/him
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]
Grumple what's your take at this moment?
Who is in your Poe?
Who is in your Poe?
- My Shell
- Sockpuppet Account
- Posts in topic: 252
- Posts: 481
- Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2020 1:23 am
- Location: East Europe
- Gender: Female
- Preferred Pronouns: she/her/hers
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]
Skinner and the wonder twins are not giving me a gigantic "switch wagons" feeling.
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]
I didn't mean to do that, I apologize. I understand that and that's why I had you at top town last phase when you were going after me 'cause it felt like paranoia. But what I perceive as a lack of progression and engaging me is irking me. Feel like you're viewing everything I do in the light of "a wolf can fake that" rather than is this dude faking that. If that make any sense.Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:20 pmThanks for minimising my contribution, i engage you in what i see worrisome, a decent wolf can make your posts with ease, i already said i will not make text analysis on your posts.Hugh Jass wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:13 pmNo, because there is literally no substance to it. "Too townie, not solvy" isn't a thing if you aren't actually defining criteria. You're not interacting with the meat of my posts which is what I'd expect someone trying to figure me out to do. The same goes for you having grippes with me being wordy when it's not the case when you agree with the take.Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:07 pmWhy is no substance? Because you don't like it and is addressed at you?Hugh Jass wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:01 pmLol. I can assure you this is very much so genuine.Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 7:35 pmTook you some time to make a plan to push me, you are not genuine at all, what you say here is a scum claim.Hugh Jass wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 5:38 pm I looked over Bart's response to you and it doesn't look great. The take on you is meh especially since they use your earlier TR on them and qualify it as being undeserved and like you trying to pocket them. They didn't voice these thoughts before you actually flipped on them, so they don't feel real here. Reaction to you looking for common ground and then voting me your top TR was meh, it doesn't feel like genuine confusion which would lead someone to look for answers. More like theatrics
I reacted instantly, you were itt and react so much time after.
Feels like i am right about you, you remain in my Poe.
This isn't an argument. I've always got thoughts ruminating, and I keep re-reading stuff. Fwiw I actually did react instantly when your handling of me continued this phase and I told you that I didn't feel like you were genuinely trying to figure me out since there is no substance. And you never follow up.
If you're town, you're dead wrong.
I don't follow up what? I don't answer at your questions? If i have a wolf read i don't really make that player my no 1 in interactions.
You don't follow up when you're questioning to reach conclusions. You've failed to answer several of mine, and when raising points that I rebutt, same.
I'm not asking you to make me your no 1 in interactions. And this isn't simply in your handling of me, it's a trend of your contribution so far. There is little of it in most of the questions you ask.
Not before a scum flip anyway.
You've played against me as a wolf before I think

Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]
I don't followBart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:26 pmWanna put equal between inactive lynch and mislynch here?Hugh Jass wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:24 pmThe gist of it is still what I had in my wall and then expended on in our interactions D2. The arbitrary contribution doesn't really feel genuine, there doesn't seem to be any progression at all. And the remarks themselves are pretty bland or with no reasoning. It's a hand in every jar vibe that feel like she's just trying to appear engaged in different topics. Fluff visibility. She hasn't really been around since and yeah it does feel like it might be because this is a dunk that she think there ain't no way to fight. Potentially two fold with not exposing partners or giving info and the other maybe sell the vibe that this is another inactive lynch.Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:15 pm [vimeo][/vimeo]Not much to add, Lisa is family, and a she abandoned the game, she was early wagoned and if she is scum she maybe didn't post to not expose parteners.
I am not sure of course, what do you think?
- PonySparkPrime
- Sockpuppet Account
- Posts in topic: 253
- Posts: 575
- Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2015 10:16 pm
- Preferred Pronouns: he/his/him
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]
Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:29 pm [mention]The Grumple[/mention] what's your take at this moment?
Who is in your Poe?
- PonySparkPrime
- Sockpuppet Account
- Posts in topic: 253
- Posts: 575
- Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2015 10:16 pm
- Preferred Pronouns: he/his/him
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]
All inactives until now flipped town and were either MLed or NKed. Is obvious Lisa lynch is an inactive lynch, but you consider her a mislynch?Hugh Jass wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:31 pmI don't followBart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:26 pmWanna put equal between inactive lynch and mislynch here?Hugh Jass wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:24 pmThe gist of it is still what I had in my wall and then expended on in our interactions D2. The arbitrary contribution doesn't really feel genuine, there doesn't seem to be any progression at all. And the remarks themselves are pretty bland or with no reasoning. It's a hand in every jar vibe that feel like she's just trying to appear engaged in different topics. Fluff visibility. She hasn't really been around since and yeah it does feel like it might be because this is a dunk that she think there ain't no way to fight. Potentially two fold with not exposing partners or giving info and the other maybe sell the vibe that this is another inactive lynch.Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:15 pm [vimeo][/vimeo]Not much to add, Lisa is family, and a she abandoned the game, she was early wagoned and if she is scum she maybe didn't post to not expose parteners.
I am not sure of course, what do you think?
Are we talking past each other?
- PonySparkPrime
- Sockpuppet Account
- Posts in topic: 253
- Posts: 575
- Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2015 10:16 pm
- Preferred Pronouns: he/his/him
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]
You say i don't have progression, i would say i kept the tunnel.Hugh Jass wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:30 pmI didn't mean to do that, I apologize. I understand that and that's why I had you at top town last phase when you were going after me 'cause it felt like paranoia. But what I perceive as a lack of progression and engaging me is irking me. Feel like you're viewing everything I do in the light of "a wolf can fake that" rather than is this dude faking that. If that make any sense.Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:20 pmThanks for minimising my contribution, i engage you in what i see worrisome, a decent wolf can make your posts with ease, i already said i will not make text analysis on your posts.Hugh Jass wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:13 pmNo, because there is literally no substance to it. "Too townie, not solvy" isn't a thing if you aren't actually defining criteria. You're not interacting with the meat of my posts which is what I'd expect someone trying to figure me out to do. The same goes for you having grippes with me being wordy when it's not the case when you agree with the take.Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:07 pmWhy is no substance? Because you don't like it and is addressed at you?Hugh Jass wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:01 pmLol. I can assure you this is very much so genuine.Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 7:35 pmTook you some time to make a plan to push me, you are not genuine at all, what you say here is a scum claim.Hugh Jass wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 5:38 pm I looked over Bart's response to you and it doesn't look great. The take on you is meh especially since they use your earlier TR on them and qualify it as being undeserved and like you trying to pocket them. They didn't voice these thoughts before you actually flipped on them, so they don't feel real here. Reaction to you looking for common ground and then voting me your top TR was meh, it doesn't feel like genuine confusion which would lead someone to look for answers. More like theatrics
I reacted instantly, you were itt and react so much time after.
Feels like i am right about you, you remain in my Poe.
This isn't an argument. I've always got thoughts ruminating, and I keep re-reading stuff. Fwiw I actually did react instantly when your handling of me continued this phase and I told you that I didn't feel like you were genuinely trying to figure me out since there is no substance. And you never follow up.
If you're town, you're dead wrong.
I don't follow up what? I don't answer at your questions? If i have a wolf read i don't really make that player my no 1 in interactions.
You don't follow up when you're questioning to reach conclusions. You've failed to answer several of mine, and when raising points that I rebutt, same.
I'm not asking you to make me your no 1 in interactions. And this isn't simply in your handling of me, it's a trend of your contribution so far. There is little of it in most of the questions you ask.
Not before a scum flip anyway.
You've played against me as a wolf before I think![]()
Are you affraid of pressure?
- PonySparkPrime
- Sockpuppet Account
- Posts in topic: 253
- Posts: 575
- Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2015 10:16 pm
- Preferred Pronouns: he/his/him
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]
Spoiler that a little please if you quote it again
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]
We are. She's a scum read of mine, and I'm the one who cased her lol. The inactive lynch angle is what I told you her absence might be if she's scum, like she decided to not show up so that we might think this is a bad lynch like the previous one.Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:33 pmAll inactives until now flipped town and were either MLed or NKed. Is obvious Lisa lynch is an inactive lynch, but you consider her a mislynch?Hugh Jass wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:31 pmI don't followBart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:26 pmWanna put equal between inactive lynch and mislynch here?Hugh Jass wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:24 pmThe gist of it is still what I had in my wall and then expended on in our interactions D2. The arbitrary contribution doesn't really feel genuine, there doesn't seem to be any progression at all. And the remarks themselves are pretty bland or with no reasoning. It's a hand in every jar vibe that feel like she's just trying to appear engaged in different topics. Fluff visibility. She hasn't really been around since and yeah it does feel like it might be because this is a dunk that she think there ain't no way to fight. Potentially two fold with not exposing partners or giving info and the other maybe sell the vibe that this is another inactive lynch.Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:15 pm [vimeo][/vimeo]Not much to add, Lisa is family, and a she abandoned the game, she was early wagoned and if she is scum she maybe didn't post to not expose parteners.
I am not sure of course, what do you think?
Are we talking past each other?
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]
I'm not. Do I come off as someone afraid of it? Lol.Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:36 pmYou say i don't have progression, i would say i kept the tunnel.Hugh Jass wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:30 pmI didn't mean to do that, I apologize. I understand that and that's why I had you at top town last phase when you were going after me 'cause it felt like paranoia. But what I perceive as a lack of progression and engaging me is irking me. Feel like you're viewing everything I do in the light of "a wolf can fake that" rather than is this dude faking that. If that make any sense.Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:20 pmThanks for minimising my contribution, i engage you in what i see worrisome, a decent wolf can make your posts with ease, i already said i will not make text analysis on your posts.Hugh Jass wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:13 pmNo, because there is literally no substance to it. "Too townie, not solvy" isn't a thing if you aren't actually defining criteria. You're not interacting with the meat of my posts which is what I'd expect someone trying to figure me out to do. The same goes for you having grippes with me being wordy when it's not the case when you agree with the take.Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:07 pmWhy is no substance? Because you don't like it and is addressed at you?Hugh Jass wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:01 pmLol. I can assure you this is very much so genuine.Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 7:35 pm
Took you some time to make a plan to push me, you are not genuine at all, what you say here is a scum claim.
I reacted instantly, you were itt and react so much time after.
Feels like i am right about you, you remain in my Poe.
This isn't an argument. I've always got thoughts ruminating, and I keep re-reading stuff. Fwiw I actually did react instantly when your handling of me continued this phase and I told you that I didn't feel like you were genuinely trying to figure me out since there is no substance. And you never follow up.
If you're town, you're dead wrong.
I don't follow up what? I don't answer at your questions? If i have a wolf read i don't really make that player my no 1 in interactions.
You don't follow up when you're questioning to reach conclusions. You've failed to answer several of mine, and when raising points that I rebutt, same.
I'm not asking you to make me your no 1 in interactions. And this isn't simply in your handling of me, it's a trend of your contribution so far. There is little of it in most of the questions you ask.
Not before a scum flip anyway.
You've played against me as a wolf before I think![]()
Are you affraid of pressure?
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]
Missed this, sorry

Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]
I'll be back in a few, dinner time.
- PonySparkPrime
- Sockpuppet Account
- Posts in topic: 253
- Posts: 575
- Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2015 10:16 pm
- Preferred Pronouns: he/his/him
- Boringboi666
- Sockpuppet Account
- Posts in topic: 168
- Posts: 179
- Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2020 6:03 am
- Location: next to some ranch
- Preferred Pronouns: she/her/hers/herself
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]
that was something that you decided on your own. we joked about having a similar name that's the only thing we have in common.
that sounds like a "you" problem. I copy pasted the list from the front page.In your most recent colour coded list I'd like to point out two things which I always find scummy -
1) You included yourself, in green, on the list. I hate it when players include themselves in their own town reads.
this is also a you problem. Color coded lists are standard, or at least they have been in the past.2) That it's colour coded. I hate colour coded lists, just ask Kza.
It takes 5 seconds to choose color tags you dork. I put the colors because I wanted to, and again because they're the universally understood standard for read lists.Further to point two, I gave you a hard time for not being succinct and you replied with "sorry I dont curate my posts", but then you take the time to curate a fucking colour coded list.
Puked in my mouth.
[VOTE: Grumple] aubergine
If you want all your posts to be plain text, size 14 calibri font double spaced, with 1 sentence paragraphs and MLA formatting that is your prerogative, have fun with it.
if you say anything else on thie topic I promise to respond to you in bright yellow text forever
(or until I get bored of it)
- Principal Skinner
- Sockpuppet Account
- Posts in topic: 66
- Posts: 332
- Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2015 10:41 am
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]
That isn't the reason Krusty gave. Krusty says Lisa should be dead for making only one post today. I disagree with that, and it's lazier than when Homer came dressed up as John Belushi to the children's Halloween party. *shudders*Hugh Jass wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 7:56 pmShe was the second wagon and has been suspected before her absence this phase. Being inactive isn't really one of the reasons.Principal Skinner wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 7:25 pmI read them. The concern is that Lisa has one post this phase and that means she's a bad student? I find that less than compelling evidence.Krusty the Clown wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 7:23 pmRead her posts. She's made a remarkable contribution this RD, 1 post! Top marks, fo shoPrincipal Skinner wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 7:22 pm What is the concern with Lisa? She's always been a top notch student.
Being suspected before her absence this phase isn't a reason either.
- Principal Skinner
- Sockpuppet Account
- Posts in topic: 66
- Posts: 332
- Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2015 10:41 am
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]
I will be unavailable for 51 minutes, during which time I must assist mother.
- PonySparkPrime
- Sockpuppet Account
- Posts in topic: 253
- Posts: 575
- Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2015 10:16 pm
- Preferred Pronouns: he/his/him
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]
Did ever Skinner reveal result today?
- PonySparkPrime
- Sockpuppet Account
- Posts in topic: 253
- Posts: 575
- Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2015 10:16 pm
- Preferred Pronouns: he/his/him
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]
I will be back later too
- Boringboi666
- Sockpuppet Account
- Posts in topic: 168
- Posts: 179
- Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2020 6:03 am
- Location: next to some ranch
- Preferred Pronouns: she/her/hers/herself
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]
I posted this a little earlier.Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:31 pmBart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:29 pm [mention]The Grumple[/mention] what's your take at this moment?
Who is in your Poe?
some of this is flexible. Otto flashes downward whenever he goes after me or anyone else over things that aren't actually related to the game. It's so frequent and consistent and no one else seems bothered by it, so I have to assume that's just a personality trait.The Grumple wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 6:24 pm Allison Taylor
The Grumple
Hugh Jass
Marge Simpson
Otto Mann
Principal Skinner
Bart Simpson
Grampa Simpson
Krusty the Clown
Lisa Simpson
Mr. Burns
You and Mr. Burns are basically in the bottom part because I haven't seen any particular reason to read you as town yet.
- PonySparkPrime
- Sockpuppet Account
- Posts in topic: 253
- Posts: 575
- Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2015 10:16 pm
- Preferred Pronouns: he/his/him
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]
If you put me and Burns in the same tier that means the bottom is not ordered?The Grumple wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:03 pmI posted this a little earlier.Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:31 pmBart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:29 pm @The Grumple what's your take at this moment?
Who is in your Poe?
some of this is flexible. Otto flashes downward whenever he goes after me or anyone else over things that aren't actually related to the game. It's so frequent and consistent and no one else seems bothered by it, so I have to assume that's just a personality trait.The Grumple wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 6:24 pm Allison Taylor
The Grumple
Hugh Jass
Marge Simpson
Otto Mann
Principal Skinner
Bart Simpson
Grampa Simpson
Krusty the Clown
Lisa Simpson
Mr. Burns
You and Mr. Burns are basically in the bottom part because I haven't seen any particular reason to read you as town yet.
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]
What? So a guy who won't curate his posts worries about his font size looking boring like a stuffy MLA? I don't get it.The Grumple wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:51 pmthat was something that you decided on your own. we joked about having a similar name that's the only thing we have in common.
that sounds like a "you" problem. I copy pasted the list from the front page.In your most recent colour coded list I'd like to point out two things which I always find scummy -
1) You included yourself, in green, on the list. I hate it when players include themselves in their own town reads.
this is also a you problem. Color coded lists are standard, or at least they have been in the past.2) That it's colour coded. I hate colour coded lists, just ask Kza.
It takes 5 seconds to choose color tags you dork. I put the colors because I wanted to, and again because they're the universally understood standard for read lists.Further to point two, I gave you a hard time for not being succinct and you replied with "sorry I dont curate my posts", but then you take the time to curate a fucking colour coded list.
Puked in my mouth.
[VOTE: Grumple] aubergine
If you want all your posts to be plain text, size 14 calibri font double spaced, with 1 sentence paragraphs and MLA formatting that is your prerogative, have fun with it.
if you say anything else on thie topic I promise to respond to you in bright yellow text forever
(or until I get bored of it)
Bright yellow me baby. Just pee everywhere, Grumple, at least Grampa wears a diaper.
- Boringboi666
- Sockpuppet Account
- Posts in topic: 168
- Posts: 179
- Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2020 6:03 am
- Location: next to some ranch
- Preferred Pronouns: she/her/hers/herself
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]
yesBart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:06 pmIf you put me and Burns in the same tier that means the bottom is not ordered?The Grumple wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:03 pmI posted this a little earlier.Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:31 pmBart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:29 pm @The Grumple what's your take at this moment?
Who is in your Poe?
some of this is flexible. Otto flashes downward whenever he goes after me or anyone else over things that aren't actually related to the game. It's so frequent and consistent and no one else seems bothered by it, so I have to assume that's just a personality trait.The Grumple wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 6:24 pm Allison Taylor
The Grumple
Hugh Jass
Marge Simpson
Otto Mann
Principal Skinner
Bart Simpson
Grampa Simpson
Krusty the Clown
Lisa Simpson
Mr. Burns
You and Mr. Burns are basically in the bottom part because I haven't seen any particular reason to read you as town yet.
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]
I assume the top isnt either because Frumplr has a stronger town read on Allison than he does himself.Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:06 pmIf you put me and Burns in the same tier that means the bottom is not ordered?The Grumple wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:03 pmI posted this a little earlier.Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:31 pmBart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:29 pm @The Grumple what's your take at this moment?
Who is in your Poe?
some of this is flexible. Otto flashes downward whenever he goes after me or anyone else over things that aren't actually related to the game. It's so frequent and consistent and no one else seems bothered by it, so I have to assume that's just a personality trait.The Grumple wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 6:24 pm Allison Taylor
The Grumple
Hugh Jass
Marge Simpson
Otto Mann
Principal Skinner
Bart Simpson
Grampa Simpson
Krusty the Clown
Lisa Simpson
Mr. Burns
You and Mr. Burns are basically in the bottom part because I haven't seen any particular reason to read you as town yet.
Weird eh?!
- Boringboi666
- Sockpuppet Account
- Posts in topic: 168
- Posts: 179
- Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2020 6:03 am
- Location: next to some ranch
- Preferred Pronouns: she/her/hers/herself
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]
you're either misquoting or misunderstanding. I'm not going to post to follow your weird standards because you're a random person on the internet, and we're playing a game.
I will gladly reformat my posts for fun, or spite however.
- NurseWilgy
- Sockpuppet Account
- Posts in topic: 155
- Posts: 762
- Joined: Mon Mar 04, 2013 1:11 pm
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]
back like we never left
- Boringboi666
- Sockpuppet Account
- Posts in topic: 168
- Posts: 179
- Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2020 6:03 am
- Location: next to some ranch
- Preferred Pronouns: she/her/hers/herself
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]
seriously though is this normal for him
- NurseWilgy
- Sockpuppet Account
- Posts in topic: 155
- Posts: 762
- Joined: Mon Mar 04, 2013 1:11 pm
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]
Grumple, what's your read on me? What convinces you that I'm scum over Lisa?
Spoiler: show
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]
Yes.
Especially when I have a red peek