The Syndicate

Epignosis wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 7:42 pm Twelve pages hung on me while I was at work. I don't know how motivated I am to read them. I am in a shitty mood because of something unfortunate that happened less than an hour. Please don't worry about it- it's nothing serious, just very frustrating, and I am probably going to stew about it for a little while.

Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 7:46 pm

Ultra wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 7:37 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 7:29 pm

Ultra wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 7:27 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 7:24 pm

nutella wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 7:22 pm ....nah I still disagree that sloonei is so likely to be nightkilled no matter what. In my experience scum don't just kill the most active players. It's way more complex than that. I don't get this kind of thinking. If he's bad he's a huge threat and y'all are crazy if you can't at least consider that.

Then ignore that argument.

Also there still isn’t even an argument for lynching me. This is just an argument against not lynching me.

Remember early in the game when you tried to play GTH?

My vote here is my gun.



Who are your picks

My suspects?
Matahari
Cooler
DrWilgy

Luxurious, but I’m not as eager to lynch her for the same argument I just made against lynching me.

Why are you not busting your butt to get any of those up there

busy irl

Ultra wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 7:51 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 7:46 pm

Ultra wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 7:37 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 7:29 pm

Ultra wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 7:27 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 7:24 pm

nutella wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 7:22 pm ....nah I still disagree that sloonei is so likely to be nightkilled no matter what. In my experience scum don't just kill the most active players. It's way more complex than that. I don't get this kind of thinking. If he's bad he's a huge threat and y'all are crazy if you can't at least consider that.

Then ignore that argument.

Also there still isn’t even an argument for lynching me. This is just an argument against not lynching me.

Remember early in the game when you tried to play GTH?

My vote here is my gun.



Who are your picks

My suspects?
Matahari
Cooler
DrWilgy

Luxurious, but I’m not as eager to lynch her for the same argument I just made against lynching me.

Why are you not busting your butt to get any of those up there

busy irl

> 400 posts

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 7:44 pm

nutella wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 7:22 pm ....nah I still disagree that sloonei is so likely to be nightkilled no matter what. In my experience scum don't just kill the most active players. It's way more complex than that. I don't get this kind of thinking. If he's bad he's a huge threat and y'all are crazy if you can't at least consider that.

Tell me why you suspect Sloonei.

Cause I don’t see a townie hunting what they think is a wolf.

nutella wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 7:52 pm

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 7:44 pm

nutella wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 7:22 pm ....nah I still disagree that sloonei is so likely to be nightkilled no matter what. In my experience scum don't just kill the most active players. It's way more complex than that. I don't get this kind of thinking. If he's bad he's a huge threat and y'all are crazy if you can't at least consider that.

Tell me why you suspect Sloonei.

Cause I don’t see a townie hunting what they think is a wolf.

I've stated multiple reasons at various times. His cases on me and lux felt disingenuous, he presented them in an awkward manner he feels like a stiff parody of himself. and the gth thing was weird but that's a smaller thing. It's a lot of gut I can't necessarily explain but basically a lot of his activity doesn't come across as genuinely motivated to me.

nutella wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 7:52 pm

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 7:44 pm

nutella wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 7:22 pm ....nah I still disagree that sloonei is so likely to be nightkilled no matter what. In my experience scum don't just kill the most active players. It's way more complex than that. I don't get this kind of thinking. If he's bad he's a huge threat and y'all are crazy if you can't at least consider that.

Tell me why you suspect Sloonei.

Cause I don’t see a townie hunting what they think is a wolf.

I've stated multiple reasons at various times. His cases on me and lux felt disingenuous, he presented them in an awkward manner he feels like a stiff parody of himself. and the gth thing was weird but that's a smaller thing. It's a lot of gut I can't necessarily explain but basically a lot of his activity doesn't come across as genuinely motivated to me.

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 7:57 pm

nutella wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 7:52 pm

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 7:44 pm

nutella wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 7:22 pm ....nah I still disagree that sloonei is so likely to be nightkilled no matter what. In my experience scum don't just kill the most active players. It's way more complex than that. I don't get this kind of thinking. If he's bad he's a huge threat and y'all are crazy if you can't at least consider that.

Tell me why you suspect Sloonei.

Cause I don’t see a townie hunting what they think is a wolf.

I've stated multiple reasons at various times. His cases on me and lux felt disingenuous, he presented them in an awkward manner he feels like a stiff parody of himself. and the gth thing was weird but that's a smaller thing. It's a lot of gut I can't necessarily explain but basically a lot of his activity doesn't come across as genuinely motivated to me.

No, a parody of Sloonei is when you write a Speedchuck/Sloonei romance story wherein Sloonei goes whole scenes only talking in questions.

This is just regular Sloonei.

Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 7:58 pm

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 7:57 pm

nutella wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 7:52 pm

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 7:44 pm

nutella wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 7:22 pm ....nah I still disagree that sloonei is so likely to be nightkilled no matter what. In my experience scum don't just kill the most active players. It's way more complex than that. I don't get this kind of thinking. If he's bad he's a huge threat and y'all are crazy if you can't at least consider that.

Tell me why you suspect Sloonei.

Cause I don’t see a townie hunting what they think is a wolf.

I've stated multiple reasons at various times. His cases on me and lux felt disingenuous, he presented them in an awkward manner he feels like a stiff parody of himself. and the gth thing was weird but that's a smaller thing. It's a lot of gut I can't necessarily explain but basically a lot of his activity doesn't come across as genuinely motivated to me.

No, a parody of Sloonei is when you write a Speedchuck/Sloonei romance story wherein Sloonei goes whole scenes only talking in questions.

This is just regular Sloonei.

Can I get a link to that? What was it like to write it? How was my physique?

Ultra wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 8:06 pm Funny enough, I'm not super sus of cooler

I can totally see it sure with his abysmal vote count

But I feel like his response to my post wasn't really tooo slank if he just hadn't caught up and only responded to the latest thing he saw

Matahari wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 4:18 pm Catching up in this game is really hard. Trying to suss out genuine sounding town reads is also really hard, when you’re not familiar with a lot of players.

The case on Lux has me baffled. Her comments, that may have been slips or may have been mistakes, I understand. Her defense did not consist of trying to make cases or point fingers at others, which seems more like an early game civ behavior to me. If anyone thinks I’m looking at this wrong, by all means, correct me.

I’m going back to iso some others then I’ll post again.

Matahari wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 6:40 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 6:25 pm “Why Marahari?”

Matahari wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 4:18 pm Catching up in this game is really hard. Trying to suss out genuine sounding town reads is also really hard, when you’re not familiar with a lot of players.

The case on Lux has me baffled. Her comments, that may have been slips or may have been mistakes, I understand. Her defense did not consist of trying to make cases or point fingers at others, which seems more like an early game civ behavior to me. If anyone thinks I’m looking at this wrong, by all means, correct me.

I’m going back to iso some others then I’ll post again.

This defense of Lux reads awkward and forced to me. I grilled her over it because “she just defended herself and didn’t point fingers at anyone” strikes me as a strange, somewhat counterintuitive read. It also stands out by virtue of its existence. Matahari defended Luxurious individually. I could see basis for a teammate pairing here.

You see things in a very strange way, it seems to me. That was not a defense of Lux. That was a “if you’re town, this might be your last chance to try and prove it” kind of post, meaning I don’t want to vote for a civ.
There is only one player I have solidly as town. That is Sabie. Juliets is close. Everyone else is neutral to pingy.

That said, I was wary of Dragomir earlier in the game, but I reversed my opinion of him somewhat. He is also just neutral now.
More than likely, my vote will go on Lux, because I think she could have tried harder to defend and do something town related than she did.
But you do things your way and I’ll do things my way.

Matahari wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 7:09 pm

nutella wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 6:49 pm @Matahari I completely don't understand your stance on lux then. It sounded to me like you were townreading her in that post but maybe I read it wrong.

I wasn’t town reading her, but I was pointing out that her weak defense could have been that of a civ who doesn’t know who else could be bad, so she wasn’t trying to build a case against anyone else. Defending yourself is only part of trying to save yourself. It also helps to point out your suspicions of other players and why they should be looked at, as well. Because it might save you.
So, to my way of thinking, why didn’t she suspect others? Why wasn’t she trying to bring up anyone else that she thought was bad. The only answer I have for that is the ones I listed before. Possibly town and had no real suspicion on anyone. Or possibly bad, and trying not to slip again. I posted about it, hoped for some agrees or disagrees.

Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 8:12 pm Similarly, Matahari’s response where she singled out Luxurious to offer a weird pseduo-defense which she later claimed was not a defense is many shades of confusing to me. I didn’t like the read she presented, and I didn’t like that she later denounced it as a defense without really explaining what the read itself.

Luxurious wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 4:47 pm

Luxurious wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 8:16 pm When does day end i have like 5 minutes before my class picks up again

Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 8:12 pm Similarly, Matahari’s response where she singled out Luxurious to offer a weird pseduo-defense which she later claimed was not a defense is many shades of confusing to me. I didn’t like the read she presented, and I didn’t like that she later denounced it as a defense without really explaining what the read itself.

Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 8:19 pm

Luxurious wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 8:16 pm When does day end i have like 5 minutes before my class picks up again

2 hours

Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 12:49 pmPeople who hide behind so-called “gut” reads are cowards. There’s always a reason.

Luxurious wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 8:17 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 8:12 pm Similarly, Matahari’s response where she singled out Luxurious to offer a weird pseduo-defense which she later claimed was not a defense is many shades of confusing to me. I didn’t like the read she presented, and I didn’t like that she later denounced it as a defense without really explaining what the read itself.

I just thought she was town reading me

Matahari wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 8:20 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 8:12 pm Similarly, Matahari’s response where she singled out Luxurious to offer a weird pseduo-defense which she later claimed was not a defense is many shades of confusing to me. I didn’t like the read she presented, and I didn’t like that she later denounced it as a defense without really explaining what the read itself.

You aren’t as good a judge of civvieness as I hoped you’d be. I can’t accept your other comments about people you think are bad, because I know you’re wrong about me. Either way, I would not place a vote on you today. I get it and I’m sure everyone else gets it too.

Matahari wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 4:45 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 4:29 pm

Matahari wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 4:27 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 4:21 pm

Matahari wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 4:18 pm Catching up in this game is really hard. Trying to suss out genuine sounding town reads is also really hard, when you’re not familiar with a lot of players.

The case on Lux has me baffled. Her comments, that may have been slips or may have been mistakes, I understand. Her defense did not consist of trying to make cases or point fingers at others, which seems more like an early game civ behavior to me. If anyone thinks I’m looking at this wrong, by all means, correct me.

I’m going back to iso some others then I’ll post again.

Talk to me about that middle paragraph. What exactly did Lux do, and why is “not pointing fingers” a good look?

She sounded like someone who wanted to save herself, but didn’t have any real suspicions to try and build a case on someone.
Yes, I know that could have been laziness. But I don’t know her or what she is like as a player.
That was just my first impression on reading through her weak defense. Do you see it differently? What other reasons would she have for not trying to bring up suspicions of others that might save her?

Would she have looked worse for trying to build a suspicion out of any component of her self-defense?

Are you asking me if she would have looked worse if she ‘no you’d’? That is possible, but not if she backed up her no u with a decent reason. Basically, make a post listing reasons why she thinks someone could be bad, so other people could decide whether it sounded like legit scumhunting or not.
The only reasons I can see are
she’s a clueless civ
She’s a lazy civ/Indi/maf who isn’t invested in the game
Or she’s is a scared Indi/maf.

Again, I don’t know her style, or meta, whatever it’s being called now. Just on face value, one read through, I thought possible town. Please give me your view, does her behavior in defensegate seem evil?

Linki- ok maybe she’s making a case now. That will give me more to go on.

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 8:17 pm Oi. I have made become tie.

Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 1:06 am Speaking of my advocates: i’m mildly concerned that Epi has stuck up for me so much. What’s his angle?

Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 8:09 pm I voted speedchuck and now some people want a CFD on me.

Interesting.

Luxurious wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 5:39 pm AAAAAAH I HAVE TO LEAVE

IT’S NOT DONE ITS NOT DONE

Spoiler: show

Dragomir wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2019 6:56 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2019 4:53 pm Suspecting people for mechanics talk is an easy strategy for scum to latch onto than mechanics talk. Discuss.

But it can also be pretty valid if all the player is doing is mechanic talk without any actual scum hunting/game solving in their posts. An easy way to look contributive.

Defending nutella +

Dragomir wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2019 9:00 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2019 8:34 pm

Dragomir wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2019 8:31 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2019 7:33 pm

Luxurious wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2019 7:30 pm

nutella wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2019 7:25 pm

I'm not, I just literally meant all of her posts of which there were only like 4 at the time lol

While directed at you it is also directly at Sloonei who actually did look at her iso lmao

I’m just really excited to be playing this game, okay?

Ya sound a little too defensive here

What was I being accused of?

I don't really care about what you were accused of but how you responded to that post. You sound a bit too panicky and too uncomfortable thus wanting to resolve things quickly in that post. I'm not seeing a town perspective to all that.

Beginning of Sloonei scum read +

Dragomir wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2019 9:09 pm

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2019 9:04 pm

Dragomir wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2019 9:00 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2019 8:34 pm

Dragomir wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2019 8:31 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2019 7:33 pm
I’m just really excited to be playing this game, okay?

Ya sound a little too defensive here

What was I being accused of?

I don't really care about what you were accused of but how you responded to that post. You sound a bit too panicky and too uncomfortable thus wanting to resolve things quickly in that post. I'm not seeing a town perspective to all that.

I see it and support it. Sloonei for the noose 2019.

You serious with this? Cause I'm actually down for it.

Eager for sloonei lynch, which coincides well with the last game we played +

Dragomir wrote: ↑Sat May 18, 2019 12:46 am

Epignosis wrote: ↑Thu May 16, 2019 10:37 pm

Ultra wrote: ↑Thu May 16, 2019 10:30 pm

Epignosis wrote: ↑Thu May 16, 2019 10:25 pm

Ultra wrote: ↑Thu May 16, 2019 10:20 pm How come nobody has commented on my suggestion

Because your suggestion is fishing. Your suggestion is impossible to implement without Felicity knowing who Rip Hunter is. Your suggestion is manure.

Read the role, poopyhead.

"Felicity is a tech genius. Once in the game she can submit a role to the host to find out who has the role."

Sloonei wrote: ↑Thu May 16, 2019 10:26 pm

Ultra wrote: ↑Thu May 16, 2019 10:20 pm How come nobody has commented on my suggestion

Because people are cautious about engaging in role-specific chatter this early in the game. It’s not a bad proposal. I haven’t looked close enough at the role list to say whether or not it’s the best.

Well, look.

I know what the role says.

I spoke bourbonese.

Ultra wrote: ↑Thu May 16, 2019 10:28 pm Forgot that the felicity player can't just post results

In that case, what we might want to try a coordinated effort to allow the felicity player to "claim indirectly"

Here's what I'm thinking, if all of us come together and decide on D1 that nobody is allowed to cast a vote, except for the felicity player who casts a vote on her peek, we get whoever we want out D1.

This doesn't break the claiming rules as far as I understand, because anybody can still step forth and vote. But if someone else does vote, we'll still know one is felicity and one is scum. So still a net +

I'm torn on you.

That you are advocating the use of a civilian role to find an independent is fishy.

Fishy my ass. The role that's being outed is better used early than later, that way its peek can be utilized much sooner and the risk of being killed would be less. Also, they immediately become vanilla after the use so mafia or any other scum killing doesn't have much an incentive to kill them anymore. If you guys don't wanna waste the DP, we can just lynch someone else and have the vig kill the person who was peeked.

Also, the indie is not just any indie, it's a damn cult, the world's most hated anti-town. I'd like them dead sooner than later.

There’s actually potential for a dragomir/ ultra team here but it’s meaningless just food for thought and something to reconsider down the line possibly.

Dragomir wrote: ↑Sat May 18, 2019 1:13 am

nutella wrote: ↑Thu May 16, 2019 11:49 pm

Epignosis wrote: ↑Thu May 16, 2019 11:35 pm

nutella wrote: ↑Thu May 16, 2019 11:34 pm

Epignosis wrote: ↑Thu May 16, 2019 11:00 pm I don't suspect Ultra. Bottom line.

I suspect Matahari.

Eh?

Do you...object to me suspecting Matahari?

Or do you object to me not suspecting Ultra?

No I'm wondering why you brought up Matahari. I'm not objecting, just kind of perplexed and wanting elaboration.

Are you concerned for your scum buddy?

This is a similar line of questioning that Nutella did with Mac

Which makes me think he’s trying to copy what nutella’s doing to either link them together or they’re buddies

On the chance he’s town he could just be making a joke but it doesnt read like that.

Dragomir wrote: ↑Sat May 18, 2019 1:45 am I like that iso by Sloo.

Reconsideration on Sloonei starts. Looks good when reconsidering reads

Dragomir wrote: ↑Sat May 18, 2019 1:59 am

nutella wrote: ↑Sat May 18, 2019 1:51 am

Dragomir wrote: ↑Sat May 18, 2019 1:13 am

nutella wrote: ↑Thu May 16, 2019 11:49 pm

Epignosis wrote: ↑Thu May 16, 2019 11:35 pm

nutella wrote: ↑Thu May 16, 2019 11:34 pm

Eh?

Do you...object to me suspecting Matahari?

Or do you object to me not suspecting Ultra?

No I'm wondering why you brought up Matahari. I'm not objecting, just kind of perplexed and wanting elaboration.

Are you concerned for your scum buddy?

bro.... mata is my top suspect as you will find out when you catch up i guess

Don't be acting like suspecting anybody means anything after the last game where Mafia(JJJ and Ultra) bussed each other D1.

Weird Amount Of Shade.

Like the issue with this is that this is multi ball and he’s using the fact that? JJJ and Ultra bussed day one when that doesnt really do anything against Nutella, but he’s not really suspecting Ultra at all (see above Ultra post)

It’s kinda weird mrrrr

Spoiler: show

Dragomir wrote: ↑Sat May 18, 2019 3:44 am

nutella wrote: ↑Sat May 18, 2019 2:11 am

Dragomir wrote: ↑Sat May 18, 2019 1:45 am I like that iso by Sloo.

why? let me know what you think of my response. almost all of his points were founded on absurd twistings of my words. I don't believe he believes what he's saying.

I first I thought he made valid statements, but thinking about it now, I was rather fooled by his in-depth analysis. Now reading back on it, half of what he said doesn't make any sense.

The player called Sloonei is grilling nutella a little bit. Nothing serious, but the directness of the final question in this exchange suggests attentiveness on his part. nutella gives it a casual sidestep, leaning (it would seem) more toward the "General town read", but with enough resistance in the "roll of foil" comment to avoid rolling over completely. I would file this under "downplaying pressure".

Like right here, not a single clue what he was trying to say here. Looks like like a bunch of words to look more in-depth with iso.

sprityo drops in and drops out. I don't object to keeping tabs on him and putting pressure on him to post more. What bothers me about this is the bluntness of nutella's response. She's being purposefully oppositional toward sprit. It looks more like she's putting a tab on future suspect than she is trying to wrangle content out of a quiet player. File this under "low-hanging fruit".

Next we go to this here. This I believe to be a super trivial reason to say that you're going after the low-hanging fruit. I mean, one would really have to stretch out your sarcasm say the bolded part. Even with that, one really can't get the line of logic there. Also, at least from what I read, you made no push or any questioning/prodding directed at Sprit, going after the low-hanging fruit doesn't really work here as a reason.

I have no direct objections to her Mac suspicion here, so I've cut it out of the post. But it exists and I don't want to seem like I'm dismissing it.
Matahari and MafiaMenace are low-hanging fruit here. Mata falls into the same category as sprit. She goes after MafiaMenace for his focus on mechanics to that point, which is something I've already commented on. These are not particularly inspired suspicions.

Only part of his post where he actually starts making sense imo. I can get how Mata falls into a low-hanging fruit category and the MafiaMenace part. But that last sentenced, the bolded I don't understand. @Sloonei what do you mean by that? So this is basically the only part of the post that I like, and it's pretty meh.

So yeah, I can grill him more but you get the point. And about your response, I'll get to that soonish.

Actually this changes the fact that he agreed with Sloonei’s, but he never actually reconsidered his position like he states later.

He obviously never liked the iso so idk why he said he did?

This is only half done So half of what I wanna talk about see: what dragomir was talking about yesterday night isnt here

But yeah I rather be here than nutella today

[VOTE: Dragomir] aubergine

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 8:39 pm

Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 8:09 pm I voted speedchuck and now some people want a CFD on me.

Interesting.

Who and which is the most scummy of them?

Ultra wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 4:16 pm

Dragomir wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 4:07 pm

Ultra wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 4:03 pm

Dragomir wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 3:53 pm

Ultra wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 3:49 pm

Dragomir wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 3:26 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 2:26 pm New exercise time. Everyone pick a player with under 50 posts on this list who is town. Pick another player under 50 who is mafia.

Speedchuck - Town

why

Look up.

Also, it's "Why?" Gotta capitalize the W and add the question mark.

Don't correct me again.

You dare place me halfway down the town list as well

tread lightly, Dragomir

Luxurious wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 5:01 pm The constant flipflopping on his reads there really just, doesnt sit well with me

Luxurious wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 5:03 pm Slooney is fine because it’s at least consistent but at the same time it’s just so weird to constantly go back and forth on people he was so sure were town

He pulled his suspicion off me, and then make on me, called me town and is now shading me again.

He agreed with slooney’s case on nutella. 180’d on it and made nutella town, and now I’m a high poster? But he’s also shading her here

It doesnt feel genuine

Dragomir wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 8:44 pm

Ultra wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 4:16 pm

Dragomir wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 4:07 pm

Ultra wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 4:03 pm

Dragomir wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 3:53 pm

Ultra wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 3:49 pm

Dragomir wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 3:26 pm
Speedchuck - Town

why

Look up.

Also, it's "Why?" Gotta capitalize the W and add the question mark.

Don't correct me again.

You dare place me halfway down the town list as well

tread lightly, Dragomir

What if I remove you from the town list?

Matahari wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 8:20 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 8:12 pm Similarly, Matahari’s response where she singled out Luxurious to offer a weird pseduo-defense which she later claimed was not a defense is many shades of confusing to me. I didn’t like the read she presented, and I didn’t like that she later denounced it as a defense without really explaining what the read itself.

You aren’t as good a judge of civvieness as I hoped you’d be. I can’t accept your other comments about people you think are bad, because I know you’re wrong about me. Either way, I would not place a vote on you today. I get it and I’m sure everyone else gets it too.

nutella wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 8:43 pm

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 8:39 pm

Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 8:09 pm I voted speedchuck and now some people want a CFD on me.

Interesting.

Who and which is the most scummy of them?

It was only one and a half people really. I proposed it and LC said he'd be down but ended up voting elsewhere.

I'm serious about it though. DDL does not feel like his town meta here and I have an increasingly bad feeling about him.

nutella wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 8:43 pm

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 8:39 pm

Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 8:09 pm I voted speedchuck and now some people want a CFD on me.

Interesting.

Who and which is the most scummy of them?

It was only one and a half people really. I proposed it and LC said he'd be down but ended up voting elsewhere.

I'm serious about it though. DDL does not feel like his town meta here and I have an increasingly bad feeling about him.

Long Con wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 9:04 pm

Matahari wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 8:20 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 8:12 pm Similarly, Matahari’s response where she singled out Luxurious to offer a weird pseduo-defense which she later claimed was not a defense is many shades of confusing to me. I didn’t like the read she presented, and I didn’t like that she later denounced it as a defense without really explaining what the read itself.

You aren’t as good a judge of civvieness as I hoped you’d be. I can’t accept your other comments about people you think are bad, because I know you’re wrong about me. Either way, I would not place a vote on you today. I get it and I’m sure everyone else gets it too.

Sloonei could be diamond-edge accurate about everything else he's said, and still wrong about you. What is this, some sort of deviant Gambler's Fallacy?

Dragomir wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 9:19 pm Forget town reading speedchuck. I despise his vote on Luxy.

I can totally see speed and nutella being buddies.