TSP ISO thoughts
#285 "wolves in nutella brad monroe scotty" in other thread
early back and forths with leetic, abigail
#483 i'm bad at the game
randomly townreads pyxxy when gira/pyxxy call him scummy
asks me about pyxxy
shades me shading dizzy
#671 says i should not have a serious wolfread on dizzy
claims not to realize abigail asked me the question...
#728 calls gira most likely wolf when i press him
"we're about to chop rondo, right"
#1166 votes wind, "convinced myself against the leetic vote" what leetic vote???
#1180: "Here’s the situation: not all is right. We’re about to limp into the stupidest looking bereft chop I’ve ever seen. It’s probably rand and there are somewhat good reasons not to do that. So then, who’s in this game who should know better? I promise I didn’t just immediately jump to the two voters on Bereft for the record, I think that looks slightly towny. Leetic seems to have lost a bit of the edge, can’t tell why. WWA is posting a lot but has no thread control nor have they attempted to wrest it. I won’t vote for Mac or dizzy day 1. Ted seems alright. Mac’s defending Gira. I won’t vote Rondo D1 for opposite reasons. Ran and Robyn are self resolving."
then "can't bring himself to think leetic is a wolf"
"if we are going to roll the dice beter to do it on abigail imo"
calls abi/pyxxy the standard d1s that don't have votes
opposes consolidating on bereft
keeps naming leetic/abigail/gira in interactions
responds to dizzy disavowing setting up a ran/dizzy dichotomy
votes robyn claims "going with the flow", says ted not a good choice today.
-- d2
claims he would have left his vote off wagon, prob on abigail or "maybe" dizzy
claims dizzy looks better, abby looks bad
#2124 doubles down on abi attack
has the bad push on me
"Could it be that Mac was killed because he was wrong, not because he was right?" lol
then throws out Gira/Ran/x team
"Five flips are dizzy rondo bereft ran and Abigail narrowly over Ted before Leetic asks"
pyxxy asks if i have wolf equity with dizzy, tsp says no
then kinda shuts down
"Actually like ok yeah Rondo / Abby / Bereft / Dizzy is probably a two wolf group"
and then all seems noncommittal towards eod and ghosts the actual eod
Conclusions: prob exactly 1 in bereft/dizzymade and the other in pyxxy/leetic, pretty heavily leaning pyxxy since not making eod is pretty congruous with no one trying to save TSP.
Rondo, Gira town, Abi town unless world's best theatre.
[VOTE:
Pyxxy] aubergine
[VOTE:
Ranmilia] aubergine
will happily thunderdome you today
?
where'd this come from?
in a game of cs rn but I re-read and I don't like TSP's response to me asking about how Ran and dizzy interacted
Re: Severance [Evening Three]
Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2023 10:25 pm
by leetic
pyxxy wrote: ↑Mon Nov 20, 2023 10:24 pm
wait there's three of you?
TSP ISO thoughts
#285 "wolves in nutella brad monroe scotty" in other thread
early back and forths with leetic, abigail
#483 i'm bad at the game
randomly townreads pyxxy when gira/pyxxy call him scummy
asks me about pyxxy
shades me shading dizzy
#671 says i should not have a serious wolfread on dizzy
claims not to realize abigail asked me the question...
#728 calls gira most likely wolf when i press him
"we're about to chop rondo, right"
#1166 votes wind, "convinced myself against the leetic vote" what leetic vote???
#1180: "Here’s the situation: not all is right. We’re about to limp into the stupidest looking bereft chop I’ve ever seen. It’s probably rand and there are somewhat good reasons not to do that. So then, who’s in this game who should know better? I promise I didn’t just immediately jump to the two voters on Bereft for the record, I think that looks slightly towny. Leetic seems to have lost a bit of the edge, can’t tell why. WWA is posting a lot but has no thread control nor have they attempted to wrest it. I won’t vote for Mac or dizzy day 1. Ted seems alright. Mac’s defending Gira. I won’t vote Rondo D1 for opposite reasons. Ran and Robyn are self resolving."
then "can't bring himself to think leetic is a wolf"
"if we are going to roll the dice beter to do it on abigail imo"
calls abi/pyxxy the standard d1s that don't have votes
opposes consolidating on bereft
keeps naming leetic/abigail/gira in interactions
responds to dizzy disavowing setting up a ran/dizzy dichotomy
votes robyn claims "going with the flow", says ted not a good choice today.
-- d2
claims he would have left his vote off wagon, prob on abigail or "maybe" dizzy
claims dizzy looks better, abby looks bad
#2124 doubles down on abi attack
has the bad push on me
"Could it be that Mac was killed because he was wrong, not because he was right?" lol
then throws out Gira/Ran/x team
"Five flips are dizzy rondo bereft ran and Abigail narrowly over Ted before Leetic asks"
pyxxy asks if i have wolf equity with dizzy, tsp says no
then kinda shuts down
"Actually like ok yeah Rondo / Abby / Bereft / Dizzy is probably a two wolf group"
and then all seems noncommittal towards eod and ghosts the actual eod
Conclusions: prob exactly 1 in bereft/dizzymade and the other in pyxxy/leetic, pretty heavily leaning pyxxy since not making eod is pretty congruous with no one trying to save TSP.
Rondo, Gira town, Abi town unless world's best theatre.
[VOTE:
Pyxxy] aubergine
[VOTE:
Ranmilia] aubergine
will happily thunderdome you today
Yeah that's not a town response.
Re: Severance [Evening Three]
Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2023 10:26 pm
by pyxxy
bleh somehow I didnt put it in my notes....longer sec
pyxxy wrote: ↑Thu Nov 16, 2023 9:59 pm
my legacy is chop leetic
I believed it was town leetic at the start bc the energy was the same
but now the _direction_ is gone
they're sheeping the rondo scumread and sheeping scumreading me in a way that I don't find omgus
I think it's scum letting town do the dirty work
pce
so tbh, like
i liked this from pyxxy at the time as it felt like an independent thought
but where did this go today? is there any followthrough? there hasn't been. he's just lazily slipped along onto the dizzy vote, which is probably a misyeet, and showing no signs of investigating elsewhere. doesn't feel like he *actually* scumreads leetic
TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Sat Nov 18, 2023 3:55 pm
Mmm no the cdistance between Ran and Dizzy felt pretty genuine. And like they’re both good enough to plan that so O wouldn’t rule it out but I wouldn’t say it’s in a way where they’d have massive equity from that or from gamestate reasons
if you don't mind helping me think
what or why do you feel like dizzy and ran are distanced?
Dizzy came into the thread with a naked suspicion on Ran, some wolfmilla comments, Ran seemed 1) genuinely offended (in a theatrical way) and 2) pushed back, to the point where Dizzy could easily have been a viable wagon if Mac hadn’t gotten the Robyn chop (but Mac also kinda wanted the Dizzy chop)
What makes it theatrical and not just real annoyance at being treated this way in every game
I don't like speculating that emotion is being called tbh
I meant theatrical in like a manner of “displayed”, I called it genuine
TSP ISO thoughts
#285 "wolves in nutella brad monroe scotty" in other thread
early back and forths with leetic, abigail
#483 i'm bad at the game
randomly townreads pyxxy when gira/pyxxy call him scummy
asks me about pyxxy
shades me shading dizzy
#671 says i should not have a serious wolfread on dizzy
claims not to realize abigail asked me the question...
#728 calls gira most likely wolf when i press him
"we're about to chop rondo, right"
#1166 votes wind, "convinced myself against the leetic vote" what leetic vote???
#1180: "Here’s the situation: not all is right. We’re about to limp into the stupidest looking bereft chop I’ve ever seen. It’s probably rand and there are somewhat good reasons not to do that. So then, who’s in this game who should know better? I promise I didn’t just immediately jump to the two voters on Bereft for the record, I think that looks slightly towny. Leetic seems to have lost a bit of the edge, can’t tell why. WWA is posting a lot but has no thread control nor have they attempted to wrest it. I won’t vote for Mac or dizzy day 1. Ted seems alright. Mac’s defending Gira. I won’t vote Rondo D1 for opposite reasons. Ran and Robyn are self resolving."
then "can't bring himself to think leetic is a wolf"
"if we are going to roll the dice beter to do it on abigail imo"
calls abi/pyxxy the standard d1s that don't have votes
opposes consolidating on bereft
keeps naming leetic/abigail/gira in interactions
responds to dizzy disavowing setting up a ran/dizzy dichotomy
votes robyn claims "going with the flow", says ted not a good choice today.
-- d2
claims he would have left his vote off wagon, prob on abigail or "maybe" dizzy
claims dizzy looks better, abby looks bad
#2124 doubles down on abi attack
has the bad push on me
"Could it be that Mac was killed because he was wrong, not because he was right?" lol
then throws out Gira/Ran/x team
"Five flips are dizzy rondo bereft ran and Abigail narrowly over Ted before Leetic asks"
pyxxy asks if i have wolf equity with dizzy, tsp says no
then kinda shuts down
"Actually like ok yeah Rondo / Abby / Bereft / Dizzy is probably a two wolf group"
and then all seems noncommittal towards eod and ghosts the actual eod
Conclusions: prob exactly 1 in bereft/dizzymade and the other in pyxxy/leetic, pretty heavily leaning pyxxy since not making eod is pretty congruous with no one trying to save TSP.
Rondo, Gira town, Abi town unless world's best theatre.
[VOTE:
Pyxxy] aubergine
Looking back, TSP seems to kind of have a paranoia over me that seems unwarranted given we last played together in like 2020? This attitude would definitely make more sense if TSP is paired with someone like pyxxy (or Abby, for that matter)
leetic wrote: ↑Sat Nov 18, 2023 3:52 pm
I guess if all three wolves are on robyn, Dyslexicon/TSP/tedxtr would make enough sense and they did it to save the latter? But then again, in that world TSP would have had no reason to go on robyn as tedxtr was pretty much safe at that point, so that world would more likely contain a deepwolf.
TSP move there is WIFOM from the wolf perspective, imo, but that's just my opinion
pyxxy wrote: ↑Sat Nov 18, 2023 3:52 pm
if dizzy flip scum
am I smoking major weed to think that gives ran wolf equity?
not even sure I'm using that phrase right :/
The phrase smoking major weed?
no that part I have experience with
TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Sat Nov 18, 2023 3:55 pm
Mmm no the cdistance between Ran and Dizzy felt pretty genuine. And like they’re both good enough to plan that so O wouldn’t rule it out but I wouldn’t say it’s in a way where they’d have massive equity from that or from gamestate reasons
more complete exchange
brb pistol round
Re: Severance [Evening Three]
Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2023 10:34 pm
by pyxxy
I think it's quite interesting
that leetic spent an entire day yesterday not being able to push someone
pyxxy wrote: ↑Mon Nov 20, 2023 10:34 pm
I think it's quite interesting
that leetic spent an entire day yesterday not being able to push someone
but now they can push me from the dot
Are you really desperate enough to push someone with a softed PR?
you do realize that you have no PR proof, right
and that you softed the very first post of D2 after I came for your neck D1
real hedgy stuff, bud
Re: Severance [Evening Three]
Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2023 10:45 pm
by pyxxy
and also
my solve is flexible between you and dizzy
you've had really towny moments, but softing, and that obviously, is like
the antithesis of how you treat other people and how they play with mech, based on playing two games with you
_antithesis_
Re: Severance [Evening Three]
Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2023 10:46 pm
by pyxxy
"why are you voting ranmilia then"
well, ran fits my solve best, and I knew that coming into today, and I would be sad to turn down a thunderdome when offered one so politely
Re: Severance [Evening Three]
Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2023 10:47 pm
by pyxxy
I read all of D2 after EOD when I had time so I'm fully powered up here
Re: Severance [Evening Three]
Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2023 10:47 pm
by pyxxy
pyxxicus metalicus
Re: Severance [Evening Three]
Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2023 10:48 pm
by leetic
Anyway, the TSP wagon looks kinda pure? I mean, Bereft was on it pretty early, and Rondo could've easily supported the Dyslexicon wagon over the TSP one at EoD, so they're probably only worth looking at if Dyslexicon (or whoever their sub is) flips red. Ranmilia joined a bit late, but eh. I don't think Gira is a wolf at all.
Dyslexicon still looks wolfy from the votecounts, and if pyxxy has a bus vote I can see the two being w/w. Abby I guess is at least a little less likely to be w/w with pyxxy.
Re: Severance [Evening Three]
Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2023 10:48 pm
by pyxxy
leetic wrote: ↑Mon Nov 20, 2023 10:48 pm
Ranmilia joined a bit late, but eh
pyxxy wrote: ↑Mon Nov 20, 2023 10:34 pm
I think it's quite interesting
that leetic spent an entire day yesterday not being able to push someone
but now they can push me from the dot
Are you really desperate enough to push someone with a softed PR?
you do realize that you have no PR proof, right
and that you softed the very first post of D2 after I came for your neck D1
real hedgy stuff, bud
Well, @Bereft should be able to confirm that they didn't visit anyone D1 (though sorry if you wanted to pretend to be a PR I guess). Plus, I softed D1 as well but you didn't seem to catch that. And why would I be so specific about a soft if it wasn't real? Also, "came for your neck" is giving yourself too much credit
leetic wrote: ↑Sat Nov 18, 2023 3:52 pm
I guess if all three wolves are on robyn, Dyslexicon/TSP/tedxtr would make enough sense and they did it to save the latter? But then again, in that world TSP would have had no reason to go on robyn as tedxtr was pretty much safe at that point, so that world would more likely contain a deepwolf.
TSP move there is WIFOM from the wolf perspective, imo, but that's just my opinion
pyxxy wrote: ↑Sat Nov 18, 2023 3:52 pm
if dizzy flip scum
am I smoking major weed to think that gives ran wolf equity?
not even sure I'm using that phrase right :/
The phrase smoking major weed?
no that part I have experience with
TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Sat Nov 18, 2023 3:55 pm
Mmm no the cdistance between Ran and Dizzy felt pretty genuine. And like they’re both good enough to plan that so O wouldn’t rule it out but I wouldn’t say it’s in a way where they’d have massive equity from that or from gamestate reasons
pyxxy wrote: ↑Mon Nov 20, 2023 10:34 pm
I think it's quite interesting
that leetic spent an entire day yesterday not being able to push someone
but now they can push me from the dot
Are you really desperate enough to push someone with a softed PR?
you do realize that you have no PR proof, right
and that you softed the very first post of D2 after I came for your neck D1
real hedgy stuff, bud
Well, @Bereft should be able to confirm that they didn't visit anyone D1 (though sorry if you wanted to pretend to be a PR I guess). Plus, I softed D1 as well but you didn't seem to catch that. And why would I be so specific about a soft if it wasn't real? Also, "came for your neck" is giving yourself too much credit
pyxxy wrote: ↑Mon Nov 20, 2023 10:34 pm
I think it's quite interesting
that leetic spent an entire day yesterday not being able to push someone
but now they can push me from the dot
Are you really desperate enough to push someone with a softed PR?
you do realize that you have no PR proof, right
and that you softed the very first post of D2 after I came for your neck D1
real hedgy stuff, bud
Well, @Bereft should be able to confirm that they didn't visit anyone D1 (though sorry if you wanted to pretend to be a PR I guess). Plus, I softed D1 as well but you didn't seem to catch that. And why would I be so specific about a soft if it wasn't real? Also, "came for your neck" is giving yourself too much credit
TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Sat Nov 18, 2023 3:27 am
And the flop on Robyn geez
TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Sat Nov 18, 2023 3:27 am
Could it be that Mac was killed because he was wrong, not because he was right?
TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Sat Nov 18, 2023 3:36 am
well now I’m sitting on Gira / ran / X yeah
Abby is just in the archetype of people I like to suspect [is the reality of it]
[VOTE:
TSP] aubergine
Just look at this. There is no universe town TSP comes in to this day and believes and says these things.
Ranmilia wrote: ↑Sat Nov 18, 2023 6:36 am
Maybe not his scumreads, but he did make a serious push to protect and get people off of Bereft (and/or dizzy), and it was working, even before any of the robyn stuff happened. Here's the post again for reference:
TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Wed Nov 15, 2023 8:05 pm
Here’s the situation: not all is right. We’re about to limp into the stupidest looking bereft chop I’ve ever seen. It’s probably rand and there are somewhat good reasons not to do that. So then, who’s in this game who should know better? I promise I didn’t just immediately jump to the two voters on Bereft for the record, I think that looks slightly towny. Leetic seems to have lost a bit of the edge, can’t tell why. WWA is posting a lot but has no thread control nor have they attempted to wrest it. I won’t vote for Mac or dizzy day 1. Ted seems alright. Mac’s defending Gira. I won’t vote Rondo D1 for opposite reasons. Ran and Robyn are self resolving.
The two people he's pushing are the voters on Bereft, which he even lampshades directly and calls them towny(?!). The other wagon atp is dizzy with me and mac voting there iirc, and he blows that off as well.
The more I look here the more I am seeing tsp/bereft/dizzy. Which is very premature but. There's hella agenda.
leetic wrote: ↑Sun Nov 19, 2023 12:12 am
Although this thread still seems suspiciously quiet. @WindwardAway any reason why you're significantly less vocal this phase than you were in the last?
Not to answer for wind in specific, but it is the weekend and our long day 1 was pretty exhausting. Would be nice if folks were around more though but... I've said my piece and don't have much new, the ball is in Dizzy's and Bereft's and Rondo's respective courts. I've cooled on TSP some but still can't really understand his mindset... but now that he's channeling illario it's probably impractical to kill him today regardless.
[VOTE:
Dizzy] aubergine
Ranmilia wrote: ↑Sun Nov 19, 2023 3:04 am
It occurs to me that TSP did not get a secret vote yesterday. If the wagon in other thread = vote theory is correct that means illario was not a wagon d1, and went straight from that to getting voted out... hm.
Ranmilia wrote: ↑Sun Nov 19, 2023 7:32 pm
I'm down to kill tsp if illario doesn't show up.
leetic wrote: ↑Sun Nov 19, 2023 9:25 pm
I suppose TSP isn't the worst option ever, especially since ilario seems intent on doing nothing, but I would much rather flip Dizzy here.
Same.
This progression, no personal offense to Ranmilia, smells.
It's bus all day but if we can squeeze another chop out of TSP, then wolves will be much better off, because wolves misplayed revealing the Ilario connection.
pyxxy wrote: ↑Mon Nov 20, 2023 10:34 pm
I think it's quite interesting
that leetic spent an entire day yesterday not being able to push someone
but now they can push me from the dot
Are you really desperate enough to push someone with a softed PR?
you do realize that you have no PR proof, right
and that you softed the very first post of D2 after I came for your neck D1
real hedgy stuff, bud
Well, @Bereft should be able to confirm that they didn't visit anyone D1 (though sorry if you wanted to pretend to be a PR I guess). Plus, I softed D1 as well but you didn't seem to catch that. And why would I be so specific about a soft if it wasn't real? Also, "came for your neck" is giving yourself too much credit
bereft already softclaimed VT in thread lol
I'm not aware of this.
Re: Severance [Evening Three]
Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2023 10:54 pm
by pyxxy
@/Gira made the Ran post
sorry for that section that didn't make sense but in my head it's the solve and it all feels connected :/
Re: Severance [Evening Three]
Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2023 10:54 pm
by leetic
Also funny how pyxxy TRed me for my PR soft D2 but now that he's in a desperate situation he has to pretend it's fake
pyxxy wrote: ↑Mon Nov 20, 2023 10:34 pm
I think it's quite interesting
that leetic spent an entire day yesterday not being able to push someone
but now they can push me from the dot
Are you really desperate enough to push someone with a softed PR?
you do realize that you have no PR proof, right
and that you softed the very first post of D2 after I came for your neck D1
real hedgy stuff, bud
Well, @Bereft should be able to confirm that they didn't visit anyone D1 (though sorry if you wanted to pretend to be a PR I guess). Plus, I softed D1 as well but you didn't seem to catch that. And why would I be so specific about a soft if it wasn't real? Also, "came for your neck" is giving yourself too much credit
Bereft wrote: ↑Sun Nov 19, 2023 8:46 pm
The micro around ted's claim passed the smell test for me tho, so I rlly rlly rlly do not see myself reevaluating there
I have reasons why his claim didn't pass the smell test for me
If you think you're about to be night killed and its going to be lost with you why are you not sharing it?
Cause ngl I was hoping Ted would possibly eat the nightkill so I wouldn't have to solve him
I targeted him last night and I find it suspicious that he said he won't answer any questions about whatever his role is
ngl i was starting to wondering whether i had misread the signup thread about most people having some power of some sort
granted that kind of thing can be bluffed ofc but saying something like that is a pretty big VT indicator (and also towny usually)
pyxxy wrote: ↑Mon Nov 20, 2023 10:34 pm
I think it's quite interesting
that leetic spent an entire day yesterday not being able to push someone
but now they can push me from the dot
Are you really desperate enough to push someone with a softed PR?
you do realize that you have no PR proof, right
and that you softed the very first post of D2 after I came for your neck D1
real hedgy stuff, bud
Well, @Bereft should be able to confirm that they didn't visit anyone D1 (though sorry if you wanted to pretend to be a PR I guess). Plus, I softed D1 as well but you didn't seem to catch that. And why would I be so specific about a soft if it wasn't real? Also, "came for your neck" is giving yourself too much credit
bereft already softclaimed VT in thread lol
I'm not aware of this.
So can you confirm that you indeed did not visit anyone N1?
pyxxy wrote: ↑Mon Nov 20, 2023 10:34 pm
I think it's quite interesting
that leetic spent an entire day yesterday not being able to push someone
but now they can push me from the dot
Are you really desperate enough to push someone with a softed PR?
you do realize that you have no PR proof, right
and that you softed the very first post of D2 after I came for your neck D1
real hedgy stuff, bud
Well, @Bereft should be able to confirm that they didn't visit anyone D1 (though sorry if you wanted to pretend to be a PR I guess). Plus, I softed D1 as well but you didn't seem to catch that. And why would I be so specific about a soft if it wasn't real? Also, "came for your neck" is giving yourself too much credit
Bereft wrote: ↑Sun Nov 19, 2023 8:46 pm
The micro around ted's claim passed the smell test for me tho, so I rlly rlly rlly do not see myself reevaluating there
I have reasons why his claim didn't pass the smell test for me
If you think you're about to be night killed and its going to be lost with you why are you not sharing it?
Cause ngl I was hoping Ted would possibly eat the nightkill so I wouldn't have to solve him
I targeted him last night and I find it suspicious that he said he won't answer any questions about whatever his role is
ngl i was starting to wondering whether i had misread the signup thread about most people having some power of some sort
granted that kind of thing can be bluffed ofc but saying something like that is a pretty big VT indicator (and also towny usually)
TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Sat Nov 18, 2023 3:27 am
And the flop on Robyn geez
TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Sat Nov 18, 2023 3:27 am
Could it be that Mac was killed because he was wrong, not because he was right?
TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Sat Nov 18, 2023 3:36 am
well now I’m sitting on Gira / ran / X yeah
Abby is just in the archetype of people I like to suspect [is the reality of it]
[VOTE:
TSP] aubergine
Just look at this. There is no universe town TSP comes in to this day and believes and says these things.
Ranmilia wrote: ↑Sat Nov 18, 2023 6:36 am
Maybe not his scumreads, but he did make a serious push to protect and get people off of Bereft (and/or dizzy), and it was working, even before any of the robyn stuff happened. Here's the post again for reference:
TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Wed Nov 15, 2023 8:05 pm
Here’s the situation: not all is right. We’re about to limp into the stupidest looking bereft chop I’ve ever seen. It’s probably rand and there are somewhat good reasons not to do that. So then, who’s in this game who should know better? I promise I didn’t just immediately jump to the two voters on Bereft for the record, I think that looks slightly towny. Leetic seems to have lost a bit of the edge, can’t tell why. WWA is posting a lot but has no thread control nor have they attempted to wrest it. I won’t vote for Mac or dizzy day 1. Ted seems alright. Mac’s defending Gira. I won’t vote Rondo D1 for opposite reasons. Ran and Robyn are self resolving.
The two people he's pushing are the voters on Bereft, which he even lampshades directly and calls them towny(?!). The other wagon atp is dizzy with me and mac voting there iirc, and he blows that off as well.
The more I look here the more I am seeing tsp/bereft/dizzy. Which is very premature but. There's hella agenda.
leetic wrote: ↑Sun Nov 19, 2023 12:12 am
Although this thread still seems suspiciously quiet. @WindwardAway any reason why you're significantly less vocal this phase than you were in the last?
Not to answer for wind in specific, but it is the weekend and our long day 1 was pretty exhausting. Would be nice if folks were around more though but... I've said my piece and don't have much new, the ball is in Dizzy's and Bereft's and Rondo's respective courts. I've cooled on TSP some but still can't really understand his mindset... but now that he's channeling illario it's probably impractical to kill him today regardless.
[VOTE:
Dizzy] aubergine
Ranmilia wrote: ↑Sun Nov 19, 2023 3:04 am
It occurs to me that TSP did not get a secret vote yesterday. If the wagon in other thread = vote theory is correct that means illario was not a wagon d1, and went straight from that to getting voted out... hm.
Ranmilia wrote: ↑Sun Nov 19, 2023 7:32 pm
I'm down to kill tsp if illario doesn't show up.
leetic wrote: ↑Sun Nov 19, 2023 9:25 pm
I suppose TSP isn't the worst option ever, especially since ilario seems intent on doing nothing, but I would much rather flip Dizzy here.
Same.
This progression, no personal offense to Ranmilia, smells.
It's bus all day but if we can squeeze another chop out of TSP, then wolves will be much better off, because wolves misplayed revealing the Ilario connection.
No offense taken, I suppose you have to here, but this directly contradicts both reality and the solve you're pushing. Sorry things have gone this way.
Re: Severance [Evening Three]
Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2023 10:58 pm
by pyxxy
leetic wrote: ↑Mon Nov 20, 2023 10:54 pm
Also funny how pyxxy TRed me for my PR soft D2 but now that he's in a desperate situation he has to pretend it's fake
leetic wrote: ↑Mon Nov 20, 2023 10:54 pm
Also funny how pyxxy TRed me for my PR soft D2 but now that he's in a desperate situation he has to pretend it's fake
you continue to be unable to read the room
And you continue to be unable to read the game.
Re: Severance [Evening Three]
Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2023 11:01 pm
by Bereft
I'm reading the room rn and you both look [...]
I'll think about this seriously later, I'm still on a mental vacation from the game.
Re: Severance [Evening Three]
Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2023 11:04 pm
by leetic
Although Bereft not visiting someone N1 doesn't have to mean they're VT. They could have a passive modifier like Bulletproof, or they could just be an X-shot role that decided not to use their shots N1 for whatever reason.
Re: Severance [Evening Three]
Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2023 11:06 pm
by leetic
We have 2 PRs flipped and 2 VTs flipped, alongside two other claimed PRs. The exact ratio of PR/V is unclear, still it's probably unlikely we are dealing with Heist levels of PR stinginess.
I explained my motivations for tracking tedxtr in a previous post today
As for Bereft, since they were just RPing I thought I would get some straight information out of the slot
Re: Severance [Evening Three]
Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2023 11:10 pm
by pyxxy
alright I'll go back and check that
because I can read
Re: Severance [Evening Three]
Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2023 11:11 pm
by leetic
Although wait, since TSP was a Bus Driver I can't 100% discount the possibility he targeted Bereft, even if Bereft was an unlikely target
Re: Severance [Evening Three]
Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2023 11:11 pm
by Gira
leetic wrote: ↑Mon Nov 20, 2023 11:06 pm
We have 2 PRs flipped and 2 VTs flipped, alongside two other claimed PRs. The exact ratio of PR/V is unclear, still it's probably unlikely we are dealing with Heist levels of PR stinginess.
dunno wouldn't be shocked if it's a relatively low # of town PRs given the severed mechanic is probably also part of the calculation
Re: Severance [Evening Three]
Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2023 11:11 pm
by Gira
leetic wrote: ↑Mon Nov 20, 2023 11:11 pm
Although wait, since TSP was a Bus Driver I can't 100% discount the possibility he targeted Bereft, even if Bereft was an unlikely target
read the flip again, it says you get the name of your true target as a result
Re: Severance [Evening Two]
Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2023 11:12 pm
by leetic
Wait
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Sun Nov 19, 2023 10:03 pm
If a player impacted by this ability receives a role result with a player name, they will receive the name of their true target, not of their intended target
Yeah, I can confirm TSP didn't target Bereft
Re: Severance [Evening Three]
Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2023 11:12 pm
by pyxxy
leetic wrote: ↑Mon Nov 20, 2023 10:22 pm
I tried to track tedxtr since 1. that was the only track that would be guaranteed to give me information (or so I thought) and 2. given some of WW's EoD posting I thought it would be helpful to resolve the slot, especially as tedxtr doesn't have much going for them besides their claim. Oh well
