Re: The Avengers [Day 1]
Posted: Sun Apr 28, 2024 4:34 am
Like...I don't know how to read him either he's doing relatively the same thing he was doing in Sims game? But then is that just normal play from him as town too and it's all NAI?
I think I know nothing about the sims game so it all means nothing to me in regards to thatLime Coke wrote: ↑Sun Apr 28, 2024 4:40 amLike...I don't know how to read him either he's doing relatively the same thing he was doing in Sims game? But then is that just normal play from him as town too and it's all NAI?
Keep in mind I also mis-townread him in Sims game as well and I had to turn around in the end to vote him out so.
Oh I thought you were in that game but I guess I was misremembering.Porscha wrote: ↑Sun Apr 28, 2024 4:48 amI think I know nothing about the sims game so it all means nothing to me in regards to thatLime Coke wrote: ↑Sun Apr 28, 2024 4:40 amLike...I don't know how to read him either he's doing relatively the same thing he was doing in Sims game? But then is that just normal play from him as town too and it's all NAI?
Keep in mind I also mis-townread him in Sims game as well and I had to turn around in the end to vote him out so.
dunno what you're talking about lol
I am sorry but this is an enormous stretch and I don't know how you could have liked his posts
This is about where I left off (the last post I actually recall reading was LC's "hey Lorab" post)
Since this was the last post in the thread this AM, I went and read Simons posts as a starting point. He reads pretty null to me. It read like he was trying to make on topic conversation out of nothing. I could see a civ doing this, esp in this super quiet thread, or I could see a wolf doing it. I will say the fact that he mentioned logical fallacies (which is, I think, a thing I might expect of Epis son) , not the people who made them, a bit tweaky. I wouldn't say it's "nonsense" though, I think calling it nonsense is a pretty enormous stretch, too.Lime Coke wrote: ↑Sun Apr 28, 2024 6:08 amEh I looked at it again I might've been a bit generous with it there wasn't much the game state stuff was just okay I guess?
I haven't gotten past this point. He now has 3 votes, so if he did something specifically sketch, I guess i will see it going forward. He had 5 posts at the time you voted not two. I could have possibly gotten with post padding as a baddie reading of his posts, if everyone else wasn't doing the same.
He's still a yellow for me, I would shift him to the greener side of yellow, rather than the orange-r, his itty bit of a reaction to Porschas vote, gave me warmish Wilgys.
No. as far as I could see, it's only Dunia, and she has irl busy-ness going on, so I'd cut her some slack. And more than half the list is in the under 10 low poster range in any case. That's why leetics vote for you got my eye. Why did he call you out for BS banter posts when that was pretty much the whole thread at that point?
Yeah, and the old Michelle was town in the game you're thinking of, lol. And to be clear, I'm not saying she's NOT town here, I just think ones position on low posting is not the only metric there is by which to judge someones opinions. I need to see more of her, but she doesn't have that "people pleasing" air I tend to associate with bad Michelle.
Vote and hope based on what? Did you pick him at random?
Just because you think someone may not be bad, doesn't exactly mean you also think they are town. Especially on a quiet Day One.falcon45ca wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 6:05 pmLong Con wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 5:01 pmI asked Tony what his intuition told him, and he gave a couple of answers to that. I took "a lot" to mean "general attitudes of which those things were an example".falcon45ca wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 4:30 pmSimon wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 4:19 pmIf we choose to play by that, then your options (so far anyway) would be motobot, Abigail Sophia, dunia, and lorab. Let me know if I am missing someone.
Also, I keep finding a lot of "intuition" and "gambler's fallacy". This tells me that some people are struggling to find anything useful to say. But then again, this is still just the beginning of the game, and I'm sure it can be hard to go off of something when there isn't much to go off to begin with.
But personally, intuition and gambler's fallacy are not something I usually go off of, especially at the start of something like this.
By "a lot", do you mean the twice?
IIRC TonyPrime brought up the gamblers fallacy, and I brought up intuition...what other mentions of these terms did you see?
This soft interrogation of Simon looks both pointless and predatory. [VOTE: falcon] aubergine
You did so once, and only after I brought up intuition...and predatory of Simon eh?
Why is Simon Town?
"Massive L"??
Having reread without reactions, this is the thing that sticks out the most to me. What did your gut tell you? Was it just random, was it becasue he had votes?
lol.
You click on the little quotation mark in the upper corner, and then you see what you quoted. At the very end of it, you see [/ quote]
Maybe it's a combination of my "don't trust me" name, my elusively mysterious avatar, and my use of theS~V~S wrote: ↑Sun Apr 28, 2024 9:02 amHaving reread without reactions, this is the thing that sticks out the most to me. What did your gut tell you? Was it just random, was it becasue he had votes?
I think this is the sketchiest vote in the thread so far.
I am gonna drop a vote on [VOTE: motobot] aubergine for now. I am going to go back and reread him in the Hungry game, where he was bad, and see if he made this kind of vote there.
Hangover?
Are you answering the question he asked me, here?S~V~S wrote: ↑Sun Apr 28, 2024 7:33 amVote and hope based on what? Did you pick him at random?
I tend to be the person most sus of LC, and I pretty much always bad read him. So now i am up to him having 2 votes for Trivia.
Not liking this, gonna be honest. It feels kinda icky.
Just because you think someone may not be bad, doesn't exactly mean you also think they are town. Especially on a quiet Day One.falcon45ca wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 6:05 pmLong Con wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 5:01 pmI asked Tony what his intuition told him, and he gave a couple of answers to that. I took "a lot" to mean "general attitudes of which those things were an example".falcon45ca wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 4:30 pmSimon wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 4:19 pmIf we choose to play by that, then your options (so far anyway) would be motobot, Abigail Sophia, dunia, and lorab. Let me know if I am missing someone.
Also, I keep finding a lot of "intuition" and "gambler's fallacy". This tells me that some people are struggling to find anything useful to say. But then again, this is still just the beginning of the game, and I'm sure it can be hard to go off of something when there isn't much to go off to begin with.
But personally, intuition and gambler's fallacy are not something I usually go off of, especially at the start of something like this.
By "a lot", do you mean the twice?
IIRC TonyPrime brought up the gamblers fallacy, and I brought up intuition...what other mentions of these terms did you see?
This soft interrogation of Simon looks both pointless and predatory. [VOTE: falcon] aubergine
You did so once, and only after I brought up intuition...and predatory of Simon eh?
Why is Simon Town?
Kinda, I guess? If someone posts a thing in thread, I think it's fair game for anyone to comment on. I found his "why is Simon town" question to be a bit black/white from my perspective, not accounting for the gray of a slow day 1, so I said so. Isn't this how we play Mafia, commenting on each others comments?Long Con wrote: ↑Sun Apr 28, 2024 10:28 amAre you answering the question he asked me, here?S~V~S wrote: ↑Sun Apr 28, 2024 7:33 amVote and hope based on what? Did you pick him at random?
I tend to be the person most sus of LC, and I pretty much always bad read him. So now i am up to him having 2 votes for Trivia.
Not liking this, gonna be honest. It feels kinda icky.
Just because you think someone may not be bad, doesn't exactly mean you also think they are town. Especially on a quiet Day One.falcon45ca wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 6:05 pmLong Con wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 5:01 pmI asked Tony what his intuition told him, and he gave a couple of answers to that. I took "a lot" to mean "general attitudes of which those things were an example".falcon45ca wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 4:30 pmSimon wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 4:19 pmIf we choose to play by that, then your options (so far anyway) would be motobot, Abigail Sophia, dunia, and lorab. Let me know if I am missing someone.
Also, I keep finding a lot of "intuition" and "gambler's fallacy". This tells me that some people are struggling to find anything useful to say. But then again, this is still just the beginning of the game, and I'm sure it can be hard to go off of something when there isn't much to go off to begin with.
But personally, intuition and gambler's fallacy are not something I usually go off of, especially at the start of something like this.
By "a lot", do you mean the twice?
IIRC TonyPrime brought up the gamblers fallacy, and I brought up intuition...what other mentions of these terms did you see?
This soft interrogation of Simon looks both pointless and predatory. [VOTE: falcon] aubergine
You did so once, and only after I brought up intuition...and predatory of Simon eh?
Why is Simon Town?
I took a look at the guests, and by far most of them seem to be registered to "claude. bot" which is a competitor of ChatGPT. So it looks like they're scrubbing us for "intelligence" to replicate. Life on the web.Long Con wrote: ↑Sun Apr 28, 2024 10:33 amI haven't gotten any errors, but there are 33 Guests right now and Syndicate pages are taking like 5 seconds to load. Normally, they load pretty instantly for me, and other web pages load instantly right now.
Not at all! Just making sure I understand correctly before follow-up questions.S~V~S wrote: ↑Sun Apr 28, 2024 11:00 amKinda, I guess? If someone posts a thing in thread, I think it's fair game for anyone to comment on. I found his "why is Simon town" question to be a bit black/white from my perspective, not accounting for the gray of a slow day 1, so I said so. Isn't this how we play Mafia, commenting on each others comments?Long Con wrote: ↑Sun Apr 28, 2024 10:28 amAre you answering the question he asked me, here?S~V~S wrote: ↑Sun Apr 28, 2024 7:33 amVote and hope based on what? Did you pick him at random?
I tend to be the person most sus of LC, and I pretty much always bad read him. So now i am up to him having 2 votes for Trivia.
Not liking this, gonna be honest. It feels kinda icky.
Just because you think someone may not be bad, doesn't exactly mean you also think they are town. Especially on a quiet Day One.falcon45ca wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 6:05 pmLong Con wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 5:01 pmI asked Tony what his intuition told him, and he gave a couple of answers to that. I took "a lot" to mean "general attitudes of which those things were an example".falcon45ca wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 4:30 pmSimon wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 4:19 pm
If we choose to play by that, then your options (so far anyway) would be motobot, Abigail Sophia, dunia, and lorab. Let me know if I am missing someone.
Also, I keep finding a lot of "intuition" and "gambler's fallacy". This tells me that some people are struggling to find anything useful to say. But then again, this is still just the beginning of the game, and I'm sure it can be hard to go off of something when there isn't much to go off to begin with.
But personally, intuition and gambler's fallacy are not something I usually go off of, especially at the start of something like this.
By "a lot", do you mean the twice?
IIRC TonyPrime brought up the gamblers fallacy, and I brought up intuition...what other mentions of these terms did you see?
This soft interrogation of Simon looks both pointless and predatory. [VOTE: falcon] aubergine
You did so once, and only after I brought up intuition...and predatory of Simon eh?
Why is Simon Town?
Do you think that if someone is directing something at you, no one else can have an opinion on it?
Ah, so they're like beneficial bacteria!S~V~S wrote: ↑Sun Apr 28, 2024 11:06 amI took a look at the guests, and by far most of them seem to be registered to "claude. bot" which is a competitor of ChatGPT. So it looks like they're scrubbing us for "intelligence" to replicate. Life on the web.Long Con wrote: ↑Sun Apr 28, 2024 10:33 amI haven't gotten any errors, but there are 33 Guests right now and Syndicate pages are taking like 5 seconds to load. Normally, they load pretty instantly for me, and other web pages load instantly right now.
S~V~S wrote: ↑Sun Apr 28, 2024 7:33 amVote and hope based on what? Did you pick him at random?
I tend to be the person most sus of LC, and I pretty much always bad read him. So now i am up to him having 2 votes for Trivia.
Not liking this, gonna be honest. It feels kinda icky.
Just because you think someone may not be bad, doesn't exactly mean you also think they are town. Especially on a quiet Day One.falcon45ca wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 6:05 pmLong Con wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 5:01 pmI asked Tony what his intuition told him, and he gave a couple of answers to that. I took "a lot" to mean "general attitudes of which those things were an example".falcon45ca wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 4:30 pmSimon wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 4:19 pmIf we choose to play by that, then your options (so far anyway) would be motobot, Abigail Sophia, dunia, and lorab. Let me know if I am missing someone.
Also, I keep finding a lot of "intuition" and "gambler's fallacy". This tells me that some people are struggling to find anything useful to say. But then again, this is still just the beginning of the game, and I'm sure it can be hard to go off of something when there isn't much to go off to begin with.
But personally, intuition and gambler's fallacy are not something I usually go off of, especially at the start of something like this.
By "a lot", do you mean the twice?
IIRC TonyPrime brought up the gamblers fallacy, and I brought up intuition...what other mentions of these terms did you see?
This soft interrogation of Simon looks both pointless and predatory. [VOTE: falcon] aubergine
You did so once, and only after I brought up intuition...and predatory of Simon eh?
Why is Simon Town?
Like you, for instance. You feel sincere to me, I don't particularly think you're bad. But I haven't seem very much yet to point to and say, "Ah, Falcon is town", just a general attitude.
I will say that your vote for LC seems the most sincere to me of the three he has currently.
@Michelle why the Falcon vote? His slight aggro edge feels more like town Falc to me. Was it just a joke "no u" thing", since he had a vote on you at that point?
I have one errand to run about noonish, but otherwise I'll be in and out all day.
I don't love his vote, but I do understand his reasons. Now I'm going to go back and reread your interaction with LC, with your points in mind, but right now it feels kinda town/town to me.falcon45ca wrote: ↑Sun Apr 28, 2024 11:24 amSpoiler: show
That's understandable, I get that. Differences in my mind are that LC did not say that, or anything, to answer my question, but framed it in somewhat demeaning light
This is D1, and w/ no info we have to probe & prod each other as much as possible
For instance, Simon didn't respond to my question to him as tho it were predatory, and I appreciated his answer
Syn expressed he had similar thoughts re: Simon, and was intending to follow up as well
How do you feel about LCs vote on me & his reason why
Fixedand leetic singled Long Con out for something that literally applied to almost everyone else in the thread at the point that he voted.
By "demeaning", you mean "accusational", right?falcon45ca wrote: ↑Sun Apr 28, 2024 11:24 amS~V~S wrote: ↑Sun Apr 28, 2024 7:33 amVote and hope based on what? Did you pick him at random?
I tend to be the person most sus of LC, and I pretty much always bad read him. So now i am up to him having 2 votes for Trivia.
Not liking this, gonna be honest. It feels kinda icky.
Just because you think someone may not be bad, doesn't exactly mean you also think they are town. Especially on a quiet Day One.falcon45ca wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 6:05 pmLong Con wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 5:01 pmI asked Tony what his intuition told him, and he gave a couple of answers to that. I took "a lot" to mean "general attitudes of which those things were an example".falcon45ca wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 4:30 pmSimon wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 4:19 pmIf we choose to play by that, then your options (so far anyway) would be motobot, Abigail Sophia, dunia, and lorab. Let me know if I am missing someone.
Also, I keep finding a lot of "intuition" and "gambler's fallacy". This tells me that some people are struggling to find anything useful to say. But then again, this is still just the beginning of the game, and I'm sure it can be hard to go off of something when there isn't much to go off to begin with.
But personally, intuition and gambler's fallacy are not something I usually go off of, especially at the start of something like this.
By "a lot", do you mean the twice?
IIRC TonyPrime brought up the gamblers fallacy, and I brought up intuition...what other mentions of these terms did you see?
This soft interrogation of Simon looks both pointless and predatory. [VOTE: falcon] aubergine
You did so once, and only after I brought up intuition...and predatory of Simon eh?
Why is Simon Town?
Like you, for instance. You feel sincere to me, I don't particularly think you're bad. But I haven't seem very much yet to point to and say, "Ah, Falcon is town", just a general attitude.
I will say that your vote for LC seems the most sincere to me of the three he has currently.
@Michelle why the Falcon vote? His slight aggro edge feels more like town Falc to me. Was it just a joke "no u" thing", since he had a vote on you at that point?
I have one errand to run about noonish, but otherwise I'll be in and out all day.
That's understandable, I get that. Differences in my mind are that LC did not say that, or anything, to answer my question, but framed it in somewhat demeaning light
I also had similar thoughts re: Simon, and then I realized that picking apart exactly what his definition of "a lot" is would be a little pedantic and bullying, and wouldn't likely bear any game-relevant fruit, so I chose not to do it. Why would you focus on something so nitpicky? What result did you imagine coming from it besides maybe Simon having less confidence in speaking his mind, for fear that it's going to be linguistically dissected and get him called out on whatever minor definitional discrepancy you decide to pounce on?Syn expressed he had similar thoughts re: Simon, and was intending to follow up as well
Long Con wrote: ↑Sun Apr 28, 2024 12:00 pmBy "demeaning", you mean "accusational", right?falcon45ca wrote: ↑Sun Apr 28, 2024 11:24 amS~V~S wrote: ↑Sun Apr 28, 2024 7:33 amVote and hope based on what? Did you pick him at random?
I tend to be the person most sus of LC, and I pretty much always bad read him. So now i am up to him having 2 votes for Trivia.
Not liking this, gonna be honest. It feels kinda icky.
Just because you think someone may not be bad, doesn't exactly mean you also think they are town. Especially on a quiet Day One.falcon45ca wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 6:05 pmLong Con wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 5:01 pmI asked Tony what his intuition told him, and he gave a couple of answers to that. I took "a lot" to mean "general attitudes of which those things were an example".falcon45ca wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 4:30 pmSimon wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 4:19 pm
If we choose to play by that, then your options (so far anyway) would be motobot, Abigail Sophia, dunia, and lorab. Let me know if I am missing someone.
Also, I keep finding a lot of "intuition" and "gambler's fallacy". This tells me that some people are struggling to find anything useful to say. But then again, this is still just the beginning of the game, and I'm sure it can be hard to go off of something when there isn't much to go off to begin with.
But personally, intuition and gambler's fallacy are not something I usually go off of, especially at the start of something like this.
By "a lot", do you mean the twice?
IIRC TonyPrime brought up the gamblers fallacy, and I brought up intuition...what other mentions of these terms did you see?
This soft interrogation of Simon looks both pointless and predatory. [VOTE: falcon] aubergine
You did so once, and only after I brought up intuition...and predatory of Simon eh?
Why is Simon Town?
Like you, for instance. You feel sincere to me, I don't particularly think you're bad. But I haven't seem very much yet to point to and say, "Ah, Falcon is town", just a general attitude.
I will say that your vote for LC seems the most sincere to me of the three he has currently.
@Michelle why the Falcon vote? His slight aggro edge feels more like town Falc to me. Was it just a joke "no u" thing", since he had a vote on you at that point?
I have one errand to run about noonish, but otherwise I'll be in and out all day.
That's understandable, I get that. Differences in my mind are that LC did not say that, or anything, to answer my question, but framed it in somewhat demeaning light
I also had similar thoughts re: Simon, and then I realized that picking apart exactly what his definition of "a lot" is would be a little pedantic and bullying, and wouldn't likely bear any game-relevant fruit, so I chose not to do it. Why would you focus on something so nitpicky? What result did you imagine coming from it besides maybe Simon having less confidence in speaking his mind, for fear that it's going to be linguistically dissected and get him called out on whatever minor definitional discrepancy you decide to pounce on?Syn expressed he had similar thoughts re: Simon, and was intending to follow up as well
I'm trying to be as helpful as possible for you to understand where I'm coming from here, because I was less concise and more reactionary in my stance last night.
There is literally no irony. You reacted one way to the same thiughts, I reacted a different way.falcon45ca wrote: ↑Sun Apr 28, 2024 12:57 pm The irony of "I have the same/similar thoughts as you, but you're the predator/bully for asking" is delicious
Also, I don't think you're a limp noodle, man. I think you're a strong competitor and a good player.falcon45ca wrote: ↑Sun Apr 28, 2024 12:56 pmLong Con wrote: ↑Sun Apr 28, 2024 12:00 pmBy "demeaning", you mean "accusational", right?falcon45ca wrote: ↑Sun Apr 28, 2024 11:24 amS~V~S wrote: ↑Sun Apr 28, 2024 7:33 amVote and hope based on what? Did you pick him at random?
I tend to be the person most sus of LC, and I pretty much always bad read him. So now i am up to him having 2 votes for Trivia.
Not liking this, gonna be honest. It feels kinda icky.
Just because you think someone may not be bad, doesn't exactly mean you also think they are town. Especially on a quiet Day One.falcon45ca wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 6:05 pmLong Con wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 5:01 pmI asked Tony what his intuition told him, and he gave a couple of answers to that. I took "a lot" to mean "general attitudes of which those things were an example".falcon45ca wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 4:30 pm
By "a lot", do you mean the twice?
IIRC TonyPrime brought up the gamblers fallacy, and I brought up intuition...what other mentions of these terms did you see?
This soft interrogation of Simon looks both pointless and predatory. [VOTE: falcon] aubergine
You did so once, and only after I brought up intuition...and predatory of Simon eh?
Why is Simon Town?
Like you, for instance. You feel sincere to me, I don't particularly think you're bad. But I haven't seem very much yet to point to and say, "Ah, Falcon is town", just a general attitude.
I will say that your vote for LC seems the most sincere to me of the three he has currently.
@Michelle why the Falcon vote? His slight aggro edge feels more like town Falc to me. Was it just a joke "no u" thing", since he had a vote on you at that point?
I have one errand to run about noonish, but otherwise I'll be in and out all day.
That's understandable, I get that. Differences in my mind are that LC did not say that, or anything, to answer my question, but framed it in somewhat demeaning light
I also had similar thoughts re: Simon, and then I realized that picking apart exactly what his definition of "a lot" is would be a little pedantic and bullying, and wouldn't likely bear any game-relevant fruit, so I chose not to do it. Why would you focus on something so nitpicky? What result did you imagine coming from it besides maybe Simon having less confidence in speaking his mind, for fear that it's going to be linguistically dissected and get him called out on whatever minor definitional discrepancy you decide to pounce on?Syn expressed he had similar thoughts re: Simon, and was intending to follow up as well
I'm trying to be as helpful as possible for you to understand where I'm coming from here, because I was less concise and more reactionary in my stance last night.
No, I think calling my question a "limp noodle" is somewhat demeaning