Page 31 of 48

Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]

Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:31 pm
by tessepia
The Grumple wrote: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:27 pm seriously though is this normal for him
Yes.
Especially when I have a red peek

Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]

Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:32 pm
by Boringboi666
Otto Mann wrote: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:31 pm
The Grumple wrote: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:27 pm seriously though is this normal for him
Yes.
Especially when I have a red peek
was a question for someone unbiased sir

Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]

Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:33 pm
by tessepia
The Grumple wrote: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:32 pm
Otto Mann wrote: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:31 pm
The Grumple wrote: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:27 pm seriously though is this normal for him
Yes.
Especially when I have a red peek
was a question for someone unbiased sir
Are you calling me biased?

Triggered

Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]

Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:38 pm
by tessepia
Ok fine. I'm just trolling grumple but he's no longer a town lean at all.

What I lack on wordiness I make for in aggravation.
Not sorry

Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]

Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:38 pm
by Hugh Jass
Principal Skinner wrote: Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:53 pm That isn't the reason Krusty gave. Krusty says Lisa should be dead for making only one post today. I disagree with that, and it's lazier than when Homer came dressed up as John Belushi to the children's Halloween party. *shudders*
Fair.
Principal Skinner wrote: Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:53 pm Being suspected before her absence this phase isn't a reason either.
No one is saying it is genius. Wanted to let you know that it's suspicion carrying over the previous phases. Here's the gist of how I felt about her in a few posts. Included Grampa's post which was noice.
Spoiler: show
Hugh Jass wrote: Mon Oct 26, 2020 2:54 am Not a big fan of Lisa's little contribution. Feels like she's hunting some easy posts to go off of, and then just share some bland takes. She's kind of using them to appear as if contributing. It's not the lack of reasoning that is off to me, it's more like they seem to be random as hell. There is no train of thoughts or contuinity to them, she's not like quoting different posts about a same discussion trying to give her thoughts about them or add to the discussion. She's more putting her hand into a lot of different discussion to I guess appear more visible, and broaden her reach.
Hugh Jass wrote: Tue Oct 27, 2020 4:48 pm That's not exactly what I was talking about. I'm not holding against her thoughts consistency stuff in general, it's not really a scum tell for me. My gripe with how she's contributing. It feels like she's mostly picking out post to quote and piggy back off, she's not really adding to discussion in a way that's game solving or advancing the game. Like there isn't really pertinent points or reaching conclusions, and it's a cheap way to milk interaction and visibility.
Hugh Jass wrote: Fri Oct 30, 2020 4:09 pm
Marge Simpson wrote: Fri Oct 30, 2020 4:02 pm
Hugh Jass wrote: Fri Oct 30, 2020 3:59 pm I fail to see how it's got a civilian mindset behind it.
i'm not really thinking it's anything explicitly civvie-motivated rather than just...not wolf motivated.

i struggle to find a wolf faking that type of read and for what reasons. not sure if as a wolf you'd go to that length?

i mean, who would have ever thought about that type of stuff?

maybe you're right but ime I'd say that stuff is kinda hard to fake as a wolf unless it's w/w
I get the angle of thoughts that usually don't pop in the heads of wolves but like here it's pretty tame I feel since the drop off in activity and Grumple's many questions were pretty noticeable imo. It's the kind of stuff that I love to point out as scum because they're at a very superficial level. There is also like a lack of attachment to it and progression from her which usually happen when a townie gets pinged by something that no one has comment and especially when it results in an immediate read. Like an eureka moment that feels genuine lol. Here it comes off more as her wanting to put it lights I guess.

Your take is alright though and I might be wrong
Grampa Simpson wrote: Thu Oct 29, 2020 12:31 am
Hugh Jass wrote: Wed Oct 28, 2020 11:07 pm Grampa's EoD2 looked pretty good. I liked our interactions and he did seems genuine in his thoughts and considering the different cases I had. Would like to hear more from him since his 2 main suspects just flipped civ. He's been trending up.
Trying to ISO Lisa with an unforgiving perspective admittedly does make her look worse than null

okay I had a whole post written out but it was word soup and I would've been guilty of that "so many paragraphs just to say a sentence worth of content" push that was used against you (inaccurately, IMO, but still)

I was going to try and argue against your "hand in every jar" argument, and propose a "she mostly town-read the dominant wagons before dipping" alternative, but when I really got down to it, her commentary about the wagons is about equal to her commentary about chopping slankers, Marge shading, and then D2 Allison shading. She's maintained a Burns scum-lean D1 and D2, voted him D2. I can't tell if she scum-leans Marge or not. I think so? She voted Marge D1 and shaded her D2, so... probably? There's just very little to work with. She doesn't say more than one or two things about any subject. Your "hand in every jar" argument is bang on.

From what I can glean, her POE is Bart, Marge, Burns, Allison, with Burns being her strongest(?) lean

Her town is... CBG? She sided with me on D1 but in a really indirect way, so can't say I'm there, especially since she called me desperate because of a bad sentence in my D2 entrance. Town-read Grumple D1 and switched that D2, but didn't commit to calling him wolf-y. Still, probably not a town-lean. And... that's it.

her only town read was the D2 wagon, and she only revealed that a few hours before the chop

Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]

Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:39 pm
by tessepia
MR so pissed rn.
Yes, I'm trolling MR too even though he's not playing.

Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]

Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:40 pm
by Boringboi666
Krusty the Clown wrote: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:27 pm Grumple, what's your read on me? What convinces you that I'm scum over Lisa?
Over the course of the game I've disagreed with the logic behind some of your reads and I've felt like they were opportunistic. I.E. when you went after Hugh for making a long post. Also it's just like a vibes thing.

I'm not convinced you're more scum than Lisa.

Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]

Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:41 pm
by Boringboi666
Otto Mann wrote: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:33 pm
The Grumple wrote: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:32 pm
Otto Mann wrote: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:31 pm
The Grumple wrote: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:27 pm seriously though is this normal for him
Yes.
Especially when I have a red peek
was a question for someone unbiased sir
Are you calling me biased?

Triggered
Oh jesus

Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]

Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:42 pm
by tessepia
The Grumple wrote: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:41 pm
Otto Mann wrote: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:33 pm
The Grumple wrote: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:32 pm
Otto Mann wrote: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:31 pm
The Grumple wrote: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:27 pm seriously though is this normal for him
Yes.
Especially when I have a red peek
was a question for someone unbiased sir
Are you calling me biased?

Triggered
Oh jesus
Yes?

Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]

Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:43 pm
by Boringboi666
I'm stopping. I'm going to feel bad when this game gets over and it turns out I've been arguing with a 14 year old about their syntax preferences if I don't.

Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]

Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:43 pm
by tessepia
Ho ho ahead caller, you're live on the air

Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]

Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:44 pm
by NurseWilgy
The Grumple wrote: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:40 pm
Krusty the Clown wrote: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:27 pm Grumple, what's your read on me? What convinces you that I'm scum over Lisa?
Over the course of the game I've disagreed with the logic behind some of your reads and I've felt like they were opportunistic. I.E. when you went after Hugh for making a long post. Also it's just like a vibes thing.

I'm not convinced you're more scum than Lisa.
For the record, I have a town lean on Hugh. I just get cranky with a sequel to War and Peace for a post.

Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]

Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:47 pm
by novaselinenever
Krusty the Clown wrote: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:44 pm
The Grumple wrote: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:40 pm
Krusty the Clown wrote: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:27 pm Grumple, what's your read on me? What convinces you that I'm scum over Lisa?
Over the course of the game I've disagreed with the logic behind some of your reads and I've felt like they were opportunistic. I.E. when you went after Hugh for making a long post. Also it's just like a vibes thing.

I'm not convinced you're more scum than Lisa.
For the record, I have a town lean on Hugh. I just get cranky with a sequel to War and Peace for a post.
That wasn't the case last phase. What changed?

Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]

Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:49 pm
by Boringboi666
I'd been viewing Otto as being an Epignosis expy but that doesn't really seem to be the case

Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]

Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:50 pm
by Principal Skinner
Bart Simpson wrote: Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:59 pm Did ever Skinner reveal result today?
Were you expecting something from me?

Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]

Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:50 pm
by PonySparkPrime
:evileye:
novaselinenever wrote: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:47 pm
Krusty the Clown wrote: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:44 pm
The Grumple wrote: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:40 pm
Krusty the Clown wrote: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:27 pm Grumple, what's your read on me? What convinces you that I'm scum over Lisa?
Over the course of the game I've disagreed with the logic behind some of your reads and I've felt like they were opportunistic. I.E. when you went after Hugh for making a long post. Also it's just like a vibes thing.

I'm not convinced you're more scum than Lisa.
For the record, I have a town lean on Hugh. I just get cranky with a sequel to War and Peace for a post.
That wasn't the case last phase. What changed?
:evileye: come on...

Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]

Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:51 pm
by tessepia
Krusty the Clown wrote: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:44 pm
The Grumple wrote: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:40 pm
Krusty the Clown wrote: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:27 pm Grumple, what's your read on me? What convinces you that I'm scum over Lisa?
Over the course of the game I've disagreed with the logic behind some of your reads and I've felt like they were opportunistic. I.E. when you went after Hugh for making a long post. Also it's just like a vibes thing.

I'm not convinced you're more scum than Lisa.
For the record, I have a town lean on Hugh. I just get cranky with a sequel to War and Peace for a post.
Amen
So many unnecessary words about stuff and things on this internet mafia website host gaming forum for people who want to play a game called mafia on the internet in an online forum for mafia players.

Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]

Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:51 pm
by PonySparkPrime
Principal Skinner wrote: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:50 pm
Bart Simpson wrote: Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:59 pm Did ever Skinner reveal result today?
Were you expecting something from me?
Yes

Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]

Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:52 pm
by Boringboi666
I personally love reading posts so idk what you guys are about.

Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]

Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:52 pm
by Principal Skinner
Principal Skinner wrote: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:50 pm
Bart Simpson wrote: Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:59 pm Did ever Skinner reveal result today?
Were you expecting something from me?
I don't know why this question exists. I'm as vanilla as they come.

Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]

Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:52 pm
by Hugh Jass
Bart Simpson wrote: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:50 pm :evileye:
novaselinenever wrote: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:47 pm
Krusty the Clown wrote: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:44 pm
The Grumple wrote: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:40 pm
Krusty the Clown wrote: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:27 pm Grumple, what's your read on me? What convinces you that I'm scum over Lisa?
Over the course of the game I've disagreed with the logic behind some of your reads and I've felt like they were opportunistic. I.E. when you went after Hugh for making a long post. Also it's just like a vibes thing.

I'm not convinced you're more scum than Lisa.
For the record, I have a town lean on Hugh. I just get cranky with a sequel to War and Peace for a post.
That wasn't the case last phase. What changed?
:evileye: come on...
lolol what

Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]

Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:53 pm
by My Shell
Well, this is exciting...

Smithers!!!

WTF is going on here?

Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]

Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:53 pm
by PonySparkPrime
Principal Skinner wrote: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:52 pm
Principal Skinner wrote: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:50 pm
Bart Simpson wrote: Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:59 pm Did ever Skinner reveal result today?
Were you expecting something from me?
I don't know why this question exists. I'm as vanilla as they come.
So you rescind your slot's claim?

Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]

Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:54 pm
by Hugh Jass
I missed you Burns sama

Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]

Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:54 pm
by PonySparkPrime
Hugh Jass wrote: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:52 pm
Bart Simpson wrote: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:50 pm :evileye:
novaselinenever wrote: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:47 pm
Krusty the Clown wrote: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:44 pm
The Grumple wrote: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:40 pm
Krusty the Clown wrote: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:27 pm Grumple, what's your read on me? What convinces you that I'm scum over Lisa?
Over the course of the game I've disagreed with the logic behind some of your reads and I've felt like they were opportunistic. I.E. when you went after Hugh for making a long post. Also it's just like a vibes thing.

I'm not convinced you're more scum than Lisa.
For the record, I have a town lean on Hugh. I just get cranky with a sequel to War and Peace for a post.
That wasn't the case last phase. What changed?
:evileye: come on...
lolol what
Nvm

Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]

Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:54 pm
by Principal Skinner
Bart Simpson wrote: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:53 pm
Principal Skinner wrote: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:52 pm
Principal Skinner wrote: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:50 pm
Bart Simpson wrote: Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:59 pm Did ever Skinner reveal result today?
Were you expecting something from me?
I don't know why this question exists. I'm as vanilla as they come.
So you rescind your slot's claim?
I don't read slot's claim.

What did slots claim?

Can slots claim?

Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]

Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:55 pm
by Hugh Jass
I think the host mentioned being absent, he probably told a mod to close the thread. But If it doesn't happen, we should stop posting at 58

Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]

Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:55 pm
by tessepia
Principal Skinner wrote: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:54 pm
Bart Simpson wrote: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:53 pm
Principal Skinner wrote: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:52 pm
Principal Skinner wrote: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:50 pm
Bart Simpson wrote: Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:59 pm Did ever Skinner reveal result today?
Were you expecting something from me?
I don't know why this question exists. I'm as vanilla as they come.
So you rescind your slot's claim?
I don't read slot's claim.

What did slots claim?

Can slots claim?
Your predecessor claimed doc

Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]

Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:56 pm
by Principal Skinner
I trust none of the people on Lisa right now.

Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]

Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:56 pm
by My Shell
shit...two minutes...sorry I'm late...something came up at the plant...radiation contamination death, etc

Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]

Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:56 pm
by PonySparkPrime
Principal Skinner wrote: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:54 pm
Bart Simpson wrote: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:53 pm
Principal Skinner wrote: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:52 pm
Principal Skinner wrote: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:50 pm
Bart Simpson wrote: Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:59 pm Did ever Skinner reveal result today?
Were you expecting something from me?
I don't know why this question exists. I'm as vanilla as they come.
So you rescind your slot's claim?
I don't read slot's claim.

What did slots claim?

Can slots claim?
You really didn't read the game, at least read your own Iso

Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]

Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:57 pm
by Principal Skinner
Otto Mann wrote: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:55 pm
Principal Skinner wrote: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:54 pm
Bart Simpson wrote: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:53 pm
Principal Skinner wrote: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:52 pm
Principal Skinner wrote: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:50 pm
Bart Simpson wrote: Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:59 pm Did ever Skinner reveal result today?
Were you expecting something from me?
I don't know why this question exists. I'm as vanilla as they come.
So you rescind your slot's claim?
I don't read slot's claim.

What did slots claim?

Can slots claim?
Your predecessor claimed doc
Then how'd I know you targeted no one? Docs don't do that.

Vote Krusty.

Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]

Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:57 pm
by tessepia
Cfd grumple

Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]

Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:58 pm
by Principal Skinner
Bart Simpson wrote: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:56 pm
Principal Skinner wrote: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:54 pm
Bart Simpson wrote: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:53 pm
Principal Skinner wrote: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:52 pm
Principal Skinner wrote: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:50 pm
Bart Simpson wrote: Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:59 pm Did ever Skinner reveal result today?
Were you expecting something from me?
I don't know why this question exists. I'm as vanilla as they come.
So you rescind your slot's claim?
I don't read slot's claim.

What did slots claim?

Can slots claim?
You really didn't read the game, at least read your own Iso
I don't read that either.

I'm honest and know what I'm about.

Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]

Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:58 pm
by PonySparkPrime
Otto Mann wrote: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:55 pm
Principal Skinner wrote: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:54 pm
Bart Simpson wrote: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:53 pm
Principal Skinner wrote: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:52 pm
Principal Skinner wrote: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:50 pm
Bart Simpson wrote: Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:59 pm Did ever Skinner reveal result today?
Were you expecting something from me?
I don't know why this question exists. I'm as vanilla as they come.
So you rescind your slot's claim?
I don't read slot's claim.

What did slots claim?

Can slots claim?
Your predecessor claimed doc
I could swear it was tracker, is my memory bad?

Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]

Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:58 pm
by tessepia
Principal Skinner wrote: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:57 pm
Otto Mann wrote: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:55 pm
Principal Skinner wrote: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:54 pm
Bart Simpson wrote: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:53 pm
Principal Skinner wrote: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:52 pm
Principal Skinner wrote: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:50 pm
Bart Simpson wrote: Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:59 pm Did ever Skinner reveal result today?
Were you expecting something from me?
I don't know why this question exists. I'm as vanilla as they come.
So you rescind your slot's claim?
I don't read slot's claim.

What did slots claim?

Can slots claim?
Your predecessor claimed doc
Then how'd I know you targeted no one? Docs don't do that.

Vote Krusty.
I tried.
No. I will not

Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]

Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:59 pm
by Principal Skinner
Bart Simpson wrote: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:58 pm
Otto Mann wrote: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:55 pm
Principal Skinner wrote: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:54 pm
Bart Simpson wrote: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:53 pm
Principal Skinner wrote: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:52 pm
Principal Skinner wrote: Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:50 pm
Bart Simpson wrote: Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:59 pm Did ever Skinner reveal result today?
Were you expecting something from me?
I don't know why this question exists. I'm as vanilla as they come.
So you rescind your slot's claim?
I don't read slot's claim.

What did slots claim?

Can slots claim?
Your predecessor claimed doc
I could swear it was tracker, is my memory bad?
I'm the principal of Sprungfield Elementary School. I am way smarter than you think I am.

Re: The Simpsons [NIGHT 3]

Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2020 11:02 pm
by Kent Brockman
Day 3

Image


We interrupt this broadcast of Dial 'M' for Murderousness to bring you startling news.

The dead have risen in Springfield and are running amok! Citizens are urged to board up their windows, keep their loves ones close, and make use of whatever projectile weapons you may find. Those with big brains should be especially cautious.

The zombies have already claimed several victims, including local 2nd grader and honor roll student, Lisa Simpson. Hers was the biggest brain of all, and a zombie spokesperson was quoted as saying they, "couldn't resist."


Lisa Simpson has been abducted by zombies. She was Vanilla Town.
It is Night 3. Players have 22 hours to submit night actions. Day will begin at 9:30 PM Eastern Time.

Re: The Simpsons [NIGHT 3]

Posted: Sat Oct 31, 2020 9:30 pm
by Kent Brockman
Night 3

Image

This just in: the dead continue to terrorize downtown Springfield and, for some reason, the Simpson family in particular. Their latest victim is the Simpson family matriarch, Marge Simpson. Speculation is that the zombies believed there to be an extra large human brain underneath her patented blue beehive hairstyle.

Springfield police could not be reached for contact, and details on both the zombie uprising and the Lincoln Squirrel investigation remain unknown. Whether or not these events are connected, who's to say?

For Channel 6, I'm Kent Brockman. May God have mercy on us all.

Marge Simpson has been abducted by zombies. She was Vanilla Town.
It is Day 4. You have 48 hours to eliminate somebody.

Re: The Simpsons [DAY 4]

Posted: Sat Oct 31, 2020 9:47 pm
by My Shell
There's a lock town, and the wolves NK my suspects.

Disrespectful.

Re: The Simpsons [DAY 4]

Posted: Sat Oct 31, 2020 10:14 pm
by Paprika
pure shit

Re: The Simpsons [DAY 4]

Posted: Sat Oct 31, 2020 10:15 pm
by Paprika
[VOTE: Allison Taylor] aubergine

feeling a little bit s p i c y

but also my POE got halved again

Re: The Simpsons [DAY 4]

Posted: Sat Oct 31, 2020 10:16 pm
by Paprika
Otto I hated your EOD but I loved your attempted trap on Skinner lol

Re: The Simpsons [DAY 4]

Posted: Sat Oct 31, 2020 10:18 pm
by Paprika
Marge hella pushed Allison EOD and didn't participate in either of the wagons, so I'll look through that ISO and see if Marge's thoughts align with my weak half-assed "idk man" read from yesterday

Re: The Simpsons [DAY 4]

Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2020 12:37 am
by tessepia
Grampa Simpson wrote: Sat Oct 31, 2020 10:16 pm Otto I hated your EOD but I loved your attempted trap on Skinner lol
I might have started drinking around 3. I'm not proud of my EoD but it was fun at the time.

Where are your reads at gramps?

Re: The Simpsons [DAY 4]

Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2020 1:04 am
by Julinook
Grampa Simpson wrote: Sat Oct 31, 2020 10:15 pm [VOTE: Allison Taylor] aubergine

feeling a little bit s p i c y

but also my POE got halved again
nah

Re: The Simpsons [DAY 4]

Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2020 1:13 am
by PonySparkPrime
Mr. Burns wrote: Sat Oct 31, 2020 9:47 pm There's a lock town, and the wolves NK my suspects.

Disrespectful.
Who is the lock town?

Sorry Lisa, RIP, i didn't realise who is posting just one post in a day is lock town in this site.

RIP Marge, i will try to understand who is evil in this game.

Image

Re: The Simpsons [DAY 4]

Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2020 1:14 am
by Julinook
Grampa Simpson wrote: Sat Oct 31, 2020 10:18 pm Marge hella pushed Allison EOD and didn't participate in either of the wagons, so I'll look through that ISO and see if Marge's thoughts align with my weak half-assed "idk man" read from yesterday
Marge scumread you too so don't give me that

Re: The Simpsons [DAY 4]

Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2020 1:16 am
by Julinook
Bart Simpson wrote: Sun Nov 01, 2020 1:13 am Who is the lock town?
I assume Skinner

I don't think wolves have a reason to make WIFOM kills at this stage in the game so Krusty probably just town for not killing Skinner.

can't make up my mind on whether or not gramps is scummy for taking aim at me after marge's death or townie for giving enough of a shit to even make a push

Everyone marge said was town has flipped town so I guess I'm just going to trust her read on you. if you outplayed all of us so be it I guess and we don't have enough misexes to get there on you anyway.

Re: The Simpsons [DAY 4]

Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2020 1:17 am
by Julinook
I guess burns or hugh are the most likely candidates for having outplayed me but idk

my reads are shit this game so don't trust me lol